Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   StriperTalk! (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Last US sardine cans being packed in Maine (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=63346)

JohnnyD 04-19-2010 11:11 PM

You state, as fact, that the quota is the reason the factory had to close, and that the quota is putting fishermen out of business.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but, the quota set in 2004 was 180,000 metric tons and has now been decreased to 91,000 metric tons.
According to statistics *From the State of Maine*:
Year Metric Tons Landed
2006 43367
2007 32935
2008 30048
http://www.maine.gov/dmr/commercialf...erring.tbl.pdf

So, explain to me where the issue is?

Also, bottom and midwater trawlers are a disgusting practice that should be completely banned. You want to complain about a group that has cost fishermen jobs - in addition to lowering the price of fish and wreaking havoc on the ecosystem all without regard for the fish and only for their wallet, you can start there.

big jay 04-20-2010 12:19 AM

speaking of spin
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring (Post 763370)
Bycatch in this fishery is not ugly - in fact information for the fishery indicates it is one of the cleanest in the region.

Information from the fishery??? If it's so clean, why have you guys been fighting like hell for years to keep the observers off the boats? Or that nifty little trick you boys like - when there's an observer on one boat, you guys just pair trawl and then the other boat hauls back every time? Oh wait, it's for safety sake that you can just dump your cod end without taking it aboard when its loaded to the gills with haddock. That's right - it's bycatch if it hits the deck, but if you just dump a few metric tons of dead groundfish, its not "by-catch"

And the crowning glory - when there's 6 miles of DEAD FLOATING STRIPERS in the Great South Channel when you boys are busy destroying the fall tuna fishery - that's not discard, b/c you didn't out them on your boat.

And as for the plant closing, while I feel for the men that lost their jobs, - stop exporting the herring on that big freaking freighter that loads at norpel in NB and keep some product for the domestic cannery market. Its not the regs that closed you down - you got a better price overseas and F'd your workers.

Spin on that.

BasicPatrick 04-20-2010 01:53 AM

:musc:Well...it didnt take the well funded mwt fleet long to find this thread. :hidin:

I wonder what meherring gets paid to hop on the internet...Welcome :cputin:

I wonder if meherring is the lobbiest that is always talking about how to fix river herring we need to increase the striped bass quota :screwy:

OR is he the dc laywer that is bold enough to admit he is trying to get loopholes in the management plan :wall:

OR maybe he is the plant manager who after giving the speach about being an industry "on our knees" gets in his 50K 2009 Toyota Sequoia :sspam:

OR the employee that likes to yell at people and try an intimidate them outside the hotels :musc:

Let's see what's will you say next...oh...I know...:bs:

The crime here is that your greedy industry is using the tragedy of this plant to push your agenda. Why is your press agent not pushing the positive effort to flip the plant into somehting more reliable :huh:

All you want the press to cover is the quota reduction...:yak5:

The only guilt I feel is that I walked away for a while after we formed CHOIR and we failed at preventing your damage from going as far as it has and for that I feel guily:deadhorse:

Hop on one of your vessels and sail off to your next MSC certified fishery that you are going to ruin. Go kill a whale or dump a bag of the wrong size herring or river herring or haddock over the side since that is what you truely do best.:bshake:

maddmatt 04-20-2010 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swimmer (Post 762160)
Thats because the mainers V-notch the females

my female has a v notch, if yours doesn't u should return it as faulty

maddmatt 04-20-2010 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stripermaineiac (Post 762231)
Maine sardines taste a lot better than the imports. Grew up on them an still love em. Shame the poleticians don't make free traders go by the agreement to improve standards in free trade countries. Drove our sardine industry out of the market as they couldn't compete with giant netters that didn't have to go by American fishery rules.MMMMMM No limits,no health care,no vacations,no OSHA,very little pay,no workers comp,no sick time an on an on. I wonder when they're gonna start worrying about our economy instead of everyone elses on the planet.Who gives a damn if theirs no work in China. The schmucks don't import hardly anything from here no how. Sorry but it's a sore point as every day another freind tells me they got laid off as their job has gone over seas. Ron

ditto

maddmatt 04-20-2010 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stripermaineiac (Post 762672)
Our poleticians spend more time making rules that put our businesses out of business than they do trying to make things better and create more jobs. All for the benefit of foreign jobs to build economies elsewhere. I wonder how much they get paid to keep working for these foreign governments cause they sure as hell aren't doing a damn thing for our country anymore.Time to vote the whole bunch out of office and start from scratch.we need people working for us and not lining their own pockets at our countries expense.

