HOF Bound....:claps:

Well deserved and long, long over due! I will forever remember the way he drove his homeruns to straight away centerfield with such power!!! The best hitter of his time in my mind! Way to go Jim Ed!:kewl:

excellent, good for him

Congrats to Jim Ed! Well deserved.

:cheers2:TOO long coming:jump:

It's about f'n time!:claps::claps::claps:

About time... I was listening to EEI going from one job site to another and they kept yapping about the process for 30 minutes straight I thought they he failed his final chance to get in. Was not until later I heard that he had...

long overdue! jim ed was the dominate hitter for a good stretch...

I heard that the first thing he said upon hearing he was elected was........








"I'm in!"

Oh, and "thanks for the opportunity"

It's about time. Good for him :kewl:

This was wayyyyyyy overdue. What a great player to watch.

Boy! Tough crowd over on SOL!!!:shocked:

Boy! Tough crowd over on SOL!!!:shocked:and you're shocked to boot?:buds:

bout time. long deserved. :claps::claps:..

I,m glad for him >.like he,s cares how I feel ;;
But he was a great power hitter & I,m really glad he made it ;; I think it would have been sooner ; But the last few years he played .. he had a chip on his shoulder & said a few things that shouldn,t have been said when he still playing ball in Boston .
That being said ,,,his fourteen year wait .. he has been a real plus for the sport ; to me he had a better attitude & outlook from the pressbox than he did from the dugout ;;

It was more fun back then & it was easier to really cheer for a team or /and a player ;; many player started & ended with the same team ;;many played for the love of the game . Now some may plat for the love of the game / BUT except for a VERY few they all play for the love of the money ... selling your soul & talent to the highest bidder :hs::hs:
Nothing shows it so clearly ,than being interviewed .. right after your team wins the world series >> great coach / teamates/ owners/ fans While you agent is selling you too the highest bidder:af:

Boy! Tough crowd over on SOL!!!:shocked:

What do you expect when you start using Ted Williams as a yardstick for measuring anything that Rice did? :tooth:

Rice is legit HOF but come on--comparing his stats to Teddy Ballgame's? :faga:

I was speaking of the fact that Williams never had 200 hits in a season Mike.....not comparing their careers, just trying to make a point that there are so many variables to a player and why he makes the hall of fame. Rice made it by doing so many things well that many greater players did not. Don't start on me about why Williams never had 200 hits...I know why but the game was different then than it was when Rice played which, again, is my point! During Rice's tenure, nobody was doing all of the things that he was doing! Jackson was smashing lots of homers, Carew was batting .325-.380, many were driving in 100+ runs......but Jim Rice was doing it all! Batting .310-.315, hitting 35-40 homers and driving in 110+.....and getting 200 hits!!! Sorry but those numbers together are staggering and not many other power hitters I can think of accomplished that combination........Aaron, Mays did but not many others........and again.....not saying Rice was the kind of player Aaron and Mays were but that he did some special things in his own right and if people can't see that then they are not paying attention!

Good for Jim ! :claps:
Was he a 1st ballot hall of famer, NO WAY
But he deserved to get in eventually.
Had the Sox won the world series back in 75 or 86 he most likely would have gone in long ago.

75 he missed the post season with a broken wrist and in 86 he was a non factor as The Great Greenwell was in left! Winning a championship in baseball does not help or hurt your career stats.....and that is what the voting is mostly based on. I don't see too many players with sub par careers and great post season numbers in the hall of fame?

glad to hear the news
about time

way, way overdue. i do remember when he broke his bat on a checked swing. cannot imagine what strength it took.

75 he missed the post season with a broken wrist and in 86 he was a non factor as The Great Greenwell was in left! Winning a championship in baseball does not help or hurt your career stats.....and that is what the voting is mostly based on. I don't see too many players with sub par careers and great post season numbers in the hall of fame?winning a championship might not hurt or help your stats, but it does help you in getting inducted:wave:

I was speaking of the fact that Williams never had 200 hits in a season Mike.....not comparing their careers, just trying to make a point that there are so many variables to a player and why he makes the hall of fame. Rice made it by doing so many things well that many greater players did not. Don't start on me about why Williams never had 200 hits...I know why but the game was different then than it was when Rice played which, again, is my point! During Rice's tenure, nobody was doing all of the things that he was doing! Jackson was smashing lots of homers, Carew was batting .325-.380, many were driving in 100+ runs......but Jim Rice was doing it all! Batting .310-.315, hitting 35-40 homers and driving in 110+.....and getting 200 hits!!! Sorry but those numbers together are staggering and not many other power hitters I can think of accomplished that combination........Aaron, Mays did but not many others........and again.....not saying Rice was the kind of player Aaron and Mays were but that he did some special things in his own right and if people can't see that then they are not paying attention!

