Ty Law is out for the season. That's not good if the Pats get the Colts....I'm sure Bill will think of something, but Troy Brown man on man against Stokley could get ugly. Might not see Law in a Pat's uniform again......:hs:

I just heard that on WEEI. Thats a tough break. I am not thrilled about that.

Hey, we did it up till now without him.
In Bill we trust!

He has most likely played his last game in New England, at least for the home team!
Hopefully he can continue to afford to feed his family!!!
:laughs:

And Seymour is going to be playing with a brace:laughs: Should be interesting Bill cracks me up he tries to be so coy with his injury reports, I am sure he knew weeks ago Ty Law was not coming back wouldn't be surprised if he had some kind of infection keeping his bone from heeling, I remember Greg Lloyd getting a staph infection and was out for months.

no poole or law, makes it harder. can't wait to see what bill comes up with:D

That blows, I hope Ty takes the high road and takes on a player/coach role for the secondary players.
At least it's not a game time decision and the coachs can get the X's and O's in order with the players they've got.

Go Pats!!!!!!!!!!!

The rules being what they are, the scheme is more important than the individual DB anyway...Bellichick will have a solid plan in place, regardless of the opponent. And stop looking ahead!! I know a certain MLB team who did that a few months ago.
:D

[QUOTE]Originally posted by fishsmith
[B]That blows, I hope Ty takes the high road and takes on a player/coach role for the secondary players.


I think he will working at one of the concession stands to help feed his family!!!

this may be the pats last horah! for a few years:(

Originally posted by PARTSGUY
this may be the pats last horah! for a few years:(

Fine by me :happy: :happy: :happy:

No not the all mighty unbeatable Pats, there goes your dynasty:crying: :hihi: :laugha:

Pats/ dynasty :smash:
Ya, they won 2 super bowls, barely!!!
If not for a clutch kicker (who should have been mvp both times and NOT Brady)
they would be 0 - 3 in superbowls!!!

Barely??? Ronnie you sound so bitter...They WON TWO super bowls in 3 years!!! But I guess they were just lucky..:D ..I suppose your a Yankees fan also and the Sox were lucky..:happy: Go Pats...:laughs:

Originally posted by Squid kids Dad
Barely??? Ronnie you sound so bitter...They WON TWO super bowls in 3 years!!! But I guess they were just lucky..:D ..I suppose your a Yankees fan also and the Sox were lucky..:happy: Go Pats...:laughs:

Not bitter at all, just stating the facts!!!
It's no secret that the AFC is FAR better than the NFC,
And last year, the Panthers (who the season before were one of the worse in the league) gave the pats ALL they can handle and nearly pulled out an upset!!!
The year before, they were given a gift , but I give them all the credit they deserve, they beat the snot out of the Steelers and then the same to the Rams!
But a dynasty? NOT

Ron...they been in 4 Superbowls.:D They won the 2 Superbowls as a team.....you can't win a Superbowl solely on the foot of your field goal kicker Ron.:smash: You anti-Pats guys just can't face facts.......weeeeeee arrrrrrre the champions.....weeeeee arrrrre the champions.....noooooo time for looooserssss for weeeeee arrrrrrre the champions........againnnnnnnn!:laughs:

Dynasty is Ron.....even the guys on TV said it!:D Define a dynasty for us Ron.....is it two SB wins in a row? Is it 3 in 4 years? Please define so I know what your definition of a dynasty is.....cause a team that has won as many games over the last 3 seasons as the Patriots has with 2 Superbowl wins to their credit....if that ain't a dynasty, I don't know what is so please tell me....cause no other team has won as many games in a 3 year span as the Pats Ron....NONE!;)

Originally posted by BigFish
Ron...they been in 4 Superbowls.:D They won the 2 Superbowls as a team.....you can't win a Superbowl solely on the foot of your field goal kicker Ron.:smash: You anti-Pats guys just can't face facts.......weeeeeee arrrrrrre the champions.....weeeeee arrrrre the champions.....noooooo time for looooserssss for weeeeee arrrrrrre the champions........againnnnnnnn!:laughs:

Oh, I forgot about the ass kicking they got form the Bears,
As a matter of fact,
That 85 Bears team would wipe the field with this current Pats teams asses!!!
That team should have gone on to be a dynasty. If Ditka and Buddy Ryan wern't so busy trying to kick each others ass, they might have become one!
You Pats fans throw around the word Dynasty too easily!!!
In a 7 year span (1976 - 1983 ) The Raiders won 3 superbowls, Do I consider them a dynasty? NO

You say the 85 Bears team should have gone on to become a dynasty....now what exactly would that entail? Would they have been considered a dynasty had they won another SB withing the next 2 seasons?:confused:

THE PATRIOTS HAVE WON MORE FOOTBALL GAMES OVER A 3 YEAR SPAN THAN ANY OTHER FOOTBALL TEAM IN NFL HISTORY AND THAT INCLUDES 2 SUPERBOWL WINS.......NOT TO MENTION THE MULTITUDE OF OTHER DOMINATING STATISTICS THAT THEY HAVE PUT IN THE RECORD BOOKS SUCH AS CONSECUTIVE GAMES WON, CONSECUTIVE GAMES SCORING FIRST.....CONSECUTIVE GAMES SCORING FIRST AND GOING ON TO RECORD A VICTORY AND GAMES WON CONSECUTIVELY AFTER ENTERING THE 4TH QUARTER WITH A LEAD........SOUNDS PRETTY DOMINANT TO ME AND THAT IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICE BERG!:smash:

The Raiders were not dominant over the NFL during that time span Ron....thus negating the label of "DYNASTY"!:smash:

[i]Originally posted by BigFish You anti-Pats guys just can't face facts.......weeeeeee arrrrrrre the champions.....weeeeee arrrrre the champions.....noooooo time for looooserssss for weeeeee arrrrrrre the champions........againnnnnnnn!:laughs: [/B]
:D :happy:

:laughs:

What BF just said...And triple that...The fact is!! The Pats have won 2 SUPER BOWLS IN 3 YEARS..Lets hope #3 is coming..:happy: :laughs:

Oh now regular season games count:confused: :rolleyes: :laughs: