since the tax cuts were signed, over a trillion dollars of money has been repatriated back to the US.

No, not every cent has been used to feed the hungry. Yes, much of it has gone into the hands of people
who were already rich. But it had the effect of benefitting many of us. It was a good thing.

Waiting for CNN and MSNBC to report on this...

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6118576945001#sp=show-clips

Yea, dividends and buybacks are great for instutional investors and the rest of us can pick up the deficit spending. And this is Trump’s signature accomplishment?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yea, dividends and buybacks are great for instutional investors and the rest of us can pick up the deficit spending. And this is Trump’s signature accomplishment?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you might have heard that unemployment is down. A trillion dollars showing up, helps that.

even if all that money goes to
institutional investors as dividends ( absurd, but let’s go along), they pay taxes. which means more
money for programs you like, like
late term abortions and free everything.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

buybacks don’t benefit retail investors by the same
exact percentage that they benefit institutional investors?

Das vadanya, komrade.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Keep repeating the party line just like State TV, comrade

Putin's Puppet has you well trained.

The overhaul of the federal tax law in 2017 was the signature legislative achievement of Floridaman’s presidency.

The biggest change to the tax code in three decades, the law slashed taxes for big companies, part of an effort to coax them to invest more in the United States and to discourage them from stashing profits in overseas tax havens.

Corporate executives, major investors and the wealthiest Americans hailed the tax cuts as a once-in-a-generation boon not only to their own fortunes but also to the United States economy.

But big companies wanted more — and, not long after the bill became law in December 2017, the Floridaman administration began transforming the tax package into a greater windfall for the world’s largest corporations and their shareholders. The tax bills of many big companies have ended up even smaller than what was anticipated when Floridaman signed the bill.

The budget deficit has jumped more than 50 percent since Floridaman took office and is expected to top $1 trillion in 2020, partly as a result of the tax law.

A majority of Americans have long believed that upper-income Americans and corporations pay too little in taxes.
Did Floridaman’s law address this situation?
Americans say no, Americans correctly perceived that Floridaman’s law did little to change this and in fact benefited corporations and the rich.

i’m the one regurgitating party talking points. Not you.

My taxes went down $2500 a year Pete, i’m not a corporation nor am i wealthy.

And how is it that budget deficits went up 50% to where we are now? Are you going only by Obama’s lowest deficit? Because he had
more than one deficit north of a trillion.

The debt is a major, major issue. But I’d bet you didn’t utter a syllable of concern about the debt from 2009-2016, which means your concern is selective, which means it’s fake.

Some facts will paint Trump
in a favorable light Pete, and those facts are just as worth knowing, as the ones that make him look ugly.

I am totally fine praising him
or criticizing him. you ignore everything that makes him look good, and obsess over the bad.

So which one of us is a party hack, and which one thinks for himself?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, given your deep and sincere concern for
our deficits and debt, which democrat candidate do you support, and what is their plan to reign in the debt? I assume you don’t support anyone who endorses an agenda likely to add meaningfully to the debt? which democrat is that? I’ll give them a look.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Anybody other than Trump, worry about the rest later.

More and more comes out each day.

Bolton, Pompeo and Defense Secy Esper met with Trump in the Oval Office in August to try to convince him it was in US interests to release military aid to Ukraine. Trump refused.

Extraordinary that this extortion plot — which abused our national security for Trump’s interests — went on for nearly 3 months with little notice until the whistleblower came forward. Makes one think about what else may be happening behind the scenes.

Both Mulvaney and Blair have declined to cooperate with impeachment investigators. Mulvaney told associates he stepped away whenever Trump spoke with Rudy Giuliani and thus had little knowledge about their Ukraine efforts. Congressional testimony from Fiona Hill has disputed that.

Criminal law 101:
-putting your hands over your ears so you don’t hear what you’re pretty sure is crime talk, doesn’t exculpate you;
-no attorney client privilege here for Floridaman & Giuliani. It’s a failed mob tactic;
-Floridaman & Guiliani look very guilty.

Everybody in the WH is trying to get away without an indictment.

The Trumplican Party is on it's way to Armageddon in 2020, will make 1964 look like a small war.

Pete, you couldn’t run away from my question fast enough, could you?

If your plan, as you stated, is to vote for Warren or Sanders if they win the nomination, that necessarily means you don’t give a crap about the debt. So drop it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How must the republican members of both the House & the Senate feel collectively as group when they all know that what they are defending is the most corrupt Impeached President of the US. No educated person could think otherwise with amount of factual evidence. Sad.

Apparently you don't care either and you sold out for $2500. Do you think that comes close to your increased share of the debt?

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Floridaman promised he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years. Instead, his budgets would add $9.1 trillion during that time. It would increase the U.S. debt to $29 trillion according to Floridaman's budget estimates.

Floridaman’s Two Strategies to Reduce the Debt
Floridaman had two strategies to reduce the U.S. debt. He promised to grow the economy 6% annually to increase tax revenues. But once in office, he lowered his growth estimate to 3.5% to 4% and he has yet to achieve that.


These projections are above the 2%-3% healthy growth rate. When growth is more than that, it creates inflation. Too much money chases too few good business projects. Irrational exuberance grips investors. They create a boom-bust cycle that ends in a recession. Floridaman’s Fiscal Year 2020 budget lowered annual growth rates down to between 2.4% and 2.9% annually.

Floridaman promised to achieve 4% growth with tax cuts. In his first 100 days, he released the outline of what would become the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018. The top individual income tax rate drops to 37%. It doubles the standard deduction and eliminates personal exemptions. The corporate cuts are permanent, while the individual changes expire at the end of 2025.

Pete, you couldn’t run away from my question fast enough, could you?

If your plan, as you stated, is to vote for Warren or Sanders if they win the nomination, that necessarily means you don’t give a crap about the debt. So drop it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
This question is kryptonite to the directionless.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How must the republican members of both the House & the Senate feel collectively as group when they all know that what they are defending is the most corrupt Impeached President of the US. No educated person could think otherwise with amount of factual evidence. Sad.

This question is kryptonite to the directionless.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You ignore the important and focus on the drivel and smokescreen blown out by the administration to cover their illegal actions.

Pete i do care. i complained about debt under obama, and i complain under
trump. but is rather rack up debt by putting money directly in peoples
pockets, than by wasting money like
obama’s stimulus did. i don’t know anyone who benefitted from that 750 billion dollar waste. But Trump gets an F on debt.

Republicans are deeply hypocritical on the issue, they only complain about debt when a democrat is president.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This question is kryptonite to the directionless.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

of course it is, and it’s terrific to watch them try to squirm their way out of it.

same as the war on women. I dont want to hear about chivalry from anyone who ever supported a Clinton or a Kennedy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

of course it is, and it’s terrific to watch them try to squirm their way out of it.

same as the war on women. I dont want to hear about chivalry from anyone who ever supported a Clinton or a Kennedy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You claim a great benefit, just think you too could go to the bank and take out a second mortgage.
You would be really rich then.
Your claim re Obama is false anyways, GDP and unemployment numbers bear that out, Floridaman, despite his best efforts hasn’t blown it yet. It will come and a rudderless ship that someone failed to fuel when he had the chance will make for an interesting voyage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You claim a great benefit, just think you too could go to the bank and take out a second mortgage.
You would be really rich then.
Your claim re Obama is false anyways, GDP and unemployment numbers bear that out, Floridaman, despite his best efforts hasn’t blown it yet. It will come and a rudderless ship that someone failed to fuel when he had the chance will make for an interesting voyage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I have a second mortgage. And
my finances are just fine.

what claim of mine regarding obama, hasn’t been borne out yet? that he added trillions to the debt?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

of course it is, and it’s terrific to watch them try to squirm their way out of it.

same as the war on women. I dont want to hear about chivalry from anyone who ever supported a Clinton or a Kennedy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He keeps responding with yada yada but still can’t find answers. A lot to say,but saying nothing.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sitting in the low chair again, I see.
Every penny Floridaman gave you, he borrowed against the future.
But you only worry about voodoo when it's Obama. :deadhorse:
It started with Reagan and hasn't worked yet.
But perhaps another Clinton might have done as well as Bill did at cutting debt.:lossinit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8hnM6xNjeU

Yada much?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yada much?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Who did you pick in December of 2015, show us your amazing mental ability to foresee what would happen.

