ummm...

"Brenda Snipes has held her position since 2003, in which year her predecessor, Miriam Oliphant, was suspended for “grave neglect, mismanagement and incompetence” and, quite literally, marched out of her office. Alas, Snipes has proven no better at fulfilling her duties than was Oliphant. On Friday, a court in Broward County found that Snipes was guilty of violating both Florida’s public-records laws and the state’s constitution by failing to provide mandatory updates to the public, and it ordered the immediate release of the missing information. As that ruling was coming down, Snipes’s office was laying out more lawsuit bait. According to the Miami Herald, an election worker found bags of “uncounted early ballots” in the Broward County office — ballots whose provenance could not be established. Snipes, meanwhile, was busy mixing together rejected provisional ballots and accepted provisional ballots, processing them all together. She justified her decision to add these provisional ballots to the official tally on the grounds that it would be better to include some illegal votes than to nix the legal ones with which, by her own incompetence, they had been blended.

This year alone, Snipes has been reprimanded by the courts twice: once, in May, for illegally destroying ballots during the 2016 Democratic primary, in violation of both state and federal law; and again, in August, for illegally opening mail-in ballots in secret. How long, we wonder, does it take to establish a pattern?


she'll probably get a promotion and a lifetime achievement award :biglaugh:

Definitely missed it :P and I agree
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She’s an elected official
Her’s isn’t a lifetime appointment
:biglaugh:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

See you skipped pointing out what a great job she's doing for the folks who elected her.

What party just elected two 2 under federal indictment and 1 dead pimp???? HMMMM


This year alone, Snipes has been reprimanded by the courts twice: once, in May, for illegally destroying ballots during the 2016 Democratic primary, in violation of both state and federal law; and again, in August, for illegally opening mail-in ballots in secret. How long, we wonder, does it take to establish a pattern?

and in neither case influenced the out come of the election ..... and were investigated and ruled on... another Napoleon of crime created by GOP image machine

Makes you wonder just how bad the other options were...hmmm

Hey . . . violating laws didn't influence the outcome of the election . . . it's all good . . . she's doing a really good job. Illegal aliens are Ok . . . they don't influence anything . . . Russian meddling in our elections didn't influence the outcome of our elections . . . not a problem (but Trump needs to be investigated) . . . it's all good . . . move on and shut the ef up.

As objective as ever
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yup

wrong thread

Yup

In Tight Race, Maine Republican Sues To Block State's Ranked-Choice Voting Law


shocking he's a republican would he have sued if he won because of ranked choice voting law ??

in arizona the dem won.. when it looked close guess what happened


Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
Just out — in Arizona, SIGNATURES DON’T MATCH. Electoral corruption - Call for a new Election? We must protect our Democracy!

Trumps not worried about protecting Democracy he's only worried about protecting Donald Trump
‏

I'm trying to conceive of a clear, conclusory, connection between Trump's tweet and your conclusion.

Can't do it.

You make some big leaps, but don't actually get here from your side of the chasm to the other side.

I’m fairly certain he’s referring to the fact that the tweet from the president is reinforcing lies about election fraud in Arizona. All while saying those lies justify the need to protect our democracy. So therefore he must be trying to spread lies to bolster his own support and get his base to vote in 2020.

I’m pretty sure that’s what he’s referring to, and it’s not that big a stretch, no matter which side of the matter you fall on
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How about he just lies, in an unprescended manner.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Your explanation resembles what wdmso has often mocked--others having to translate what Trump's words mean. But I appreciate that you're certain of what he meant. So, what was Trump lying about in the Tweet wdmso posted?

define "unprescended"

It’s the opposite of prescended. Simple
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I refer to his cabinet as the others having to translate what Trump's words mean. big difference ,,,, but not surprising you see them as the same


seems your the only person who can't decipher the words of a 6th grader aka Trump... and his nuanced approach? to speaking and tweets >> I forget his supporters think he is a genius for getting in liberals heads ... but why should words no less facts equal meaning

If a sixth grader wrote an essay with this type of punctuation they would never see seventh grade.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it's a "nuanced" approach" :hihi:

That’s not nice of you to say about the POTUS and his social media posts....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Get a cup of coffee and try again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

isn't that where the baby comes out ass first

I’m glad you appreciate it... I put a lot of work into it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Are you still working on answering my question--what was Trump lying about in the Tweet wdmso posted?

Evidence of voter fraud in Arizona, specifically around signature matches
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Arizona Republican party made this accusation. I don't think that the party was "lying." It may have just been wrong. If Trump referred to the Arizona Republicans belief, does that mean he lied? If being wrong is a lie, then what politician is not a liar?

Trump has a college degree and went to military school before that. And, again, your stream of conscious spray of words here needs some translation. I might could do it, but don't care to.

Your facts and words in this post do require some serious translation in order to equal meaning.

Andrew Gillum Concedes to Ron DeSantis in Florida Governor’s Race after recount

so the recount assailed by Republicans, without evidence, as a possible smoke screen for election fraud ...

since they won this race in the recount no more voter fraud??? should we expect more of the same from the GOP in tough elections 2020? Thats it is always Fraud unless we win???