Perhaps this could not be a tribal discussion, I have a little hope for that.
Our government above the local level is dominated by lawyers.
I believe that is one of the reasons we have more lawyers per capita than any other nation and why we need lawyers to succeed. Laws are written In legalese and typically only lawyers know that language.
I think that limiting state and federal terms to 2 in each house along with contribution limits would be to the citizens advantage

Laws are written In legalese




:confused::rotf2:

:confused::rotf2:

I would surmise you have not held any elected office
There’s a reason they call it code
http://uscode.house.gov/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, you struggle with the distinction between legal and illegal and you are worried about legalese??

Pete, you struggle with the distinction between legal and illegal and you are worried about legalese??
Go ahead, #^&#^&#^&#^& this thread up with your tribal #^&#^&#^&#^&
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nothing tribal there Pete, tough week?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nothing tribal there Pete, tough week?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Let’s just make this discussion a continuation of another
Go right ahead
I’m out
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I give pete 30 minutes or until he discovers a new word :jester:

Perhaps this could not be a tribal discussion, I have a little hope for that.
Our government above the local level is dominated by lawyers.
I believe that is one of the reasons we have more lawyers per capita than any other nation and why we need lawyers to succeed. Laws are written In legalese and typically only lawyers know that language.
I think that limiting state and federal terms to 2 in each house along with contribution limits would be to the citizens advantage

I agree. Term Limits, limited political funding. Limited career politicians (unsure if this last is wise, balancing experience against accumulated power)