View Full Version : Putin’s puppet


Got Stripers
07-01-2020, 10:21 AM
If the intel is right and Trump wasn’t briefed or someone didn’t make damn sure he understood the gravity of the intel, then we have a serious problem. If the intel is right and Trump was briefed and clearly understood the gravity of the intel and did nothing, we have a serious problem. Either way if true Russia needs to be held accountable and part of that surely is not bringing them back into the G7.

Pete F.
07-01-2020, 11:08 AM
The White House says the president has been briefed on the alleged Russian bounties to kill U.S. soldiers. And, they are planning to brief the Gang of Eight on the issue today. But, Tweety is calling it all a hoax.

Yeah, it’s odd the WHOLE world is conspiring against 45 with all these hoaxes and even pretending to get sick and dying just to wreck his chances of re-election. The Deep World.


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The Russia Bounty story is just another made up by Fake News tale that is told only to damage me and the Republican Party. The secret source probably does not even exist, just like the story itself. If the discredited @nytimes has a source, reveal it. Just another HOAX!
7:09 AM · Jul 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

PaulS
07-01-2020, 12:19 PM
Most unprepared President in our lifetime. Lazy man.

Got Stripers
07-01-2020, 12:24 PM
Most unprepared President in our lifetime. Lazy man.

Come on he isn’t lazy, just look at all the golf he has somehow managed to get in.

Got Stripers
07-01-2020, 03:56 PM
Sad state of affairs when the White House messaging is to confirm Trump can walk, drink and now read.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
07-01-2020, 08:55 PM
Putin’s Puppet now says he doesn’t believe our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia is paying bounties to Taliban who kill U.S. troops. Why not? Because . . . wait for it:

Because Putin TOLD him Russia isn’t doing that. Shades of Helsinki. Can this really be happening?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

RickBomba
07-01-2020, 10:23 PM
Can I say something?

Why is it every time someone says the Silent Majority, all I can think of is those dumb ass bastards who couldn’t answer all the word prollems in mathy maths?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
07-02-2020, 07:02 AM
It really makes everyone, even his boot licking GOP cronies, question just what Putin has on Trump. Could be the pee tapes or it will come out with the taxes or some shady family business deal will be announced after he leaves.

Pete F.
07-02-2020, 12:11 PM
It's all connected by a common denominator

Today they arrested Ghislaine Maxwell and now we know why Colludi was at the White House yesterday, Barr couldn’t stop SDNY arrest of Ghislaine. Same reason they all got together at Lutnicks house next door to Epstein’s before his arrest.

SDNY just announced the Ghislaine Maxwell case, like the original Epstein case, is staffed by the Public Corruption Unit.

Sex trafficking cases do NOT run out of Public Corruption, unless there is some potential angle against a public official.

Two words to explain that: Alex Acosta

Pete F.
07-26-2020, 12:54 PM
On Thursday, Trump and Putin discussed arms control.

Today, Putin announced that the Russian Navy would be armed with hypersonic nuclear strike weapons and underwater nuclear drones.

Must have been another perfect phone call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch
07-26-2020, 01:57 PM
On Thursday, Trump and Putin discussed arms control.

Today, Putin announced that the Russian Navy would be armed with hypersonic nuclear strike weapons and underwater nuclear drones.

Must have been another perfect phone call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"The idea that 'correlation implies causation' is an example of a questionable-cause logical fallacy."

Pete F.
07-26-2020, 06:58 PM
Sure, Jan
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
07-29-2020, 10:24 AM
"It never reached my desk"..................... is not the brand of leadership our country needs.

And his call with his puppet master was about nuclear proliferation, his most significant actual actions in that area, both withdrawing from the INF Treaty and the Open Skies Treaty, have exposed us to more proliferation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HzB2tAUd64

Pete F.
08-18-2020, 12:23 PM
In its thousand page report released just now, ENDORSED BY REPUBLICANS, the Senate intelligence committee offers a raft of damning evidence of the Trump campaign’s eager acceptance of help from a foreign power during the 2016 campaign.
And it’s happening again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch
08-18-2020, 02:12 PM
In its thousand page report released just now, ENDORSED BY REPUBLICANS, the Senate intelligence committee offers a raft of damning evidence of the Trump campaign’s eager acceptance of help from a foreign power during the 2016 campaign.
And it’s happening again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

A few bullet points from the UK's Daily Mail on the report:

But the report does not conclude there was collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia

Instead Republicans and Democrats offered their own conclusions with Trump's party saying there was no collusion and Democrats arguing there was

Also takes aim at the FBI for using the Steele dossier without adequate vetting

Report also delves into reports of a 'kompromat' tape of Trump and says there is no evidence Russian intel had one


Sounds pretty much like old news.

