Chuck Todd shockingly edited some remarks that Barr made about the Flynn investigation, to make it sound like Barr said the exact opposite of what he actually said. It was so glaring, NBC apologized. They said the selective editing was inadvertent.

It's funny how every single inadvertent error these people make, happens to make Trump look bad. They never, ever err in his favor. If the errors were inadvertent, wouldn't the impact be a little more balanced than 100% unfavorable to Trump?

Just a coincidence, though. Right?

Meanwhile when Trump* is asked why testing is some kind of global competition by a young Asian reporter he yells at her that she should ask CHINA.
And then Kaitlyn Collins asked the same question when Trump tired to bulldoze past it, so he ends it and huffed off stage like the angry teenage girl he is.
Quite the wimp you’ve aligned yourself with.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So they mistakenly cut short the part where Barr lied and that was the problem?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So they mistakenly cut short the part where Barr lied and that was the problem?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I think NBC apologized because there could have been assumptions they were trying to mislead due to editing issues Jeff. Stand down.
Fake news will be here for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

“‘This is what should worry the campaign: Biden is in his basement and he’s beating Trump,’ a former West Wing staffer told me. ‘If I were Biden, the lesson I would learn is: Shut the #^&#^&#^&#^& up and let Trump go out there and destroy himself.’”

He's pretty good at it

So they mistakenly cut short the part where Barr lied and that was the problem?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

NBC apologized for their own actions, but you know better. How many times a day do you masturbate to your Obama poster?

NBC admitted what they did was wrong, but that's not good enough for you.

“‘This is what should worry the campaign: Biden is in his basement and he’s beating Trump,’ a former West Wing staffer told me. ‘If I were Biden, the lesson I would learn is: Shut the #^&#^&#^&#^& up and let Trump go out there and destroy himself.’”

He's pretty good at it

Sounds like you have nothing to worry about. I mean, an anonymous source, it doesn't get much better than that.

Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGNTMma8Fiw

pete, it was nbc themselves who apologized. you aren’t capable
if commenting rationally in that, so you pivot to trump. you literally cannot allow any conversation to take place which is critical of the left, even when they themselves apologized.

NBC: we made a mistake.
Pete: but what about that one time when Trump...

do you see how deranged that is? in your world, there can be no criticism, u less trump is the one getting criticized. think about that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why would I compliment an incompetent.
Everyone but Trump* makes mistakes, just ask him

NBC apologized for their own actions, but you know better. How many times a day do you masturbate to your Obama poster?

NBC admitted what they did was wrong, but that's not good enough for you.
Are you ok?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The interesting thing about the Swine flu is that the big reason it killed only about 10% of what the Trump virus did is the government took it seriously, ramped up testing and succeeded in "beating the invisible enemy". Nobody even needed to call themselves a war time General who cowered in the rear, said you didn't need testing and tested everyone around him. Once a coward, always a coward. Congratulations Donnie Bonespurs

Once a Bitchslappedboy
Always a Bitchslappedboy
Congrats Bitchslappedboy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Are you ok?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

me? i’m good. i’m not the one who disagrees when NBC, who knows what they did, admits they acted inappropriately. you can’t even allow them to apologize for their own actions.

“you couldn’t have done anything wrong, you’re liberal!!!”.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Here we go Jim getting fed his daily fox news outrage ... i guess he missed the apology part of the storie...

Fox and every right leaning mouth piece has been playing liberal comments out of context for decades with no apology or attempt to hide it...
.. your just so indoctrinated you miss them ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iEm2hRRmN8

Here we go Jim getting fed his daily fox news outrage ... i guess he missed the apology part of the storie...

Fox and every right leaning mouth piece has been playing liberal comments out of context for decades with no apology or attempt to hide it...
.. your just so indoctrinated you miss them ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"i guess he missed the apology part of the storie"

I mentioned the apology in the title of the thread. It's in the title...but you say I messed it. How come every time they make a mistake, it's a mistake that hurts republicans? They never, ever make a mistake that helps Republicans.

Obviously, Foxnews has hosts that are as biased as everyone who works everywhere else - Sean Hannity, the folks on Fox and Friends, etc. There are also some hosts who are balanced, who say to liberals every night, "that's a good point". Like Tucker Carlson. When Boll O'Reilly was at his most popular, he sometimes let liberals like Juan Williams, host his show when he was away. That's what separates Foxnews form everyone else, the only network with some shows where you can get an honest presentation of both sides. Where else do you get that?

Jim: "NBC apologizes"

WDMSO: You forgot to mention that they apologized.

I mean, can you think honestly for two seconds on this forum?

Jim: "NBC apologizes"

WDMSO: You forgot to mention that they apologized.

I mean, can you think honestly for two seconds on this forum?

it's challenging

it's challenging

You forget to mention that it's challenging.

