View Full Version : This is very important


spence
10-11-2016, 11:18 AM
"THE REAL WIKILEAKS SMOKING GUN POINTS TO TRUMP, NOT CLINTON"

An investigative report published in Newsweek reveals that hacker organization Wikileaks falsified information and leaking phony “Hillary Clinton emails” in an attempt to undermine her presidential campaign.

http://secondnexus.com/politics-and-economics/wikileaks-falsified-documents-trump-russia/?utm_content=inf_10_1164_2&tse_id=INF_cd0644708fc811e6b6db4d0235f40af5

ecduzitgood
10-11-2016, 11:29 AM
This is important also.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/11/man-did-what-hillary-did-with-classified-information-in-jail/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

buckman
10-11-2016, 11:34 AM
http://secondnexus.com/politics-and-economics/wikileaks-falsified-documents-trump-russia/?utm_content=inf_10_1164_2&tse_id=INF_cd0644708fc811e6b6db4d0235f40af5

Lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
10-11-2016, 11:35 AM
This is important also.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/11/man-did-what-hillary-did-with-classified-information-in-jail/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Very different scenarios.

ecduzitgood
10-11-2016, 11:54 AM
Where is the outrage?http://observer.com/2016/10/james-comey-and-loretta-lynch-should-be-impeached-for-whitewashing-clintons-crimes/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ecduzitgood
10-11-2016, 11:56 AM
Very different scenarios.

Yeah one had the protection of the Democratic machine/party.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
10-11-2016, 01:30 PM
Yeah one had the protection of the Democratic machine/party.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
No, if you're read into it they are very different scenarios. Google his name...

ecduzitgood
10-11-2016, 03:07 PM
No, if you're read into it they are very different scenarios. Google his name...

You explain since you say there is a difference. Why do you Democrats always expect everyone else to do the work to figure out what you are trying to say.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
10-11-2016, 03:09 PM
You explain since you say there is a difference. Why do you Democrats always expect everyone else to do the work to figure out what you are trying to say.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
The answer is in your question.

ecduzitgood
10-11-2016, 03:12 PM
The answer is in your question.

Because Democrats don't like to do the work. Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
10-11-2016, 03:54 PM
Because Democrats don't like to do the work. Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
You're close.

Slipknot
10-11-2016, 08:28 PM
Phony emails of Clinton bashing Catholics?
Not likely phony, that site looks phony your link has with all the pop up scam crap though
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Slipknot
10-11-2016, 08:29 PM
You're close.

Sounds like Aristocrats
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

JohnR
10-12-2016, 12:21 PM
Very different scenarios.


Different scenarios - still a race to the bottom.

We are at a strange crossroads. We have a GOP candidate likely in bed with the Russians as typically the RU influence is with Dems and organizations on the left supporting them.

Fly Rod
10-13-2016, 07:34 AM
Spence....U and all left wing socialist R blaming russia for the emails....no government official has proven that theory...they assume or think but do not know.....:)

Slipknot
10-13-2016, 09:55 AM
speaking of Russia,

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/25/flashback-clintons-loved-russia-enough-sell-uranium/

They accuse Donald of admiring Russia while she has already acted on her love for Russia, more hipocracy.

I think she loves money and power and it is funny she needs the very people she hates to win this election. Voters who cast a ballot for someone that hates them seems insane to me.

hq2
10-13-2016, 10:09 AM
Different scenarios - still a race to the bottom.

We are at a strange crossroads. We have a GOP candidate likely in bed with the Russians as typically the RU influence is with Dems and organizations on the left supporting them.

Yeah, weirdest election in 50 years! Who would thought that the Republican candidate would actually turn out to be a paid Russian agent? Wow! Strange times. And, unfortunately for us with Putin, more and worse to follow.

wdmso
10-13-2016, 02:12 PM
http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-sidney-blumenthal-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-benghazi-sputnik-508635


But the Russians had faked it all, taking a real document released by WikiLeaks and altering it to create a bogus story—one that ultimately was picked up by Trump himself.

JohnR
10-14-2016, 10:08 PM
The Russians and their tools have hacked numerous entities WRT this election and discovered real issues, they have also faked some of them. It is what they do.

But we are so effed up right now we cannot get around this.

Dark times ahead folks.

wdmso
10-15-2016, 04:29 AM
Heard it on the radio they doubt the hacks and Leaks are from the Russian FSB (their CIA) they would not likely Volunteer put that out there .. which makes sense

as for other players in Russia who knows .. I am just a little curious what the Trump camp or the RNC would be saying if wiki leaks and other hackers started dumping their internal email and memos .. or would they Blame Hillary ?

If getting info from hackers is going to lead to investigations watch out America

scottw
10-15-2016, 04:55 AM
ironic that a woman dealing with sensitive information who chose to set up a secret, unsecured server in her residence is now being pummeled by hacked documents and stolen emails:crying:

don't think of them as hackers, think of them as "whistle blowers"

you are correct John, one of the two disasters running for POTUS will be inheriting an enormous disaster from the current disaster-in-chief...what could go wrong? :hee:

wdmso
10-15-2016, 10:51 PM
don't think of them as hackers, think of them as "whistle blowers"

WOW thats speaks volumes

buckman
10-17-2016, 08:03 AM
don't think of them as hackers, think of them as "whistle blowers"

WOW thats speaks volumes

I like to call it investIgative journalism.... Somebody has to do it , the media won't or can't .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device