CNN contributor and Yale University lecturer, blames Trump for Will Smith slapping Chris Rock at the Oscars and for people sticking around.

Yes, everyone in Hollywood takes their cues from Trump.

Wow.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-analyst-blames-trump-aftermath-will-smith-chris-rock-oscars-incident

I heard Will Smith is being invited to speak at CPAC
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

some guy i never heard of, thinks it was Trump's fault . big, big whoop.

WOW So much for not caring about what someone says who you dont Know!

you want to see TDS ondisplay ? head over to NEWSMAX at least 3 article a day involving Trump and his victimization

and only right wingers think she blamed Trump ..


Herr comment "So did like anyone walk out after that happened??? Or are we getting an independent psychological case study on how Trump got normalized?"

doesn't sound like she's blaming Trump as much as the people who found his and Smith actions in public acceptable...and said nothing and sat still.. He (Smith) should have been escorted out and got his award in the mail , but fame got him a pass ! Sound familiar

some guy i never heard of, thinks it was Trump's fault . big, big whoop.

WOW So much for not caring about what someone says who you dont Know!

you want to see TDS ondisplay ? head over to NEWSMAX at least 3 article a day involving Trump and his victimization

and only right wingers think she blamed Trump ..


Herr comment "So did like anyone walk out after that happened??? Or are we getting an independent psychological case study on how Trump got normalized?"

doesn't sound like she's blaming Trump as much as the people who found his and Smith actions in public acceptable...and said nothing and sat still.. He (Smith) should have been escorted out and got his award in the mail , but fame got him a pass ! Sound familiar

you posted someone that no one has ever heard of. i posted a CNN contributor and lecturer at Yale. Meaning i posted someone who’s highly regarded in the left.

Newsmax is a joke, not reliable obviously.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i posted someone who’s highly regarded in the left.


you have quite the Active Imagination:btu:

She’s exactly right.

No she’s not
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No she’s not
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no she’s not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Asha’s reaction to MAGAworld

Is it a slow news day in MAGAland???

I have to say I’m flattered that my opinion is so important in their alternate reality 😂

Of course, They can't talk about the Eastman decision or the Navarro/Scavino contempt vote, they have to fill the time w something.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Asha’s reaction to MAGAworld

Is it a slow news day in MAGAland???

I have to say I’m flattered that my opinion is so important in their alternate reality 😂

Of course, They can't talk about the Eastman decision or the Navarro/Scavino contempt vote, they have to fill the time w something.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

she’s in CNN and is a lecturer at yale. she’s a relevant person in the left.

yes, pointing out the absurdity of her statement is a character flaw of conservatives. laughing at her means we are bad, not that she said something ridiculous.

i have news for you paul. people
slapped one another before anyone knew who trump was. that may come as a shock to you, but there are some ugly parts of humanity that are not 100% Trumps fault.

we can and should talk about the eastman decision, we should also dicusss inflation, crime, and the mess at the southern border. can’t you discuss multiple things?


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Here’s a guy who will never have a chance because of people of your ilk

THE REVENGE OF THE NORMAL REPUBLICANS

Will Hurd thinks there are enough normal voters to deliver him the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Here’s a guy who will never have a chance because of people of your ilk

THE REVENGE OF THE NORMAL REPUBLICANS

Will Hurd thinks there are enough normal voters to deliver him the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’ve never heard of him, so he has little chance.

your idea of a normal
republican is a wuss who would be guaranteed to lose in a general
election.

we nominated normal republicans in 2008 and 2012. you forget what the entire media did to them? that’s why trump won the nomination in 2016. we needed someone who could beat the left in the arena of dirty fighting, and he did.

Desantis is an extraordinary republican, which is precisely why you are scared sh*fleas of him. you’re terrified of him, and you should be. He has many of the positive attributes of trump, with apparently ( this could
change obviously) none of the 6 year-old brat. he has many of the attributes that will appeal
to trump fans, with no visible evidence of the insanity that made it easy to demonize him.

he’s standing by a wife with cancer. as opposed to liberal hero john edwards, who cheated on his wife when she was battling cancer.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

DeSantis’ political views change with the moods of his base.
It looks like suddenly for you morals count, though I could see your Edwards and raise you one Gingrich.
As far as his wonderful claims that educators are grooming children.
Anyone with half a brain would realize that people don’t change their sexual orientation because of what they read.
If that was true there would be no gay people. They’ve all read about straight people for their whole lives and haven’t changed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

