[QUOTE=Raven;464192]jail house justice should happen soon....i hope:nailem:

No way that will happen, this guy will never see general population!

[QUOTE=Raider Ronnie;464200]he'll probably stay at devals house.

God, some of you are really f'ed up :doh:

-spence

like you would'nt beleive....justa satrical poke a the guy..easy there dude....

Hey, you're pimping a rightwing stereotype that ain't true...

-spence

The soft on crime stereotype?

No that Dems care more about protecting the abuser ala the ACLU. Most child and womens rights legislation doesn't start in the GOP.

-spence

two things that i've heard from numerous sources are- he donated $5000 to help a convicted viscous rapist be freed and also make it easier for convicted criminals to shield their records from society..

I believe he donated money to the man's defense on the grounds that he was being prosectuted in an improper manner. While embarrasing in a campaign it would look as though he felt he was doing the right thing. Sounds more like a Federalist than a liberal.

This isn't the same thing as trying to free a convicted rapist, and certainly not in the context of this thread :rtfm:

To be honest I don't know much about the guy, but I do know the GOP in MA did a pathetic job of picking a candidate...Where's Mitt when you need him :hee:

-spence

And the value of that Legislation is nil when Judges apply sentences such as this.

spence- he donated money to pay for dna tests which failed to help that brutal creep. he also helped get a covicted cop killer off death row while working for naacp. tough on crimials ehh?

Sounds like the problem is with the judge then...

Or perhaps sentencing guidelines that are too weak. Don't know the specifics of the law in this case.

-spence

It's my understanding that the case was not prosecuted properly, even a potential creep deserves fair judgement.

-spence

Bingo. "Strong" Guidelines is a bit of an oxymoron though. Mandatory sentencing which removes the power of discretion from Judges who practice progressive justice for criminals convicted of crimes against children
is the answer. Forty something states have moved in this direction with the usual suspects holding out (MA, VT, NY, etc.).