hear, hear........

maddmatt 04-20-2010 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Sandman (Post 762680)
You sound like my father! :rotf2:

your father is right

maddmatt 04-20-2010 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAKAI (Post 762810)
Just coming up from the basement, sharpening the tines on the pitchfork.
Enjoy your Birkenstocks while you can my Liberal comrades.
The next Revolution draws nigh.
:fence:

yeah!!!!!

maddmatt 04-20-2010 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by big jay (Post 763376)
Information from the fishery??? If it's so clean, why have you guys been fighting like hell for years to keep the observers off the boats? Or that nifty little trick you boys like - when there's an observer on one boat, you guys just pair trawl and then the other boat hauls back every time? Oh wait, it's for safety sake that you can just dump your cod end without taking it aboard when its loaded to the gills with haddock. That's right - it's bycatch if it hits the deck, but if you just dump a few metric tons of dead groundfish, its not "by-catch"

And the crowning glory - when there's 6 miles of DEAD FLOATING STRIPERS in the Great South Channel when you boys are busy destroying the fall tuna fishery - that's not discard, b/c you didn't out them on your boat.

And as for the plant closing, while I feel for the men that lost their jobs, - stop exporting the herring on that big freaking freighter that loads at norpel in NB and keep some product for the domestic cannery market. Its not the regs that closed you down - you got a better price overseas and F'd your workers.

Spin on that.

ouch!

maddmatt 04-20-2010 08:17 AM

i love this thread!

The Dad Fisherman 04-20-2010 09:01 AM

MM....You need to learn how to Multi-Quote...:hihi:

maddmatt 04-20-2010 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 763432)
MM....You need to learn how to Multi-Quote...:hihi:

huh? wat that? u luky i use commputter.

maddmatt 04-20-2010 09:42 AM

just trying to get my number of posts to 10,000 so i can be somebody :biglaugh:

The Dad Fisherman 04-20-2010 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maddmatt (Post 763436)
huh? wat that? u luky i use commputter.

Just use the little "+" button next to the quote button. you select all the posts you want to quote then hit the Quote button on the last one. that way it puts them all in the same post like I just did with both of yours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by maddmatt (Post 763437)
just trying to get my number of posts to 10,000 so i can be somebody :biglaugh:

Then you can comment on each one......and you got a loooooong way to go to catch Bigfish in the Post count :hee:

meherring 04-20-2010 11:13 AM

Missing the Point
 
You all are missing the point, the plant closing is not related to midwater trawling. Bumble Bee clearly stated that they will close because the reduced quota in the inshore GOM is not sufficient for them to be viable. While the State of Maine numbers appear to be correct, the federal area quotas are the ones to look at.

Inshore GOM:
2006 - 60,000 mt
2007 - 50,000 mt
2008 - 45,000 mt
2009 - 45,000 mt
2010 - 26,546 mt

These fish have been supplied to the plant during the summer/fall season by purse seiners. The quota was drastically cut even though the science says the stock is stable, because of campaigns by the Pew, etc people.

The Norpel plant has nothing to do with this, nor does their fish caught in the winter and shipped oversees. It has to do with available quota in the GOM.

As for all the accusations about midwater trawling, there is no factual information to support the allegations. The fishery has bycatch, but when compared to others in the region it is a clean fishery. There is no factual information to support the striper bycatch in the Channel. In fact, the MA DMF investigated through VMS and found there where no herring boats in the area, but lets not let the facts get in the way.

All the sensational rhetoric "greedy, etc" does not overcome the facts.

The bottom line here is the plant has closed, 140 people have lost there jobs, and these campaigns attacking the fishery have devasted the Maine herring fishery. And as I said before, Patrick, you and your like, should look in the mirror. While the entire outcome can't be laid at anyones feet, you have had a hand in it.