Pete, a trillion dollars coming back home, is a good
thing. i’m really sorry to inform you that Trump is doing some good things.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It certainly drove the market by funding buybacks, but that does little for future growth.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W790RC1Q027SBEA
And don't worry they have found new ways to hide the profits.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/30/business/corporate-tax-cuts-impact.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

Pete, did it help spur investment, which creates jobs?

stock buybacks help the iras and 401ks of middle
class americans - true or false?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, did it help spur investment, which creates jobs?
short term effect, didn't last see graph
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W790RC1Q027SBEA

stock buybacks help the iras and 401ks of middle
class americans - true or false?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
True, if you only look at current cost and ignore the debt incurred to artificially drive growth.
America, unlike Floridaman is in this for the long haul.
And he is clueless about how to run a bureaucracy and so does nothing other than tweet, golf and spew lies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwIAxtZCpaI

Pete, Obama and Trump each added trillions to the debt in at attempt to spur growth. (trump increased the take home pay of tens if
millions of Americans as he did so, Obama did not) Is there any evidence that suggests that growth was short lived? We’re still growing...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, Obama and Trump each added trillions to the debt in at attempt to spur growth. (trump increased the take home pay of tens if
millions of Americans as he did so, Obama did not) Is there any evidence that suggests that growth was short lived? We’re still growing...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Ahh, but Obama did increase wages and don't forget he started way in the hole.
Floridaman is in power at the end of the business cycle and historically wages have always risen then, though it still is minimal compared to the usual business cycle and is far from the best ever as Floridaman claims.
Floridaman was lucky enough to get on Obama's coattails, best coattails ever.

https://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker

Without fighting trade wars, kicking allies and kissing dictators we could have had wage and GDP growth over 5% like the usual business cycle.
But instead we have the Floridaman MEH and he has you convinced it's great because he says so.
The odds are pretty good it has already turned down.
You'll find out in 6 months.
What's Floridaman going to do then, print money?
See what that does for your savings.

Don’t forget to adjust for inflation Pete.

I’d think if these tax cuts were so great Jim would have entitles the thread 10 great things.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

obama started way in the hole. Very, very true.

My take home pay didnt get a direct boost from anything obama did, not like what i got with the tax cuts. that’s what i’m saying. And i’m right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don’t forget to adjust for inflation Pete.

I’d think if these tax cuts were so great Jim would have entitles the thread 10 great things.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

$2,500 a year in my pocket. that’s not meaningless, madam.

and a trillion dollars back in our economy. Let’s ignore that. Because TDS.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Short term I’d agree Trump has put money in my retirement account, but the cost to future generations is going to be high. I’d have preferred to not sell my sole for an extra $2500 and the damage he is doing to the environment, to foreign policy, to ethics, to morals, to civility, those things that we would expect from our leader is hard to even measure.

Look at what he has done to the GOP, aside from one who has spoken out against Moscow Mitch’s comments, they are all prepared to take an oath to swear to be impartial jurors, while professing up front they will be anything but. Good Christian men like a Trump can swear to god and country to be impartial knowing they will not even bring documents or witnesses and even if they do, all will ignore the facts. It is a desperation to maintain the power in the senate, this is the old white old school guard worrying about the trend in politics and the move away from their party now stands for.

Got Stripers, when obama
put money into your retirement accounts,,did you worry that it was short
lived and future generations would suffer? if
not, why not? very specifically, why not? because trump is a jerk?

i didn’t sell my soul for $2500. i voted for trump before
i knew there’d be a tax cut and would have voted for him anyway.

Is my soul better off behind a candidate who supports abortion until the moment of birth? Nope.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Short term I’d agree Trump has put money in my retirement account, but the cost to future generations is going to be high. I’d have preferred to not sell my sole for an extra $2500 and the damage he is doing to the environment, to foreign policy, to ethics, to morals, to civility, those things that we would expect from our leader is hard to even measure.

Look at what he has done to the GOP, aside from one who has spoken out against Moscow Mitch’s comments, they are all prepared to take an oath to swear to be impartial jurors, while professing up front they will be anything but. Good Christian men like a Trump can swear to god and country to be impartial knowing they will not even bring documents or witnesses and even if they do, all will ignore the facts. It is a desperation to maintain the power in the senate, this is the old white old school guard worrying about the trend in politics and the move away from their party now stands for.

and i can make a compelling case according to what I believe, that it's the democrats who are putting facts aside for politics.