Pete F.
08-18-2020, 02:43 PM
I'm sure this is no big deal but multi-year Senate Intel report has found that Trump's campaign manager was in constant touch with Russian intel officer, and that Roger Stone learned in advance about WikiLeaks dumps at "tasking" of Trump campaign.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch
08-18-2020, 02:49 PM
I'm sure this is no big deal but multi-year Senate Intel report has found that Trump's campaign manager was in constant touch with Russian intel officer, and that Roger Stone learned in advance about WikiLeaks dumps at "tasking" of Trump campaign.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Insufficient evidence of conspiracy. No big deal.

Got Stripers
08-18-2020, 03:01 PM
Insufficient evidence of conspiracy. No big deal.

I know no big deal, hey Russia if your listening, I could really use some help and don't forget I'm likely going to need even more in 2020, after I completely fu*k up as I usually do.

Pete F.
08-18-2020, 03:13 PM
Insufficient evidence of conspiracy. No big deal.

The bipartisan 966-page Senate report goes where Mueller feared to tread and unearths a gold mine of compelling evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia’s government to win the American presidency illegally.

And they’re still at it.

Trump told Mueller in written answers that he recalled no conversations with Stone about WikiLeaks.

SSCI: "The Committee assesses that Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone’s access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions."

We have the right to expect far more of a president than merely that he not be provably a criminal.

We have the right to expect of a president what the Framers expected & the Constitution and his oath demands.

detbuch
08-18-2020, 04:02 PM
The bipartisan 966-page Senate report goes where Mueller feared to tread and unearths a gold mine of compelling evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia’s government to win the American presidency illegally.

And they’re still at it.

Ho hum. More "compelling" evidence.

Trump told Mueller in written answers that he recalled no conversations with Stone about WikiLeaks.

Hillary established the validity of not recalling.

SSCI: "The Committee assesses that Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone’s access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions."

But Trump didn't recall. It's OK not to recall.

We have the right to expect far more of a president than merely that he not be provably a criminal.

Is that in Article 2?

We have the right to expect of a president what the Framers expected & the Constitution and his oath demands.

I don't recall the "right to expect." No doubt that's part of the vast residuum of rights inherent in the Constitution that the Progressives have pretty much ensured that Judges could interpret out of existence.

Good luck with your right to expect.

If we don't have the right to expect that a President should not be hampered by constant investigations ginned up by phony warrants, or that some executive agency would create those warrants along with a a "compellingly" elaborate narrative of presidential malfeasance built on fabricated evidence in order to criminally remove a President, what do we have a right to expect?

Got Stripers
08-18-2020, 04:15 PM
Well let’s look at the chronology, he encouraged Russian interference in our election before he won, so boo hoo, maybe had he played it fair and square life would be different, ah but then he is Trump so nothing would have changed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch
08-18-2020, 04:57 PM
Well let’s look at the chronology, he encouraged Russian interference in our election before he won, so boo hoo, maybe had he played it fair and square life would be different, ah but then he is Trump so nothing would have changed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Perhaps you haven't heard, Mueller mentioned this supposed encouragement you speak of, yet he concluded there was not sufficient evidence to claim that Trump conspired with Russia. Go figure.

Got Stripers
08-18-2020, 05:22 PM
Perhaps you haven't heard, Mueller mentioned this supposed encouragement you speak of, yet he concluded there was not sufficient evidence to claim that Trump conspired with Russia. Go figure.

Nobody is fooled no matter how you spin it, a thousand more pages to show his campaign actively sought help from Russia, then he does it again via Ukraine, lately it’s the USPS and now he wants to meet with Putin ahead of the election, when his taxes are finally public it will all likely make sense even to you.

spence
08-18-2020, 05:43 PM
Perhaps you haven't heard, Mueller mentioned this supposed encouragement you speak of, yet he concluded there was not sufficient evidence to claim that Trump conspired with Russia. Go figure.
Because of encrypted transmissions and dishonest testimony...

My god.

detbuch
08-18-2020, 06:13 PM
Because of encrypted transmissions and dishonest testimony...