DeSantis’ political views change with the moods of his base.
It looks like suddenly for you morals count, though I could see your Edwards and raise you one Gingrich.
As far as his wonderful claims that educators are grooming children.
Anyone with half a brain would realize that people don’t change their sexual orientation because of what they read.
If that was true there would be no gay people. They’ve all read about straight people for their whole lives and haven’t changed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

morals always count. But when judging a far off executive, results count a lot more.

true on gingrich. but it’s you, not me, putting morals at the front and center. i care more that gingrich worked with bill
clinton to cut taxes, balance the budget, and generate a surplus. that result matters a lot more than infidelity. i wouldn’t want gingrich to date my mom. but i’d have loved for him to be potus when he was at the top of his game.

your side also flip flops on the importance of morals. in the bill clinton years, liberals paid zero attention to ethics and focused on results. in the trump years, liberals ignored results and focused on ethics.

of course plenty of republicans did the same thing, in the opposite manner. no shortage of hypocrisy in the gop.

“people don’t change their sexual orientation based on what they read.”.

that’s certainly true most of the time. but i don’t want elementary school
kids reading about any kind of sexual orientation, regardless if the effect it may or may not have on their lifestyle choices. let them read about Henry Huggins and Beezus and Ramona and Ribsy. Let them be kids for christ’s sake.

it’s an elementary schools
job to teach reading, writing, math, science,,citizenship. It’s my job, not the teachers job, to tell my kids what to think about different sexual
impulses and choices. it’s the schools job to make sure my kids aren’t bothering anyone else. it’s my job, and mine alone, to teach my kids what to think about these things.

these kids are way behind in reading and math with all they’ve missed. get them caught up in academics. leave the divisive political discussions to the parents

i don’t know what incentivizes people to make these choices, but i’m convinced that waaay more people are making different choices than previously. i could
be wrong, but i don’t think i am. i think that culturally, we are encouraging different choices to show how tolerant and woke we are. i’m not sure it’s a good thing in every case.

regardless, it has nothing to do with the purpose of an elementary school.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why can children only read books from the 50s

Yep, you flip almost as much as DeSantis

CNN contributor and Yale University lecturer, blames Trump for Will Smith slapping Chris Rock at the Oscars and for people sticking around.

Yes, everyone in Hollywood takes their cues from Trump.

Wow.

your idea of a normal
republican is a wuss who would be guaranteed to lose in a general
election.

we nominated normal republicans in 2008 and 2012. you forget what the entire media did to them? that’s why trump won the nomination in 2016. we needed someone who could beat the left in the arena of dirty fighting, and he did.

he’s standing by a wife with cancer. as opposed to liberal hero john edwards, who cheated on his wife when she was battling cancer.

but it’s you, not me, putting morals at the front and center.

Meanwhile in the Moral Majority party
Several Republicans say they are “upset” that Madison Cawthorn said his Republican colleagues have invited him to cocaine parties and orgies. One Republican said people are now asking who is partaking in orgies, is that because they didn’t get an invite? Kevin McCarthy plans to talk with Cawthorn about it, does he feel he’s missing out too?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why can children only read books from the 50s


Elementary schools don't have libraries large enough to house every book that has been published. Choices as to which books their libraries contain have to be made. The citizens of the community have a right and obligation to determine what is in their school libraries. Especially in regards to books that are not part of the curricula. And the citizens also have the right to determine if the school's curricula includes controversial material.

Otherwise, parents can let their children read books from any era.

Anyone with half a brain would realize that people don’t change their sexual orientation because of what they read.


You might want to give that some more thought. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/09/57342/

I thought you didn’t believe in psychology
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why can children only read books from the 50s

Yep, you flip almost as much as DeSantis

CNN contributor and Yale University lecturer, blames Trump for Will Smith slapping Chris Rock at the Oscars and for people sticking around.

Yes, everyone in Hollywood takes their cues from Trump.

Wow.

your idea of a normal
republican is a wuss who would be guaranteed to lose in a general
election.

we nominated normal republicans in 2008 and 2012. you forget what the entire media did to them? that’s why trump won the nomination in 2016. we needed someone who could beat the left in the arena of dirty fighting, and he did.

he’s standing by a wife with cancer. as opposed to liberal hero john edwards, who cheated on his wife when she was battling cancer.

but it’s you, not me, putting morals at the front and center.

"Why can children only read books from the 50s"

Even you know what I meant. Let them read books that allow them to retain their childhoods for a bit. You're willing to use kids like rats in a lab experiment. I'm less inclined to do so. I know what constitutes happy and productive childhood and what doesn't.

"Yep, you flip almost as much as DeSantis"

Some examples of my flipping? I go where facts and truth and common sense take me. You desperately cling to your left wing manifesto at all times, same as the rest of you here.