I mean...Jesus Christ

In 2016, the FBI took an unprecedented action against Hillary Clinton which likely could have been a but-for cause of Trump*s election victory.

And nearly four years later, Trumplicans are still busy promoting conspiracy theories about how the FBI was conspiring against Trump*.
Trumplicans got everything they could have dreamed of from the FBI in 2016: just days before the election, an investigation was opened and made public that caused measurable harm to Clinton's campaign.

Yet Trumplicans are obsessed with the idea that they were the real victims.

Now it's 2020, and Trump* has already long since directed the DOJ to launch investigations into his 2020 opponent. So now we're just waiting to see when Trumplicans will start arresting members of the prior administration on charges arising out of their derpy conspiracy theories.

Meanwhile, Trump* is firing Inspector Generals left and right, though sparing the IGs who comply with Trump*s wishes to investigate his enemies, not his friends.

So what are the odds DOJ IG Horowitz will ever actually release his findings on how the FBI tried to help Trump* win?

In 2016, the FBI took an unprecedented action against Hillary Clinton which likely could have been a but-for cause of Trump*s election victory.

And nearly four years later, Trumplicans are still busy promoting conspiracy theories about how the FBI was conspiring against Trump*.
Trumplicans got everything they could have dreamed of from the FBI in 2016: just days before the election, an investigation was opened and made public that caused measurable harm to Clinton's campaign.

Yet Trumplicans are obsessed with the idea that they were the real victims.

Now it's 2020, and Trump* has already long since directed the DOJ to launch investigations into his 2020 opponent. So now we're just waiting to see when Trumplicans will start arresting members of the prior administration on charges arising out of their derpy conspiracy theories.

Meanwhile, Trump* is firing Inspector Generals left and right, though sparing the IGs who comply with Trump*s wishes to investigate his enemies, not his friends.

So what are the odds DOJ IG Horowitz will ever actually release his findings on how the FBI tried to help Trump* win?

On a thread discussing that NBC admitted a mistake, you respond with "meanwhile, Trump..."

You can't do it. You can't allow a discussion that includes criticism of anyone other than Trump. In all seriousness, do you spend 24 a day obsessing over him? You are completely consumed.

pete sounds more shaken than obama and he's making half as much sense

Trumplicans got everything they could have dreamed of from the FBI in 2016: just days before the election, an investigation was opened and made public that caused measurable harm to Clinton's campaign.



You are always, always, always wrong. Believe me, we didn't get "what we dreamed of" from the FBI regarding Hilary. They didn't haul her off in cuffs.

Is she didn't want that harm to take place, maybe she shouldn't have put classified emails on a Commodore 64 in her basement, and maybe she could have cooperated instead of answering, when asked if she wiped her servers, "you mean like with a cloth?" She absolutely deserved some harm from her actions. That was all her choice. But as with most liberals, nothing is ever her fault, everything is always someone else's fault.

You are always, always, always wrong. Believe me, we didn't get "what we dreamed of" from the FBI regarding Hilary. They didn't haul her off in cuffs.

Is she didn't want that harm to take place, maybe she shouldn't have put classified emails on a Commodore 64 in her basement, and maybe she could have cooperated instead of answering, when asked if she wiped her servers, "you mean like with a cloth?" She absolutely deserved some harm from her actions. That was all her choice. But as with most liberals, nothing is ever her fault, everything is always someone else's fault.

Oddly enough numerous members of the Trump* administration have violated the same rules, crickets from the Trumplicans.
But it is ok, Trump* was victimized

it's hard to decide who is more senile...pelosi or biden

Oddly enough numerous members of the Trump* administration have violated the same rules, crickets from the Trumplicans.
But it is ok, Trump* was victimized

Then arrest them. Fair enough?

The DOJ refuses to investigate, Administration is consistently blocking Congress
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Then vote them out in November, that's how it works.

Fact: Never in the history of the United States has a sitting president ever been removed from office because of posts on fishing boards or Facebook.

Feel free to run that by snopes or factcheck.org
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fact: Never in the history of the United States has a sitting president ever been removed from office because of posts on fishing boards or Facebook.

Feel free to run that by snopes or factcheck.org
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

that's just mean crushing his hopes and dreams....

That PeteF is in need of a towel to cry into.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That PeteF is in need of a towel to cry into.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That towel may need to be industrial sized come November...

I think the Trump* defender who posts twice as much as I do, rabidly in defense of the Citrus Caligula will likely have a far harder time in November.

Since Sunday, Trump* has used his Twitter account to make allegations of criminal conduct against no less than 20 people and groups, throwing out unfounded accusations including even murder as he rages against his enemies.

Seems to be projecting again and panicking about being revealed as the Con man he is.

You would think he has more important things to do.