My god.

Because of his exhaustive, expensive, investigation . . .

Do you have a god?

spence
08-18-2020, 06:15 PM
Because of his exhaustive, expensive, investigation . . .

Do you have a god?

Just restating what Mueller said, backed up by the bi-partisan Senate report.

detbuch
08-18-2020, 06:18 PM
Nobody is fooled no matter how you spin it, a thousand more pages to show his campaign actively sought help from Russia, then he does it again via Ukraine, lately it’s the USPS and now he wants to meet with Putin ahead of the election, when his taxes are finally public it will all likely make sense even to you.

Not my spin. As the Daily Mail stated: "But the report does not conclude there was collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia" . . . in spite of your spin.

detbuch
08-18-2020, 06:19 PM
Just restating what Mueller said, backed up by the bi-partisan Senate report.

Mueller said there was not sufficient evidence to determine that Trump conspired with Russia. And the Senate report did not conclude that he did.

Got Stripers
08-18-2020, 06:43 PM
Not my spin. As the Daily Mail stated: "But the report does not conclude there was collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia" . . . in spite of your spin.

He can’t win on his job rating, certainly not on handling this heath crisis (wait until fall not even close to over), when you trash the economy that ship sailed, I’m pretty sure it’s not on foreign relations, oh wait his empathy for American lives loss due to his incompetence opps that won’t play, man he can’t even say look at all the 2016 promises I made good on, what you have left is cheating with foreign help or his go to black and white card. You and your little band of hard core Trumpets are who he plays to, it’s as predictable as your defense of his piss poor performance, VOTE for change or live with the sh*t show that will follow.

Got Stripers
08-18-2020, 07:21 PM
Hey I heard a rumor that if elected a Trump is nominating the My Pillow Owner Lindell to head the CDC and the Covid task force.

detbuch
08-18-2020, 07:24 PM
He can’t win on his job rating, certainly not on handling this heath crisis (wait until fall not even close to over), when you trash the economy that ship sailed, I’m pretty sure it’s not on foreign relations, oh wait his empathy for American lives loss due to his incompetence opps that won’t play, man he can’t even say look at all the 2016 promises I made good on, what you have left is cheating with foreign help or his go to black and white card. You and your little band of hard core Trumpets are who he plays to, it’s as predictable as your defense of his piss poor performance, VOTE for change or live with the sh*t show that will follow.

Talk about spin . . . WOW . . . a real sh*t show of it!

Pete F.
08-18-2020, 08:16 PM
The report states flatly that Konstantin Kiliminik is a Russian intelligence officer. So let that sink in: Donald Trump's campaign chairman worked closely with a Russian intelligence officer. Just how can you argue the FBI had no predicate to investigate?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
08-18-2020, 08:48 PM
The report states flatly that Konstantin Kiliminik is a Russian intelligence officer. So let that sink in: Donald Trump's campaign chairman worked closely with a Russian intelligence officer. Just how can you argue the FBI had no predicate to investigate?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
08-18-2020, 08:49 PM
Talk about spin . . . WOW . . . a real sh*t show of it!

Mueller could only use evidence that would be admissible in court to reach his conclusions. Even if he couldn't prove a crime (there was lots of obstruction) the GOP gave Trump a pass on soliciting, accepting & benefiting from Russian help to win. Fail.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch
08-18-2020, 09:23 PM
Mueller could only use evidence that would be admissible in court to reach his conclusions.

Duh . . .

detbuch
08-18-2020, 09:24 PM
The report states flatly that Konstantin Kiliminik is a Russian intelligence officer. So let that sink in: Donald Trump's campaign chairman worked closely with a Russian intelligence officer. Just how can you argue the FBI had no predicate to investigate?


Basically old news that you can re-hash all you want, I'm not interested. What the Senate report said, among a lot of old news is “We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,”

Got Stripers
08-19-2020, 04:43 AM
Basically old news that you can re-hash all you want, I'm not interested. What the Senate report said, among a lot of old news is “We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,”

I really think your board name needs to be changed to DaBarr as it would be more in line with how you roll. Much like Barr you are the resident defender of Trump and as I said above nobody is fooled.

