![]() |
I don't believe I quoted you. Why don't you make a long list of Obama's qualifications and enlighten us all. Or tell me something he truly stands for. I have an open mind, please teach me so I may follow too.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I choose to join organizations that protect rights that I believe in. By the way Obama couldn't even stand by his church when the going got tough. Some values. I am still waiting for the list. Someone in the herd must have one.:bl:
|
|
Couldn't stand by his church?
Can you blame him? As far as I can tell the man stands by his religion. Why is it so wrong that he walked away from his church when he didn't agree with it? If your church turned into a KKK meeting would you keep going? And honestly, you accused him of being a preacher and us sheep, you must know him better than we do. Why precisely do we need to be telling you what he stands for if you already know so much about him? |
Quote:
|
I'll have to admit I had a little falling out with the church myself being Catholic but he never complained or left untill it started to hurt his poles. That's why I say he has no values.
|
Quote:
Haven't you ever been in the situation of "well... he still goes, eh, i'll go anyhow..."? He didn't abandon the church until the pastor refused to apologize for what he said. |
I wouldnt be so quick to judge him over the church thing. Just because you do not agree 100% With your preist/reverand/rabi, does not mean that you reflect the same values, nor does it reflect that you have to find a new church. So he didnt agree with the guy and he stayed... so what. So he left because the media pounced on this as one of his weaknesses.. so what. I would have done the same thing. The social aspects of church sometimes out weigh the religious aspects. I would wager to guess that every affluent black person in his town attended that church. Sometimes sheep are slow to leave the flock, unless wolves are hopping the fence.
|
Thanks Nebe, I did not know he had done so much. " he gave the most important speech on religion in the last 40 years" HOLy SH@@t how did I miss it. And he stopped the spread of those infamous "weapons of mass destruction". I think he is awsome
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Unquestionably it was the best speech on religion in 40 years.
did you listen to it? http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid1209568851 |
No, I just took his word for it. It said it on his website so thats good enough for us, right? baa baa
|
Quote:
|
Man, we can't get away from that can we. The goal of the original mission was accomplished, we just forgot the next step.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
we apologize for other's mistakes. then we kill them.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The "next step" as you say was a means to that end, and one that has proved to be a strategic blunder. -spence |
The media has been quite for awhile now. Things are doing much better over there.If you have anyone close to you, that is over there, they will tell you the same thing. History will prove we did the right thing. Then you Dems will take credit for it somehow.
|
First page of his speech included 11 references to things Americans are afraid of.
Yeah, we're sick of hearing it over and over again. :doh: |
Quote:
You mean how Egypt has slid further away from Democracy? How Iran is exploiting our weakened global position to persue nukes? How Saudia Arabia continues to oppress women while we enrich their kingdom? And this is all worth 4,000+ dead and a trillion dollars siezed from the US Taxpayer in a marketing scheme and borrored from a communist government? Yes, there have been meaningful advances made in Iraq, but we have to date seen little that indicates the Iraqi's are capable of running a government on their own. The very same sectarian divide that Saddam kept quiet under an iron fist is still there waiting to explode. Our International standing (read LEVERAGE) is still in the dumper, and even more so with the fall of the US Dollar. And with all of this, America, the great nation she is is still the best place in the world (unlike some, I don't expect to be speaking Farsii any time soon). Best case for the Bush legacy is that he's remembered as an incompetent dope who poisoned his administration with other equally incompetent dopes and arrogant, fanatic idiologues. How the pragmatic voices of reason were time and time again tossed aside in favor of those who would tow the line, and use every issue as campaign fodder without regard to impact of the American way of life. Worst case is that either McCain or Obama makes great strides to rebuild the American brand, which I think either is capable of doing, as this will wipe Bush's folly's with a neon highlighter. -spence |
And the media has still been quiet about the situation with our troops on the ground. Regardless of whether going in was foolish or not, the sad fact is the Bush Admin & Rummy made one colossal upgefucht after another over there. But a lot of hard work and good leadership by our troops has made a positive impact and due to the Surge, the corner may have been turned for good. But that does not get mentioned.
Quote:
|
Quote:
The media has covered the Surge at length over the past year. I've seen it in print, online and on the evening shows. I've seen the positive elements of the Surge reported as well as the tenuous elements reported. Helped = yes, worked = not so quick. Granted it's not a daily front page story, but there are other issues like elections, the economy and Lindsey Lohan who deserve their time. This is just more media baiting from the right wing. -spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Us against them. Only 6 words total just to make it easy to swallow. I sure wish the world were this simple. -spence |
Quote:
|
Spence obviously doesn't get it.
all pray the same all blow up the same right buckman? |
No, but if you think you can reason with these kind and gentle folks then have at it. Tell me again why they attacked us, so I can understand how the pacifist would have handled things. We did get attacked didn't we?
|
Quote:
But its "us" against "them" so does "them" mean "all of them"? Maybe some of them? Maybe a minority of them? Which is it? Should we go burn down the Arch Diocses of Boston because a couple priests were kiddie touchers? |
Quote:
Before you make a statement like that, you need to analyze why they are against us, or why it is that they threw the 1st stone at us. Our foreign policy has been against them for decades. The problem is oil and Israel. If our country ignored those 2 issues and made decisions in regards to foreign policy without taking them into consideration, you would see a happier Muslim population in the middle east and a population that would have no reason to want to attack Americans. But because we want their oil and because we worked with england to create the nation of Israel in the 40's and displace millions of Palestinians and force them to live in refuge camps for decades, I can see why we are hated. You certainly can not think that we as a nation have done nothing to pour fuel on the Muslim fire for years and years.. To think that the Muslim population would sit back and let us screw them over time after time is like the thought that the American Indians who once roamed the great planes of our country would sit back and let the white man steal their lands without raising a fist in defense. Were they against us? or were we against them? open your eyes |
Quote:
Holt sh@@t, do you ever listen to your self. Maybe we should give America back to the Indians. Last I checked your car and boat run on fossil fuels too. Are you saying that if we just leave them alone they will be peaceful. Hell they have been killing each other off for thousands of years. They no nothing of peace and to blame it on Israel is pathetic. How about the Muslums taking over Europe or is that Ok. As long as no one who is not a Muslim is in their country. |
common sense man... common sense. If you were my neighbor and I built a guest house on your property against your will, what would you do? Give me a kiss and polish my shoes? Sounds ridiculous doesnt it? The thing is that i would never do that in the first place.
So lets say I did build a guest house on your property and your screaming and yelling about it.. no one listens to you and those who do, say that my grandparents once owned your land so your out of luck.. you have no options so you use the only option you have left to get me off of your land... violence. Then people start paying attention to you and you think your going to get your way, but the people paying attention have labeled you as a terrorist. Now you have no way out.. you might as well just kill yourself, or better yet, kill me and yourself at the same time.. no one wins. But.. If i had the decency to treat you right in the first place and respect your rights, we'd be having a cook out right now.. |
Quote:
For example you'll see muslims, jews, christians, hindus all in Kuala Lumpur. You don't see the muslims freaking out and beheading anyone? Why is that? And just to be clear, if there's one group that hates muslims more than the right wing, its hindus. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com