Meanwhile in the Moral Majority party
Several Republicans say they are “upset” that Madison Cawthorn said his Republican colleagues have invited him to cocaine parties and orgies. One Republican said people are now asking who is partaking in orgies, is that because they didn’t get an invite? Kevin McCarthy plans to talk with Cawthorn about it, does he feel he’s missing out too?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

(1) I'm pretty skeptical about what you wrote.

(2) I don't take my cues from any elected politician, I assume that they're all morally bankrupt. Unlike you, I don't define either side by the worst behaviors exhibited by a tiny speck of the party. I think that the beliefs of regular folks is a much better barometer for what a party "is".

But you continue, you ignore all the immorality on the left and try to define the entire GOP by the worst actions of a tiny speck of its masses. We know that makes you feel better, s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g your thumb while saying over and over "the GOP is Trump, the GOP is Trump, the GOP is Trump".

Trump to Putin: Release Info on Hunter Biden's Business With Oligarchs

from NEWSMAX where TDS is 24x7

https://www.newsmax.com/us/vladimir-putin-oligarchs-hunter-biden-business/2022/03/29/id/1063396/#CommentSection

"Why can children only read books from the 50s"

Even you know what I meant. Let them read books that allow them to retain their childhoods for a bit. You're willing to use kids like rats in a lab experiment. I'm less inclined to do so. I know what constitutes happy and productive childhood and what doesn't.

"Yep, you flip almost as much as DeSantis"

Some examples of my flipping? I go where facts and truth and common sense take me. You desperately cling to your left wing manifesto at all times, same as the rest of you here.

I just showed how you flipped from claiming a loss of decency in society is not TFGs fault to how Republicans needed a “tough” guy like Trump to win

Better go live on an island or an autocratically governed country (Hungary or Russia come to mind) that way you’ll never have explain why Sam has two moms and take away a kids childhood
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

(1) I'm pretty skeptical about what you wrote.

(2) I don't take my cues from any elected politician, I assume that they're all morally bankrupt. Unlike you, I don't define either side by the worst behaviors exhibited by a tiny speck of the party. I think that the beliefs of regular folks is a much better barometer for what a party "is".

But you continue, you ignore all the immorality on the left and try to define the entire GOP by the worst actions of a tiny speck of its masses. We know that makes you feel better, s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g your thumb while saying over and over "the GOP is Trump, the GOP is Trump, the GOP is Trump".

Despite Madison Cawthorn's attempt to sex shame them, I, for one, think that Republican leaders in Washington, DC have every right to gather together to have group sex with each other.
And the cocaine. Don’t forget the cocaine at the GOP sex orgies.

I’m viewing Marsha Blackburn's frequent bed head in a totally different light now and saddened they didn't Just Say No.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Better go live on an island or an autocratically governed country (Hungary or Russia come to mind) that way you’ll never have explain why Sam has two moms and take away a kids childhood


Authoritarian Pete lectures Jim on what he calls autocratic countries.

Kudos to the progressive orgy and cocaine mixers with wheelchair accessibility. We've come a long way baby
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Kudos to the progressive orgy and cocaine mixers with wheelchair accessibility. We've come a long way baby
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Authoritarian Pete celebrates orgy. Authoritarian Progressives celebrate the right to orgies and the long way we have come to the Progressive world of self identity. Be whatever you want to be. Don't be trapped in some restrictive biological entity. Life is an orgy of self identified gender mixers partying into the bliss of desired and chosen social constructs--the Progressive heaven on earth.

Bigotry, sedition, and subservience to Russia are quite acceptable. They even condone it to appease their Fox News base.

But, orgies are one step too far!!

But at least we found the kind of thing that warrants a talking-to from McCarthy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Bigotry, sedition, and subservience to Russia are quite acceptable. They even condone it to appease their Fox News base.

But, orgies are one step too far!!

But at least we found the kind of thing that warrants a talking-to from McCarthy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Authoritarian, all-knowing Pete again demonstrates his insights into the minds of the Fox News base. They are obviously, as Pete tells us, all bigots and Putin's puppets. We all know this, but need to be reminded of what is obvious.

Chris Rock forgot a key rule: If you’re going to make fun of anyone’s wife, make sure it’s Ted Cruz’s. Because then Ted will work tirelessly to make sure you become the next President of the United States.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Chris Rock forgot a key rule: If you’re going to make fun of anyone’s wife, make sure it’s Ted Cruz’s. Because then Ted will work tirelessly to make sure you become the next President of the United States.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Authoritarian Pete is reminding us of what he says is a key rule. Pete considers himself an expert on the important rules.