When Biden claimed
that he had no intention of complying with any senate subpoenas demanding he testify, I didn’t hear anyone
in the left claim
that he was guilty of obstruction and therefore unqualified to be potus. So add that to a
long list of things that liberals say are impeachable when Trump does them, but not worth mentioning when democrats do it.

Got an explanation for that? I’m all
ears.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and i can make a compelling case according to what I believe, that it's the democrats who are putting facts aside for politics.

When Biden claimed
that he had no intention of complying with any senate subpoenas demanding he testify, I didn’t hear anyone
in the left claim
that he was guilty of obstruction and therefore unqualified to be potus. So add that to a
long list of things that liberals say are impeachable when Trump does them, but not worth mentioning when democrats do it.

Got an explanation for that? I’m all
ears.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He had a good reason for not being on the witness list, because he has no first hand knowledge about the charges against a Trump, this trial isn’t about whether Hunter took a hand out job due to his dad being VP. If you think a Trump was actually looking into corruption, you are drunk on the Fox/GOP coolaid.

He also suggested that if he was served with a legal subpoena he would comply. Personally I’d love to see the Bidens as witnesses, provided Bolton, Mulvaney, budget and Pompeo all testify without pulling the BS executive privilege card. That won’t happen because those testimonies potentially flip enough votes to have him removed.

Biden said: “I am just not going to pretend that there is any legal basis for Republican subpoenas for my testimony in the impeachment trial. That is the point I was making yesterday and I reiterate: this impeachment is about Trump’s conduct, not mine.”
And he said he would comply.
I think he should have just pulled a Floridaman move and claimed that he never said that.

Floridaman has yet to comply with a single subpoena, not one.
Of course he has said:
I'll release my taxes
I'll testify to Mueller
I'd love to testify in the impeachment
I'd love to have my guys testify
Has he done any of those?
No, he has obstructed the investigation as much as possible.
Remember nobody that has witnesses that could provide exculpatory evidence prevents them from testifying.

My ears await your rationalization for that.

Floridaman’s a moral arsonist, and if he determined that the only way to hold on to power was to burn everything to the ground, he’d gladly be king of ashes. To paraphrase Milton: Better to reign over a ruined country than to be just another crass plutocrat in a noble one.
Though I think he will end in prison.

He had a good reason for not being on the witness list, because he has no first hand knowledge about the charges against a Trump, this trial isn’t about whether Hunter took a hand out job due to his dad being VP. If you think a Trump was actually looking into corruption, you are drunk on the Fox/GOP coolaid.

He also suggested that if he was served with a legal subpoena he would comply. Personally I’d love to see the Bidens as witnesses, provided Bolton, Mulvaney, budget and Pompeo all testify without pulling the BS executive privilege card. That won’t happen because those testimonies potentially flip enough votes to have him removed.

one of the things i keep hearing about Trump, is that he used his office to dig up dirt on a political opponent.

Biden certainly has first hand
knowledge of his role
in Ukraine, and he could testify to things that justify Trumps wanting to know what happened there. But we can’t have people
knowing what actually happened there, not if it hurts a Democrat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, one of the accusations of Trumps conduct, is that there was no legitimate reason for him to
inquire into the Bidens actions there. None of us knows exactly what happened. But if the truth revealed that Trump had every reason to find out what took place, that makes his actions more legitimate.

Why is Biden so determined to keep a lid on what he and Hunter did there? And why are liberals like you so opposed to asking what they did there? Hmmm?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

GS, today he’s saying he’d comply. Originally, he said he’d refuse to comply. After he said that, no one on the left accused him of obstruction and said that disqualified him from being potus.

Why?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

GS, today he’s saying he’d comply. Originally, he said he’d refuse to comply. After he said that, no one on the left accused him of obstruction and said that disqualified him from being potus.

Why?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
How can one obstruct justice ahead of a subpoena, your reaching now buddy, but again full blown witnesses kill Trump not the Bidens, so bring it on Moscow Mitch.

Pete, one of the accusations of Trumps conduct, is that there was no legitimate reason for him to
inquire into the Bidens actions there. None of us knows exactly what happened. But if the truth revealed that Trump had every reason to find out what took place, that makes his actions more legitimate.

