I guess I should have used red instead of capital letters like he does. What's the code for red? I don't have a choice of font color on my phone and have to type the code in and I can't find the list I had.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You use the tired old Progressive play book of characterizing a source as unworthy of even considering therefor, a priori, dismissing anything it has to say, thereby evading any need to analyze it or even discuss it.

And the "OPINION" piece, as you describe it, stated several "facts" to buttress its opinion. Which is a lot more than I can say about your opinionated response.

As for making your point, I'm not sure of which point you are referring to. I am not trying to out of hand dismiss so-called fact checking. But for god's sake, have enough native intelligence to see through what is often opinion rather than fact. Biased opinion at that. Sure, one can reasonably refute false quotes. But calling incomplete or incongruous analysis, as in the WaPost's fact checking (that Matloff shredded) "facts" is more than wrong or misleading. It is a form of lying.

My point is that having full faith in "fact checkers" may absolve you of critical thinking, but it can make you what others here refer to as a sheeple.

Actually that is incorrect, if you are a person that works with classified material, it is your responsibilty to report any leak of classified material ASAP, so the proper clean up measures can be taken.

Both sender and receiver share the same responsibilty of protecting classified material.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The FBI also clarified this assertion. There were three emails that were said to be marked classified, yet there was no proper header and by Comey's own words the markings were incomplete. The State Department later said the information wasn't even classified and the whole thing was just human error.

Hate to break it to you.

Once again what we hear with our ears and see with our own eyes is exactly the opposite in your bizzaro world or you claim simple never happened . When is the next holiday weekend so we can get another Friday release of more stuff that never happened? I'm stunned at how many devices she used .... I guess that happens when you need to smash them with a hammer occasionally
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Try reading what's actually said versus what's reported. Sorry it doesn't fit your narrative of Clinton as an evil super genius. She said she didn't send or receive anything marked classified and by the FBI Director's own words that statement holds true.

This is another big piece of abject stupidity. They tried to play this card on FOX News this Sunday and got laughed at. For her to say she wanted one device for convenience and then to report she had multiple devices isn't a contradiction, it's not like she was using them at the same time.

As for smashing with a hammer, that's pretty common way to dispose of a personal phone. I run a drill through old hard drives before I recycle my computers. Perhaps if it was reported the right way it would seem insidious.

[QUOTE=spence;1107654]Try reading what's actually said versus what's reported. Sorry it doesn't fit your narrative of Clinton as an evil super genius. She said she didn't send or receive anything marked classified and by the FBI Director's own words that statement holds true.


This is another big piece of abject stupidity. They tried to play this card on FOX News this Sunday and got laughed at. For her to say she wanted one device for convenience and then to report she had multiple devices isn't a contradiction, it's not like she was using them at the same time.

As for smashing with a hammer, that's pretty common way to dispose of a personal phone. I run a drill through old hard drives before I recycle my computers. Perhaps if it was reported the right way it would seem insidious.[/QUOTE

I never said she was a genius .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device