Hunter Biden could be charged with tax crimes

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809

As he should be if he committed a crime just like Donald

^^^trump derangement :kewl:

Hunter Biden could be charged with tax crimes

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809

As he should be if he committed a crime just like Donald

how can that be? we were told it was russian disinformation?

either (1) the left, big tech, and the media all lied. Or (2) bidens DOJ takes its direction from russian disinformation. there isn’t a third choice. so which is it?

how can that be? we were told it was russian disinformation?



200 former top level experts in something insisted:bl:

how can that be? we were told it was russian disinformation?

either (1) the left, big tech, and the media all lied. Or (2) bidens DOJ takes its direction from russian disinformation. there isn’t a third choice. so which is it?

Who said these maybe crimes are because of the laptop

Was that in the leak?

I still think a judge will throw it out before it gets to trial. If he’s even charged

If anything came off the laptop as the bases for the charge

What’s funny is you guys think you’re vindicated because they say he lied on a form to get a gun in 2018 Oh the horror! what’s that a $50 fine and owed taxes but everyone already knew that.

So with a nutshell your whole laptop story is still a bust

Yeah trumps misdeeds and potential crimes make Hunter look like a Boy Scout But will defend Trump to the end that he’s persecuted by the deep state


Question is Hunter an elected official does he have an official position in the government or is he a private citizen clearly Republicans don’t care that he’s a private citizen

where is the smoking gun that ties his father to China and Ukraine and all the other nonsense you guys have been spewing since the laptop story came out?




Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim needs his but but Hunter win and snarky boy is just waiting for the next post he can show us his sharp wit; well in his head maybe. Yet Trumps circle of supporters, partners in crimes and family employees continue to be charged with crimes. The DOJ still believes Trump is still holding classified documents he doesn’t own (crime) and continues to lie about having them (crime) and the Trump endorsed politicians are suggesting a civil war is coming. Hunter is the real risk to America right:rotf3:

where is the smoking gun that ties his father to China and Ukraine and all the other nonsense you guys have been spewing since the laptop story came out?


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I thought the whole thing about the laptop was it was going to show Pres Biden was getting $?

Who said these maybe crimes are because of the laptop

Was that in the leak?

I still think a judge will throw it out before it gets to trial. If he’s even charged

If anything came off the laptop as the bases for the charge

What’s funny is you guys think you’re vindicated because they say he lied on a form to get a gun in 2018 Oh the horror! what’s that a $50 fine and owed taxes but everyone already knew that.

So with a nutshell your whole laptop story is still a bust

Yeah trumps misdeeds and potential crimes make Hunter look like a Boy Scout But will defend Trump to the end that he’s persecuted by the deep state


Question is Hunter an elected official does he have an official position in the government or is he a private citizen clearly Republicans don’t care that he’s a private citizen

where is the smoking gun that ties his father to China and Ukraine and all the other nonsense you guys have been spewing since the laptop story came out?




Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

why do you think a judge throws it out? i’m very curious what you base that on?

Jim needs his but but Hunter win and snarky boy is just waiting for the next post he can show us his sharp wit; well in his head maybe. Yet Trumps circle of supporters, partners in crimes and family employees continue to be charged with crimes. The DOJ still believes Trump is still holding classified documents he doesn’t own (crime) and continues to lie about having them (crime) and the Trump endorsed politicians are suggesting a civil war is coming. Hunter is the real risk to America right:rotf3:


but trump!!

i don’t need anything. you’re way more obsessed with teump
then i am with biden. bidens time is
about up

why do you think a judge throws it out? i’m very curious what you base that on?

I have mentioned it before it’s called Chain of custody . Or basically it’s a contaminated crime scene

Not because Not honest Rudy claim theirs stuffs on it


https://securitycurrent.com/hunter-bidens-laptop-part-deux-subpoena-vs-warrant/

Good read on the laptop


And let be honest they were investigating hunters business dealings before the laptop stories started in December 2019,

Investigation into Hunter Biden's "tax affairs" began in 2018

And the gun form you don’t need a laptop to prove that. Which is pretty trivial

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/11/lying-buy-gun-fear-not-feds/


If you lied to buy a firearm, fear not the feds.
Your chances of being prosecuted by the Justice Department for falsifying information to illegally buy a gun are almost zero.
Reviews by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System in fiscal 2017 led to 112,000 gun-purchase denials because people were in forbidden categories, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The Justice Department’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) investigated 12,700 of those cases.
How many of the investigated cases resulted in prosecutions?
Twelve.
That’s 0.09 percent of the cases ATF investigated.

Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?” as part of the background check.

Agin let’s be honest 50% if all gun owners lied like hunter did !

let’s prosecute them all
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

but trump!!

i don’t need anything. you’re way more obsessed with teump
then i am with biden. bidens time is
about up

Really Jim, are you not up to speed on how Trump continues to drive the Republican Party into what my father and our extended family (all republicans) couldn’t even recognize today. I can’t believe you don’t understand why we are still concerned about Trump and his influence, even as he and those around him are in legal jeopardy. I hope Row and women voters snap the party back to reality in November, or we are domed to see idiots like Hershel Walker elected to run our country.

Really Jim, are you not up to speed on how Trump continues to drive the Republican Party into what my father and our extended family (all republicans) couldn’t even recognize today. I can’t believe you don’t understand why we are still concerned about Trump and his influence, even as he and those around him are in legal jeopardy. I hope Row and women voters snap the party back to reality in November, or we are domed to see idiots like Hershel Walker elected to run our country.

gimme a break. america liked Trumps policies, they were popular, effective, and he did things for both sides ( tax cuts, criminal
justice reform).

Your side says it’s fine if i share a public restroom with little
girls and fine if i compete physically with girls and says that men can get pregnant and that cops are the enemy. Which side is unrecognizable, exactly?

Bill Clinton was a democrat president who slashed capital gains taxes and paid for it by kicking millions of deadbeats off of welfare. Is that something that today’s democrat party would embrace? Today that’s what a conservative republican says.

The only way todays GOP is unrecognizable to what it was 15 years ago, is how well we’re polling with hispanics.

gimme a break. america liked Trumps policies, they were popular, effective, and he did things for both sides ( tax cuts, criminal
justice reform).

Your side says it’s fine if i share a public restroom with little
girls and fine if i compete physically with girls and says that men can get pregnant and that cops are the enemy. Which side is unrecognizable, exactly?

Bill Clinton was a democrat president who slashed capital gains taxes and paid for it by kicking millions of deadbeats off of welfare. Is that something that today’s democrat party would embrace? Today that’s what a conservative republican says.

