Here’s liberal icon Robert De Niro, speaking at a Hollywood awards show ( did you all know that entertainers occasionally get together to give each other awards?? it’s very rare but apparently it does happen), where he starts his speech with “f—- trump”, and gets a huge ovation.

Can’t have it both ways. if this is ok, and it was, then “let’s no brandon” is obviously tame in comparison.

they never stop wanting to have their cake and eat it too.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1zNr8Pf1QkY

That's 1

I think anyone who uses either in public is a POS. Know anyone?

The "Let's go Brandon" thing doesn't offend me much, I just think it's childish and cowardly. The secret code for "#^&#^&#^&#^& Trump" was, is, and always will be "#^&#^&#^&#^& Trump."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That's 1

I think anyone who uses either in public is a POS. Know anyone?

i know lots. i concede “let’s go brandon” it’s juvenile and immature, but it’s also fun if you’re a republican.

you’re not aware of anyone other then De Niro, who used vulgarity in public to describe Trump? Really?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The "Let's go Brandon" thing doesn't offend me much, I just think it's childish and cowardly. The secret code for "#^&#^&#^&#^& Trump" was, is, and always will be "#^&#^&#^&#^& Trump."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

yes, we’re all afraid of you pete, which is why we say let’s go brandon. very cowardly to avoid the f word.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Is he a public official in the halls of Congress? Jim that where you missing the point once again the 2 are not remotely the same are they?

I have seen more vulgar flags bumper stickers and hats promoted by the Trump supporters then anytime I have ever seen but yet we have in TEXAS

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is asking the state's association of school boards to "ensure no child is exposed to pornography or other inappropriate content in a Texas public school," in the latest GOP attempt to dictate what can and can't be taught in classrooms.

Guess kids can see their vulgar messaging on the news and on the street … but we will apply our morals on books we disagree with. Abbot thinks an image of a penis is porn.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I suppose this gets your panties in a bunch also

Josh Hawley says more men today are watching porn and playing video games because their masculinity has been criticized.

Hard to believe but, this guy is a U.S. Senator, telling boys that games and porn are the natural reaction to criticism. Not only is this one of the most majestic snowflake rationalizations of all time, but he has the causation backward.

Just remember Hawley doesn't get paid to soberly address societal problems, he gets paid to use those problems to his advantage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I suppose this gets your panties in a bunch also

Josh Hawley says more men today are watching porn and playing video games because their masculinity has been criticized.

Hard to believe but, this guy is a U.S. Senator, telling boys that games and porn are the natural reaction to criticism. Not only is this one of the most majestic snowflake rationalizations of all time, but he has the causation backward.

Just remember Hawley doesn't get paid to soberly address societal problems, he gets paid to use those problems to his advantage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Hawley isn’t telling men that’s the natural reaction to criticism. Hawley is saying that’s how some
men are reacting. i have no idea if he’s right or not.

Pete, if i say “black fathers are abandoning their children in harmful numbers”, that doesn’t mean I’m telling men to do that. i’m just reporting what’s happening. You don’t see that difference?

you can bet Hawley isn’t talking about an equal share of conservative men and liberal men, Pete. Conservative men arent being told their masculinity is toxic or shameful. Hawley is talking about you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Is he a public official in the halls of Congress? Jim that where you missing the point once again the 2 are not remotely the same are they?

I have seen more vulgar flags bumper stickers and hats promoted by the Trump supporters then anytime I have ever seen but yet we have in TEXAS

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is asking the state's association of school boards to "ensure no child is exposed to pornography or other inappropriate content in a Texas public school," in the latest GOP attempt to dictate what can and can't be taught in classrooms.

Guess kids can see their vulgar messaging on the news and on the street … but we will apply our morals on books we disagree with. Abbot thinks an image of a penis is porn.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Congressperson Tlaib said on tv they were going to “impeach the motherf*cker.” She’s a public official, i believe? But that was ok. everything liberals do is swell.

you keep posting about how
bad it is that conservatives want to ban certain books, but you defended liberals who want to ban To Kill A Mockingbird. so is your point that liberal censorship is ok, but not conservative censorship?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i know lots. i concede “let’s go brandon” it’s juvenile and immature, but it’s also fun if you’re a republican.

you’re not aware of anyone other then De Niro, who used vulgarity in public to describe Trump? Really?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sure TDF posted 2 others and you posted a Sent. so is that 4 w/De Niro?