I think the Trump* defender who posts twice as much as I do, rabidly in defense of the Citrus Caligula will likely have a far harder time in November.

Since Sunday, Trump* has used his Twitter account to make allegations of criminal conduct against no less than 20 people and groups, throwing out unfounded accusations including even murder as he rages against his enemies.

Seems to be projecting again and panicking about being revealed as the Con man he is.

You would think he has more important things to do.

You are wrong
Again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think the Trump* defender who posts twice as much as I do, rabidly in defense of the Citrus Caligula will likely have a far harder time in November.

Since Sunday, Trump* has used his Twitter account to make allegations of criminal conduct against no less than 20 people and groups, throwing out unfounded accusations including even murder as he rages against his enemies.

Seems to be projecting again and panicking about being revealed as the Con man he is.

You would think he has more important things to do.

i’ll be just fine if trump gets the boot. i won’t be starting 3 anti-Biden rants a day, you can bet in that.

i think you fail to see why Dangles and I respond to you. Because it’s entertaining, not because we expect to score any political victories. there are only a dozen people here, that’s almost as low as the ratings at CNN and MSNBC, we arent impacting politics. just jousting each other.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Even when I don't post you incessantly and rabidly chase others that have opinions that conflict with yours.
Because Kavanaugh, abortion, tax cut and saving us from brown people.

Unfortunately as I thought from the escalator ride, the incompetent Barking Carnival Clown has our country collapsing around him and when he's not watching TV, he is sitting in the bathroom tweeting on his phone.

You can be proud if you want, I'm embarrassed by his behavior.

Even when I don't post you incessantly and rabidly chase others that have opinions that conflict with yours.
Because Kavanaugh, abortion, tax cut and saving us from brown people.

Unfortunately as I thought from the escalator ride, the incompetent Barking Carnival Clown has our country collapsing around him and when he's not watching TV, he is sitting in the bathroom tweeting on his phone.

You can be proud if you want, I'm embarrassed by his behavior.

I ask questions, guilty as charged. What I don't do, is go after other people's kids, mothers, and spouses. Only you do that. Good for you!

"You can be proud if you want, I'm embarrassed by his behavior"

I feel the same way about his behavior, I've said so a thousand times. Is there any reason why you fail to grasp that? I'm not proud of his behavior, but I applaud his results. That's what matters to me, results. What has to happen, exactly, before you'll accept that I despise his ethics? Why is that beyond your grasp, do you think?

"saving us from brown people."

Ah, the last resort of the beaten and desperate liberal, playing the race card. Now if you could show that I only oppose illegal immigration for brown people, but I support illegal immigration for whites, you would have a point. Since I never said anything that stupid, you obviously don't have a point, you are grasping at straws in an attempt to paint me as a racist. Which is precisely what bitch-slapped liberals do when even they know they have lost.

Anything else you want to attempt to school me on, while actually humiliating yourself in the process? Or are you sufficiently bitch-slapped for one day?

You're a bore. And you're a pussy.

I ask questions, guilty as charged. What I don't do, is go after other people's kids, mothers, and spouses. Only you do that. Good for you!

"You can be proud if you want, I'm embarrassed by his behavior"

I feel the same way about his behavior, I've said so a thousand times. Is there any reason why you fail to grasp that? I'm not proud of his behavior, but I applaud his results. That's what matters to me, results. What has to happen, exactly, before you'll accept that I despise his ethics? Why is that beyond your grasp, do you think?

"saving us from brown people."

Ah, the last resort of the beaten and desperate liberal, playing the race card. Now if you could show that I only oppose illegal immigration for brown people, but I support illegal immigration for whites, you would have a point. Since I never said anything that stupid, you obviously don't have a point, you are grasping at straws in an attempt to paint me as a racist. Which is precisely what bitch-slapped liberals do when even they know they have lost.

Anything else you want to attempt to school me on, while actually humiliating yourself in the process? Or are you sufficiently bitch-slapped for one day?

You're a bore. And you're a pussy.

Grow up

Grow up

Says the guy who makes profane comments about other people's mothers, wives and children. Yes, we can all learn about manners and maturity from you. Teach us more! Tell us more about how to behave!

I ask questions, guilty as charged. What I don't do, is go after other people's kids, mothers, and spouses. Only you do that. Good for you!

"You can be proud if you want, I'm embarrassed by his behavior"

I feel the same way about his behavior, I've said so a thousand times. Is there any reason why you fail to grasp that? I'm not proud of his behavior, but I applaud his results. That's what matters to me, results. What has to happen, exactly, before you'll accept that I despise his ethics? Why is that beyond your grasp, do you think?

"saving us from brown people."

