![]() |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
for your own gain, is unethical. clearly you’re ok with it, at least when a democrat does it. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
we don’t enthusiastically endorse waste or indoctrination. education, yes. which side opposes school choice, can you remind me, i forgot? to democrats, “supporting education” means giving more money to teachers unions, so that much of that money will get donated to democratic political campaigns. But it doesn’t necessarily improve the quality of the education being offered. Spending more, isn’t necessarily the same thing, as supporting education. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not sure Harvard's School of West Sri-Lankan Genderfluid Archeology Department is higher education than Perdue's Aerospace Engineering program. *Some* of higher ed's famed institutions have jumped the rails reality. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
of them are hundreds of years old, so i’m not sure todays political climate in those states, is why those schools were built there. but that’s what you are suggesting? show me the evidence that spending is any kind of proxy. Here in CT, we spend more than 14k per kid in my town ( southington). schools are pretty good. the catholic school costs 5k per year, and has much higher test scores. there is almost zero correlation between spending and student performance. student performance is largely determined in the home. i was a public schoolteacher for a brief time, i come from a family of many public schoolteachers. money has almost nothing to do with it, especially when 90% of an education budget goes to teachers salaries, healthcare, and pensions. Students don’t know or care about that stuff. that does almost nothing to improve test scores. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I love science
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
engineering and medicine? gimme a break...you’re making stuff up out of thin air. conservatives are probably resisting the science of climate change for political reasons, just as liberals deny the science of unborn baby development in pursuit of their own political agenda. both sides play dumb when it suits them. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It must be a struggle in your daily life. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
do with that. but spending money isn’t always the answer. if i’m a teacher at a crappy school in hartford, and next year i get a fat raise and cheaper health insurance, how does that help my students perform better? because i’m any municipal education budget, that’s where all the money goes. because the unions control the politicians, at least here in CT. when you have to cut things like art and music, and lay-off non tenured teachers to satisfy union contracts, i don’t see how that helps students. do you? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com