I'm sure there are more.

Hawley isn’t telling men that’s the natural reaction to criticism. Hawley is saying that’s how some
men are reacting. i have no idea if he’s right or not.

Pete, if i say “black fathers are abandoning their children in harmful numbers”, that doesn’t mean I’m telling men to do that. i’m just reporting what’s happening. You don’t see that difference?

you can bet Hawley isn’t talking about an equal share of conservative men and liberal men, Pete. Conservative men arent being told their masculinity is toxic or shameful. Hawley is talking about you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The leader of the Incels is talking about me?

Josh Hawley's comment that "men are being drawn to porn & video games" because "their manhood has been 'criticized'" says more about Hawley's male inadequacies than I think he realizes

I’m beginning to understand just how pervasive the hatred for women is throughout the Republican Party. No better example of that than Hawley. I think he’s the idol of all Incels.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Congressperson Tlaib said on tv they were going to “impeach the motherf*cker.” She’s a public official, i believe? But that was ok. everything liberals do is swell.

you keep posting about how
bad it is that conservatives want to ban certain books, but you defended liberals who want to ban To Kill A Mockingbird. so is your point that liberal censorship is ok, but not conservative censorship?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device



Seems you never looked at the link it’s not just liberal who wished to ban to kill a mockingbird but don’t let facts trip you up. And keep supporting State governments banning books .. again your ability to insist 2 clearly different incidents are the same is a skill in DENIAL


eYes Jim and she was soundly rebuked for doing so…. She wasn’t embraced by the Democratic Party Or was it spoke on the floor or the house or Senate

Jerry Nadler (D-NY), chair of the House Judiciary Committee, distanced himself both from Tlaib’s sentiment and the way she expressed it.

“I don’t really like that kind of language. But more to the point, I disagree with what she said,” Nadler said

Pelosi rejected Tlaib’s profanity

But the jerry springer GOP. Remains silent
Yet House GOP leaders urge 'no' vote on Bannon contempt. Once again putting Trump a company before the country..

No ethics no integrity no vision.
Just insult and more of the usual just say No
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The "Let's go Brandon" thing doesn't offend me much, I just think it's childish and cowardly. The secret code for "#^&#^&#^&#^& Trump" was, is, and always will be "#^&#^&#^&#^& Trump."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

pete's posts are secret code for some really crazy $hit....:rtfm:

the brandon thing is hilarious

The leader of the Incels is talking about me?

I think he’s the idol of all Incels.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

had to look this up...you're spending too much time on those freaky websites

Seems you never looked at the link it’s not just liberal who wished to ban to kill a mockingbird but don’t let facts trip you up. And keep supporting State governments banning books .. again your ability to insist 2 clearly different incidents are the same is a skill in DENIAL


eYes Jim and she was soundly rebuked for doing so…. She wasn’t embraced by the Democratic Party Or was it spoke on the floor or the house or Senate

Jerry Nadler (D-NY), chair of the House Judiciary Committee, distanced himself both from Tlaib’s sentiment and the way she expressed it.

“I don’t really like that kind of language. But more to the point, I disagree with what she said,” Nadler said

Pelosi rejected Tlaib’s profanity

But the jerry springer GOP. Remains silent
Yet House GOP leaders urge 'no' vote on Bannon contempt. Once again putting Trump a company before the country..

No ethics no integrity no vision.
Just insult and more of the usual just say No
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No one can read your posts and have a clue where you stand on banning books. You're all over the place. It boils down to, as always, liberal=good, conservative=bad.

I don't think most Americans object to banning some books from school libraries. Even public libraries. I'm not saying books be banned completely, but if you like pornographic smut, buy it yourself, you have no right to ask me to pay for it so you can read it for free. If you want to buy it, knock yourself out.

"Yes Jim and she was soundly rebuked for doing so"

By you? Paul? Pete? Please show me those posts? Jerry Nadler? Wow, I'm impressed.

There's no vulgarity to let's go Brandon. It's f-u-n-n-y. Liberals forgot what that word means.

Conservative men arent being told their masculinity is toxic or shameful.

No Jim they are being told and taught to be a conservative MAN you need to learn the art of name calling and shamming of others be as Disrespectful as you possibly can grab that pussy lie to get your way and Most of all don’t let anyone tell you what the truth is .. because the Truth is what you want it to be! And no will not replace you
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Conservative men arent being told their masculinity is toxic or shameful.