Ah, the last resort of the beaten and desperate liberal, playing the race card. Now if you could show that I only oppose illegal immigration for brown people, but I support illegal immigration for whites, you would have a point. Since I never said anything that stupid, you obviously don't have a point, you are grasping at straws in an attempt to paint me as a racist. Which is precisely what bitch-slapped liberals do when even they know they have lost.

Anything else you want to attempt to school me on, while actually humiliating yourself in the process? Or are you sufficiently bitch-slapped for one day?

You're a bore. And you're a pussy.

What an angry person you are.

What an angry person you are.

"Anger is a natural, healthy emotion that is designed for your protection. Anger has lots of energy that you can use for good, healthy purposes. Anger is a response to a threat of any kind, and that has survival value. Actually, everything is healthy about anger, in the beginning. It only becomes unhealthy when it is denied, suppressed, or expressed in destructive ways."

What an angry person you are.

Yawn.

Says the guy who makes profane comments about other people's mothers, wives and children. Yes, we can all learn about manners and maturity from you. Teach us more! Tell us more about how to behave!

Just in case you don't know what someone is whining about, I posted after multiple yappy pup posts from him when he didn't like the answer he got.

You're in the wrong thread, so tell me did you work hard to be this much of a moron, or are you the product of a combination of enthusiastic inbreeding and a mother who spent her pregnancy huffing paint thinner while servicing her other clients in a truckstop bathroom?

Ever notice the things that upset people the most are pretty close to true, so go ahead and scream, I'm sure it's been hard on you with social distancing...........

Just in case you don't know what someone is whining about, I posted after multiple yappy pup posts from him when he didn't like the answer he got.

You're in the wrong thread, so tell me did you work hard to be this much of a moron, or are you the product of a combination of enthusiastic inbreeding and a mother who spent her pregnancy huffing paint thinner while servicing her other clients in a truckstop bathroom?

Ever notice the things that upset people the most are pretty close to true, so go ahead and scream, I'm sure it's been hard on you with social distancing...........

"You're in the wrong thread"

You told me to grow up. I pointed out, correctly, that you're not in any kind of a position here to offer character advice. It takes a special kind of jerk, to go after someone's kids, mother, and spouse. You do that when you are losing the debate, which is often. It's funny, you act a lot like Trump, who you obsessively despise. Funny when you look at it that way. You have problems with everyone here, even the people who aren't bomb throwers like TDF. So either you are the problem, or everyone else is. Which is more likely? When you alienate someone as tolerant and easygoing as TDF, it's time to ask yourself some questions.

I have had respectful disagreements with most people here, even my fellow conservatives.. You attack everyone who disagrees with you. So which is more likely, that you are the problem, or that everyone else is the problem?

"Ever notice the things that upset people the most are pretty close to true"

I see. So if I get upset that you call me a racist, that must mean I really am a racist. That makes all kinds of sense, like most of the stuff you post. And I didn't get upset, I just destroyed that asinine post of yours. It made me laugh, not upset.

"You're in the wrong thread"

You told me to grow up. I pointed out, correctly, that you're not in any kind of a position here to offer character advice. It takes a special kind of jerk, to go after someone's kids, mother, and spouse. You do that when you are losing the debate, which is often. It's funny, you act a lot like Trump, who you obsessively despise. Funny when you look at it that way. You have problems with everyone here, even the people who aren't bomb throwers like TDF. So either you are the problem, or everyone else is. Which is more likely? When you alienate someone as tolerant and easygoing as TDF, it's time to ask yourself some questions.

I have had respectful disagreements with most people here, even my fellow conservatives.. You attack everyone who disagrees with you. So which is more likely, that you are the problem, or that everyone else is the problem?

"Ever notice the things that upset people the most are pretty close to true"

I see. So if I get upset that you call me a racist, that must mean I really am a racist. That makes all kinds of sense, like most of the stuff you post. And I didn't get upset, I just destroyed that asinine post of yours. It made me laugh, not upset.

You are just so cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK5Z-7tcQgI

You are just so cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK5Z-7tcQgI

compared to you, yes.

What an angry person you are.

So you can insult people (for a lot less than calling your mom a whore, and your wife Da Pussy, or going after your kids), and that doesn't say anything derogatory about you. Must be nice to be able to declare that the rules don't apply to you. Very nice.

You never have anything to say when Pete or Spence or WDMSO get insulting. Only when me, Dangles and Scott do it. I can only conclude that you don't care when liberals do it. Please offer another possible explanation.

You never have anything to say when Pete or Spence or WDMSO get insulting.
Don’t put me in that group. I don’t insult anyone.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you can insult people (for a lot less than calling your mom a whore, and your wife Da Pussy, or going after your kids), and that doesn't say anything derogatory about you. Must be nice to be able to declare that the rules don't apply to you. Very nice.

