View Full Version : Russia, Russia, Russia!!


Jim in CT
02-13-2019, 05:20 PM
The senate, like the House, says there is exactly zero direct evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign, and Russian meddling in our election.

This, from NBC. I give them credit for reporting that.

Nebe
02-13-2019, 05:32 PM
Is the senate non-biased? Lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
02-13-2019, 06:01 PM
They did not say there is no evidence.
They said They found no evidence.
If you think those two statements are the same, you qualify as a Trumplican.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw
02-13-2019, 06:05 PM
They did not say there is no evidence.
They said They found no evidence.
If you think those two statements are the same, you qualify as a Trumplican.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That is so funny
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
02-13-2019, 06:17 PM
I wonder how many times Jim has burnt himself on a lightbulb.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
02-13-2019, 06:17 PM
I haven’t hear the fat lady even warm up, the singing is coming.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw
02-13-2019, 06:21 PM
I haven’t hear the fat lady even warm up, the singing is coming.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yeah we’ve been hearing that for a while
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Dad Fisherman
02-13-2019, 06:37 PM
That is so funny
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

They didn't say there were no Unicorns.
They said they have found no Unicorns
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
02-13-2019, 06:37 PM
Yeah we’ve been hearing that for a while
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Just wait good things take time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT
02-13-2019, 07:02 PM
Is the senate non-biased? Lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

House said the same thing...

Jim in CT
02-13-2019, 07:04 PM
They did not say there is no evidence.
They said They found no evidence.
If you think those two statements are the same, you qualify as a Trumplican.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fair enough. After two years and spending how many millions of dollars, they found no evidence.

Do we punish people for evidence that might exist, but hasn't been found?

You are grasping at straws. BIG TIME.

They found no evidence, but he still might be guilty. That's enough for you?

Jim in CT
02-13-2019, 07:07 PM
I haven’t hear the fat lady even warm up, the singing is coming.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Senate says they are wrapping it up, they have no questions left to ask. Mueller has, so far, shown zip. Sure his investigation may uncover something.

I'm not singing. I said that both chambers of congress have said there's nothing. The crimes that Mueller has charged people with, have all been crimes that took place after his investigation started. He hasn't charged a single person with a single crime, that took place before he started.

Pete F.
02-13-2019, 07:40 PM
Fair enough. After two years and spending how many millions of dollars, they found no evidence.

Do we punish people for evidence that might exist, but hasn't been found?

You are grasping at straws. BIG TIME.

They found no evidence, but he still might be guilty. That's enough for you?
Much like Kavanaugh, they didn’t look very hard.
Mueller will find it if it exists and he prosecuted people so far for lying, nobody lies before a question is asked. Well except Trump
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
02-13-2019, 07:46 PM
This thread is funny. Jim, read the news.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT
02-13-2019, 08:02 PM
Much like Kavanaugh, they didn’t look very hard.
Mueller will find it if it exists and he prosecuted people so far for lying, nobody lies before a question is asked. Well except Trump
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
how do you know they didn’t look very hard?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
02-13-2019, 08:24 PM
I read and listen.

You know that circumstantial evidence counts.
You may look at the evidence in aggregate, not individual items.
That’s what the judge will tell the jury.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT
02-13-2019, 09:28 PM
I read and listen.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

To what, MSNBC? you listen to every syllable which supports liberalism, you immediately dismiss everything else. That’s listening?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sea Dangles
02-13-2019, 09:49 PM
This thread is funny. Jim, read the news.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jeff,do your sources speak of a code red happening soon?🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
02-14-2019, 02:24 PM
Jeff,do your sources speak of a code red happening soon?🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Is this your default response now?

Seems like every week that goes by more people close to Trump are getting in trouble for their election dealings with Russians.

Sea Dangles
02-14-2019, 02:51 PM
I was just curious and I know you had predicted such an event was imminent. I wasn’t sure if you had heard more.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device