No Jim they are being told and taught to be a conservative MAN you need to learn the art of name calling and shamming of others be as Disrespectful as you possibly can grab that pussy lie to get your way and Most of all don’t let anyone tell you what the truth is .. because the Truth is what you want it to be! And no will not replace you
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Right, because liberals don't call people names. Obama didn't tell an audience that the McCain campaign wanted people to be afraid of hos skin color, he didn't say Republicans just "hate all the time", Hilary didn't call half the country deplorable. Biden didn't say that Republicans want to put blacks back in chains. I'm making all of that up. Trump is the only jerk. No one in the democrat party insults people.

GET OVER YOUSELF. Anything to avoid talking honestly about results for two seconds.

There's no vulgarity to let's go Brandon. It's f-u-n-n-y. Liberals forgot what that word means.


That a child’s response

but dad I just said to mom see you next Tuesday .. I never used the C word


That goal post moving job is still open
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That a child’s response

but dad I just said to mom see you next Tuesday .. I never used the C word


That goal post moving job is still open
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Wayne, it started because a reporter (naturally) denied what the crowd was chanting. If the media could have been honest for a split second, we wouldn't even be discussing this. I agree it's immature, I said so before you did.

"That goal post moving job is still open"

Funny because when I asked you how my positions changed yesterday, you said that you weren't referring to me specifically, as a goal post mover.

So You're flip flopping again, not, not me. I said, before you did, that Let's Go Brandon is immature, juvenile. But it's also funny. I'm sorry to break it to you, but not everything funny has to be at the expense of republicans. It is actually possible to make fun of a liberal.

You really, really stink at this.

hat a child’s response

but dad I just said to mom see you next Tuesday .. I never used the C word


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wut????

Conservative men arent being told their masculinity is toxic or shameful.

No Jim they are being told and taught to be a conservative MAN you need to learn the art of name calling and shamming of others be as Disrespectful as you possibly can grab that pussy lie to get your way and Most of all don’t let anyone tell you what the truth is .. because the Truth is what you want it to be! And no will not replace you

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

if they could, in addition, learn to spray paint stuff, burn stuff, interfere with traffic and throw bags of urine they could switch parties

if they could, in addition, learn to spray paint stuff, burn stuff, interfere with traffic and throw bags of urine they could switch parties

Just what happened on January 6th?

Oh, I forgot those were patriots

Why would lindsey graham want police to shoot peaceful patriot tourists???

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You're all completely missing the point of Lets Go Brandon. It's at least as much of an arrow aimed at the media, as it is at Biden. The media is constantly telling us to ignore what we plainly see and hear, and listen to their pro-liberal spin instead. The southern border is fine. Our cities are doing well. There's no inflation. The final Afghan withdrawal was a success. Parents in Loudon County have no reason to complain.

It's all of that, culminating with this Nascar reporter (intentionally or not), telling America that they weren't hearing what they were hearing. It's a way to joke about the absurdity of it all, and that "all" includes Foxnews by the way, but it also includes all the liberal outlets which far outnumber the conservative ones.

It's not just giving the finger to Biden, though that's part of it. It's a way to laugh about the indescribably stupid place where we find ourselves, where several left leaning folks here can never, ever, under any circumstances, admot a conservative has a good point. Not only can you never say the conservative is "right", I've never seen one of you admit that a conservative even made a good point. Not once, not ever.

We are in an ugly, absurd place, and I am obviously contributing to it too. or I wouldn't be wasting time here. But I have no problem admitting when one of you makes a good point. You guys can't do it, you aren't physically capable of it.

So let's go Brandon!

if they could, in addition, learn to spray paint stuff, burn stuff, interfere with traffic and throw bags of urine they could switch parties

Or kill cops.

Just what happened on January 6th?

Oh, I forgot those were patriots

Why would lindsey graham want police to shoot peaceful patriot tourists???