Why is Biden so determined to keep a lid on what he and Hunter did there? And why are liberals like you so opposed to asking what they did there? Hmmm?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Impeachment isn’t about the Bidens. If there was any there, there, our FBI would have handled it. Because there wasn’t, Floridaman resorted to trying to bribe a vulnerable ally into announcing an investigation, impairing our nat’l security & theirs. That’s why Floridaman was impeached.

So many questions remain unanswered.

What exactly happened after the White House, and Floridaman, learned about the whistleblower complaint?

What did the criminal referral from the CIA GC say?

And what discussions did the White House and the DOJ have about both?

How can one obstruct justice ahead of a subpoena, your reaching now buddy, but again full blown witnesses kill Trump not the Bidens, so bring it on Moscow Mitch.

i’m not teaching, you’re dodging. He said very explicitly that if he were to get a subpoena, he’d refuse to comply.

None of you is capable of
answering a challenging question. it’s unbelievable. You can’t just say “you know what, if we’re going to criticize trump for not complying, we should hold biden to the same standard.”

you can’t even admit that biden originally refused to comply.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So many questions remain unanswered.

?

i guess the house did a crappy job if, according to you, so many questions were unanswered.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i guess the house did a crappy job if, according to you, so many questions were unanswered.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Hence the obstruction of congress Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim your a Transactional supporter of Trump or to keep it easy it's a quid pro quo

He gives you 2500.00 ( I know I am not seeing 2500 ) judges and abortion and you ignore everything else. Trust me politics has always had Transactional components . But the GOP and trump's supporters have taken it way beyond that

Just look at your rabid claims that the bidens need to be investigated, yet Carter paige was illegally surveillance, you can't have it both ways, why hasn't the GOP started their own investigations into these illegal Biden activities? Because he hasn't been nominated yet, or elected when those things happen and if they happen , we'll see the GOP smearing campaign in full gear:kewl:

Hence the obstruction of congress Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and arent there court cases pending to see what the administration had to provide, and what they don’t? why not wait until those are settled?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim your a Transactional supporter of Trump or to keep it easy it's a quid pro quo

He gives you 2500.00 ( I know I am not seeing 2500 ) judges and abortion and you ignore everything else. Trust me politics has always had Transactional components . But the GOP and trump's supporters have taken it way beyond that

Just look at your rabid claims that the bidens need to be investigated, yet Carter paige was illegally surveillance, you can't have it both ways, why hasn't the GOP started their own investigations into these illegal Biden activities? Because he hasn't been nominated yet, or elected when those things happen and if they happen , we'll see the GOP smearing campaign in full gear:kewl:

you’re demonstrably lying. i don’t ignore everything else. i call him out for being a jerk all the time, but only when it’s actually true. a demonstrably false post, pure BS. desperate times call for desperate actions.

any thoughtful voter gives a lot of thought to the kinds of judges a potus will appoint. No surprise, i love the way he’s packing all
levels of courts with young judges who will use the constitution as a rulebook, rather than using their own personal beliefs. if he gets re elected, and if the gop keeps the senate, he probably gets another supreme court pick, one that will really transform that court away from judicial activism, resulting in one that rules by the constitution. amazing that there is disagreement on that, absolutely amazing.

i’m not trying to have anything both ways. im not saying carter page can never be investigated, but not if the FBI has to break the rules to get permission to spy on him, which the IG says they did. If there was probable cause, then
there’s no need to use debunked dossiers. Is that going too fast for you?


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and arent there court cases pending to see what the administration had to provide, and what they don’t? why not wait until those are settled?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, the "obstruction of Congress" charge is ridiculous on its face. Most of opposition politics is about "obstructing" the other party. Congress obstructs itself on a daily basis, as well as it obstructs the President. Congress has been obstructing Trump, ergo the executive branch, from the beginning of his presidency.

There is no such crime entitled "obstruction of Congress." Impeachment on this basis is a purely political ploy.

i guess the house did a crappy job if, according to you, so many questions were unanswered.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think they did an amazing job in 10 weeks while being obstructed in every way possible by Floridaman. It could have been Whitewater or Benghazi, but in those cases people testified. Floridaman might as well take the Fifth.

Perhaps you can clarify on what basis has the Justice Department refused to appoint a special counsel to, or otherwise to, investigate the bribery, extortion, and other crimes that the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence found?

What discussions have there been on that?

All of these questions need to be answered by a comprehensive investigation by a special counsel, inspectors general, or both.

MAGA
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device