I come from a Maine fishing family, I am not a lawyer, lobbiest or plant manager and don't have a press agent. I also don't plan on spending time arguing here with people who rely on internet forums for their information. Try reading something factual for a change at nefmc.org

JohnnyD 04-20-2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring (Post 763447)
You all are missing the point, the plant closing is not related to midwater trawling. Bumble Bee clearly stated that they will close because the reduced quota in the inshore GOM is not sufficient for them to be viable. While the State of Maine numbers appear to be correct, the federal area quotas are the ones to look at.

No, *you're* missing the point and then spinning your position as it's proven wrong and scientifically inaccurate.

If the Maine numbers appear correct, and the federal area quotas are the ones to look at, then why does your post and all the sob stories harp on Maine "decreasing the quota in half"?

Quote:

As for all the accusations about midwater trawling, there is no factual information to support the allegations. The fishery has bycatch, but when compared to others in the region it is a clean fishery. There is no factual information to support the striper bycatch in the Channel. In fact, the MA DMF investigated through VMS and found there where no herring boats in the area, but lets not let the facts get in the way.
Must've been an unreported oil spill or other disaster that caused miles of belly up stripers. Exactly what other fishery are you referring to that midwater trawling is "a clean fishery" relative to?
YouTube - DEAD STRIPERS OFF NEW ENGLAND - WHO DID THIS?

Steve K 04-21-2010 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Sandman (Post 762111)
Last US sardine cans being packed in Maine - Yahoo! News


How's that "Hope and change" working for ya?

It has been working great for me. I did not realize that during "Mission Accomplished" jobs previously sent offshore came back to the US. Please enlighten us.

likwid 04-21-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Sandman (Post 762111)
Last US sardine cans being packed in Maine - Yahoo! News


How's that "Hope and change" working for ya?


Production at Maine canneries has been sliding since peaking at 384 million cans in 1950. Faced with declining demand and a changing business climate, the plants went by the wayside one by one until, five years ago, the Stinson plant was the last one standing.


Quit being a tool and trying to politicize a dying business.

flatts1 04-21-2010 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring (Post 763370)
The total quota was reduced becuase of scientific uncertainty and the inshore quota that Stinson's relied heavily on was drastically reduced because of a political campaign that Basicpatirck has been participating in for a number of years - along with Earth Justice, CHOIR and Pew - all friends of fishermen everywhere!

I always find it amusing when the midwater lobby tries to paint those of us interested in seeing our forage fisheries managed sustainably as some of out of touch environmentalists.


Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring (Post 763370)
...it is insulting to Maine fishermen"

You're kidding right?

The Maine fishermen have been some of the strongest folks leading the charge to bring some sanity to the sea herring fishery since the Midwater boats came.

Are you sure that you have attended all meetings on this issue as you mentioned, MEherring? When did you start? You know it doesn't help to attend these meetings if you don't pay attention.

Poor chum. Here, let me help you. Take a listen to the following audio clip from a September 2006 NEFMC meeting. It is only 5 minutes. Pay attention, now, and realize just how out of touch you really are.

http://www.fishtalk.org/rc/nefmc/ful...0928/t3/s3.m3u

MEherring in case you missed it Steve Weiner, the chairman of Choir, is the commercial tuna fisherman who spoke in that above audio clip. He is a Maine fisherman. Also note that the Maine Lobstermen's Association supported CHOIR's positions as well. Might I suggest you try expanding your circle of friends in the Maine fishing community.

I could introduce you to some at the next NEFMC meeting if you like.

Hope this helps.

Mike Flaherty
Wareham, MA

flatts1 04-21-2010 06:55 PM

People in glass houses...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring
And as I said before, Patrick, you and your like, should look in the mirror.

You're funny, MEherring.

Quote:

Lessons Learned From Herring Amendment 1
By Mike Flaherty

Commercial Fisheries News
February 2006



As someone who has been deeply interested and involved in the New England Fishery Management Council’s management of Atlantic herring, I appreciate the depth of coverage, analysis, and opinions that Commercial Fisheries News has devoted to this issue.

While I’m not a commercial fisherman or a processor or a paid lobbyist, at this time I would like to share with you some of my thoughts and observations as someone who has learned a lot during the Amendment 1 process. My hope is that folks will take some lessons learned here and apply them toward future management measures by working together not only on sea herring, but other species as well.

Here are the words New England council Chairman Frank Blount used at the Council’s November 2005 meeting in Hyannis, MA to describe his frustration at council members who could not agree on what to do with Amendment 1 to the Atlantic Herring Fishery Management Plan.