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

they obviously were watching what was going on in the country for the previous year or so and thought..."oh, that's how protesting is done"...thankfully they didn't burn the place down

Or kill cops.

yeah that was an interesting slogan/chant..."what do we want...dead cops...."...very thoughtful and mature

they obviously were watching what was going on in the country for the previous year or so and thought..."oh, that's how protesting is done"...thankfully they didn't burn the place down

BINGO . . . DING DING . . . BULLSEYE. The template was made, and though the riot was a tepid imitation of what was lauded as righteous "protests" in Seattle and Portland and "unrest" in Ferguson, et al, it was framed as a near overthrow of the U.S. government, a destruction of the country, one of the most dangerous moments in our history.

BINGO . . . DING DING . . . BULLSEYE. The template was made, and though the riot was a tepid imitation of what was lauded as righteous "protests" in Seattle and Portland and "unrest" in Ferguson, et al, it was framed as a near overthrow of the U.S. government, a destruction of the country, one of the most dangerous moments in our history.

Looks pretty tepid to me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVZvp-Dv0gg

Looks pretty tepid to me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVZvp-Dv0gg

How many people did they murder, compared to the BLM riots?

How many billions of dollars in damage did they do, compared to the BLM riots?

How many people did they murder, compared to the BLM riots?

How many billions of dollars in damage did they do, compared to the BLM riots?

Per participant, far more

And No president encouraged rioting in the case of BLM, the former guy had participants "standing back and standing by" waiting to participate and then sat watching on TV.

And if you want to claim it's not the party of white supremacy then why did Jenna Ryan, a rioter from Texas, claim (incorrectly) "Definitely not going to jail, I have blonde hair, white skin, a great job, a great future and I'm not going to jail. Sorry to rain on your hater parade. I did nothing wrong"

Because of course blonde hair and white skin makes you above the law, that's for those people..............

Per participant, far more

And No president encouraged rioting in the case of BLM, the former guy had participants "standing back and standing by" waiting to participate and then sat watching on TV.

And if you want to claim it's not the party of white supremacy then why did Jenna Ryan, a rioter from Texas, claim (incorrectly) "Definitely not going to jail, I have blonde hair, white skin, a great job, a great future and I'm not going to jail. Sorry to rain on your hater parade. I did nothing wrong"

Because of course blonde hair and white skin makes you above the law, that's for those people..............

"Per participant, far more"

Since they murdered zero people, I'd be very interested to see your math. I agree that per participant is a good way to compare, but the January 6th rioters murdered exactly zero people. And the BLM rioters murdered some.

Trumps exact words were to go to the capital "peacefully and patriotically". That's exactly, precisely, what he said. Not sure how that's inciting a riot.

Many, many elected democrats supported the BLM riots. as did many in the media.

"And if you want to claim it's not the party of white supremacy then why did Jenna Ryan"

(1) is one idiot Republican speaks for the whole GOP, can I say that the BLM rioter who killed a black cop, speaks for you? Or the guy who shot Rep Scalise, does he represent the entire democrat party? Do you hear how idiotic that sounds? That's your logic.

party of white supremacy - cut taxes for blacks, ushered in record low black unemployment, increased funding for black colleges, championed criminal justice reform, advocate for school choice, all things that disproportionately help blacks. If we're white supremacists, we're really bad at white supremacy, because what we want is for blacks to escape the cities and climb the economic ladder.

How many people did they murder, compared to the BLM riots?

How many billions of dollars in damage did they do, compared to the BLM riots?

Pete doesn’t see the difference between people protesting the government(and yes I think they went too far)for whatever reason and people attacking, assaulting, inconveniencing their fellow citizens, vandalizing and destroying their businesses or homes and generally being public menaces
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Right, because liberals don't call people names. Obama didn't tell an audience that the McCain campaign wanted people to be afraid of hos skin color, he didn't say Republicans just "hate all the time", Hilary didn't call half the country deplorable. Biden didn't say that Republicans want to put blacks back in chains. I'm making all of that up. Trump is the only jerk. No one in the democrat party insults people.

GET OVER YOUSELF. Anything to avoid talking honestly about results for two seconds.

again!! : all name calling is created equal :yak5:

wut????

no vulgarity was used so Mom should be ok ...

again!! : all name calling is created equal :yak5:

Doesn't it seem like some people's panties are in a bunch.

when possible always fall back to the BLM riots because they are exactly the same as what happened on January 6th

Conservatives are Just disingenuous people .. its that simple creating their own alternative facts

So to talk about alternative facts is to talk about the opposite of reality (which is delusion), or the opposite of truth (which is untruth).

love conservative Logic

again!! : all name calling is created equal :yak5:

I never said all name-calling equal. I agree that some is worse than others. But to you, the degree to which it's bad, depends entirely on the political party of the person logging the insult. I don't think that matters at all.