Pete F.
08-19-2020, 06:31 AM
Basically old news that you can re-hash all you want, I'm not interested. What the Senate report said, among a lot of old news is “We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,”

Wrong

The person running the Trump campaign had a close associate who is a Russian intelligence officer, with whom he was sharing confidential campaign information as Russia mounted its effort to help Trump get elected.
As part of that effort, Russia broke into Democratic systems, then passed damaging information to WikiLeaks for carefully timed release. The president’s longtime friend had a line into the “leak” part of Russia’s hack-and-leak, through which he learned the subject and timing of upcoming leaks and kept Trump personally informed.
If that’s not “collusion,” what is?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
08-19-2020, 06:35 AM
Basically old news that you can re-hash all you want, I'm not interested. What the Senate report said, among a lot of old news is “We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,”
That’s not what the report said, it’s what Rubio said and he’s either lying or he didn’t read his own report.

This once again blows Trump and Barr’s claims of a hoax to bits and highlighting that Trump lied to the FBI.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
08-19-2020, 07:54 AM
Everyone in Trump's orbit lied to Mueller & SSCI about the campaigns involvement with Russia. People don't lie under oath & risk perjury charges unless they are hiding something. Something big. We all know what it is. And the GOP gave Trump a pass for it.

The committee made a bi-partisan CRIMINAL REFERRAL of Don Jr., Kushner, Bannon & others to the DC US Attorney’s Office.

No wonder Barr was so desperate to pull career US Attorney Jessie Liu from her position to install his lackey. Do we think that the lackey, Tim Shea, who dumbed down the Roger Stone sentence AND tried to tank the Mike Flynn case was going to let Don Jr., Jared and Bannon be prosecuted?

PaulS
08-19-2020, 08:14 AM
Where's SD to post Greatest President ever?

PaulS
08-19-2020, 08:28 AM
“On numerous occasions over the course of his time of the Trump Campaign, Manafort sought to secretly share internal campaign information with Kilimnik. … Manafort briefed Kilimnik on sensitive campaign polling data and the campaign’s strategy for beating Hillary Clinton.”



“While there were several problems with the F.B.I.’s FISA renewals for Page, the committee assesses that Page’s previous ties to Russian intelligence officers, coupled with his Russian travel, justified the F.B.I.’s initial concerns about Page.”


“Campaigns should notify F.B.I. of all foreign offers of assistance, and all staff should be made aware of this expectation. In order to not encourage, or amplify foreign influence efforts, campaigns should reject the use of foreign origin material especially if it has potentially been obtained through the violation of U.S. law.”

And yet Trump has repeatedly said he would accept foreign aid in his election.

detbuch
08-19-2020, 09:33 AM
That’s not what the report said, it’s what Rubio said and he’s either lying or he didn’t read his own report.

It's his report not yours. He knows what's in his report.
And he's eminently qualified to say what's in it.

This once again blows Trump and Barr’s claims of a hoax to bits and highlighting that Trump lied to the FBI.


That's what you claim.

Pete F.
08-19-2020, 09:57 AM
Among many other damning findings, the Rubio Cotton Report confirms what Mueller told Representative Val Demings on July 24, 2019 during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee:

The President of the United States lied under oath to the Special Counsel’s Office.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
08-19-2020, 09:59 AM
Roger Stone also lied under oath to protect Trump, and he was convicted by a jury and ordered to jail because of it. But then Trump repaid Stone’s criminal “loyalty” by abusing his pardon power to make sure that Stone never set foot in jail for lying to protect Trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence
08-19-2020, 10:33 AM
It's his report not yours. He knows what's in his report. And he's eminently qualified to say what's in it.
So I guess he's a liar then.

detbuch
08-19-2020, 11:03 AM
So I guess he's a liar then.

Guess whatever you wish. You've guessed wrong before.

detbuch
08-19-2020, 11:17 AM
Among many other damning findings, the Rubio Cotton Report confirms what Mueller told Representative Val Demings on July 24, 2019 during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee:

The President of the United States lied under oath to the Special Counsel’s Office.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"But that is not what Mueller said under oath . . .

"Mueller's report accuses a number of figures in Trump's orbit of lying but does not accuse Trump of doing so, instead saying that some of Trump's written responses were “incomplete or imprecise.” Recently disclosed sections of the report show the special counsel only raised the possibility that Trump lied, while also leaving open the possibility that Trump simply did not recall his conversations with Stone from two years prior."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/andrew-weissmann-warps-mueller-testimony-about-trump-written-answers

Pete F.
08-19-2020, 11:57 AM
No, that’s what the Rubio Cotton report said

Apparently his memory is not as good as the Stable Genius claims
Person woman man camera TV
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
08-19-2020, 12:08 PM
Where's SD to post Greatest President ever?

Be careful what you wish for, it’s been almost civil around here with him busy having fun in the new boat and home his better half bought him.

spence
08-20-2020, 07:23 AM
No, that’s what the Rubio Cotton report said

Apparently his memory is not as good as the Stable Genius claims
Person woman man camera TV
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
It also said there’s no evidence of Ukrainian meddling to help Clinton, that the Russian interference was substantial and that Trump and many Republicans have actively participated in pushing Russian propaganda to cover it all up.

Every single Republican on the Senate Intel committee signed off on this.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw
08-20-2020, 07:44 AM
Be careful what you wish for, it’s been almost civil around here with him busy having fun in the new boat and home his better half bought him.

he's probably having a great time chasing tuna while you jealous dummies spend your days here complaining about him and trump:hihi:

wdmso
08-20-2020, 07:54 AM
FYI. This is a GOP sanctioned Intel report

PaulS
08-20-2020, 08:19 AM
he's probably having a great time chasing tuna while you jealous dummies spend your days here complaining about him and trump:hihi:

Personally I can charter a tuna trip if I want. I am not jealous of him and actually feel sorry for him and his family. You should see how many posts you have here - and usually there are snarky posts meant to piss someone off - sad individual.

Pete F.
08-20-2020, 08:20 AM
There’s no doubt Tweety embraced Russia’s work to help him win our election in 2016. Apparently the GOP thinks Putin wants what’s best for America. If you disagree, Vote.

detbuch
08-20-2020, 10:55 AM
There’s no doubt Tweety embraced Russia’s work to help him win our election in 2016. Apparently the GOP thinks Putin wants what’s best for America. If you disagree, Vote.

Whatever embracing you claim went on, there is not sufficient evidence of conspiring. And however much Russia tried to interfere in the election, there is no real evidence of it influencing it or of succeeding in anything other than sowing the kind of massive discord we are witnessing now.

I doubt that Putin wanted to see the U.S. economy grow the way it did before covid. I don't think he wanted to see the unemployment rate increase the way it did, or the stock market to continue its crazy upward bound, or to see the US redo NAFTA and make trade deals with Pacific Rim countries. If he did, maybe he did want what's best for America.

scottw
08-20-2020, 03:42 PM
Personally I can charter a tuna trip if I want.

.

they won't let you on the boat in skinny pants...just sayin'

PaulS
08-20-2020, 03:50 PM
they won't let you on the boat in skinny pants...just sayin'

Can't ruin those expensive pants so I bought a pair of grundens for my boat. Just got to go out on the boat once to try them out.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
08-30-2020, 08:44 PM
No collaboration?
What a crock of bull.
Tweety is in with the Russians up to his eyeballs.

New York Times: Justice Department secretly curtailed investigation into Russian election interference
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
08-31-2020, 11:30 AM
D.C. Circuit DENIES Michael Flynn's petition to force the federal judge on his case to grant DOJ's motion to dismiss the prosecution, in a reversal of the initial three-judge panel ruling in Flynn's favor.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
09-20-2020, 07:11 AM
Julian Assange was offered a presidential pardon if he helped to resolve the "ongoing speculation about Russian involvement" in the hacking of Democratic National Committee emails leaked during the 2016 U.S. election campaign, a London court was told Friday.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
09-21-2020, 06:51 PM
New Tweety campaign slogan

"I like Putin. He likes me."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
12-15-2020, 07:44 AM
Scope of Russian Hack Becomes Clear: Multiple US Agencies Were Hit- State Department, the Department of Homeland Security and parts of the Pentagon. Investigators trying to determine the extent military, intelligence community & nuclear labs were affected.

It never gets old or any less absurd to recall that Trump wanted to have a joint cyber unit with Putin.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso
12-15-2020, 08:06 AM
Scope of Russian Hack Becomes Clear: Multiple US Agencies Were Hit- State Department, the Department of Homeland Security and parts of the Pentagon. Investigators trying to determine the extent military, intelligence community & nuclear labs were affected.

It never gets old or any less absurd to recall that Trump wanted to have a joint cyber unit with Putin.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Newsmax AoN Breitbart. None of their story’s name Russia go to the comment section they all think it’s the CCP and Biden a Chinese plant
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
12-15-2020, 01:50 PM
Now Putin and McConnell have both acknowledged that Biden is the next president. Guess which one Trump won't criticize for it?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw
12-15-2020, 01:58 PM
Newsmax AoN Breitbart. None of their story’s name Russia go to the comment section they all think it’s the CCP and Biden a Chinese plant
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I bet this makes you feel like a foreign agent infiltrating enemy lines...nice work..keep it up....

wdmso
12-15-2020, 09:12 PM
I bet this makes you feel like a foreign agent infiltrating enemy lines...nice work..keep it up....


So far, the list of affected U.S. government entities includes the Commerce Department, Department of Homeland Security, the Pentagon, the Treasury Department, the U.S. Postal Service and the National Institutes of Health.


All by the Russians and not a peep from the White House or Republicans house or senate?.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F.
12-20-2020, 09:30 AM
That’s because Trump's creed, described here - "Everyone is corrupt, everyone is on the take, everyone mistreats women, we’re living in a world without morals or principles and all that matters is whether you win" - is also Putin's
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nebe
12-20-2020, 09:54 AM
Trumps silence speaks volumes.

First Lady Melanoma could be a Russian agent and is controlling him... far fetched? Yes. Impossible? Just look at the behavior.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sea Dangles
12-20-2020, 11:30 AM
He is clearly the greatest president in the history of our lifetime.

wdmso
12-20-2020, 11:37 AM
He is clearly the greatest president in the history of our lifetime.

If doing nothing is your how you measure his Greatness, your absolutely correct, he’s a a GOAT
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
12-20-2020, 01:24 PM
It just yet another money grab, I wonder how much SD, Scott, Jim and others have contributed to the con making millions on the way out the door.

Pete F.
01-05-2021, 10:56 AM
Tweety delivers a line that is an absolute jackpot for adversaries to democracy:

"We run all over the world telling people how to run their elections. We don't even know how to run ours."

Champagne is flowing in Tweety’s good friends offices in North Korea, China, Russia and every wannabe dictator worldwide.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT
01-05-2021, 01:36 PM
If doing nothing is your how you measure his Greatness, your absolutely correct, he’s a a GOAT
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

doing nothing...yet a record number of americans said in a 2020 poll, that they were better off than 4 years ago. Gallup does that poll every presidential election year, and never before have as many americans said they were better off.

this list is “nothing” to you? I’ll start by saying he had some big failures as they all do , like no i
orovents i’m healthcare and letting violent riots co to use in liberal states whose governors couldn’t keep peace, he added too much debt.

the list of “nothing”:

tax cuts ( big expansion in child tax credits, helping people
with kids)
historically low unemployment
lowest minority unemployment ever
increased funding for black colleges ( just what a racist would
do)
criminal justice reform ( just what a racist would
do)
created economic opportunity zones in blighted cities ( just what a racist would do)
progress towards peace in the middle east
routed ISIS
didn’t send kids to die in questionable wars
stock market records

did i fabricate any of that? did any of those things not happen during his tenure?

This list, is why even in the middle of a pandemic, a record number of americans said they were better off than 4 years ago. I know how much you hate that. But it’s true.

trump is a disgusting human being, a disgrace as a husband and father. his results as the ceo of america, are the best since at least reagan.

If all you can do is say he did nothing, hat tells us more about you, than it does about trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

zimmy
01-05-2021, 02:56 PM
If doing nothing is your how you measure his Greatness, your absolutely correct, he’s a a GOAT
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Or if you are a 3 year old, you would think that.

scottw
01-05-2021, 03:10 PM
Or if you are a 3 year old, you would think that.

Are you calling Wayne a 3 year old?I thought you guys were on the same team?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers
01-05-2021, 03:20 PM
Are you calling Wayne a 3 year old?I thought you guys were on the same team?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Follow along now it’s not that hard, Wayne was responding to the most boring repetitive post of SD and Zimmy was piling on.

scottw
01-05-2021, 05:59 PM
Follow along now it’s not that hard, Wayne was responding to the most boring repetitive post of SD and Zimmy was piling on.

then he should have quoted what SD said ....spelling... like voting, isn't that hard...:humpty:

Got Stripers
01-05-2021, 06:03 PM
then he should have quoted what SD said ....spelling... like voting, isn't that hard...:humpty:

Still hanging on to voting, news flash the voting is over, he lost. Can’t wait to see whether his lap dog Pence is going to do his job or attempt to please his mob boss.