The only way todays GOP is unrecognizable to what it was 15 years ago, is how well we’re polling with hispanics.

The Democrats want to do what you claim as much as your side wants to make abortion a felony with no exceptions, eliminate gay marriage, permit child marriage, eliminate Social Security, Medicare and the federal department of education and make it so all states are equally as unsafe as Republican ones:
States with the highest murder rate:

Mississippi - 20.50 per 100k
Louisiana - 19.90 per 100k
Alabama - 14.20 per 100k
Missouri - 14 per 100k
Arkansas - 13 per 100k
South Carolina - 12.70 per 100k
Tennessee - 11.50 per 100k
Maryland - 11.40 per 100k
Illinois - 11.20 per 100k
It's not just Chicago, Stupid.

As far as the Republican Party being unrecognizable…….

In 2011, just 36% of Republicans said a politician who committed an immoral act could still fulfill their duties.

With Trump on the 2016 ballot, that shot up to 70%.

In 2020: 71%.

The exact situational ethics and moral relativism they claim makes liberals immoral. Their hypocrisy is revolting.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I hope Row and women voters snap the party back to reality in November, or we are domed to see idiots like Hershel Walker elected to run our country.



classic....dim wit, what's that?...like a 5 watt bulb?

I thought the whole thing about the laptop was it was going to show Pres Biden was getting $?

that's "the Big Guy"...get it straight

gimme a break. america liked Trumps policies, they were popular, effective, and he did things for both sides ( tax cuts, criminal
justice reform).

Your side says it’s fine if i share a public restroom with little
girls and fine if i compete physically with girls and says that men can get pregnant and that cops are the enemy. Which side is unrecognizable, exactly?

Bill Clinton was a democrat president who slashed capital gains taxes and paid for it by kicking millions of deadbeats off of welfare. Is that something that today’s democrat party would embrace? Today that’s what a conservative republican says.

The only way todays GOP is unrecognizable to what it was 15 years ago, is how well we’re polling with hispanics.

I guess he should have won in a landslide Jim, oh wait he did right, I’m pretty sure America didn’t want more of the same.

Really Jim, are you not up to speed on how Trump continues to drive the Republican Party into what my father and our extended family (all republicans) couldn’t even recognize today. I can’t believe you don’t understand why we are still concerned about Trump and his influence, even as he and those around him are in legal jeopardy. I hope Row and women voters snap the party back to reality in November, or we are domed to see idiots like Hershel Walker elected to run our country.

do you even know what the Roe ruling does einstein? it doesn’t make abortions illegal, it allows states to decide ( which is constitutionally where it belongs). Once there, abortion will only be prohibited in states where a majority of citizens want it to be prohibited. That’s called “democracy”.

Walker is the only dummy huh? none on the left? AOC, Hank Johnson ( i’m afraid Guam is gonna tip over), Maxine Waters, eric swalwell sleeps with a chinese soy, Joe Biden lately, how many more examples? plenty of idiots on both sides.

classic....dim wit, what's that?...like a 5 watt bulb?

I pop in to poke fun at the stupidity I see in this forum, if autofill gets ahead of me I could care less, unless you need help getting the meaning. Keep up the most important job of your life, correcting spelling errors on a site frequented by four people must really make your parents proud.

I guess he should have won in a landslide Jim, oh wait he did right, I’m pretty sure America didn’t want more of the same.

no, he lost resoundingly because he was such a jerk. americans liked his policies, they despised the man. I can i understand both of those sentiments.

If you deny his policies were popular, please
explain why the gallup poll showed an all time record number of americans said they were better of after 4 years of trump, more than any other president whod ever been polled?

i’m reacting to facts. you can only react to your ideology. americans liked trump’s policies,,but they disliked trump as a person, more.

Which suggests that someone who’d govern like trump, without being a world class jerk, could be very popular. which is why your side is terrified of Desantis. Trumps populist, effective policies without the attitude of an 8 year old applied brat.

do you even know what the Roe ruling does einstein? it doesn’t make abortions illegal, it allows states to decide ( which is constitutionally where it belongs). Once there, abortion will only be prohibited in states where a majority of citizens want it to be prohibited. That’s called “democracy”.

Walker is the only dummy huh? none on the left? AOC, Hank Johnson ( i’m afraid Guam is gonna tip over), Maxine Waters, eric swalwell sleeps with a chinese soy, Joe Biden lately, how many more examples? plenty of idiots on both sides.

I know exactly what it does, I also know several lied stating they would go there before appointment and your party already knows what that decision will do. If you don’t think women are voting with that decision in there (get it Scott) mines (double fun Scott), than you fooling yourself.

no, he lost resoundingly because he was such a jerk. americans liked his policies, they despised the man. I can i understand both of those sentiments.

If you deny his policies were popular, please
explain why the gallup poll showed an all time record number of americans said they were better of after 4 years of trump, more than any other president whod ever been polled?

i’m reacting to facts. you can only react to your ideology. americans liked trump’s policies,,but they disliked trump as a person, more.

Which suggests that someone who’d govern like trump, without being a world class jerk, could be very popular. which is why your side is terrified of Desantis. Trumps populist, effective policies without the attitude of an 8 year old applied brat.

Jim you crack me up. You think we aren’t laughing reading you generalize that Americans loved his policies, we know which Americans you really are referring to.

I guess he should have won in a landslide Jim, oh wait he did right, I’m pretty sure America didn’t want more of the same.

if americans don’t want more of the same, why is trump polling well against biden in a theoretical 2024 rematch?

i’m not sure america wants trump back ( even i do not), but they want his sane policies back…cheap gas, no inflation, lower crime, less insanity at the border ( though i give trump an f for not building the wall like he promised), less gender weirdness shoved in our faces.

what % of americans would say they’re better ifff today, than on Trumps last day in office? for sure, not all
of that is bidens fault. But it’s all his problem.

Trump will be all set to run with Marjorie Greene: “I’m not a racist. I don’t care if you’re black, Asian or normal.”

All the normal people will vote for him…..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I pop in to poke fun at the stupidity I see in this forum

.

yes...you've repeated this often...which I guess makes you better than everyone else

Marjorie Greene: “I’m not a racist. I don’t care if you’re black, Asian or normal.”


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

did she really say that?...just curious

Trump will be all set to run with Marjorie Greene: “I’m not a racist. I don’t care if you’re black, Asian or normal.”

All the normal people will vote for him…..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Biden: poor children are just a smart as white children.

But that’s ok.

