Raider Ronnie
09-17-2021, 07:15 PM
Well isn’t that just like the left !
This guy Miley should be put in front of a firing squad and no mention of it here.
🤔
This guy Miley should be put in front of a firing squad and no mention of it here.
🤔
View Full Version : Crickets Raider Ronnie 09-17-2021, 07:15 PM Well isn’t that just like the left ! This guy Miley should be put in front of a firing squad and no mention of it here. 🤔 spence 09-17-2021, 08:09 PM Please learn how to spell his name before you discredit an American asset. Dumb ass. Pete F. 09-17-2021, 09:39 PM Do you think the MAGA crowd insisting General Milley committed treason realize they're calling attention to the fact that everyone around their insane orange God king in the last months of his presidency thought he was completely insane and a danger to the country? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device detbuch 09-17-2021, 11:17 PM Do you think the MAGA crowd insisting General Milley committed treason realize they're calling attention to the fact that everyone around their insane orange God king in the last months of his presidency thought he was completely insane and a danger to the country? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device If "everyone around" him thought he was "completely insane" and acting like a "God king", orange or otherwise, there was, and is, a constitutional method of removing him from office. That method does not include a general conspiring with an enemy of the United States, nor even with an ally. Nor does the Constitution give the government agencies and appointed bureaucrats which all comprise what is referred to as "the Deep State," the power to undermine the President, especially because of unfounded or unproven opinions. And it would be treason if it were done to aid and comfort an enemy of the United States. That you do not seem to see the great danger to "our Democracy" such actions and the condoning of them are, shows how insane is your desire to destroy Trump, even if it is done by unconstitutional, treacherous, and dangerous ways. Got Stripers 09-18-2021, 04:46 AM If "everyone around" him thought he was "completely insane" and acting like a "God king", orange or otherwise, there was, and is, a constitutional method of removing him from office. That method does not include a general conspiring with an enemy of the United States, nor even with an ally. Nor does the Constitution give the government agencies and appointed bureaucrats which all comprise what is referred to as "the Deep State," the power to undermine the President, especially because of unfounded or unproven opinions. And it would be treason if it were done to aid and comfort an enemy of the United States. That you do not seem to see the great danger to "our Democracy" such actions and the condoning of them are, shows how insane is your desire to destroy Trump, even if it is done by unconstitutional, treacherous, and dangerous ways. Boy is that a dumb response, twice this clown was impeached and his GOP senators failed to take action, so in so little time left they should have tried again? The further away from the election he got the more unhinged he got, I’m glad someone was taking steps to avoid him from using the world ending power I frankly don’t think one man should have. Jim in CT 09-18-2021, 06:40 AM Boy is that a dumb response, twice this clown was impeached and his GOP senators failed to take action, so in so little time left they should have tried again? The further away from the election he got the more unhinged he got, I’m glad someone was taking steps to avoid him from using the world ending power I frankly don’t think one man should have. so it’s “dumb” to suggest we follow the rules, when doing so doesn’t give us the result we want? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-18-2021, 07:28 AM The US Department of Defense acknowledges in its law manual that "the law of war governs the use of nuclear weapons". The responsibility to obey the law "runs from the top down - right down to the crew member on the submarine". If the president orders an illegal strike, anyone who carries out that order is potentially liable for war crimes. They'd have a duty to say "no". In the real world, it would not be an easy thing to stop. First one officer says it is a war crime, he’s relieved of command and perhaps more till you get to Bork, who pushes the button because he believes the president has complete control without question. An unprovoked nuclear strike with the accompanying collateral damage would be considered by most of the world to be a war crime, there’s no exception for the guy with a bigger button. General Milley worked within the rules, luckily nothing happened. The same concerns were there in the last days of the Nixon presidency. As far as talking to his equal in the Chinese armed forces, the SECDEF knew, it happened in a room full of members of various agencies and a readout was produced and distributed. Now do TFGs meeting with Putin, with no one and no notes Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-18-2021, 07:33 AM Well isn’t that just like the left ! This guy Miley should be put in front of a firing squad and no mention of it here. 🤔 It was a perfect phone call that’s all Milley need to say , it worked for Trump you believed it.. FYI the phone call was approved by the secretary of defense with 13 others on both calls not surprised you left that part out , or why the call was needed Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-18-2021, 07:42 AM so it’s “dumb” to suggest we follow the rules, when doing so doesn’t give us the result we want? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device What rules weren’t followed by the. General We know what rules Trump didn’t follow.. but no outrage over that from the right Yet Trump still claiming the election was rigged while he show’s support for those who tried to overturn the election in his name on Jan 6 Talk about cricket’s Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-18-2021, 07:52 AM so it’s “dumb” to suggest we follow the rules, when doing so doesn’t give us the result we want? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device These deserves 2 different responses does this statement apply to the entirety of Republicans and Trump? After they lost the election , and they filed bogus lawsuits after lawsuits based on lies or changed election laws just because they lost and had to curb voter turnout? And what about Trumps call to GA to find votes I don’t recall if that bothered you as much as Biden being told who to pick during a press conference ? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-18-2021, 08:22 AM These deserves 2 different responses does this statement apply to the entirety of Republicans and Trump? After they lost the election , and they filed bogus lawsuits after lawsuits based on lies or changed election laws just because they lost and had to curb voter turnout? And what about Trumps call to GA to find votes I don’t recall if that bothered you as much as Biden being told who to pick during a press conference ? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device see here’s the difference…i have said very explicitly that the january 6h rioters should be arrested and prosecuted. but many many liberals defended the blm rioters, dismissed it as mostly peaceful. i’m not sure what to think of what this guy did. he’s saying it’s normal, lots of other brass are saying it’s a court martial level offense. how many times do i need to say it? Trump is a morally bankrupt reptile. and he’s not above the law. but you will never criticize biden for anything. You keep acting as if i’m Sean Hannity, and you do it because pretending i’m as rabidly partisan as you are, is easier for you to deal with, than the reality that i’m fair and truthful. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-18-2021, 08:28 AM What rules weren’t followed by the. General We know what rules Trump didn’t follow.. but no outrage over that from the right Yet Trump still claiming the election was rigged while he show’s support for those who tried to overturn the election in his name on Jan 6 Talk about cricket’s Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device it’s not against the rules for a general to contact his counterpart in the military of our largest global adversary, and promise to let them know in advance if we are ever planning action against them? that’s not promising to commit treason f we were at war with china? Maybe offering to commit treason in the future isn’t a crime. i’m not sure it’s a good thing, though. That’s if he did in fact offer to warn them ahead of time, if we were to plan action against them. That’s hat Bob Woodward claims, and i didn’t see him deny it, maybe he did. “no outrage from the right” the russia thing was a joke, and i’ve said he was reckless with his claims about the stolen election, bough i don’t believe it’s reasonable to say he invited the riot when he said to “peacefully and patriotically” go to the capital. those were his exact words. He didn’t do nearly enough to try and stop it. I’m not sorry he’s gone, though obviously i wouldn’t have selected biden to replace him. I don’t know how i can be more honest than that. Have you ever criticized Biden? Plagiarism, compulsive lying, a rape allegation against him that’s way more credible than the allegation against kavanaugh, obvious signs of corruption with Hunter selling influence. telling blacks that republicans want to put them in chains, calling a black congressman boy, and now showing obvious signs of dimentia. Do you have anything to say about that? you’ll deflect all of it. Biden said you can’t be black u less you support him. you said you were ok with that. not a syllable of criticism. who can be honest between us, and who will always, always defend his side? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-18-2021, 08:34 AM see here’s the difference…i have said very explicitly that the january 6h rioters should be arrested and prosecuted. but many many liberals defended the blm rioters, dismissed it as mostly peaceful. i’m not sure what to think of what this guy did. he’s saying it’s normal, lots of other brass are saying it’s a court martial level offense. how many times do i need to say it? Trump is a morally bankrupt reptile. and he’s not above the law. but you will never criticize biden for anything. You keep acting as if i’m Sean Hannity, and you do it because pretending i’m as rabidly partisan as you are, is easier for you to deal with, than the reality that i’m fair and truthful. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim clearly your not The conservatives I am speaking of this is Trumps party .. and no current brass is saying anything about it being a court martial offense , the facts speak for themself no secret no personal cell phone all in the open I am far from a rabid partisan I am objective enough to BS when the right decide to manufacture their canned outrage as Truth .. Like most MAGA hero’s who Milley was until Milley was caught choosing the constitution over Trump .. they go from hero to Traitor overnight and there is a long list of them to include mike pence In the MAGA universe and Republicans world everything is a lie fake news or everyone’s else fault .. It’s Amazing to watch the Party of No in action Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-18-2021, 08:37 AM Jim clearly your not The conservatives I am speaking of this is Trumps party .. and no current brass is saying anything about it being a court martial offense , the facts speak for themself no secret no personal cell phone all in the open I am far from a rabid partisan I am objective enough to BS when the right decide to manufacture their canned outrage as Truth .. Like most MAGA hero’s who Milley was until Milley was caught choosing the constitution over Trump .. they go from hero to Traitor overnight and there is a long list of them to include mike pence Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device you do act like a rabid partisan, i’ve never seen you agree with a conservative here. And a sincere thank you for saying Im not the brain dead conservative you’re speaking about, and of course there are plenty of those out there, and they deserve to be mocked. maybe we can try to elevate this a bit. gotta run, coaching little league. enjoy the nice weekend, sincerely. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-18-2021, 08:45 AM you do act like a rabid partisan, i’ve never seen you agree with a conservative here. And a sincere thank you for saying Im not the brain dead conservative you’re speaking about, and of course there are plenty of those out there, and they deserve to ebe mocked. maybe we can try to elevate this a bit. gotta run, coaching little league. enjoy the nice weekend, sincerely. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device I will when conservatives present something that makes sense and isn’t a lie … but that doesn’t happen often and when it does their own party turns on them .. can you say Liz Chaney 32 years in corrections and 25 in the military I consider myself a moderate . But by today’s GOP standard Iam married to AOC LOL Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-18-2021, 09:29 AM I will when conservatives present something that makes sense and isn’t a lie … but that doesn’t happen often and when it does their own party turns on them .. can you say Liz Chaney 32 years in corrections and 25 in the military I consider myself a moderate . But by today’s GOP standard Iam married to AOC LOL Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device right, democrats are ok with dissention which is why they are all being nice to joe manchin right now. and why they are so respectful to black conservatives. AOC literally said joe manchin is killing people. democrat is always right, the conservative is always wrong. always. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device detbuch 09-18-2021, 02:59 PM The US Department of Defense acknowledges in its law manual that "the law of war governs the use of nuclear weapons". The responsibility to obey the law "runs from the top down - right down to the crew member on the submarine". If the president orders an illegal strike, anyone who carries out that order is potentially liable for war crimes. The President did not order a strike. They'd have a duty to say "no". Yes, that is their duty. But this is not remotely like what actually happened. It is not their duty to assume he would or might order a strike. Nor is it their duty to warn and cooperate with an adversary as to what might happen. And worse, the adversary might act preemptively. The adversary may have strike plans of its own about which they won't warn anybody. Or a warning might actually incite it to strike first. Or it might give comfort to the enemy to know that someone of authority would give it a heads up on what he will or will not do. And give it the comfort to know that it is not in much danger of being nuked if it continues its plan to dominate the Pacific rim. It is certainly not the duty of a military officer to personally psychoanalyze the President and act upon his personal diagnosis. If the mental health of the President is in serious question, then it should be clinically and professionally tested. Or if, as you suggest, "everyone around him" thought he was completely insane and acting like a God king and a danger to the country, it would have been easy to invoke the 25th amendment and remove him from office. In the real world, it would not be an easy thing to stop. First one officer says it is a war crime, he’s relieved of command and perhaps more till you get to Bork, who pushes the button because he believes the president has complete control without question. An unprovoked nuclear strike with the accompanying collateral damage would be considered by most of the world to be a war crime, there’s no exception for the guy with a bigger button. But this supposition is not what happened. And if we must act on such suppositions, then who is in charge? And on what grounds--supposition, maybe, shoulda woulda coulda? This is a recipe for chaos, which could even be more of a threat of war and self destruction. All manner of suppositions and possibilities could be conceived by such a lack of discipline and certainty of command. It sounds like you're trying to rationalize his action and give it a sort of logical, rational, imprimatur of pro forma approval. General Milley worked within the rules, luckily nothing happened. The same concerns were there in the last days of the Nixon presidency. Which rules? What rule says you must act in such a way without first having a conversation with the President about his intentions and discussing the Pros and Cons and legality of those intentions. What rule says you have a right to assume the President's intentions, or even the possibility of them, and to reach some agreement with an enemy about your suppositions. As far as talking to his equal in the Chinese armed forces, the SECDEF knew, it happened in a room full of members of various agencies and a readout was produced and distributed. He talked to his equal in the Chinese armed forces, but not to the President? The SECDEF knew but the President wasn't informed? This sounds like a coup. And a coup not founded on facts, but on supposed possibility. Where does such a procedure end? The President is the Commander in Chief. The SECDEF and the generals are under his command. If they can go around the President, in this presumed but unproven situation, what's to stop them in other and possibly all other situations? Just assume the President is crazy and so circumvent any possibility he has to act? Now do TFGs meeting with Putin, with no one and no notes Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device I think you have already done that . . . more than once. detbuch 09-18-2021, 03:12 PM Boy is that a dumb response, twice this clown was impeached and his GOP senators failed to take action, so in so little time left they should have tried again? The further away from the election he got the more unhinged he got, I’m glad someone was taking steps to avoid him from using the world ending power I frankly don’t think one man should have. I wasn't thinking impeachment. There is the easier route, the 25th Amendment. Pete said everyone around him thought Trump was insane and a danger to the country. Everyone around him also included important and powerful republican Senators and Congressmen as well as the Vice President. If, indeed, they all thought that Trump was insane and a danger to the country, they could easily have removed him via the 25th amendment. Got Stripers 09-18-2021, 03:31 PM I wasn't thinking impeachment. There is the easier route, the 25th Amendment. Pete said everyone around him thought Trump was insane and a danger to the country. Everyone around him also included important and powerful republican Senators and Congressmen as well as the Vice President. If, indeed, they all thought that Trump was insane and a danger to the country, they could easily have removed him via the 25th amendment. Sure that might happen, Pence the orange man lap dog, your debate starts and ends from your perspective. We’re you in the room? Did you somehow get a briefing or full transcript? Sounds to me like these calls were to assure people Trump might seem unhinged, but we have rules in place to prevent things from happening. Good for him and I really don’t give a rats a*rse if you think otherwise. nightfighter 09-18-2021, 03:55 PM Who the #^&#^&#^&#^& in their right mind could possibly be ready to defend, support, and bring Trump back to any political office in this country???? He, alone, has DESTROYED the Republican party. Talk about sheeple.... Look how the Republicans in Congress cower in fear of him. He said he wanted, and likely told, Mike Pence, to do the "right thing" during the certification of the electoral college. We know what that meant. We ALL know what he meant, including RR, Detbuch, and ScottW. Yet you back his immoral platform. This partisan chit is destroying the country, and maybe this site. No one is above criticism here, including Biden, OBama, and any other elected official you care to bring into the fight. While I do have issues with Milley's actions from a constitutional view, I do think he did the right thing, in that moment, that period of time, to diffuse any possible wrong interpretation of what might come out of the Trump WH. If the right ever wants to take back the White House, it better jettison Trump, now and forever, in order to be taken seriously by many former supporters of their platforms. Until Trump is gone for good, I will not in good conscience be able to support their candidates. I am not going to proof, or rewrite this. Just shot from the hip because I am so damn mad at how he (Trump) screwed up a good thing, AND all these hangers on, like the OP, Ronnie, just want to snipe and pick, without offering any ideas as to how their side could be making things great again WITHOUT TRUMP.... Got Stripers 09-18-2021, 04:13 PM Well said Ross, it’s just sad, amazing and a bit frightening how this party has changed. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device nightfighter 09-18-2021, 04:35 PM Well said Ross, it’s just sad, amazing and a bit frightening how this party has changed. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Yep, sad. I felt dirty for voting in that column for the first time in my life... And I have heard the same from many who would not ever want their vote share publicly... We had all voted for him once, but never again. Pete F. 09-18-2021, 06:16 PM “You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their prejudices quicker than you can convince one man by logic.” - Robert A. Heinlein Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device redlite 09-18-2021, 08:30 PM Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 08:43 AM Who the #^&#^&#^&#^& in their right mind could possibly be ready to defend, support, and bring Trump back to any political office in this country???? He, alone, has DESTROYED the Republican party. Talk about sheeple.... Look how the Republicans in Congress cower in fear of him. He said he wanted, and likely told, Mike Pence, to do the "right thing" during the certification of the electoral college. We know what that meant. We ALL know what he meant, including RR, Detbuch, and ScottW. Yet you back his immoral platform. This partisan chit is destroying the country, and maybe this site. No one is above criticism here, including Biden, OBama, and any other elected official you care to bring into the fight. While I do have issues with Milley's actions from a constitutional view, I do think he did the right thing, in that moment, that period of time, to diffuse any possible wrong interpretation of what might come out of the Trump WH. If the right ever wants to take back the White House, it better jettison Trump, now and forever, in order to be taken seriously by many former supporters of their platforms. Until Trump is gone for good, I will not in good conscience be able to support their candidates. I am not going to proof, or rewrite this. Just shot from the hip because I am so damn mad at how he (Trump) screwed up a good thing, AND all these hangers on, like the OP, Ronnie, just want to snipe and pick, without offering any ideas as to how their side could be making things great again WITHOUT TRUMP.... i agree trump running would be a disaster. you’re acting like the party is in shambles, the numbers don’t say that. the democrats lost waaaaay more seats under obama, than the republicans lost to teump. his platform? his platform was popular with all but the dedicated left. cut taxes, grow the economy, add jobs, cheap gas, energy independence, clobbering terrorists, secure the border, set stock market records, no questionable wars. people, including a lot of independents, liked his platform. they hated his insanity and temper tantrums. the platform was spot on, he was just the wrong person. but he might have been the only person who could have defeated hilary. and that was extremely important because he nominated three supreme court justices. god knows what madness he prevented by stopping her from nominating three scotus judges. I can’t imagine he runs again, and if he wins the nomination, the party deserves the abyss it will get shoved into. to do what he did with the economy, and still get his azz kicked at re-election, has to a send a message to people ( probably not to him) that he had his time, but his time is up. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 08:45 AM Well said Ross, it’s just sad, amazing and a bit frightening how this party has changed. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device what frightens you, exactly? all those black people working? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Raider Ronnie 09-19-2021, 09:09 AM what frightens you, exactly? all those black people working? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Everything frightens these fools. The biggest accomplishment Trump made as President is showing just how corrupt & big the Swamp is !!! Democrats, Republicans, FBI, CIA, The Media, military leaders, judges & the courts. The saying use to go Money talks & bull#^&#^&#^&#^& walks. Now it’s Money & bull#^&#^&#^&#^& talks & honesty & truth walk. I’m out of here. #^&#^&#^&#^& this site. Enjoy your Socialism. John R PLEASE BAN ME AGAIN Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Got Stripers 09-19-2021, 10:51 AM Everything frightens these fools. The biggest accomplishment Trump made as President is showing just how corrupt & big the Swamp is !!! Democrats, Republicans, FBI, CIA, The Media, military leaders, judges & the courts. The saying use to go Money talks & bull#^&#^&#^&#^& walks. Now it’s Money & bull#^&#^&#^&#^& talks & honesty & truth walk. I’m out of here. #^&#^&#^&#^& this site. Enjoy your Socialism. John R PLEASE BAN ME AGAIN Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device That’s rich, corrupt, let’s do a head count of convicted or charged people in Trumps orbit vs Biden at the end of his term. Pete F. 09-19-2021, 10:57 AM As I said years ago, Trump will destroy the Republican Party. Geoff Duncan and Anthony Gonzalez are walking, talking avatars for what the “Waiting for the World to Change” Republicans want the party to be: They are both conservative, savvy, and early in promising careers. There is an entire class of professional ostriches who have spent a half-decade wishing Trump away, downplaying the danger, and imagining that there is hope for a responsible conservative party once he magically disappears. Duncan and Gonzalez are just the kind of Republican electeds that that crowd wished for. But they are now walking off the field in part over the violent, credible threats they received for not going along with Trump’s coup attempt that led to the sacking of the Capitol. They are set to be replaced by the likes of Max Miller, avatars of deplorable Trumpism. As for what’s next, Gonzalez told the Times, “I don’t believe [Trump] can ever be president again. . . . Most of my political energy will be spent working on that exact goal.” Having seen the ugly face of the Trumpist GOP firsthand, Gonzalez understands the stakes and the peril. I hope he understands the political implications of his statement. It’s long past time for those who want the GOP to be a party of Anthony Gonzalezes, not a party of Donald Trump Jr. fanboys, to take their heads out of the sand. The Republican party is a pro-insurrection Trump cult and anyone who is not on board is cast aside. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device nightfighter 09-19-2021, 10:59 AM i agree trump running would be a disaster. you’re acting like the party is in shambles, the numbers don’t say that. the democrats lost waaaaay more seats under obama, than the republicans lost to teump. his platform? his platform was popular with all but the dedicated left. cut taxes, grow the economy, add jobs, cheap gas, energy independence, clobbering terrorists, secure the border, set stock market records, no questionable wars. people, including a lot of independents, liked his platform. they hated his insanity and temper tantrums. the platform was spot on, he was just the wrong person. but he might have been the only person who could have defeated hilary. and that was extremely important because he nominated three supreme court justices. god knows what madness he prevented by stopping her from nominating three scotus judges. I can’t imagine he runs again, and if he wins the nomination, the party deserves the abyss it will get shoved into. to do what he did with the economy, and still get his azz kicked at re-election, has to a send a message to people ( probably not to him) that he had his time, but his time is up. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device I am not going to disagree with most of this. BUT, the party is in shambles..... and it will be tied to Trump until they denounce him and stop running so scared. As for Jim's comment... about being scared of black people working??? I just don't see any logic in your reasoning to draw such a conclusion. Ronnie, you are and always have been all in or nothing. Your way or the highway. Suit yourself. But the great majority of America and I believe, S-B, ain't going to bow down to socialism.... But we are pissed off. PO'd about the same corruption you mention in your good-bye post. But I do not see how you connect the dots with Trump showing us all how corrupt things are. Unless, unless you mean his inner circle of advisors, attorneys, and employees who were indicted and or jailed.... You just can't have it both ways. Time to get off the Trump wagon and regroup behind someone who is mentally competent and has demonstrated that they can work with people who they might disagree with, yet still get something done for the greater good. nightfighter 09-19-2021, 11:10 AM Saw this. Just wanted to make sure it is entered into the conversation when there are some who want to call him a great president. Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 11:27 AM I am not going to disagree with most of this. BUT, the party is in shambles..... and it will be tied to Trump until they denounce him and stop running so scared. As for Jim's comment... about being scared of black people working??? I just don't see any logic in your reasoning to draw such a conclusion. Ronnie, you are and always have been all in or nothing. Your way or the highway. Suit yourself. But the great majority of America and I believe, S-B, ain't going to bow down to socialism.... But we are pissed off. PO'd about the same corruption you mention in your good-bye post. But I do not see how you connect the dots with Trump showing us all how corrupt things are. Unless, unless you mean his inner circle of advisors, attorneys, and employees who were indicted and or jailed.... You just can't have it both ways. Time to get off the Trump wagon and regroup behind someone who is mentally competent and has demonstrated that they can work with people who they might disagree with, yet still get something done for the greater good. first i like the way you say things and you can say anything to me i’m a big boy with thick skin. the gop has half the senate, almost half the house, and for awhile has had a majority of state legislatures and governorships. we have a much deeper bench than the left. who can they run in 2024 if Biden can’t? Much of the gop has denounced him as a person. Guys like Dan Crenshaw have said 1,000 times they don’t like his style. GS said he was frightened at what the gop has become. the gop, under Trump, put all time records of blacks to work, so i was making a sarcastic comment. you think the left won’t bow to socialism? AOC and her ring are a very powerful force within that party. They aren’t running the party. But they aren’t written off as fringe looks either. That party is lurching way to the left, the democrat party is completely unrecognizable as the party that gave us bill clinton ( who i liked) who balanced the budget by cutting taxes and kicking huge numbers of people off welfare, none of whom needed to be on welfare because they all went out and got jobs. They just needed someone to tell them they had to. “get something done for the greater good”. right before the pandemic, i don’t know how much more Trump could have done to help the country. i hate the guy, but I, and much of America, liked what he did. I think if we nominate him again it would be a complete, unmitigated disaster. i don’t believe his ego allows him to see that. i believe, and hope, that the kingmakers within the party see it. I completely agree it’s 100% time to get off the Trump train. I hope they have the brains to do it. I think if we nominate a mature, kind person who will advocate for the same policies as trump without acting like a 10 year-old bully, they’d be tough to beat in stable times. Covid may make stability elusive. i don’t think americans like open borders, men competing in physical contests with women, defunding the police, growing numbers are getting tired of being told that we, and more importantly our children, can’t live normal lives. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Got Stripers 09-19-2021, 11:45 AM I am not going to disagree with most of this. BUT, the party is in shambles..... and it will be tied to Trump until they denounce him and stop running so scared. As for Jim's comment... about being scared of black people working??? I just don't see any logic in your reasoning to draw such a conclusion. Ronnie, you are and always have been all in or nothing. Your way or the highway. Suit yourself. But the great majority of America and I believe, S-B, ain't going to bow down to socialism.... But we are pissed off. PO'd about the same corruption you mention in your good-bye post. But I do not see how you connect the dots with Trump showing us all how corrupt things are. Unless, unless you mean his inner circle of advisors, attorneys, and employees who were indicted and or jailed.... You just can't have it both ways. Time to get off the Trump wagon and regroup behind someone who is mentally competent and has demonstrated that they can work with people who they might disagree with, yet still get something done for the greater good. You are the John McCain on this board, but I fear to many like RR are all in regardless of the tangent this party veered off on. Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 12:23 PM You are the John McCain on this board, but I fear to many like RR are all in regardless of the tangent this party veered off on. what major policies does the gop endorse that McCain would have been against? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Got Stripers 09-19-2021, 12:33 PM Humor Jim Ross is willing to reach across and discuss, not much of that left in politics Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 12:37 PM Humor Jim Ross is willing to reach across and discuss, not much of that left in politics ok and mccain did that too. no there’s not much of that left. neither side compromises, everything is strict party line. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-19-2021, 12:50 PM John McCain chose Barack Obama and George W. Bush -- the two men who kept him from the White House -- to eulogize him and didn't want Trump to attend his funeral. I’d say he would have been standing shoulder to shoulder with Liz Cheney and Adam Kinziger, roaring about gutless Senators and voted as his wife did. Just what policy is the Republican Party for, other than being the party of None and Trump Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-19-2021, 04:49 PM This is another issue with the GOP we spent trillions of dollars in Afghanistan and they never lifted a finger in protest Nor did the Democratic’s but now since Biden a Dem wants to spend money in the dear old USA magically the Republicans are against it .. only because owning and blocking the libs get them votes. What happened to MAGA I guess it’s was just a campaign slogan for Republicans only the rest of America need not apply Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 05:01 PM This is another issue with the GOP we spent trillions of dollars in Afghanistan and they never lifted a finger in protest Nor did the Democratic’s but now since Biden a Dem wants to spend money in the dear old USA magically the Republicans are against it .. only because owning and blocking the libs get them votes. What happened to MAGA I guess it’s was just a campaign slogan for Republicans only the rest of America need not apply Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device 3.5 trillion with a lot of pork, is something the opposition party will always squawk over. not much to see there as spence says every time something paints dems negatively. democrat senator manchin also says he’s opposed to it. the most moderate, democrat, one of the only who ever goes his own way, is opposed to it, or so he says now. you’re saying if you are pro america, you should never oppose any federal spending? sure sounds like that’s what you’re saying here. o sense. you never stop complaining about trumps tax cuts, but it’s a character flaw to oppose biden’s tax cuts? it’s only ok when you do it? american citizens who work for tesla, should be delighted at the prospect of having their federal income taxes used to give tax credits to ford? Can’t they just pass a true infrastructure bill that has nothing but infastructure spending in there? no one opposes that. are you saying that democrats “lifted a finger” to oppose any if trumps spending? come on. his tax cuts? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 05:05 PM This is another issue with the GOP we spent trillions of dollars in Afghanistan and they never lifted a finger in protest Nor did the Democratic’s but now since Biden a Dem wants to spend money in the dear old USA magically the Republicans are against it .. only because owning and blocking the libs get them votes. What happened to MAGA I guess it’s was just a campaign slogan for Republicans only the rest of America need not apply Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device here’s an AP article saying democrats opposed trumps defense budget. so much for them “never lifting a finger.”. yes they gave trump a rubber stamp. https://apnews.com/article/5fd6f64b33744fa19125d98d4b88bcd1 Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device nightfighter 09-19-2021, 06:05 PM no there’s not much of that left. neither side compromises, everything is strict party line. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Our politicians are on the same bottom rung with divorce lawyers: Win at all costs and destroy the other side while you are at it.... Term limits, please. Making decisions based on right from wrong, when voting in the US Congress, is clearly not exclusive to either party.... This is at the core of the problem in our current state of affairs. We have serious problems when Nikki Minaj or Kim Kardashian hold more sway in such vital decisions among such a large demographic in America. I do not believe AOC has nearly the power her media coverage would have/desire you to believe. Jim, your "pork" comment is spot on. The infrastructure bill should have absolutely nothing attached nor hanging on its coattails. Pete F. 09-19-2021, 06:15 PM Joe Manchin is a Senator from a state that ranks last in infrastructure, 48th for economy, 47th for healthcare and economic opportunity, 45th for education. Just who is he representing, his constituents are Americans that would stand to gain the most from what the Democrats propose. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device detbuch 09-19-2021, 06:27 PM Sounds to me like these calls were to assure people Trump might seem unhinged, What is the point of assuring people people that Trump "might seem" unhinged? That would also assure people that Trump might not seem unhinged. detbuch 09-19-2021, 06:41 PM Joe Manchin is a Senator from a state that ranks last in infrastructure, 48th for economy, 47th for healthcare and economic opportunity, 45th for education. Just who is he representing, his constituents are Americans that would stand to gain the most from what the Democrats propose. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Perhaps his constituents don't agree with you. They voted for him. Maybe they think they "stand to gain" other things more. Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 07:10 PM Perhaps his constituents don't agree with you. They voted for him. Maybe they think they "stand to gain" other things more. correct. i guess pete should get to decide which states have a senator and which do not. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-19-2021, 07:12 PM and Senator Sinema from AZ also says she won’t back that bill. I guess Pete will tell us why AZ doesn’t count either. There are 2 of 50 democrat senators who are capable of acting on their own ( not a lot of republicans capable of that either), and both are opposed to the bill. but it’s only the republicans fault. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 06:33 AM Perhaps his constituents don't agree with you. They voted for him. Maybe they think they "stand to gain" other things more. Perhaps he doesn’t represent his constituents well Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device scottw 09-20-2021, 06:36 AM Perhaps he doesn’t represent his constituents well Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device well...it's west virginia...soooo....not nearly as smart or superior in most ways as the new englanders who look down upon them Pete F. 09-20-2021, 06:37 AM Arizona ranks 39th overall, good luck with that Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 06:37 AM well...it's west virginia...soooo....not nearly as smart or superior in most ways as the new englanders who look down upon them If you say so Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 06:39 AM Back to before the train wreck “The focus on Milley misses a larger point: He was just one of a half-dozen senior military and civilian officials who took similar unusual steps during the final months of Trump’s administration to prevent what they feared might be a catastrophe.” Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-20-2021, 07:42 AM Perhaps he doesn’t represent his constituents well Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device perhaps you can explain why he keeps getting re-elected. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-20-2021, 07:59 AM here’s an AP article saying democrats opposed trumps defense budget. so much for them “never lifting a finger.”. yes they gave trump a rubber stamp. https://apnews.com/article/5fd6f64b33744fa19125d98d4b88bcd1 Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Americans defense budget is out of control and has been for decades it’s welfare from defense contractors and company Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Jim in CT 09-20-2021, 08:09 AM Americans defense budget is out of control and has been for decades it’s welfare from defense contractors and company Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device i agree with that 100%. but in your previous post (#38) weren’t you were critical of republicans for opposing biden’s defense budget? you’re kind of all over the place. Seems like you’re saying every single thing democrats do is righteous and honest, and every single thing everyone else does is bad. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 08:46 AM perhaps you can explain why he keeps getting re-elected. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device White voters without a four-year degree made up 69 percent of voters there in 2020, according to census data, the highest in the country. And Joe Manchin has a dream that he will be reelected, it's unlikely. Jim in CT 09-20-2021, 08:55 AM White voters without a four-year degree made up 69 percent of voters there in 2020, according to census data, the highest in the country. And Joe Manchin has a dream that he will be reelected, it's unlikely. it sure seems like you’re saying you have an issue with white people who don’t have a 4 year degree. i thought liberals were tolerant and inclusive? If you have a 4 year degree, it doesn’t seem to be doing you a while lot of good in terms of civility or honest thinking. Manchin was elected senator in 2010, 2012, and 2018. He was governor before that. You don’t think he’s going to win in 2024, do you think he’ll lose to a republican, or will he lose in a primary to a more liberal democrat. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 09:43 AM Always looking for insults, poor victim, no issues, just the facts. White voters without a four-year degree made up 69 percent of voters there in 2020, according to census data, the highest in the country is a fact. They elected TFG. I think Manchin will lose in the general to a trumplican, so does he. He's considered running for governor again and he's 74 and will be 77 in the next election cycle. Something will happen, lots of political games coming Jim in CT 09-20-2021, 09:48 AM Always looking for insults, poor victim, no issues, just the facts. White voters without a four-year degree made up 69 percent of voters there in 2020, according to census data, the highest in the country is a fact. They elected TFG. I think Manchin will lose in the general to a trumplican, so does he. He's considered running for governor again and he's 74 and will be 77 in the next election cycle. Something will happen, lots of political games coming “they elected trump.” and they elected Manchin, who is a pretty liberal democrat. You’re concerned with Manchins age, but not Biden’s? People have been saying for ten years that Manchins time is up. i don’t like him, i’d like to see him lose, but he’s popular there. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 10:00 AM “they elected trump.” and they elected Manchin, who is a pretty liberal democrat. You’re concerned with Manchins age, but not Biden’s? I think Joe Manchin is concerned with his age, you'll figure it out when you grow up, 40 is a long time for adolescence People have been saying for ten years that Manchins time is up. i don’t like him, i’d like to see him lose, but he’s popular there. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device All right, all the way, no centrist can survive. If Manchin is a liberal Democrat in your view, because he voted with the Biden agenda items is Bernie then more right wing? scottw 09-20-2021, 10:47 AM Americans defense budget is out of control and has been for decades it’s welfare from defense contractors and company Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device I know right?...just ask weekend-at-biden's brother... scottw 09-20-2021, 10:58 AM and Senator Sinema from AZ also says she won’t back that bill. I guess Pete will tell us why AZ doesn’t count either. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device people in Arizona and West Virginia are really stupid...Pete and his friends in Vermont are super smart...look how they are crushing covid... Pete F. 09-20-2021, 11:23 AM people in Arizona and West Virginia are really stupid...Pete and his friends in Vermont are super smart...look how they are crushing covid... The pandemics 2nd wrongest commentator continues to just be clueless. Every other state has a higher death rate than Vermont! Only 294 people in VT have died. The point of the vaccines is that it protects from hospitalization and death. Gov Phil Scott has been pro-vax & its working scottw 09-20-2021, 11:54 AM [QUOTE=Pete F.; The point of the vaccines is that it protects from hospitalization [/QUOTE] The point of the vaccines was to prevent you from getting it to prevent the spread till it became obvious that you could still get it and spread it if you are vaccinated Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 12:14 PM The point of the vaccines was to prevent you from getting it to prevent the spread till it became obvious that you could still get it and spread it if you are vaccinated Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device The pandemics 2nd wrongest commentator continues to just be clueless. scottw 09-20-2021, 12:53 PM hey pete, how many hundreds of tips did you send to the FBI about Kavanaugh that you feel they ignored? scottw 09-20-2021, 12:58 PM The point of the vaccines is that it protects from hospitalization and death. we were told Pfizer has 95% efficacy "preventing infection"...not "protecting from hospitalization"..or death "Based on evidence from clinical trials in people 16 years and older, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective at preventing laboratory-confirmed infection with the virus that causes COVID-19" Pete F. 09-20-2021, 01:00 PM hey pete, how many hundreds of tips did you send to the FBI about Kavanaugh that you feel they ignored? None myself, but I do have an acquaintance who went to law school with him. They offered and were never contacted. You’re sounding like Gym Jordan🙈 Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Pete F. 09-20-2021, 01:01 PM we were told Pfizer has 95% efficacy "preventing infection"...not "protecting from hospitalization"..or death "Based on evidence from clinical trials in people 16 years and older, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective at preventing laboratory-confirmed infection with the virus that causes COVID-19" The pandemics 2nd wrongest commentator continues to just be clueless. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device detbuch 09-20-2021, 01:39 PM The pandemics 2nd wrongest commentator continues to just be clueless. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device But you are just choc full of a daily never ending array of clues, most of which don't pan out. Pete F. 09-20-2021, 01:55 PM But you are just choc full of a daily never ending array of clues, most of which don't pan out. Troll much?:drevil: detbuch 09-20-2021, 02:01 PM Troll much?:drevil: You do realize you trolled with your response here? You do that a whole lot. You're one of the biggest trolls on the forum, if not the biggest. Pete F. 09-20-2021, 02:37 PM But you are just choc full of a daily never ending array of clues, most of which don't pan out. You do realize you trolled with your response here? You do that a whole lot. You're one of the biggest trolls on the forum, if not the biggest. Actually trolling is what you did here, with your only prior post in this thread. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device detbuch 09-20-2021, 03:44 PM Actually trolling is what you did here, with your only prior post in this thread. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device You're the one who brought up trolling with your troll. And you are the Troll par excellence on this forum. "Internet troll. In Internet slang, a troll ( /troʊl, trɒl/) is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community" No-one posts as much digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages than you. Nor starts as many quarrels as you. So Troll all you want. But its meta trolling to insert the notion of someone else's supposed trolling as if it were some compelling response when in fact it is what you continuously do. Not to mention blatant hypocrisy. Pete F. 09-29-2021, 06:08 AM Do you think the MAGA crowd insisting General Milley committed treason realize they're calling attention to the fact that everyone around their insane orange God king in the last months of his presidency thought he was completely insane and a danger to the country? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Milley confirms previous reports that he received an unclassified, unsigned order to withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan by Jan. 15, apparently arbitrary plans during Trump's lame-duck term to fulfill a campaign promise and stymie incoming administration. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device wdmso 09-29-2021, 08:39 AM Tom Cotton GENERAL MILLEY, I CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THAT YOUR ADVICE ABOUT STAYING IN AFGHANISTAN WAS REJECTED. I’M SHOCKED TO LEARN THAT YOUR ADVICE WASN’T SOUGHT UNTIL AUGUST 25 ON STAYING PAST THE AUGUST 31 DEADLINE. I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU’RE THE PRINCIPAL MILITARY ADVISER; THAT YOU ADVISE, YOU DON’T DECIDE. THE PRESIDENT DECIDES. BUT IF ALL THIS IS TRUE, GENERAL MILLEY, WHY HAVEN’T YOU RESIGNED?’ Gen AS A SENIOR MILITARY OFFICER, RESIGNING IS A REALLY SERIOUS THING. IT’S A POLITICAL ACT, IF I’M RESIGNING IN PROTEST. MY JOB IS TO PROVIDE ADVICE. MY STATUTORY RESPONSIBILITY IS TO PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE, OR BEST MILITARY ADVICE, TO THE PRESIDENT… THE PRESIDENT DOESN’T HAVE TO AGREE WITH THAT ADVICE. HE DOESN’T HAVE TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS JUST BECAUSE WE’RE GENERALS, AND IT WOULD BE AN INCREDIBLE ACT OF POLITICAL DEFIANCE FOR A COMMISSIONED OFFICER TO JUST RESIGN BECAUSE MY ADVICE IS NOT TAKEN. THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T WANT GENERALS FIGURING OUT WHAT ORDERS WE ARE GOING TO ACCEPT AND DO OR NOT. THAT’S NOT OUR JOB. THE PRINCIPLE OF CIVILIAN CONTROL OF THE MILITARY IS ABSOLUTE — IT’S CRITICAL TO THIS REPUBLIC.’ And In addition to that, just from a personal standpoint, my dad didn't get a choice to resign at Iwo Jima," "And those kids there at Abbey Gate, they don't get a choice to resign, and I'm not going to turn my back on them," Milley said in "I'm not gonna resign– they can't resign, so I'm not going to resign, there's no way." He added, "if the orders are illegal, we're in a different place, but if the orders are legal, from civilian authority, I intend to carry them out." It’s seems Tom Cotton a former Captain thinks ones personal feeling should come before ones Duty.. Yet he condemned Jan 6th no quarter for insurrectionists. Those who attacked the Capitol today should face the full extent of federal law. But blocked the Jan6th commission? And he questioned Milley principles ? Does he own any mirrors? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device scottw 09-30-2021, 08:10 AM Milley Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device I bet he ends up with a show on MSNBC Pete F. 09-30-2021, 09:36 AM Gen Mark Milley: Defense Distinguished Service Medal (2) Army Distinguished Service Medal (4) Defense Superior Service Medal (3) Legion of Merit (3) Bronze Star Medal (4) Rep Matt Gaetz: - Free Britney - Sex trafficker - Pedophile vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
|