Rice also never walked, and Williams only swung at strikes. That's the reason Williams never had 200 hits in a season---but he averaged well over 100 walks. Rice's career high walk total for one year was 62.

Ted Williams wouldn't swing at a pitch that was a half inch off the plate, and he got the benefit of the doubt from the umps all the time.

Rice swung at anything, and pitchers knew it. Throw him a slider, down and away, and he'd invariably try to pull it. That's why he was known as Mr. 6-4-3.

The numbers and stats still speak for themselves. In that 12 year period of his prime he was in the top 5 in the MVP voting 6 out of 12 seasons and won once. We can sit here and cut up any players numbers any number of different ways but in the end, in his time, like it or not....Jim Rice was the best in the game.

What are your thoughts on the Reggie Jackson/Jim Rice comparison Mike?? Curious which guy you would rather have on your team? Just a curious question?

as far as the 200 hits in a season....weren't the seasons a few games shorter back in William's day....I think they were only 150 games back then

I mentioned that in another post...here or SOL...they were 154 games. Like I said...different times. I also believe that the years between 1945 and 1970 had the absolute cream of the crop of baseball talent of all time! Look at the hitters the pitchers had to face and look at the pitchers the hitters had to face???!!!!!!

Boy! Tough crowd over on SOL!!!:shocked:




:laugha:

The numbers and stats still speak for themselves. In that 12 year period of his prime he was in the top 5 in the MVP voting 6 out of 12 seasons and won once. We can sit here and cut up any players numbers any number of different ways but in the end, in his time, like it or not....Jim Rice was the best in the game.

What are your thoughts on the Reggie Jackson/Jim Rice comparison Mike?? Curious which guy you would rather have on your team? Just a curious question?

Jackson. Rice was one of the worst clutch hitters I ever saw.

Who cares what people think L. he's in and that is all that matters.

Jackson. Rice was one of the worst clutch hitters I ever saw.



Thats exactly what I always thought about Rice, a LOT of meaningless stats but he never stepped up when it counted, also at the top of the list every year for hitting into double plays.
But still I'm glad he got in now! certainly NOT a 1st ballot guy though !
As for Larry comparing Rice with Reggie Jackson, You got to be kidding Larry !!!

The comparison is justified as I was drawing a paralell between the two as different hitters......here, let me draw you a picture.:doh: Rice=Power+ Average+ Hits+ Runs Batted In. Jackson= Power+ Runs Batted In+ just as many double plays and twice as many whiffs!

He is in....and that is all that matters.

The comparison is justified as I was drawing a paralell between the two as different hitters......here, let me draw you a picture.:doh: Rice=Power+ Average+ Hits+ Runs Batted In. Jackson= Power+ Runs Batted In+ just as many double plays and twice as many whiffs!

He is in....and that is all that matters.


Reggie was a winner !
Rice wasn't !

Reggie played on lots more talented teams. What would have been if Rice played on those A's and Yankee teams? Bet things would have been different.

Reggie played on lots more talented teams. What would have been if Rice played on those A's and Yankee teams? Bet things would have been different.

Not looking to argue with you Larry, But 2 world series MVPs, Mr October, close to 600 home runs, ect..... :wave:

Reggie played on lots more talented teams. What would have been if Rice played on those A's and Yankee teams? Bet things would have been different.

You're kidding me---Lynn, Yaz, Fisk, Evans, Burleson, Hobson, Cooper, Petrocelli. Later on Boggs, Greenwell, Gedman, Lansford, Baylor, Dave Henderson.

Yeah, Rice really played with a bunch of ham and eggers :rolleyes:

You're kidding me---Lynn, Yaz, Fisk, Evans, Burleson, Hobson, Cooper, Petrocelli. Later on Boggs, Greenwell, Gedman, Lansford, Baylor, Dave Henderson.

Yeah, Rice really played with a bunch of ham and eggers :rolleyes:



Mike,
You & I should take the advice of your signature :laughs:

Mike,
You & I should take the advice of your signature :laughs:

You are putting words in my mouth. Re-read my post.....Jackson played for "more talented" teams. He did! Do you deny it? Rice played for some fantastic teams....but those A's and those Yankees were better teams....no?

You are putting words in my mouth. Re-read my post.....Jackson played for "more talented" teams. He did! Do you deny it? Rice played for some fantastic teams....but those A's and those Yankees were better teams....no?

No. The Sox and Yankees of Jackson's stint in the Bronx were even.

The Sox and Yankees tied in the regular season in 78, and the Yankees edged them by 2-1/2 games in 77.

The Sox beat Oakland in the 75 ALCS--swept them, in fact. Jackson was still with the A's then.

Rice came up in 75.

The Yankees won the pennant in 76 without Jackson, who was traded to Baltimore by the A's after 75.

How do you figure they were "more talented"? :confused: