![]() |
tip of the iceberg? how do you know?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
What did Hillary do that was unethical?
|
Quote:
i’ll ask you, if russia leaked emails that said trump did unethical things, and the emails were accurate,,would you be more concerned about what trump did, or with the fact that russia broke the story? is anyone denying the accuracy of what was in those emails? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
keeps saying that revealing the emails, helped cost her the election. so i presume something was in there, right? if the leaked emails were about yoga and chelsea’s wedding, no one would be saying it impacted the election. pete claimed that russia’s leaking the emails, tilted the election in favor of trump. that necessarily means, that what was in the emails, hurt hilary. right? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Unlike you I don't have "a side" and have prob. still voted for more Presidential candidates with Republican after their name than I have for Democrats. |
Quote:
"Russia hacked the DNC and leaked the emails." Does that say Hillary's emails? You did and now you are lost in Hillarian rage again, I see. While you and Trump apparently do not realize it, she did not win. What threat to our democracy does she pose at this point? Here's the thing that should concern you and other Trumplicans Russia hacked the RNC and never leaked the emails. The GOP never Trumpers (McCarthy among them) jumped on the Trump wagon What does Russia have on the Republicans? What level of corruption exists to be found in the republican leadership? Of course there is none on the right, it only exists on the left. Anyone who would suggest otherwise must be wearing a tinfoil hat. |
Quote:
i had knowledge of what was in the emails. So pete says that the leaking of the emails hurt her chances of getting elected. From that, i assume that means there was something bad in the emails. you disagree? so Pete says that public knowledge of the emails harmed her chances of winning, and you don’t concede that means the emails made her look bad? this is great... Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
i’ve heard a million times that the leaked Podesta emails hurt hilary in the election. but you’re saying the emails don’t reveal anything damaging to her? hilary is wondering in the woods alone babbling like an idiot, i spend no time thinking of her. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
i’ve heard a million times that the leaked Podesta emails hurt hilary in the election. but you’re saying the emails don’t reveal anything unethical. gotcha. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Hillary's emails were not on the DNC server, they were housed on a server located at her home in Chappaqua, New York. You are as confused as Trump and Colludy by Russian propaganda. Here's the thing that should concern you and other Trumplicans Russia hacked the RNC and never leaked the emails. The GOP never Trumpers (McCarthy among them) jumped on the Trump wagon What does Russia have on the Republicans? What level of corruption exists to be found in the republican leadership? Of course there is none on the right, it only exists on the left. Anyone who would suggest otherwise must be wearing a tinfoil hat. |
i am
confused for sure. i’m not talking about her emails in her home. i was talking about ( because i thought its what you were referring to) the russian hack of John Podestas email account, shares with wikileaks. when liberals talk about russian interference, this is usually what they mean. and if hilary hadn’t engaged in anything sordid, than publishing those emails could not have damaged her electability. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
i think there’s lots of corruption within the gop. doesnt mean i think trump committed an impeachable
offense. how many times was there a smoking gun? cohen testimony, tax returns, russian collusion, obstruction of justice, now this. when you make a certain. umber if false claims, eventually you lose credibility. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
CBS/YouGov now: Does Trump deserve to be impeached, not deserve to be, or too soon to say?
Deserves it 42% Doesn't deserve 36% Too soon 22% CBS/NYT Oct. '98: Do Clinton's actions warrant impeachment/removal? Yes 37% No 60% |
Quote:
how accurate were those polls in measuring what would happen at the election? if those polls are accurate, you have nothing to worry about. yet you desperately post every negative tidbit you can find. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
TRUMP'S RESPONSE TO IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY
(per his statements) 1. Those investigating me are traitors and must be put to death. 2. My political enemies must be imprisoned. 3. Those who oppose me who aren't put to death or imprisoned will face armed insurrection by my supporters. |
Quote:
Yes 37% No 60% These numbers are from a few days after the House voted to impeach Clinton. It's not by popular vote. Trump's impeachment will be driven by how people react to the evidence provided, if the Senate thinks that it is politically expedient for him to go, he's gone. They want to get re-elected, don't be dreaming that it is not political. |
prank call in which Schiff thinks he’s talking to Ukrainian officials, telling them he’d accept any dirt on Trump they could give him.
Is his intent, an impeachable offense? Let me answer for you: No, because shut up. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop...-in-prank-call Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
At the very end of the story, FOX says that Schiff suspected it was a prank, called the FBI before the call, recorded the call, the reported back to FBI afterwards. The implication the it was a secret deal to get dirt is an lie. Once Trump agreed to take Russian help, Putin owned him, and he still does, and Fox helps keep him in power. Shame on them. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
The but Hillary is strong in you
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
you got me good on the schiff story though, clobbered me. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I brought up this, below, and the questions are at the end, they refer to the RNC emails that were hacked and never released? Could be because there’s nothing there or there is and it’s in use. What we know: 1 Russia hacked the DNC and leaked the emails. 2 Russia hacked the RNC and never leaked the emails. 3 The GOP never Trumpers (McCarthy) jump on the Trump wagon What does Russia have? What is the level of corruption found? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And why were the speeches problematic? Is it bc she refuses to release them and you don't know what she talked about? |
Quote:
The Russians said you better not do that. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
paul, did your side make a big deal about how the email release hurt Hilary, or not? can we start there? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com