I heard the Academy wants to pull Will Smiths Best Actor nomination for the role of Ali, The Greatest would never bitch slap someone like a pissy rich chick who's mad at the maid because she folded the towels wrong.

He must have been channeling his inner Joan Crawford
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I heard the Academy wants to pull Will Smiths Best Actor nomination for the role of Ali, The Greatest would never bitch slap someone like a pissy rich chick who's mad at the maid because she folded the towels wrong.

He must have been channeling his inner Joan Crawford
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Smith doesn’t slap the men who sleep with his wife, only those who joke about her. Principles.

there’s a babylon bee headline saying “chris rock smooths things over with will smith by sleeping with his wife.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

False election claims dominate party for Trump, allies at Mar-a-Lago
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

False election claims dominate party for Trump, allies at Mar-a-Lago
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

lots of desperate liberals will talk about trump no. stop until
november. better for them
than talking about inflation, crime, immigration, gas prices, etc.

it’s ok when stacey abrams makes false election claims bough. and ok when congressional
democrats did it after the 2016 election.

but it’s a huge problem when trump
does it.

because “false equivalence!!”.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The former president said he had not destroyed any call logs from the afternoon of Jan. 6 and took part in no phone calls on “burner phones.” He defended his long silence during the attack by claiming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others were responsible for ending the deadly violence.

A vote for trump is a vote against America
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

lots of desperate liberals will talk about trump no. stop until
november. better for them
than talking about inflation, crime, immigration, gas prices, etc.

it’s ok when stacey abrams makes false election claims bough. and ok when congressional
democrats did it after the 2016 election.

but it’s a huge problem when trump
does it.

because “false equivalence!!”.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Says the man who post Trump polls beating Biden for 2024 in 2021 22
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Says the man who post Trump polls beating Biden for 2024 in 2021 22
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

First, i think trump would get creamed in 2024. i don’t want him
to run.

second, trump s a potential
issue for 2024. he’s not a big issue in the midterms ( unless he declares before then), but democrats want to keep him an issue, because it’s a winning issue for them, so fine, it’s smart for them
to do that if it works

third, why is it always ok with you when your side tries to overturn or delegitimization a list election, but you go crazy when the right does it?

That’s the difference between us. I can saybgrump shouldn’t run again because it’s disgusting for him to make false claims that the election was stolen. .

but that’s exactly what stacey abrams says, and you defend her

you’re not actually opposed to making false claims of election fraud. you only care when republicans do it.

same with every single other issue.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

First, i think trump would get creamed in 2024. i don’t want him
to run.

second, trump s a potential
issue for 2024. he’s not a big issue in the midterms ( unless he declares before then), but democrats want to keep him an issue, because it’s a winning issue for them, so fine, it’s smart for them
to do that if it works

third, why is it always ok with you when your side tries to overturn or delegitimization a list election, but you go crazy when the right does it?

That’s the difference between us. I can saybgrump shouldn’t run again because it’s disgusting for him to make false claims that the election was stolen. .

but that’s exactly what stacey abrams says, and you defend her

you’re not actually opposed to making false claims of election fraud. you only care when republicans do it.

same with every single other issue.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


still in denial and regurgitating your false facts and sea of false equivalences . Shocking
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

still in denial and regurgitating your false facts and sea of false equivalences . Shocking
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Stacey Abrams is making insuooorted accusations that her list election was stolen. Her making that baseless accusation, hurts the confidence americans have in elections .

you don’t like it when republicans fabricate charges if election fraud, but you’re fine when she does it.

you can’t just say “false
equivalence.”. you have to explain why it’s a false equivalence. and you don’t explain why, because you can’t. she’s still saying the election was stolen from the voters of GA. but you’re ok with it, she’s a democrat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

One said something, the other organized an armed insurrection with the purpose of overturning the election that he lost.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

One said something, the other organized an armed insurrection with the purpose of overturning the election that he lost.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

true. but wayne has criticized trump for making false claims of the election being stolen, and undermining confidence in our election integrity. in that regard, Abrams did the same thing. but he won’t, he can’t, criticize her.

and some congressional democrats i. 2916, tried to u do the results of an election because they lost. again, zip from you guys.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Meanwhile, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett were all members of George W. Bush’s legal team to prevent the recount in Florida in 2000 that gave Bush the Electoral College.
That's why Trump nominated Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, not because of "merit". He thought they would hand him the election. Problem was he had ZERO evidence of fraud and couldn't meet the threshold for a case reviewable by the SCOTUS.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

true. but wayne has criticized trump for making false claims of the election being stolen, and undermining confidence in our election integrity. in that regard, Abrams did the same thing. but he won’t, he can’t, criticize her.

and some congressional democrats i. 2916, tried to u do the results of an election because they lost. again, zip from you guys.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You believe Pete's claim that Trump "organized an armed insurrection" is true?