You never have anything to say when Pete or Spence or WDMSO get insulting. Only when me, Dangles and Scott do it. I can only conclude that you don't care when liberals do it. Please offer another possible explanation.
Cuz I could care less about you. I think you're an angry person. When they start insulting me I'll insult them back. There's no comparison between everyone else and you in terms of number of insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Cuz I could care less about you. I think you're an angry person. When they start insulting me I'll insult them back. There's no comparison between everyone else and you in terms of number of insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You should probably take yourself up on your own proposition and care less about him and how angry you think he is--a whole lot less . . .

Don’t put me in that group. I don’t insult anyone.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You're not Trump-like about it for sure. But when you run out of things to say, you always resort to saying I wasn't sharp enough to understand what really happened. That's your go-to dig. Easier than saying "you have a point", which I have yet to see you say, not once.

When they start insulting me I'll insult them back.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But whenever a conservative does exactly that, there you are, chastising them. Again, your own rules don't apply to you.

compared to you, yes.
Trying to discuss anything with you is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end, just not worth the amount of #^&#^&#^&#^&e you get.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don’t insult anyone.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and biden didn't know anything....

Cuz I could care less about you. I think you're an angry person. When they start insulting me I'll insult them back. There's no comparison between everyone else and you in terms of number of insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

turn that frown upside down.....

turn that frown upside down.....

Uphill every step
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But whenever a conservative does exactly that, there you are, chastising them. Again, your own rules don't apply to you.

Show me (other than this thread) where I've insulted you first compared to the many hundreds of times you've insulted me and other people first. I'm sure the others feel the way I do now. Why take Jim's constant insults - just give it back to him the way he insults everybody who he thinks is on the "other side"
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Show me (other than this thread) where I've insulted you first compared to the many hundreds of times you've insulted me and other people first. I'm sure the others feel the way I do now. Why take Jim's constant insults - just give it back to him the way he insults everybody who he thinks is on the "other side"
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

We talked about this...throwing out the word retard is deeply, deeply offensive to most people. But once again, you get to decide that it's OK when you use it.

Trying to discuss anything with you is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end, just not worth the amount of #^&#^&#^&#^&e you get.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Oh, you like to discuss things? You said it was OK when Obama pout kids in cages but bad when Trump does it, because Trump did it to more kids. I asked what the magic number was, and you called my mother a whore.

That's your idea of discussion. You're the one who can't do it. Again, you have problems with everyone. You're the common thread.

Oh, you like to discuss things? You said it was OK when Obama pout kids in cages but bad when Trump does it, because Trump did it to more kids. I asked what the magic number was, and you called my mother a whore.

That's your idea of discussion. You're the one who can't do it. Again, you have problems with everyone. You're the common thread.
Just look at the baby you support

Trump- 3 wives, 5 kids by 3 women, abortions by mistresses, non church goer, casino owner, multiple extramarital scandals, Impeached POTUS
Failed President
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Just look at the baby you support

Trump- 3 wives, 5 kids by 3 women, abortions by mistresses, non church goer, casino owner, multiple extramarital scandals, Impeached POTUS
Failed President
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I am well aware of his character. I would never, under any circumstances, voted for him in the GOP primary, for exactly those reasons. I agree with you on his character. You keep acting as if I defend his character. I don't.

Is your list complete? When he is judged, is it fair to leave out unemployment of 3.5%, lowest minority unemployment ever, kept us safe from jihadists, waived student loans for wounded vets, helped bring about criminal justice reform, tax cuts for 60% of Americans...why not include those things as well?

That's the difference between us. I prefer to judge him on everything he does, the good and the bad (there's plenty of both). You must dismiss all the good, you are not capable of acknowledging the good, in your mind it must be as simple as there only being bad, there not being anything good.

What do you think it means, that you focus on the bad and intentionally deny the good? Governors Cuomo and Newsom both praised his handling of the virus. They can admit he did some good. You can't. Why?

They had no choice or do you think Trump*s statement that they have to be nice to us meant nothing
And ponder this
So unregistered foreign agent for Hungary/Acting Director of National Intelligence/Amb. to Germany Ric GRENELL has given a Senator who spent July 4th in Moscow a list of where Mike Flynn was caught talking to foreign spies.

LET'S ANALYZE, SHALL WE?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

They had no choice or do you think Trump*s statement that they have to be nice to us meant nothing
And ponder this
So unregistered foreign agent for Hungary/Acting Director of National Intelligence/Amb. to Germany Ric GRENELL has given a Senator who spent July 4th in Moscow a list of where Mike Flynn was caught talking to foreign spies.

LET'S ANALYZE, SHALL WE?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pleas do.

Oh, you like to discuss things? You said it was OK when Obama pout kids in cages but bad when Trump does it, because Trump did it to more kids. I asked what the magic number was, and you called my mother a whore.