“I think it’s a pretty sad state of affairs when we can work on an amendment for three-and-a-half years and come up with seven alternatives, with input from everybody over years and years and years, and then come up and say at the final meeting that nobody supported any of them.”

By the end of that meeting, the council was persuaded by an overwhelming “tidal wave” of public support for Preferred Alternative 7, which proposed to establish a “buffer zone” to protect herring from the ultra-high efficiency of pair and single midwater trawlers.

As a result, the midwater herring trawl fleet found itself prohibited from the inshore Gulf of Maine—Area 1A—for four months of the year. Of course, midwater trawlers do have the option of switching over to purse seine gear, but that can be an investment upwards of $500,000.

A matter of scale

The premise behind the need to limit midwater trawl activity in Area 1A was based on reports that the gear employed by midwater trawlers, notably pair trawlers, is of a scale so large that its dead discard rate dwarfed that of the traditional purse seine gear, which at one time was the dominant gear type in the herring fishery.

Indeed, during the Amendment 1 process, many folks testified how they saw localized depletion of herring in the inshore Gulf of Maine as pair trawling increased while purse seining decreased. As a result, total mortality on herring from those midwater trawlers working in that area could actually be much higher than the 60,000 metric tons (mt) of total allowable catch (TAC) set for that area - a figure already described as being “of concern and may be excessive” by the Council’s own Scientific and Statistical Committee back in June of 2003.

Why it happened

The reason why the Amendment 1 process took so long and ended up as it did was due to many things. However, unquestionably the overriding factor was that a few powerful factions within the herring industry were unwilling to budge, even a little bit, when it came to working with many of the other valid stakeholders who rely so much on a healthy and abundant inshore herring resource.

I think lobbyist Jeff Kaelin summed up the position and attitude for the majority of the midwater fleet well on July 2004 when he testified, “We are very much opposed to any restrictions in Area 1A at all.”

The herring fishery is a public resource. The sooner the midwater lobby realizes this and opens up to the notion of cooperation and compromise, then the better for all.

Reduced TAC desired

During the herring specification process, which preceded the amendment process, it was the hope of commercial groundfishermen, tuna fishermen, environmentalists, recreational fishermen, whale watch groups, and a growing number of others to reduce the Area 1A TAC by 15,000 mt, equivalent to 25 percent.

This seemed reasonable since the long-term goal of the herring management plan was to develop the relatively untapped TACs in the offshore areas. In turn, this would also help spread fishing effort out.

When that motion failed, a very modest reduction of 5,000 metric tons (eight percent) was proposed.

At the time, the executive director of the Massachusetts Fisheries Recovery Commission, Vito Calomo, helped to derail the motion by imploring, “The 5,000 mt in the scope of the whole herring plan really isn't a lot, but the 5,000 mt taken out of 1A is a tremendous amount.”

When that motion also failed, the focus for many then turned toward limiting the impact of massive midwater trawlers inshore for the above stated reasons.

Too late

Now fast forward to November 2005 when the New England council was debating the merits of Alternative 7. When push came to shove and it was near certainty that the council was going to prohibit late entrants to the Area 1A herring fishery, suddenly Calomo saw the light.

“Reduce the TAC. Not reduce the people who fish for the TAC,” he insisted. “If we are concerned so much about Area 1A, reduce the TAC,” Calomo repeated. The fact of the matter is that this whole mess could have been avoided long ago if Calomo and others were just a wee bit more flexible and open to compromise and cooperation on reducing the Area 1A TAC over a year ago.

Unfortunately, since he and others shot that option down earlier on in the process, an Area 1A reduction wasn’t even on the table as part of any of the Amendment 1 alternatives. So by that point, the council couldn't have reduced the TAC even if it wanted to.

The missed opportunities for the herring lobby to work together with everyone else are endless. One can go as far back as four years ago to when representatives of the Coalition for the Atlantic Herring Fishery’s Orderly, Informed, and Responsible Long-Term Development (CHOIR) approached the East Coast Pelagic Association (ECPA) and others to hammer out a small, voluntary, five-square-mile area as an experimental buffer zone.