You believe Pete's claim that Trump "organized an armed insurrection" is true?

no. and i shouldnt have said so.

at the rally, on video, trump told the folks to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the capital. In TDS land, somehow that means he organized an armed coup.

if the gop takes the house, as appears certain, they should
impeach biden. for the same exact reason that a pitcher whose teammates are getting beaned, needs to retaliate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If you think that Putin's brutality in Ukraine, Orban's so-called "election" in Hungary, Vucic's election in Serbia, LePen's campaign in France, or GOP efforts to attack democracy are unrelated stories, you don't understand the current global battle between autocracy & democracy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If you think that Putin's brutality in Ukraine, Orban's so-called "election" in Hungary, Vucic's election in Serbia, LePen's campaign in France, or GOP efforts to attack democracy are unrelated stories, you don't understand the current global battle between autocracy & democracy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Authoritarian Pete calls "elections" autocracy and lies about GOP attacking democracy.

Authoritarian Pete calls "elections" autocracy and lies about GOP attacking democracy.

he knows what’s coming in November and he can’t handle it, the wheels are coming off the bus big time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he knows what’s coming in November and he can’t handle it, the wheels are coming off the bus big time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In Florida, kids can’t say “gay” but in Tennessee they can say “I do”.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In Florida, kids can’t say “gay”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

lie. you’re in trump-level territory for your psychotic lying.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In Florida, kids can’t say “gay” but in Tennessee they can say “I do”.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

lie. you’re in trump-level territory for your psychotic lying.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Just leave out half the quote, truly a member of the Groping Ogre Party

Just leave out half the quote, truly a member of the Groping Ogre Party

You show us where in any FL law it says students can't say "gay".

You can no longer get through a sentence without telling a demonstrable lie, because so much of the current facts and the truth supports my political agenda, not yours.

You know that you cannot win an honest discussion about the FL law. So instead of just saying "I can see where some people would like that law", you lie absurdly about what it says.

Then I just looked up the proposed TN law. You lied about that too. The proposed law would make common law marriages legal. And the only way you can bring "child marriage" into it, is by pointing out that the proposed bill, as currently written, doesn't have a minimum age.

Read my link. A democrat asked the following (reasonable) question to the republican who sponsored the bill:

"What in your legislation would stop a 16-year-old from going down with someone else to the courthouse and getting this done, since there’s no age restriction within your law?”

State Rep Tom Leatherwood, the guy who sponsored the bill, said it would be construed that minors cannot enter into it.:

If they pass the bill without an age restriction, that's beyond stupid. They haven't done that yet.

So once again, you lied.

The proposed bill will make it harder for same-sex couples to be legally married, that's what the fuss is about. Nobody's intention is tp let 12 year olds get married.

You can't go 2 seconds without lying right now.

https://www.actionnews5.com/2022/04/06/proposed-legislation-could-legalize-child-marriage-tennessee/

So the purpose of the law is to make sure that something that almost never happens doesn’t, or is it just to call educators evil.
Because we all assume that people who are “called” to be educators would also feel compelled to indoctrinate children.
Pretty #^&#^&#^&#^&in warped mind you have
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So the purpose of the law is to make sure that something that almost never happens doesn’t, or is it just to call educators evil.
Because we all assume that people who are “called” to be educators would also feel compelled to indoctrinate children.
Pretty #^&#^&#^&#^&in warped mind you have
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Authoritarian propaganda minded Pete says Jim has a warped mind.

So the purpose of the law is to make sure that something that almost never happens doesn’t, or is it just to call educators evil.
Because we all assume that people who are “called” to be educators would also feel compelled to indoctrinate children.
Pretty #^&#^&#^&#^&in warped mind you have
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

how often does lynching happen?

where does it say educators are evil?

every town, state, and the feds have education guidelines that teachers must adhere to. but only those guidelines proposed by republicans, would you say call
educators evil.

you’re batsh*t crazy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In the 1890s, the white press labelled the unapologetically Black Ida B. Wells hysterical - and hopelessly “unobjective” - because of her fierce opposition to lynching.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In the 1890s, the white press labelled the unapologetically Black Ida B. Wells hysterical - and hopelessly “unobjective” - because of her fierce opposition to lynching.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In 2021, Why should racial murders matter more than non-racial murders?