Breaking News: Hunter Biden has decided to change his name to Hershel Walker, so Republicans will forget his past.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

did she really say that?...just curious

I’m sure that’s what Pete heard.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Trump will be all set to run with Marjorie Greene: “I’m not a racist. I don’t care if you’re black, Asian or normal.”

All the normal people will vote for him…..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

can you source that quote please??

can you source that quote please??

it honestly sounds more like a brandon quote....

it honestly sounds more like a brandon quote....

brandon DID say poor kids are just as smart as white kids. and that was fine.

I googled what pete claims she said, didn’t see anything. As TDF said, i think he’s just literally making it up as he goes along now.

brandon DID say poor kids are just as smart as white kids. and that was fine.

I googled what pete claims she said, didn’t see anything. As TDF said, i think he’s just literally making it up as he goes along now.


Your amazing you claim someone (possibly) tried to run over his wife

Even with police stating They found no evidence that Warnock ran over his estranged wife’s foot with his car

But your so honest and truthful . You suggest hes a lunatic based on a lie?



So, the truth is, Walker did hold a gun to his wife’s head several times (and a knife to her throat) and tried to choke her. But it was over 15 years ago,

Yet you don’t call him a lunatic ?

Then demand a source for what’s clearly sarcasm or hyperbole about Greene

You have odd choices In the conservative you go to bat for .

FYI
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Your amazing you claim someone (possibly) tried to run over his wife

Even with police stating They found no evidence that Warnock ran over his estranged wife’s foot with his car

But your so honest and truthful . You suggest hes a lunatic based on a lie?



So, the truth is, Walker did hold a gun to his wife’s head several times (and a knife to her throat) and tried to choke her. But it was over 15 years ago,

Yet you don’t call him a lunatic ?

Then demand a source for what’s clearly sarcasm or hyperbole about Greene

You have odd choices In the conservative you go to bat for .

FYI
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

f walker did. in fact do that, why isn’t he in prison?

sarcasm or hyperbole about greene? the lunatic put it in quotes. but it’s ok when democrats make stuff up. you do it because you know the truth doesn’t serve your narrative.

Marjorie Taylor Greene is an absolute nut job, that’s not good enough for pete,,his deranged obsession compels him to make stuff up out of thin air. You can’t bring yourself to call him on it, and when i do, guy say the flaw is mine

makes sense. stick with that.

sarcasm or hyperbole about greene? the lunatic put it in quotes.

he doesn't know what quotes are ;)

The worst part about this quote is that you truly can't tell if it's satire without researching.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene doubles down on her claim at the Trump rally that “Democrats are killing Republicans, and it’s the most dangerous thing in this country.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The worst part about this quote is that you truly can't tell if it's satire without researching.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

this is because nobody knows who she is.....

this is because nobody knows who she is.....

If you would spend 1/2 reading articles instead of being a snarky troll you might learn something:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Marjorie Taylor Greene took her seat directly behind Republican House leader Kevin McCarthy, a proximity to power for the firebrand congresswoman that did not go unnoticed, as he unveiled the House GOP's midterm election agenda in Pennsylvania.

Days later, she appeared on stage warming up the crowd for Donald Trump, when the former president rallied voters in Michigan to cast ballots for Republicans, including for control of Congress.

Once shunned as a political pariah for her extremist rhetoric, the Georgia congresswoman who spent her first term in the House stripped of institutional power by Democrats is being celebrated by Republicans and welcomed into the GOP fold. If Republicans win the House majority in the November election, Greene is poised to become an influential player shaping the GOP agenda, an agitator with clout.

“No. 1, we need to impeach Joe Biden. No. 2, We need to impeach Secretary Mayorkas. And No. 3, we should impeach Merrick Garland,” Greene told The Associated Press outside the U.S. Capitol. Alejandro Mayorkas is the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and Garland the attorney general.

Scolding the media for having been “wrong about me" from the start, she said those who know better “take me very seriously.”

“I’m going to be a strong legislator and I’ll be a very involved member of Congress,” she predicted. “I know how to work inside, and I know how to work outside. And I’m looking forward to doing that.”

This is the outlook for the Republican Party in the Trump era, the normalizing of once fringe figures into the highest ranks of political power. It’s a sign of the GOP’s rightward drift that Greene’s association with extremists and nationalists, violent rhetoric and remarks about Jewish people have found a home in elected office. Her ascent brings into focus the challenge ahead for McCarthy, whose GOP ranks are filling with far-right political stars with the potential to play an oversized role in setting the policies, priorities and tone of the new Congress.

“I’ve said for a long time there’s a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party,” said Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, at a briefing ahead of the midterm elections.

When the congresswoman says outlandish things — as she did at the Trump rally earlier this month claiming "Democrats want Republicans dead, and they've already started the killings" — few Republican leaders dare a public or private rebuke of such incendiary language. In this case, she was exaggerating two local incidents involving politics, one that ended tragically in a fatality.

Greene’s political currency stretches beyond her massive social media following and her ability to rake in sizable sums from donors. Her proximity to Trump makes her a force that cannot be ignored by what's left of her mainstream GOP colleagues.

McCarthy’s allowance for Greene to sit front and center with leadership for the campaign rollout was not by accident but design. The Republican lawmakers in attendance celebrated her presence, calling it a sign of the GOP’s “big tent” that welcomes all comers. But Greene's arrival also signaled a stark normalizing of the most extreme elements in the Republican Party.

Longtime political strategist Rick Wilson, a former Republican who left the party in the Trump era, calls Greene’s brand of politics “government by trolling” that marks a dangerous new era for the GOP and will make it difficult to govern. McCarthy is in line to become House speaker if Republicans regain the majority.

The worst part about this quote is that you truly can't tell if it's satire without researching.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

the worst part is that you got caught lying red handed, humiliated. She’s a lunatic pete, i agree with you. you don’t need to lie about her, the truth will suffice.

If you would spend 1/2 reading articles instead of being a snarky troll you might learn something:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Marjorie Taylor Greene took her seat directly behind Republican House leader Kevin McCarthy, a proximity to power for the firebrand congresswoman that did not go unnoticed, as he unveiled the House GOP's midterm election agenda in Pennsylvania.

Days later, she appeared on stage warming up the crowd for Donald Trump, when the former president rallied voters in Michigan to cast ballots for Republicans, including for control of Congress.

Once shunned as a political pariah for her extremist rhetoric, the Georgia congresswoman who spent her first term in the House stripped of institutional power by Democrats is being celebrated by Republicans and welcomed into the GOP fold. If Republicans win the House majority in the November election, Greene is poised to become an influential player shaping the GOP agenda, an agitator with clout.

“No. 1, we need to impeach Joe Biden. No. 2, We need to impeach Secretary Mayorkas. And No. 3, we should impeach Merrick Garland,” Greene told The Associated Press outside the U.S. Capitol. Alejandro Mayorkas is the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and Garland the attorney general.

Scolding the media for having been “wrong about me" from the start, she said those who know better “take me very seriously.”

“I’m going to be a strong legislator and I’ll be a very involved member of Congress,” she predicted. “I know how to work inside, and I know how to work outside. And I’m looking forward to doing that.”

This is the outlook for the Republican Party in the Trump era, the normalizing of once fringe figures into the highest ranks of political power. It’s a sign of the GOP’s rightward drift that Greene’s association with extremists and nationalists, violent rhetoric and remarks about Jewish people have found a home in elected office. Her ascent brings into focus the challenge ahead for McCarthy, whose GOP ranks are filling with far-right political stars with the potential to play an oversized role in setting the policies, priorities and tone of the new Congress.

“I’ve said for a long time there’s a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party,” said Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, at a briefing ahead of the midterm elections.

When the congresswoman says outlandish things — as she did at the Trump rally earlier this month claiming "Democrats want Republicans dead, and they've already started the killings" — few Republican leaders dare a public or private rebuke of such incendiary language. In this case, she was exaggerating two local incidents involving politics, one that ended tragically in a fatality.

Greene’s political currency stretches beyond her massive social media following and her ability to rake in sizable sums from donors. Her proximity to Trump makes her a force that cannot be ignored by what's left of her mainstream GOP colleagues.

McCarthy’s allowance for Greene to sit front and center with leadership for the campaign rollout was not by accident but design. The Republican lawmakers in attendance celebrated her presence, calling it a sign of the GOP’s “big tent” that welcomes all comers. But Greene's arrival also signaled a stark normalizing of the most extreme elements in the Republican Party.

Longtime political strategist Rick Wilson, a former Republican who left the party in the Trump era, calls Greene’s brand of politics “government by trolling” that marks a dangerous new era for the GOP and will make it difficult to govern. McCarthy is in line to become House speaker if Republicans regain the majority.

if they take the house the gop should absolutely impeach biden. what’s good for the goose…i have. i use for greene but i agree biden and garland should be impeached.

[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1233597]f walker did. in fact do that, why isn’t he in prison?



Omg you hate being called out on your nonsense

Where was this logic
when you claimed Raphael ran over his wife..



FYI most women who are victims of domestic violence don’t press charges
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

if they take the house the gop should absolutely impeach biden. what’s good for the goose…i have. i use for greene but i agree biden and garland should be impeached.

To bad this isn’t sarcasm or hyperbole

Is it Jim

But your not in the cult lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

snarky troll

.

I can't believe you said this :laugha:

To bad this isn’t sarcasm or hyperbole

Is it Jim

But your not in the cult lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

before trumps first day, the democrats decided they were going to impeach him. but that was ok.

and calling parents domestic terrorists for speaking at school board meetings is not what the DOJ should be doing.

if they take the house the gop should absolutely impeach biden. what’s good for the goose…i have. i use for greene but i agree biden and garland should be impeached.

On what grounds?

I can't believe you said this :laugha:

I pointed out how you were 100% wrong about Greene.

Snarky troll - Isn't that what you are?

Do you ever comment on the thread? You usually just insult the person you respond to.

Sad.

Do you ever comment on the thread? .

yes....

You usually just insult the person you respond to.



never to the degree that you do...you should hold yourself to higher standards

On what grounds?

on the grounds that if it’s ok for democrats to begin impeachment solely because they hate the president ( they were calling for impeachment before they had reason, but they never stopped looking), that the republicans can do the same thing.

what might we find if we investigate the bidens as completely as we’ve investigated trump? Maybe we’ll see.

On what grounds?

and garland on the grounds that it’s not terrorism for parents to speak up at school board meetings.

and garland on the grounds that it’s not terrorism for parents to speak up at school board meetings.

So bc he hurt someone's feelings?

what might we find if we investigate the bidens as completely as we’ve investigated trump? Maybe we’ll see.

By Bidens do you mean cousins, children, in laws, etc?

So bc he hurt someone's feelings?

trying to flag people as domestic terrorists for speaking at school board meetings is “hurting their feelings”. ok. stuck with that.

paul, democrats do these things, overstep like this, when they’re in power, forgetting that things change. Then when the gop reciprocates, the democrats start clutching their pearls and fainting.

the best way to make sure the opposing teams pitcher isn’t headhunting, is to tell your pitcher to plunk someone himself.

By Bidens do you mean cousins, children, in laws, etc?

Joe, Hunter, Whoever got rich by selling influence, lying about it ( “ i never once spoke to my son about his business dealings”), or otherwise broke the law. Let’s investigate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,,for 2 years if the gop takes the house. Let’s pay republicans to write up bullsh*t opposition research and use that to get FISA warrants on Biden insiders, and see what’s that turns up. Or is there some law that says only the left can do that?

Joe, Hunter, Whoever got rich by selling influence, lying about it ( “ i never once spoke to my son about his business dealings”), or otherwise broke the law. Let’s investigate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,,for 2 years if the gop takes the house. Let’s pay republicans to write up bullsh*t opposition research and use that to get FISA warrants on Biden insiders, and see what’s that turns up. Or is there some law that says only the left can do that?

I've said this about you before that you have to be careful that you don't bc who you hate.

Maybe Durham can do it as he has a lot of time on his hands now that his investigation has fizzled out w/nothing to show for it. Maybe he can get back his reputation.

before

and calling parents domestic terrorists for speaking at school board meetings is not what the DOJ should be doing.

Jim once again posting untruthful stories

Only republicans said the memo called parents domestic terrorists the memo doesn’t exist

In 2021, Garland released a memo addressing the “disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence” levied at schools. The memo sparked months of backlash and false claims that the attorney general believed parents who were concerned about education policy were “domestic terrorists.”

Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, ruled that the memo did little more than announce a “series of measures” that directed federal authorities to address increasing threats targeting school board members, teachers and other school employees.

“The alleged AG Policy is not regulatory, proscriptive, or compulsory in nature because it does not impose any regulations, requirements, or enforcement actions on individuals,”

Jim you repeatedly post lie after lie your a true Maga republican
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim you repeatedly post lie after lie your a true Maga republican
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well in Jim's defense he didn't say the Trump campaign didn't collude with Russia.

on the grounds that if it’s ok for democrats to begin impeachment solely because they hate the president ( they were calling for impeachment before they had reason, but they never stopped looking), that the republicans can do the same thing.

what might we find if we investigate the bidens as completely as we’ve investigated trump? Maybe we’ll see.

solely because they hate the president

That’s a cult members response if there ever was one .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

solely because they hate the president

That’s a cult members response if there ever was one .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

when Rashida Talib said to “impeach the motherfu—er”, she had no idea if he’d done anything wrong, but she hated him, and that was enough.

you forgot the russian hoax? the failed income tax hoax? all
that crap?

let’s just put the bidens under the same
exact scrutiny. why is that unfair?

If the gop takes the house, they call those shots.

Jim once again posting untruthful stories

Only republicans said the memo called parents domestic terrorists the memo doesn’t exist

In 2021, Garland released a memo addressing the “disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence” levied at schools. The memo sparked months of backlash and false claims that the attorney general believed parents who were concerned about education policy were “domestic terrorists.”

Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, ruled that the memo did little more than announce a “series of measures” that directed federal authorities to address increasing threats targeting school board members, teachers and other school employees.

“The alleged AG Policy is not regulatory, proscriptive, or compulsory in nature because it does not impose any regulations, requirements, or enforcement actions on individuals,”

Jim you repeatedly post lie after lie your a true Maga republican
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and when Garland was asked about examples of
violence against school boards by those parents ,,he drew a blank. and it probably cost democrats the. VA governors race.

Teachers work for parents. That’s how it works. Parents pay the bills. If you don’t want parents to have a say, that’s simple, stop confiscating their pay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post

and garland on the grounds that it’s not terrorism for parents to speak up at school board meetings.



So bc he hurt someone's feelings?



your feelings get hurt pretty easily here and nobody has called you a terrorist or even referred to you in the many ways you refer to others

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post

and garland on the grounds that it’s not terrorism for parents to speak up at school board meetings.



your feelings get hurt pretty easily here and nobody has called you a terrorist or even referred to you in the many ways you refer to others

Snarky one why would you think I ever cared about any classless POS' on this site who can't act like normal adults?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Snarky one why would you think I ever cared about any classless POS' on this site who can't act like normal adults?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

this comment is very adult :claps:

when Rashida Talib said to “impeach the motherfu—er”, she had no idea if he’d done anything wrong, but she hated him, and that was enough.

you forgot the russian hoax? the failed income tax hoax? all
that crap?

let’s just put the bidens under the same
exact scrutiny. why is that unfair?

If the gop takes the house, they call those shots.

Denial and have truths are your security blanket

Ah the everything a hoax another Maga universe favorite response
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and when Garland was asked about examples of
violence against school boards by those parents ,,he drew a blank. and it probably cost democrats the. VA governors race.

Teachers work for parents. That’s how it works. Parents pay the bills. If you don’t want parents to have a say, that’s simple, stop confiscating their pay.

Once again changing the subject what a surprise

You scream a lot about parenting rights then post a fox outrage story of a parent exercising their Rights

since you don’t agree with the reason.

There’s a word for that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wayne's responses are not predictable at all....:rotf2:

MAGA, truth, fact, extreme, radical, outrage, anger, hate, denial, cult

Once again changing the subject what a surprise

You scream a lot about parenting rights then post a fox outrage story of a parent exercising their Rights

since you don’t agree with the reason.

There’s a word for that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

paul
asked about garland, i responded. It’s called answering the question that was asked.

this comment is very adult :claps:

Chris D was an embarrassment to this site and should never have been allowed to act the way he did.

Chris D was an embarrassment to this site and should never have been allowed to act the way he did.

detbuch was as civil and patient as anyone here and you jackals attacked him mercilessly....

you should be banned for your foul language and insults :bl:....I know, I know...you only do it because others make you do it, so it's ok :rotflmao:

Chris D was an embarrassment to this site and should never have been allowed to act the way he did.

is this your attempt to blame him for your bad behavior?

wayne's responses are not predictable at all....:rotf2:

MAGA, truth, fact, extreme, radical, outrage, anger, hate, denial, cult

Nothing worthwhile worrying about….

Greene: Biden’s 5 million illegal aliens are on the verge of replacing you, your jobs, and your kids in school. Coming from all over the world, they’re also replacing your culture.

That’s the Republican Party
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nothing worthwhile worrying about….

Greene: Biden’s 5 million illegal aliens are on the verge of replacing you, your jobs, and your kids in school. Coming from all over the world, they’re also replacing your culture.

That’s the Republican Party
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

did you make this one up too?

detbuch was as civil and patient as anyone here and you jackals attacked him mercilessly.…

Bingo, all he wanted to do was engage in adult political discourse, instead he was stuck in an episode Real Housewives of S-B, bunch of catty bitches.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Chris D was an embarrassment to this site and should never have been allowed to act the way he did.

start your own site or take out your damn tampon.

detbuch was as civil and patient as anyone here and you jackals attacked him mercilessly....

you should be banned for your foul language and insults :bl:....I know, I know...you only do it because others make you do it, so it's ok :rotflmao:

That is a lie. I used to ignore him. I told him I thought he was the most boring person on the site but I hardly ever insulted him other than that. Can you pls. pull up some of the insults if you think I insulted him otherwise I think you are liar.

Bingo, all he wanted to do was engage in adult political discourse, instead he was stuck in an episode Real Housewives of S-B, bunch of catty bitches.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Says the person who pretty much only comments on people's spelling, posts memes in an attempt to I guess annoy people and insults people.

Seriously - how much do you think you add to this forum?

start your own site or take out your damn tampon.

Suck my di ck you douchebag.

Suck my di ck you douchebag.

but it’s ok when you do it. And i won’t tattle to the moderators.

your brain broke. Have you and pete been painting inside with the windows shut?

Says the person who pretty much only comments on people's spelling, posts memes in an attempt to I guess annoy people and insults people.

Seriously - how much do you think you add to this forum?

god almighty.

but it’s ok when you do itI only respond to your constant classless insults. Why should anyone take your classless insults? . And i won’t tattle to the moderators.You mean when I laughed at the mods. when one of them told people to act civilized after they insulted someone the day before

your brain broke. Have you and pete been painting inside with the windows shut?

Yet you are the one who has more posts here than anyone else?

god almighty.

what is getting your panties in a bunch now?

start your own site or take out your damn tampon.

Ah, the poor victim

Only a real man would make a comment like this, the misogyny is evident.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Seriously - how much do you think you add to this forum?






Suck my di ck you douchebag.





can't make this stuff up...too funny...Mr. Congeniality

Says the person who pretty much only comments on people's spelling, posts memes in an attempt to I guess annoy people and insults people.

