![]() |
Quote:
Never said it didn't matter. What I did say was that the Administration built Zarqawi up so they could rip him down. This happened even before the war as they falsely cited his presence in Iraq as proof that Saddam had links to al Qaida. This happened during the insurgency as the military and Administration intentionally and repeatedly overstated his impact to keep the media focused on terrorisim and not sectarian violence. This doesn't mean he wasn't a very nasty bastard or that his death doesn't matter...but things need to be put into perspective. -spence |
general casey to pilot
go ahead general Casey....
engage target.... give him 1000 pounds of allah perspective....:eek::shocked: aye sir...approaching target.... bombs sent sir... pilot: returning to base.... well done Pilot.... thankyou sir. :lm: |
perfect
Quote:
HSSSSSS tory you spelled it right ! :wavey: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And this isn't about being negative to American success...my comments are to put the event into perspective as the Administration has distorted his role. Did you know that in 2004 NBC reported the Pentagon requested permission 3 times to take Zarqawi out (before the Iraq war) in 2002. They were concerned he would raise some hell in Europe and given the post 9/11 mindset wanted to eliminate the problem. The requests were denied as the Administration didn't want to upset their case for war with Saddam. Much better to make wild accusations Zarqawi and Saddam were drinking tea together on cool evenings after evening prayers :rolleyes: He was an evil man and our special ops have spent 2 freaking years tracking him down...but his role in this chapter of the "war on terror" should be looked at in context. The real world is a lot more nuanced than many would like to believe. -spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-spence |
Spence and likwid,
While i respect your right to your opinions, which is one of the beauties of our system of democracy, I am dismayed with your focus upon the political viewpoint. You want a dose of reality? you can come fish a day or night with some personal friends of mine who have been on the ground 'in theater', some who are members of the one four five. I promise they'll respect your right to a point of view, but they'll tell it like it is. We (include me) have no idea what is real over there. I would be willing to bet that you would be rethinking some of your posts after meeting them..... My support is 100% behind those who are on the ground, at risk, for you and me. I will not participate online in a media nor political discussion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Can't speak for Likwid, don't know him. Putting the Zarqawi death in context isn't in any way diminishing the efforts of our troops. That's just the same bull%$%$%$%$ logic that says any critisim of the President is against the troops and their mission. I know all I can know, and I form my opinions on that base. I'm not some liberal crackpot, hell, I'm even making my stepson read Nathan Fick's book so he can understand what it means to be a Marine. My support and utter respect for our troops is precisely the reason I get so ticked when they are seemingly shown such contempt by the civilian leadership who order them into combat in a reckless manner. -spence |
Quote:
What CIVILIAN Leadership are you referring to??? Obviously you are not referring to the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. So who exactly are you referring to ? I am VERY confused. S-plain it to me ! |
Quote:
-spence |
"I'm not prepared to lay out a detailed policy or strategy," "It's not something you can expect in a situation that is moving this fast and has the level of detail you're looking for."
Riddle me this , Who said these words? Hint, this guy would have been a TOP POLICYMAKER if KERRY won the election. Point is, what alternative plans are the Dems offering this year in 2006 ? |
Quote:
Sad but true |
Quote:
That's just silly. The real issue isn't even Dem vs Repub. It's to flush the current neocon policy wonks out of office. Any decent leader could do what it takes to regain our moral high ground and make objective decisions giving the operational folks a chance to make more meaningful contributions on the ground that have some staying power. -spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198940,00.html I think Neil Covuto sums it up pretty well. Can a Fella just hear "good job" for ONCE?!. Nanci Pelosi says "well, its about time" that pretty much sums it up for her party. |
Quote:
Tin, if you want I can pull little snippets here and there to justify nearly anything. I remember seeing numerous Democratic Congresspeople making positive statements the day it was announced. As for Pelosi...given that it's taken the most elite special forces in the most powerful nation on earth 2 years to find someone who publishes their video on the Internet every few weeks... IT IS ABOUT TIME :cheers: -spence |
Quote:
Sure there is a faction of the progressive left that does despise the person to the point where they can't think straight...in fact my sister is one of them :bo: But I'd argue there's an even larger segment on the right who are so vested in Bush and Company that they are lying to themselves to avoid judgement on his policy blunders on a daily basis. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt :jump1: Ba-dum, bump! I have another show at 11. -spence |
It took how long to catch the unibomber, and that was on OUR turf in MONTANA. the Feds admitted they flew right over his shack many times(even after they knew exactly where it was) and could not see it, and he didnt have his own army hiding him. Its called hiding in PLAIN SIGHT. Its not so easy to find a single person who knows his home turf and does not want to be found.
You really think he posted on chat lines in real time, like we are doing here? PUULEAASE . Anyone can send a video tape to Al Jaseera and remain completely anonymous. You and I need to drink a beer or 2 one day. Some of my best friends are also Democrats:wall: , not that there is anything wrong with that. .:buds: |
Quote:
They don't tell US troops because A) they will get killed and B) they don't like us very much. Perhaps if we planned a little better for the "hearts and minds" aspect of things instead of letting the country go down the toilet the people would be a little more cooperative! And to be honest, I've always thought that if we did pull out ala Murtha that the local militas would snuff out the foreign terrorists in about a day. Full on civil war might ensue...but at least it would be clean :) Dinking some wine right now. Perfect end to an afternoon of shingling. -spence |
killing solves nothing.
|
Quote:
Amazing listening to Sean Hannity BLAST Nick Berg's father for his comments about Zarqawi's death...What would Jesus do? -spence |
im not christian.. he lives up near boston
my point is killing this guy only serves to boost our moral. there will be another insect to take his place by next friday probably and he will be eager to proove that he is just a ruthless as the last. quagmire... |
Quote:
It could really go either way...better or worse. -spence |
where is osama?
|
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
UNREAL what i am reading in this thread |
Quote:
You'd probably invite Osama to the White House for tea if you were president. |
Quote:
-spence |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com