Biden said that republicans want to put blacks in chains, and Hilary said republicans are deplorable and irredeemable. In terms of anticipating how a president would likely view people who disagree with him, I don't know that insults get much worse than that.

Hilary said republicans are deplorable and irredeemable.

Is that what she said?

when possible always fall back to the BLM riots because they are exactly the same as what happened on January 6th

Conservatives are Just disingenuous people .. its that simple creating their own alternative facts

So to talk about alternative facts is to talk about the opposite of reality (which is delusion), or the opposite of truth (which is untruth).

love conservative Logic

"when possible always fall back to the BLM riots because they are exactly the same as what happened on January 6th "

Who said they were the same? I'd say the BLM riots were worse. Comparing death, bloodshed, or property damage (which seem like the appropriate ways to compare riots), there's no comparison. None.

If it's ok when your side murders people, burns buildings, and does tend of billions of dollars in damage when they are upset...why isn't it OK when another group reacts much less violently when they are upset. Wayne, BLM burned many buildings to the ground.

Is that what she said?

She said half of them are. Yes, that's what she said, and a lot of people think that was exactly why she lost, which is precisely what she deserved.

You're denying she said that?

Did Biden say to a roomfull of blacks, that Republicans want to put y'all back in chains?

"when possible always fall back to the BLM riots because they are exactly the same as what happened on January 6th "

Who said they were the same? I'd say the BLM riots were worse. Comparing death, bloodshed, or property damage (which seem like the appropriate ways to compare riots), there's no comparison. None.

If it's ok when your side murders people, burns buildings, and does tend of billions of dollars in damage when they are upset...why isn't it OK when another group reacts much less violently when they are upset. Wayne, BLM burned many buildings to the ground.

Again America’s had riots all thru our history .. But we have had only one attempt to overthrow the newly elected POTUS

Ok Jim they were just another Group..who reacted LOL

Like I said disingenuous ..

The GOP is already starting to sow the seed of another possible failed election

Virginia GOP and Matt Schlapp claim some voters without masks kept from polls
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Again America’s had riots all thru our history .. But we have had only one attempt to overthrow the newly elected POTUS

Ok Jim they were just another Group..who reacted LOL

Like I said disingenuous ..

The GOP is already starting to sow the seed of another possible failed election

Virginia GOP and Matt Schlapp claim some voters without masks kept from polls
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

except there’s no evidence that there was a plan to overthrow biden.

also, unless i am very mistaken, when bush beat gore, the democrats took that to court in “an attempt to overthrow the newly elected POTUS”.

and after the 2016 election, but before electoral certification, there were a fair number of people begging the electors not to vote for Trump . which again, seems like an obvious “attempt of overthrow the newly elected potus.”

so other than the two times when your side did it recently, there aren’t any examples in history of anyone doing it. That’s what you’re saying. i mean that’s just brilliant.

keep bleating like a good sheep wayne.

“republicans are baaaaaaaad.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso, an article from the washington post about using the electors to prevent a newly elected teump from becoming potus.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/democrats-can-use-the-electoral-college-to-stop-trump-but-not-how-you-think/2016/12/05/c69bb24e-ba86-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wayne, here is change.org taking out newspaper ads, begging electors not to vote for the newly elected trump.

all kinds if hollywood activists did it too.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/310466-full-page-ads-urge-gop-electors-not-to-vote-for-trump%3famp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She said half of them are. Yes, that's what she said, and a lot of people think that was exactly why she lost, which is precisely what she deserved. So I'll do what you do here - you lied. She said half.

You're denying she said that?Yes, she said "you could put half ..."

Did Biden say to a roomfull of blacks, that Republicans want to put y'all back in chains?

Given the % of Rs who are living in a fantasy world and claim without any evidence that Biden lost, she was correct.