Seriously - how much do you think you add to this forum?

http://practiceoflawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/karen3.gif
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

can't make this stuff up...too funny...Mr. Congeniality

So people should take the constant insults directed toward them? All yu have is snarky responses. Such a bad look for an adult.

http://practiceoflawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/karen3.gif
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

As I said.......

[QUOTE=PaulS;1233710]

Such a bad look for an adult.


[QUOTE=PaulS;1233710]

Suck my di ck you douchebag.



:rolleyes:

[QUOTE=PaulS;1233710]

Such a bad look for an adult.


[QUOTE=PaulS;1233710]

Suck my di ck you douchebag.



:rolleyes:

See previous posts snarky one. Have you found any posts where I insulted Debuch other than saying 2/3 times I thought the posts were boring? I would hate to have to call you a liar (again).

So people should take the constant insults directed toward them? All yu have is snarky responses. Such a bad look for an adult.

no. but after i shows you a long list of some insults that pete posted, you told me you didn’t care what he says.

Fine. Then stop caring what others say. If it doesn’t bother you when the lefties do it, i don’t see why others should be held to a different standard. That’s what makes this a joke.

Only a real man would make a comment like this, the misogyny is evident.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

now that we know men can menstruate and have babies...I'm not sure this is accurate

I would hate to have to call you a liar (again).



I promise not to hurl expletives at you when you do :hee:

no. but after i shows you a long list of some insults that pete posted, you told me you didn’t care what he says. That is right bc he is not insulting me. You can't help yourself but throw insults out there so when you do it with others why wouldn't they respond in kind?

Fine. Then stop caring what others say. If it doesn’t bother you when the lefties do it, i don’t see why others should be held to a different standard. That’s what makes this a joke.

So you mean when you get angry and your panties get in a bunch and you start insulting me I should just sit back and take it? That is hilarious and no wonder you really don't have any friends here.

no wonder you really don't have any friends here.



this is very adult.....

I promise not to hurl expletives at you when you do :hee:

BC it will be true. You said I used to insult Debutch and that is a lie. Post some up.

this is very adult.....

Snarky - such a bad look for an adult.

BC it will be true. You said I used to insult Debutch and that is a lie. Post some up.

let me help you with your reading comprehension...

you brought up Chris D out of the blue probably because you are still suffering some psychological damage from him toying with your little mind...

I brought up Detbuch and pointed out...

"detbuch was as civil and patient as anyone here and you jackals attacked him mercilessly...."

it was a general and accurate comment, I then wrote...


"you should be banned for your foul language and insults ...."


which is true...you are the worst here currently.....

and then I offered your usual excuse for your bad behavior...

"I know, I know...you only do it because others make you do it, so it's ok "

and of course you continue to provide fodder :bl:

So you mean when you get angry and your panties get in a bunch and you start insulting me I should just sit back and take it? That is hilarious and no wonder you really don't have any friends here.

“that is right because he is not insulting me.”

well i’d seen you call out dangles when he wasn’t insulting you, same with me.

sorta looks like it’s not about who is getting insulted that bothers you, but who is doing the insulting. only bad when it’s aimed at liberals, coming from conservatives

Do you see my point paul?

“that is right because he is not insulting me.”

well i’d seen you call out dangles when he wasn’t insulting you, same with me.

sorta looks like it’s not about who is getting insulted that bothers you, but who is doing the insulting. only bad when it’s aimed at liberals, coming from conservatives

Do you see my point paul?

SD constantly insulted everyone who didn't toe the R line. So there was a history of him insulting me and everyone else whose opinion he didn't like. So that is the difference. Pete has not insulted me.

Do you see my point Jim?

SD constantly insulted everyone who didn't toe the R line. So there was a history of him insulting me and everyone else whose opinion he didn't like. So that is the difference. Pete has not insulted me.

Do you see my point Jim?

Pete is the exact mirror image of Dangles. But you're fine with it when he does it.

Yes, we all see your point - insults are only OK when coming from the left.

let me help you with your reading comprehension...

you brought up Chris D out of the blue probably because you are still suffering some psychological damage from him toying with your little mind...I have no damage I just thought he was a classless POS who brought the whole site down by insulting people's kids and wives.

I brought up Detbuch and pointed out...

"detbuch was as civil and patient as anyone here and you jackals attacked him mercilessly...."

it was a general and accurate comment, I then wrote...


"you should be banned for your foul language and insults ...."


which is true...you are the worst here currently.....Currently :laughs:

and then I offered your usual excuse for your bad behavior...

"I know, I know...you only do it because others make you do it, so it's ok "

and of course you continue to provide fodder :bl:

You must be more damaged than I thought if you think people should take any rude behavior addressed towards them.

You must be more damaged than I thought if you think people should take any rude behavior addressed towards them.

People you've called out for being insulting: me, Dangles, Scott, TDF.

People whose insults you ignore: you, Pete. WDMSO, Got Stripers.

I think we all see the commonality.

Pete is the exact mirror image of Dangles. But you're fine with it when he does it.

Yes, we all see your point - insults are only OK when coming from the left.You keep saying that yet you constantly insult people first.

No he's not. Not even close. Go look at your thread on gratitude. You posted something he responded and you come back with insults. That is a typical thread. You don't like what is posted so you start with insults. Look in the mirror and reflect a little.

Edit - go look at the economy thread. You did the exact same thing there with Pete. You don't like his answer so you resort to a childish insult.

See a pattern here?

People you've called out for being insulting: me, Dangles, Scott, TDF.

People whose insults you ignore: you, Pete. WDMSO, Got Stripers.

I think we all see the commonality.

people insulting me: you, Dangles, Scott, TDF.

People not insulting me: Pete. WDMSO, Got Stripers

I think we all see the commonality

people insulting me: you, Dangles, Scott, TDF.

People not insulting me: Pete. WDMSO, Got Stripers

I think we all see the commonality

problem is, i’ve seen you call conservatives out for insulting people other than you, so you seem to dislike insults even when not aimed at you. as long as they come from the right, you don’t like them

You called me out more than once for insulting Hilary. Are you Hilary?
Or, more likely, are you fine with insults from your side but clutch your pearls in horror when it comes form the right?

We know what it is paul. It’s ok.

problem is, i’ve seen you call conservatives out for insulting people other than you, so you seem to dislike insults even when not aimed at you. as long as they come from the right, you don’t like them

You called me out more than once for insulting Hilary. Are you Hilary?
Or, more likely, are you fine with insults from your side but clutch your pearls in horror when it comes form the right?

