You're right it is not appropriate but the people on the right here constantly throw around insults so when someone responds I think they are justified. You're a moderator but why have a moderator when nothing is too low here and you don't do a thing about it?

You want me to point out your hypocrisy. Remember when I posted about the coast guard cadets and you pointed out if was really CG "members" as if that really makes a difference. Then the next day you complained that Spence did something similar to what you did. That is hypocrisy.

I laugh how you really never post anything of substance but lurk and throw out little jabs or memes.

I think Pete F needs to go to a truck rest stop for some action.
Pathetic loser obviously hasen’t been #^&#^&#^&#^&ed in decades.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I never said Hunter didn't get the job bc of this dad. That is not a crime. Would it be proper for the DOJ to announce an investigation into Trump for pedo. bc Epstein was a pedo and Trump is on camara saying he hung out w/Epstein liked "young girls"?

so i had it coming, because pete was responding to my insults.

All i did, was ask him exactly how
many times it’s ok to put kids in cages, before it becomes immoral.

Let’s recap, shall we?

Pete: it was immoral for trump
to put kids in cages.

Jim: Obama did it first, obama built the facilities with cages.

Pete: Trump did it more often.

Jim: so what’s the maximum number of kids you can put in cages, before it becomes immoral?

Pete: your mother was a paint sniffing prostitute.

TDF: that’s a new low

Paul: Pete was just responding to Jim’s insults.


sound about right, paul and pete?

Your slipping paul. i know SD yanks your chain pretty good. But you’re slipping.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't think he yanks my chain at all.

you tell him pretty regularly that you don’t care for him, that’s all i meant. you also seemed to miss the point of everything else i just posted.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Read it for yourself

You chased me from one thread to another trying to bring me down to your level.

Not afraid to call me a Jew hater, Omar or other names because I quoted Ilan Goldenberg or dared to criticize Floridaman's latest stupidity. Definitely demonstrated your prejudices once again.

So congratulations, I'm glad you have impressed yourself and the rest of the Trumplicans.

Now go chase your tail

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, I don't think I do.

"You chased me from one thread to another trying to bring me down to your level"

Because you said that what distinguishes Trump from Obama in terms of kids in cages is the number of times he did it, I merely asked you what the magic number is. How many is OK, how many is too many? Obviously that's an insane argument, and you know you aren't going to be able to come up with any threshold which a child wouldn't laugh at, so you went at my mother.

I was trying to get you to clarify your stated position. That's bringing you down to my level? Makes no sense...

"Not afraid to call me a Jew hater"

You said that it's problematic for Jews to work on a Mideast peace treaty, and you said it was "gross" that only Jews were on the stage. Your words. Sounds anti-Semitic to me. And I don't play the bigot card regularly.


"I'm glad you have impressed yourself and the rest of the Trumplicans"

TDF is a Trumplican now?? Wow. When you have to call HIM a Trumplican, that shows you how deep into the Twilight Zone you are.

Take a deep breath. TDF is one of the most level-headed and nonpartisan guys here. He really is. Think about what he said to you, and why he of all people, felt compelled to say it. He's not me or SD, he doesn't come out here looking to stir the pot. Ask yourself what you had to do, to trigger that reaction from someone who everyone would say is fair and level-headed.

I'd say you and I are about done on this forum. You're a predictable, thoughtless, mean-spirited, vulgar, cowardly, bitter, desperate, deeply and pathetically insecure, pimple of a person. And every single person here knows it. You have an awful lot in common, with the guy you spend every waking second trying to criticize. Very little daylight between you and Trump. Kind of funny when you look at it that way.

So who at Burisma is Hunter's relative? I gave you the definition of Nepotism which showed you are totally wrong.

You epitomize the uneducated vile right who think they are right when they are wrong. You don't have anything to add so you throw childish insults out.

You say so.

Out of curiosity, if I said that Pete has a habit of starting anti Trump posts, would you reflexively disagree with me?

If I said that, you'd be calling me angry...

Yes, you're not an angry person. He takes more crap here than anyone.

Not in response to his constant childish posts.

But you are angry. Look at the other post you just made.

Of course not. It is clear that is what he does.

If you had the courage to answer his question he wouldn’t have to chase you. Keep cherry picking facts and making a fool of yourself. Silly liberal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does this response imply that his father had nothing to do with getting the job? Tell us how wrong you are again.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm actually having a great day. A great day. It's a beautiful day. Market way up, got a ton done at work, going to a kids basketball game in a few minutes, grilling some thick ribeyes over charcoal for dinner afterwards (charcoal a million times better than gas). And I completely annihilated someone who absolutely had it coming (he mostly did it to himself, I just finished him off). You think I'm angry? You couldn't be more wrong, I'm nowhere near angry. You literally couldn't be more wrong. But don't let that stop you.

Paul, in this thread, in the last couple of pages, you had some negative things to say about me, SD, and TDF. And everyone who engages in insults, does so because of some character flaw. Everyone that is, except you. You and only you, are justified every time the insults fly. You're the only person in the world who can fight back and not have it say something negative about you.

Must be nice to be that special.

Do you have any proof Biden talked, emailed, sent Rudy G. in the middle of the night to go talk to any one at Burisma? Either you do or you're wrong again.

I am special thank you.

You don't think SD is a petty, childish person who doesn't add anything to this forum?

Certainly the investigation would uncover this proof. You are being coy here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you or Jim have no proof of anything concerning the Bidens.

Didn't you say that you don't deny that Joe used his influence to get Hunter the job?

Because I keep hearing that what makes Trump's actions a crime isn't that he withheld aid, but that he did so for his own benefit. So if it's impeachable for Trumo to use his office for his own benefit, would it be impeachable for Biden to use his office for his son's benefit.

Paul, here's what we know. I have no problem with investigating Trump, I have no problem with havng Bolton testify. I also have no problem with looking into th Bidens.

You are only interested in seeking truth which helps your side.

Let Bolton testify. It won't change the fact that he's not getting convicted. It also won't change the fact that anyone not named Joe Biden will have a real tough time beating Trump in the general if the economy holds.

And your proof that Trump gave up on withholding aid because people were aware, is that th aid was released after people were aware.

So in your mind, if "b" follows "a", that's proof that "b" was caused by "a".

I bought some nice steaks this morning. Later, the stock market went up. Using your logic, did the market go up because I boought steaks?

Again, your threshold for what constitutes proof or probaby cause, depends entirely on teh political party of the accused.

You know Floridaman really had no choice but to use Giuliani and Parnas to go after Biden.

I mean, it's not like there's some bureau in the federal government that does investigations.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I never said that Joe Biden got hunter a job. I said Hunter got a job because his father was famous / a politician. Just as one of the bush-girls got the TV gig and C. Clinton benefited from her family fame. There's no proof Joe contacted anyone at Burisima to ask for a job for Hunter.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

yeah you got me there.

Edit - if you are having Lobster tomorrow night please let me know and I'll double down on some of my stocks as this virus from China is killing some of my portfolio.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it appears that everyone related to joe was feasting on tax dollars and shady influence for years which probably had absolutely nothing to do with joe:huh:...between the weaponization and corruption of the FBI and other governmental agencies by Obama... and Biden Inc. robbing the world blind one wonders what else might have been going on during the Obama years....but let's continue to stomp our feet over a little phone call...LET'S GO BERNIE! ....BA..BA.. BA BA BA......LET'S GO BERNIE!...BA..BA...BA BA BA!

i think we’re getting dominoes tonight ( but i like the way you think!) , let’s see the effect it has.

have a good one, paul!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device