Given the % of Rs who are living in a fantasy world and claim without any evidence that Biden lost, she was correct.

i have no doubt you think she was correct. you’re entitled to that opinion. but it’s interesting, then, when you act butt hurt when those people you despise, respond with let’s go brandon.

you show nothing but loathing, yet you ask for respect. that’s what cracks me up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i have no doubt you think she was correct. you’re entitled to that opinion. but it’s interesting, then, when you act butt hurt when those people you despise, respond with let’s go brandon.

you show nothing but loathing, yet you ask for respect. that’s what cracks me up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think you need to look in the mirror cuz I've never seen anyone as vile as you. The way you talk about women or anyone you dislike shows a total lack of class. Your constant insults to members of this site is stunning.

How do I show nothing but loathing? I'm not here day in and day out, hour after hour, at all hours of the day and night feeling like I need to respond with insults to every post like you do. I guess you could say what I think of you would be loathing ( if I really cared about you) as there's not a chance in hell that I would want to have anything to do with you because I think you are a POS the way you talk to everybody.

Enough people on this site have met me in person to know what type of person I am. I doubt there's very many people who would stand up for you or your reputation.

Now is the time to post how I use the word retard one time so I can give you my standard response back to say how I was making fun of you and the other conservatives who used to say they were so superior yet allowed Trump to mock the handicapped.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think you need to look in the mirror cuz I've never seen anyone as vile as you. The way you talk about women or anyone you dislike shows a total lack of class. Your constant insults to members of this site is stunning.

How do I show nothing but loathing? I'm not here day in and day out, hour after hour, at all hours of the day and night feeling like I need to respond with insults to every post like you do. I guess you could say what I think of you would be loathing ( if I really cared about you) as there's not a chance in hell that I would want to have anything to do with you because I think you are a POS the way you talk to everybody.

Enough people on this site have met me in person to know what type of person I am. I doubt there's very many people who would stand up for you or your reputation.

Now is the time to post how I use the word retard one time so I can give you my standard response back to say how I was making fun of you and the other conservatives who used to say they were so superior yet allowed Trump to mock the handicapped.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i don’t need to look in the mirror, i’m not the one who started a post because let’s go brandon hurt my delicate feelings. i have no problem taking what i dish out. fair is fair.

you pre-emptively bring up your use of the word retard ( and your insistence that there’s nothing wrong with it, which is even
more stunning to me) as if it’s not a valid example for me to bring up, of you being every bit as vile as you say i am.

paul, i happily concede that if you focus on my worst moments, and ignore your worst moments, that you compare favorably to me. but it’s not how you compare people. it’s convenient for you if we do it that way for sure, but it’s not a legitimate way to do it.

“retard” is ok. calling tens of
millions of americans “deplorable” is ok. but you can’t take “let’s go brandon.”

makes sense.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You're all completely missing the point of Lets Go Brandon. It's at least as much of an arrow aimed at the media, as it is at Biden. The media is constantly telling us to ignore what we plainly see and hear, and listen to their pro-liberal spin instead.
I think the obvious answer is the announcer knew she was on live TV and was witty in trying to minimize the situation.

I think the obvious answer is the announcer knew she was on live TV and was witty in trying to minimize the situation.

very possible.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

.

I think the obvious answer is the announcer knew she was on live TV

.

Yeah, no ..she probably had no idea she was on live tv..,,
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

except there’s no evidence that there was a plan to overthrow biden.

also, unless i am very mistaken, when bush beat gore, the democrats took that to court in “an attempt to overthrow the newly elected POTUS”.

That is what is legally available to a presidential candidate, you omit that Gore was VP and even though he was the opposition candidate the Electoral College results went through

and after the 2016 election, but before electoral certification, there were a fair number of people begging the electors not to vote for Trump . which again, seems like an obvious “attempt of overthrow the newly elected potus.”

Somebody said something....

so other than the two times when your side did it recently, there aren’t any examples in history of anyone doing it. That’s what you’re saying. i mean that’s just brilliant.

keep bleating like a good sheep wayne.

“republicans are baaaaaaaad.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Examples in history 1800, 1824, 1860, 1876

I think you dream of a pair of high rubber boots and a nice ewe.

Was this Jim????

There was a guy, who could best be described as the village idiot that was walking around Ridgefield, CT with his unleashed dog all last weekend, shouting ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ up and down the main street. His take was that the dog was named Brandon, he did this all day.

Was this Jim????

There was a guy, who could best be described as the village idiot that was walking around Ridgefield, CT with his unleashed dog all last weekend, shouting ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ up and down the main street. His take was that the dog was named Brandon, he did this all day.

Good one!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device