We know what it is paul. It’s ok.


You mean when you show the misogyny you have unlike anything close from other people here - probably.

You must be more damaged than I thought if you think people should take any rude behavior addressed towards them.

didn't say that...you just tend to overreact....

You mean when you show the misogyny you have unlike anything close from other people here - probably.

but YOU said you only care when people insult you personally. That’s what you said, and i proved that’s wrong. You don’t like it when anybody in the right insults anyone in the left. But you are going to pretty good lengths to deny that fact.

but YOU said you only care when people insult you personally. That’s what you said, and i proved that’s wrong. You don’t like it when anybody in the right insults anyone in the left. But you are going to pretty good lengths to deny that fact.

Yes, WE were talking about people throwing insults here - did you not remember that? Prove that wrong!

Yes, WE were talking about people throwing insults here - did you not remember that? Prove that wrong!

yes we were talking about that. You said you don’t like insults.

Then, I said you never complain when pete and wayne and GS throw insults.

Then, you said that you only call it out when people
specifically insult you.

Then,,i pointed out how wrong that is, because you regularly call people out for insults not aimed at you, and it’s interesting that it’s never the liberals you call out.

Then, you flip flopped again and said my misogyny was bad when i insulted hilary ( even though you had just said you only comment when people insult you personally). but interestingly, you said you didn’t care when Pete insulted TDFs daughters that one time

Paul you’re all over the place, but it comes down to this…you hate it when the left gets insulted, and you don’t care when the left is doing the insulting. You cannot make that wrong.

yes we were talking about that. You said you don’t like insults.

Then, I said you never complain when pete and wayne and GS throw insults.

Then, you said that you only call it out when people
specifically insult you.

Then,,i pointed out how wrong that is, because you regularly call people out for insults not aimed at youthat is a lie bc YOU CONSTANTLY insult people here, and it’s interesting that it’s never the liberals you call out.

Then, you flip flopped again and said my misogyny was bad when i insulted hilary ( even though you had just said you only comment when people insult you personally). but interestingly, you said you didn’t care when Pete insulted TDFs daughters that one time

Paul you’re all over the place, but it comes down to this…you hate it when the left gets insulted, and you don’t care when the left is doing the insulting. You cannot make that wrong.

Jim - Actually I could care less about you. Your (we'll leave the typo there in case the other 2 want to comment on it so they can have something to post today) an angry di ck who constantly insults people. A low class individual who has no friends here so doesn't care how rude he is (unless of course you're that way in life which is a distinct possibility).

If you don't think misogyny needs to be called out, well that is on you

If you don't think misogyny needs to be called out, well that is on you

So please explain then, why you said you didn’t care that Pete insulted TDFs daughters? If you say misogyny needs to be called out, why are you so selective about calling it out? Why is it ok when Pete does it?

You backed yourself into a corner here Paul.

Sounds like you’re saying the liberals here can insult anyone as long as it’s not you…and the conservatives here can’t insult anybody.

Sounds fair. Very principled.

So please explain then, why you said you didn’t care that Pete insulted TDFs daughters? If you say misogyny needs to be called out, why are you so selective about calling it out? Why is it ok when Pete does it? 1) BC it has nothing to do with me. 2)If I remember correctly Kevin posted a meme mocking liberal daughters (maybe 3 obese women? and Pete's post was in response to that. It was meant in the same way Kevin's post was.

You backed yourself into a corner here Paul.

Sounds like you’re saying the liberals here can insult anyone as long as it’s not you…and the conservatives here can’t insult anybody.But you constantly insult people. I pointed out 2 instances about other threads where someone responded to you and you did the usual angry Jim thing - you insulted them.

Sounds fair. Very principled.
Your really boring at this point.

Your really boring at this point.

"1) BC it has nothing to do with me. 2)If I remember correctly Kevin posted a meme mocking liberal daughters (maybe 3 obese women? and Pete's post was in response to that. It was meant in the same way Kevin's post was."

Ok, so (forgive me, I'm trying to follow you here)...

you don't like insults...but you're OK with insults not pointed at you...unless it's sexist...in which case it's still OK with you, as long as you deem that "it was meant in the same way that a previous comment was"...

So if TDF makes fun of women, it's OK to bring his daughters into it...but if Hilary calls me deplorable and irredeemable and I respond, that's not OK, that's still me being sexist...

So do only liberals get to respond to previous insults?

"Your really boring at this point"

I have no doubt this has been unpleasant for you. It's been a struggle for me to try and follow the many ways you're trying to twist your way out of this, but it's been fun.

Daughter, singular. No way in hell I could handle more than one :hihi:

….and it was a meme mocking liberals, not liberal women.

Just getting the facts straight.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Daughter, singular. No way in hell I could handle more than one :hihi:


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I have three :conf::hihi:

I have no doubt this has been unpleasant for you. It's been a struggle for me to try and follow the many ways you're trying to twist your way out of this, but it's been fun.

Hasn't been unpleasant for me at all. I told you I think you are a di ck with the way you insult people and that is prob. why you have NO friends here at all. I'm not trying to twist anything. You insult me I'll insult you back. Pretty simple. Someone doesn't insult me I could care less. You can't have anyone disagree with you or you get angry and insult them. I pointed out the 2 other threads you started and Pete commented on (w/no insults) and like a little bit ch you came back both times with insults - bc that is what you do. You post misogynistic posts I'll call you out. I think this has been fun also just reminding you that you have no friends here. There is no one you can call to ask to go fishing, no one you can call to see how they are doing, no one will call you to go fishing, no one will send you a note on Christmas wishing you a Merry Christmas. Should I go on?

If Kevin mocks liberals he has to expect some blow back. It seems to bother you more than him.

Hasn't been unpleasant for me at all. I told you I think you are a di ck with the way you insult people and that is prob. why you have NO friends here at all. I'm not trying to twist anything. You insult me I'll insult you back. Pretty simple. Someone doesn't insult me I could care less. You can't have anyone disagree with you or you get angry and insult them. I pointed out the 2 other threads you started and Pete commented on (w/no insults) and like a little bit ch you came back both times with insults - bc that is what you do. You post misogynistic posts I'll call you out. I think this has been fun also just reminding you that you have no friends here. There is no one you can call to ask to go fishing, no one you can call to see how they are doing, no one will call you to go fishing, no one will send you a note on Christmas wishing you a Merry Christmas. Should I go on?

If Kevin mocks liberals he has to expect some blow back. It seems to bother you more than him.

"I'm not trying to twist anything."

That's just about all you're doing...