That's your idea of discussion. You're the one who can't do it. Again, you have problems with everyone. You're the common thread.
No, actually I said you’re a moron
I have since reconsidered and decided that you are merely an imbecile.
But just keep proving my point, little boy.
Those Jesuit spelling skills are not up to ESL levels.
Perhaps an immigrant could give you lessons.
Many of them have transferable skills that may have applications in your cubicle.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, give it a rest please.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, give it a rest please.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he's a little frustrated....

We talked about this...throwing out the word retard is deeply, deeply offensive to most people. But once again, you get to decide that it's OK when you use it.

see post 60

No, actually I said you’re a moron
I have since reconsidered and decided that you are merely an imbecile.
But just keep proving my point, little boy.
Those Jesuit spelling skills are not up to ESL levels.
Perhaps an immigrant could give you lessons.
Many of them have transferable skills that may have applications in your cubicle.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I am a world-class speller. What I can't do, is type.

see post 60

I saw it many times. In your mind, it was defensible. I can say the same thing about my posts.

Pete, give it a rest please.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'll stop too.

Thank You
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I saw it many times. In your mind, it was defensible. I can say the same thing about my posts.

So calling Dems. whores and people pussy, commenting on women's look is defensible?

Tell us again what a good Christian churchgoer you are.

he's a little frustrated....

Why is he frustrated - he is giving it out as good as he is getting it.

So a bridge too far is moron (or is it imbecile) but Pussy is ok?

You too Paul, Give it a rest.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why is he frustrated - he is giving it out as good as he is getting it.

So a bridge too far is moron (or is it imbecile) but Pussy is ok?

He called my wife, Da Pussy. You didn't have an objection to that. But when I call him that, you say that's inappropriate. Defend that.

So calling Dems. whores and people pussy, commenting on women's look is defensible?

Tell us again what a good Christian churchgoer you are.

Like you, I do it when it's done to me (or in his case, my mother, or my wife, or TDF's kids). It's OK for you to retaliate, but wrong when anyone ese does it.

So calling Dems. whores .

Not "dems". I use the whore label for any elected official who screws their constituents for money. I specifically called John Rowland, a Republican, a whore, and you know that, so you are now lying because the truth doesn't fit your argument. But in CT, the overwhelming majority of elected officials who have screwed us for money, happen to be democrats. While it might make you feel better if I blamed our problems in CT on Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan, that would also be stupid.

He called my wife, Da Pussy. You didn't have an objection to that. But when I call him that, you say that's inappropriate. Defend that.

My point was that pussy seemed to be ok but when moron was used, TDF decided that was enough.

Like you, I do it when it's done to me (or in his case, my mother, or my wife, or TDF's kids). It's OK for you to retaliate, but wrong when anyone ese does it.

That is not what I said.

Not "dems". I use the whore label for any elected official who screws their constituents for money. I specifically called John Rowland, a Republican, a whore, and you know that, so you are now lying because the truth doesn't fit your argument. But in CT, the overwhelming majority of elected officials who have screwed us for money, happen to be democrats. While it might make you feel better if I blamed our problems in CT on Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan, that would also be stupid.

You're a liar. You call Dems. whores. Then you tried to justify it when I called you out. You constantly make fun of to women's looks.

I always laugh when you come back and quote the same post multiple times.

"AND ANOTHER THING...…"

You're a liar. You call Dems. whores. Then you tried to justify it when I called you out. You constantly make fun of to women's looks.

I always laugh when you come back and quote the same post multiple times.

"AND ANOTHER THING...…"

I called the dems in CT who screwed us for money, whores. If the Republicans controlled the legislature for 95% of the last 40 years and did this to us, I'd call them whores. But unfortunately for you, it was democrats.

"You constantly make fun of to women's looks. "

So to you, making fun of Rachael Maddow is more objectionable, than his calling my mother a whore, my wife Da Pussy, and attacking Kevin's kids.

That makes all kinds of sense Paul. Stick with that.

I called the dems in CT who screwed us for money, whores. If the Republicans controlled the legislature for 95% of the last 40 years and did this to us, I'd call them whores. But unfortunately for you, it was democrats.

"You constantly make fun of to women's looks. "

So to you, making fun of Rachael Maddow is more objectionable, than his calling my mother a whore, my wife Da Pussy, and attacking Kevin's kids.

That makes all kinds of sense Paul. Stick with that.

You deserve the insults the way you insult people here - you always have and you always will. Kevin is a big enough man to defend his own kids.

Since the word whore is so easily used, you should call McConnel and the conserv. in Kentucky (and many, many other states) who look down on the liberal states but gladly take their $.

Both of you need to knock it off and get back on topic or you're both getting a vacation.

And I don't care who starts it, takes two to have a pissing contest. At some point somebody has to be the bigger man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You deserve the insults the way you insult people here - you always have and you always will. Kevin is a big enough man to defend his own kids.

