View Full Version : Empty barrels ring loudest


Sea Dangles
01-31-2020, 07:54 AM
Where is PeteF this morning?
🤡🤐🤡

Got Stripers
01-31-2020, 08:13 AM
What’s there to comment on, this trial is going exactly as I expected, but I think not calling Bolton and having an opportunity to cross examine is going to come back to bite some of these senators down the road when Bolton starts his book tour.

Jim in CT
01-31-2020, 08:18 AM
why didn’t the house call Bolton?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw
01-31-2020, 08:24 AM
What’s there to comment on, this trial is going exactly as I expected,
.

Nostradamus I tell ya

Got Stripers
01-31-2020, 08:24 AM
why didn’t the house call Bolton?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Are you seriously asking that, the White House blocked everyone and everything, that’s a joke of a question.

scottw
01-31-2020, 08:26 AM
Are you seriously asking that, the White House blocked everyone and everything, that’s a joke of a question.

you are seriously misinformed

Jim in CT
01-31-2020, 08:26 AM
Are you seriously asking that, the White House blocked everyone and everything, that’s a joke of a question.

it was a serious question.

so the white house can block someone from testifying in the house, but not in he senate?

F*ck off, i’m asking a question, not everyone is exactly like
you.

Seemed like the democrats blame the white house for bolton not testifying in the House, but blame the goo senators for bolton not testifying in the senate. i don’t k ow why that would be.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
01-31-2020, 08:55 AM
it was a serious question.

so the white house can block someone from testifying in the house, but not in he senate?

F*ck off, i’m asking a question, not everyone is exactly like
you.

Seemed like the democrats blame the white house for bolton not testifying in the House, but blame the goo senators for bolton not testifying in the senate. i don’t k ow why that would be.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Boy Jim a simply yes it was a serious question would be sufficient to get you point across, I guess you are joining the RR/SD camp where civility really doesn't matter; sort of like what we see in the white house.

Have a good day.

Jim in CT
01-31-2020, 09:02 AM
Boy Jim a simply yes it was a serious question would be sufficient to get you point across, I guess you are joining the RR/SD camp where civility really doesn't matter; sort of like what we see in the white house.

Have a good day.

so you didn’t call it a joke of a question. fine for you to insult me, immoral for
me to respond.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT
01-31-2020, 09:08 AM
that’s a joke of a question.

this is indicative of you sincerely wishing to engage in dialogue. I’m stupid enough to have taken that as derogatory.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
01-31-2020, 09:19 AM
so you didn’t call it a joke of a question. fine for you to insult me, immoral for
me to respond.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

A "joke' vs fu*k off, seems to me quite a bit different, but based on one of the other threads where there seemed to be a challenge to see who could come up with the most outrageous insult, this board continues to move the civility bar to a point its hard to go much lower.

Jim in CT
01-31-2020, 09:25 AM
GS, telling a joke is meant to be funny. Calling someone a joke, is meant to be an insult.

You’re telling me i’m wrong? I don’t care at all if you insult me, but don’t tell me that’s not what you were doing.

And i see you didn’t answer
my joke of a question, probably because you don’t know either.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw
01-31-2020, 09:35 AM
everybody drink!

Pete F.
01-31-2020, 10:18 AM
Where is PeteF this morning?
🤡🤐🤡

You rang