"Someone doesn't insult me I could care less. "

Not true. We've all seen you call out the conservatives here for insulting people who are not you. What you could care less about, is when any conservative is insulted. That's what you don't care about. Insults are tolerated and justified when they come from the left. All other insults are a character flaw.

"You post misogynistic posts I'll call you out"

Why? 2 seconds ago, you said you couldnt care less unless it was about you? And why don't you call about misogynistic posts that come from your fellow liberals?


"If Kevin mocks liberals he has to expect some blow back"

Yet when I insult Hilary after she calls me deplorable and irredeemable, you say it's wrong for me to insult her.

You are therefore clearly saying, that only democrats can fight back. Sorry if I don't accept that Paul. What's good for the goose...

You can't win this. You're holding the 2 sides to completely different standards, and you can't spin it any other way. You're saying liberals can insult back if they've been insulted first, but conservatives can't.

"

You can't win this. You're holding the 2 sides to completely different standards, and you can't spin it any other way. You're saying liberals can insult back if they've been insulted first, but conservatives can't.

I'm not holding anyone to different standards. Go see post 103.

If you see a lib. insult a cons. insult them back. Have at it. But the majority of the insults thrown around here are by the Cons. Always has been. SD never added anything other than insults. Snarky Scott hardly ever adds anything but is quick with insults/spelling/grammer corrections, etc. Even Kevin hardly adds anything except memes or comments on spelling. It is not my job to point out every insult.

If you want me to be a moderator here you prob. wouldn't last a day bc all you do is insult people. Go look at the 2 threads I pointed out. You keep ignore that.

^^^^^serious narcissism:rolleyes:

we've read your posts...it's not pretty

^^^^^serious narcissism:rolleyes:

we've read your posts...it's not pretty

Serious Snarky trolling.

As I said snarky Scott hardly ever adds anything but is quick with insults/spelling/grammer corrections, etc.

Such a bad look for an adult male.

Such a bad look for an adult male.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Suck my di ck you douchebag.




this will live in infamy.....:claps:

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Suck my di ck you douchebag.




this will live in infamy.....:claps:

you’re forgetting the cornerstone of liberalism….everything is OK when liberals do it.

probably a bunch of in-cel’s.

I'm not holding anyone to different standards. Go see post 103.

If you see a lib. insult a cons. insult them back. Have at it. But the majority of the insults thrown around here are by the Cons. Always has been. SD never added anything other than insults. Snarky Scott hardly ever adds anything but is quick with insults/spelling/grammer corrections, etc. Even Kevin hardly adds anything except memes or comments on spelling. It is not my job to point out every insult.

If you want me to be a moderator here you prob. wouldn't last a day bc all you do is insult people. Go look at the 2 threads I pointed out. You keep ignore that.

for the tenth time, you called me out for sexism when i insulted hilary, but defended pete when he insulted TDFs daughters.

So insulting women is ok when your fellow lefties do it, not on when i do it

different standards.

your back hurt from moving the goalposts so many times on this thread?

for the tenth time, you called me out for sexism when i insulted hilary, but defended pete when he insulted TDFs daughters. I told you why he did it. Did you not understand? You want Kevin to be able to insult liberal woman (in jest) and so Pete did the same w/Kevin's daughter (in jest).

So insulting women is ok when your fellow lefties do it, not on when i do it

different standards.

your back hurt from moving the goalposts so many times on this thread?Ok douchebag

Sorry your so upset you sniveling snowflake.

you’re forgetting the cornerstone of liberalism….everything is OK when liberals do it.

probably a bunch of in-cel’s.

Who is a bunch of incels?

Who is a bunch of incels?

oh i meant you…sorry it was vague.

did you did you hear what happened in Bristol last night? 2 cops murdered, one of them a 35 year old with 2 little
kids and another on the way. Ambushed at a domestic call.

But Let’s have democrats and the media spend another ten years engaged in a non-stop attack on all cops, keep convincing america that cops are a bunch of racist assassins. It will result in some dead cops, but it helps democrats win elections even if it’s a lie, so it’s a small price to pay.

defund the police! the border is secure! crime is down! the economy is healthy! orange man bad! Hooray!

oh i meant you…sorry it was vague.

did you did you hear what happened in Bristol last night? 2 cops murdered, one of them a 35 year old with 2 little
kids and another on the way. Ambushed at a domestic call.

But Let’s have democrats and the media spend another ten years engaged in a non-stop attack on all cops, keep convincing america that cops are a bunch of racist assassins. It will result in some dead cops, but it helps democrats win elections even if it’s a lie, so it’s a small price to pay.

defund the police! the border is secure! crime is down! the economy is healthy! orange man bad! Hooray!

So I'm an incel?

That is hilarious. Is there any wonder you have no friends.

Sorry your so upset you sniveling snowflake.

yes you told me pete was responding to a previous insult. therefore his sexist insult was ok.

when insulted hilary, i was also responding to a specific previous insult ( calling americans deplorable and irredeemable). But that was sexist.

you’re proving my point. You are on with pete’s i suits when hes responding to a previous insult, but it’s not ok when i do the same exact thing.

because he’s a liberal, so it’s ok when he does it.

So I'm an incel?

That is hilarious. Is there any wonder you have no friends.

yes. and apparently one who’s also slow on the uptake if you still don’t get it.

now i called you that, in response to insults you lobbed at me. Which you said was acceptable when pete does it. So…

Once again, one daughter

And I didn’t insult Liberal Women, it was a harmless “Let me guess, not my president” meme

Pete threw a little shade, I rolled with it, let it go :rolleyes:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Once again, one daughter

And I didn’t insult Liberal Women, it was a harmless “Let me guess, not my president” meme

Pete threw a little shade, I rolled with it, let it go :rolleyes:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no, you didn’t insult liberal women, and you handled it gracefully. better than i did.

yes you told me pete was responding to a previous insult. therefore his sexist insult was ok.

when insulted hilary, i was also responding to a specific previous insult ( calling americans deplorable and irredeemable). But that was sexist.

you’re proving my point. You are on with pete’s i suits when hes responding to a previous insult, but it’s not ok when i do the same exact thing.

because he’s a liberal, so it’s ok when he does it.

Your insults are misogynistic. That what is it when you comment on woman's looks. Like you use to do with Hillary, Rachel M. Etc.

yes. and apparently one who’s also slow on the uptake if you still don’t get it.

now i called you that, in response to insults you lobbed at me. Which you said was acceptable when pete does it. So…

And I laughed bc you are an angry clown who has no friends here.

Youre more upset about what you view as Pete's insult than Kevin is. Isn't that the definition of a snowflake?