Since the word whore is so easily used, you should call McConnel and the conserv. in Kentucky (and many, many other states) who look down on the liberal states but gladly take their $.

"You deserve the insults the way you insult people here "

But the liberals here who insult people (or their wives and children), they don't deserve insults. Right?

Paul, it's pretty simple. You resort to insults when you feel it's justified. And I resort to insults when I feel it's justified. We're both doing the same thing. Clearly, you agree with your justification more than you agree with mine, which is a matter of opinion, and that's fine.

It's a funny coincidence, that the ones who you call out for using insults, are all conservatives. That's just a coincidence, right? It's not because it's all political?

To be clear, I could literally care less when anyone here insults me personally (I did react when Pete brought my mother into it, that was my bad). I dish it out, and I have zero problem with taking it.

What I like to point out, is the obvious hypocrisy of someone who criticizes insults made by the republicans, and ignores/defends the insults made by the liberals.

That is not what I said.

OK. Have you ever criticized a fellow liberal, for insults here? I have suggested to Dangles that he back off, on multiple occasions.

Both of you need to knock it off and get back on topic or you're both getting a vacation.

And I don't care who starts it, takes two to have a pissing contest. At some point somebody has to be the bigger man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

To the original topic, even Chuck Todd apologized. Again, it's a funny coincidence that all of the errors, are moves that help democrats. Just a coincidence.

This is now almost a non story, as other, bigger things have happened this week to help Trump, like the Flynn mess, Obama's apparent involvement, and what the judge is doing with the DOJ's decision to drop the case. And the election in CA, which was supposed to be a real indicator of things to come, until the Republican won, and then PRESTO, now it doesn't mean anything, which it probably never did.

And the election in CA, which was supposed to be a real indicator of things to come, until the Republican won, and then PRESTO, now it doesn't mean anything, which it probably never did.

Katie Hill had flipped the seat for the first time in 26 years... It had been red before that. The Garcia guy was a good candidate. The democrat actually led after the first election but no one was over 50% so they had a runoff and Garcia won.

I wouldn't exactly call this an indicator of things to come....

OK. Have you ever criticized a fellow liberal, for insults here? I have suggested to Dangles that he back off, on multiple occasions.

I don't think there is any comparison between the daily insults you and the other conserv. throw out here. SD has NEVER posted anything remotely intelligent, just some of the most vile insults possible. Scott seems to be trying to dumb down his posts for the last 3 years.

Katie Hill had flipped the seat for the first time in 26 years... It had been red before that. The Garcia guy was a good candidate. The democrat actually led after the first election but no one was over 50% so they had a runoff and Garcia won.

I wouldn't exactly call this an indicator of things to come....

What happens in a single congressional district, rarely says anything about the country. But both sides pretend it does when it suits them.

Scott seems to be trying to dumb down his posts for the last 3 years.



has it been that long?

I don't think there is any comparison between the daily insults you and the other conserv. throw out here. .

In other words, no, you have never criticized a democrat. Pete went after TDFs children, called my mother a truck stop whore, called my wife Da Pussy. You can't speak against it. But I make fin of Rachael Maddow, and you get all bent out of shape.

Paul, all that matters is politics. We get it.

In other words, no, you have never criticized a democrat. Pete went after TDFs children, called my mother a truck stop whore, called my wife Da Pussy. You can't speak against it. But I make fin of Rachael Maddow, and you get all bent out of shape.

Paul, all that matters is politics. We get it.

You're constantly insulting people here - even PRIOR to anyone saying a word to you. You start posts with insults in them. So don't claim you don't have a part in it. He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was. Bad but not quite the same. Your on here 7 days a week - night and day. You refer to Dems as "the other side" as if people are at war. TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you. You've complained that Pete makes too many posts but for 8-10 years you had by far the most posts here. So how much is too many posts? Is it one more than you make?

So don't claim you don't have a part in it. He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was. Bad but not quite the same. Your on here 7 days a week - night and day. You refer to Dems as "the other side" as if people are at war. TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you. You've complained that Pete makes too many posts but for 8-10 years you had by far the most posts here. So how much is too many posts? Is it one more than you make?

"So don't claim you don't have a part in it" I never, ever claimed I don't do it.

"He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was"

If that's true, it's a distinction without any difference. He didn't make interrogatories about my wife or a bout TDF's children. He made statements. Statements that you didn't object to. Not only did you not object to what he said about TDF's kids, you objected when I called him out on it. You had no problem with what Pete said, but you had a problem when I called him out. But when you don't like what someone says, it's heroic when you call them out. Go ahead and explain that.


"TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you"

Yes he can, you're right. Apparently the only one who can't defend himself, is the only tattletale here. That's you. And again, it's OK when YOU criticize me for insulting others, but when I criticize someone else for insults, you say the insult recipient doesn't need my help. Does Rachael Maddow, Hilary Clinton, and Dan Malloy need your help? WHy do you defend them against me? How is that any different than what I did? Here's the difference. TDF is here, and they're not, and TDFs kids didn't do anything to Pete. So I'd call him out again for that in a second.

You and I are doing the same exact thing (we both use insults, we both criticize others for using over-the-top insults), but it's heroic when you do it, problematic when I do it.

"You've complained that Pete makes too many posts "

I point out, correctly (not complain) about how many anti-Trump threads he starts. I don't care how often he posts in a general sense. I could care less, and don't keep track, wouldn't even know how to look it up.

When you stop using insults, I'll recognize your position to tell me not to do the same. When you stop calling others out when they use insults you don't like, I'll recognize your position to tell me not to do the same.

For some reason you fail to recognize that you constantly insult people first something I normally do not do. As far as telling Pete to stop with the insults I'll do that when he starts insulting me. There is no comparison between you and I here or you and anyone else. You need to recognize that since you've been on this forum it is going downhill with your constant insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, please don't respond to this. TDF said "At some point somebody has to be the bigger man." Between you and PaulS, I think you're the bigger man. Let it rest. It's not going anywhere relevant or meaningful to the rest of us.

Ouch
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, please don't respond to this. TDF said "At some point somebody has to be the bigger man." Between you and PaulS, I think you're the bigger man. Let it rest. It's not going anywhere relevant or meaningful to the rest of us.

I do respect guys like TDF who don't ever take the bait when someone else throws an elbow, and I do aspire to that, and I routinely fall short, obviously.

I try to make a point not to argue with someone when they are obviously correct, as you are here! So OK.

I try to make a point not to argue with someone when they are obviously correct, as you are here! So OK.

Ouch
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Both of you need to knock it off and get back on topic or you're both getting a vacation.

And I don't care who starts it, takes two to have a pissing contest. At some point somebody has to be the bigger man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Whiners gonna whine
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Roly - Exactly, look who posted directly below that request.

Then the debutch tries to insult me by saying Jim is the better man (his insults are the reason I and many other ignore him) and then Jim basically says " I agree with you, I am better than Paul"

You guys throw so many insults around you don't even recognize when you do it anymore.

Roly - Exactly, look who posted directly below that request.

Then the debutch tries to insult me by saying Jim is the better man (his insults are the reason I and many other ignore him) and then Jim basically says " I agree with you, I am better than Paul"

You guys throw so many insults around you don't even recognize when you do it anymore.
No need to justify your stupidity friend. I have accepted you as is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No need to justify your stupidity friend. I have accepted you as is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I told you I would never associate with a vile scummy person like you.

Where were you yesterday? Trying to find a job to earn some $.

You pathetic overweight loser.

Roly - Exactly, look who posted directly below that request.

Then the debutch tries to insult me by saying Jim is the better man (his insults are the reason I and many other ignore him) and then Jim basically says " I agree with you, I am better than Paul"

You guys throw so many insults around you don't even recognize when you do it anymore.

Paul, what i was agreeing to in Detbuchs post, is that i should stop engaging in trading insults. that’s what i meant, nothing more. You get to choose whether or not to believe me. Fair enough?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Paul, what i was agreeing to in Detbuchs post, is that i should stop engaging in trading insults. that’s what i meant, nothing more. You get to choose whether or not to believe me. Fair enough?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fair enough.

Fair enough.

a breakthrough....I give it 45 minutes

Fair enough.

That's a start.

I told you I would never associate with a vile scummy person like you.

Where were you yesterday? Trying to find a job to earn some $.

You pathetic overweight loser.
You can’t be smart.

The reason I make this statement should be obvious. Allow me to explain...

You have stated many times how you don’t associate with people like me. No problem,you have a choice and I respect that. Yet the very next sentence is a question.....which means you are attempting to engage me.
THIS IS ASSOCIATING WITH ME

You can’t be even a little smart.
Now start your next whine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You can’t be smart.

The reason I make this statement should be obvious. Allow me to explain...

You have stated many times how you don’t associate with people like me. No problem,you have a choice and I respect that. Yet the very next sentence is a question.....which means you are attempting to engage me.
THIS IS ASSOCIATING WITH ME

You can’t be even a little smart.
Now start your next whine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

By associating I mean hanging out, going fishing, having a drink. Would not want to do that.

I will insult you back whenever I see you insult me.

a breakthrough....I give it 45 minutes

9:10 to 9:57....almost nailed it

By associating I mean hanging out, going fishing, having a drink. Would not want to do that.

I will insult you back whenever I see you insult me.

You are aware of what associating actually means?
Asking for a friend
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sure I know.