As CHOIR’s Rich Ruais testified at a May 2005 meeting of the herring oversight committee, “They walked away from us on that. Absolutely no help whatsoever. We repeatedly had meetings whether it was in Rockland, ME or Gloucester, MA. Absolutely nothing came from any effort to work with ECPA on this issue.”

Joe Jancewicz of the East Coast Tuna Association added, “I was at those meetings up in Rockland in the O'Hara building when we tried for the compromise. I was the one who drew out on the chart what would be nice to compromise with. We pretty much got laughed out of the building.”

Now ECPA and all other midwater trawlers are banned from all of Area 1A for four months of the year. I wonder if they now wish they gave more consideration to the much smaller area when they had the chance?

APA effort commended

Out of all of this, there was one very notable example of cooperation. In the hope of hammering out a “compromise alternative,” the herring boats based out of New Bedford and represented by Peter Moore of the American Pelagic Association (APA) did reach out to CHOIR. Tremendous credit needs to be given here to Moore as his actions were at APA’s peril of being perceived as breaking ranks with the remaining midwater lobby, which continued to cling to its hard-line positions.

As Moore described at the June 2005 New England council meeting in Portland, ME, “We’re really sticking our necks out here in trying to move this compromise ahead.”

The purpose of this “Alternative 8” was to allow midwater trawlers to fish in Area 1A, but only allow two trips per month during the peak season. Alternative 8 had very good support. Unfortunately, because of its late timing, it did not gain enough support from the full council to be included in Amendment 1, as it would have probably further delayed the amendment. However, it remains a shining example of what can be done if folks work together.

As we move forward, whether the topic is herring, groundfish, marine protected areas, or any of the other issues where so many different stakeholders are impacted, I hope that more folks take a moment to reach out to the other side to work on real and reasonable solutions.

big jay 04-21-2010 09:15 PM

Big Steaming Pile of BullSh#t
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring (Post 763447)
I come from a Maine fishing family, I am not a lawyer, lobbiest or plant manager and don't have a press agent. I also don't plan on spending time arguing here with people who rely on internet forums for their information. Try reading something factual for a change at nefmc.org

Sure you aren't a lobbyist for the midwaters....

The Midwater boats completely and absolutely screwed up the traditional maine seiner and weir fishery and those guys hate you too.

Now way in hell anyone associated with the traditional seiners is going to defend your pair-trawlers.

Nice Try. You put those men out of their jobs, quit trying to spin it.

No one here is that stupid.

meherring 04-21-2010 09:53 PM

Mike proved my point for me
 
Gee Mike - now you've made it easy.

Your letter and Steve's testimony clearly advocate for the reduction in the inshore TAC. Steve talks of a crashed stock and suggests that there may even be a need to close the fishery, but we can't do that because of lobstermen. He chastises Dr. Pierce for considering the economic impact to the herring industry and states the economic impact to him and others is more important. Real nice - we should all be more concerned for Steve in his ocean front home in Kennebunk and a fancy tuna boat than we should be for those 140 people in Prospect.

Steve claims to speak for many, but I doubt the numbers are what he portrays. The MLA is not a supporter of CHOIR and in fact asked to be removed from the CHOIR web site when they found they were listed. The few commercial Maine fishermen that jumped on this bandwagon feeld quite burned and the few that remain are mostly underwritten by PEW-Earth Justice - not hardly a ground swell.

And for all of your denigrating midwater trawls, that's not even the issue here. This is about the summer purse seine fishery and the cannery. The seine boats have gone from approx. 80 landing days in 2006 to approx 28 landing days (during the PS only period June-Sept 31) in 2009. All this under the recommended TAC reductions by you and others. All this with no clear science or assessment for the GOM herring population. Your goal was clear - you hate the big boats, but you also didn't care about who else got thrown under the bus.

As for your article, its all heresay, you weren't even there. I could do the same and offer the opposite opinion, but I won't.

The work of you and your friends as devastated the Maine herring fishery - midwater trawlers, purse seiners, cannery workers and not very helpful to lobstermen either. It also may prove to be a very bad ecosystem choice for us all as the lobster industry tries to replace about 30,000 mt of bait with products from the West Coast, Europe, ect - where ever they can get it.

As for going to meetings, I've been to quite a few - but I didn't see you. No, your at home listening to your tapes - really clued in. Have you ever been herring fishing? Ever been to Prosepct Harbor?

"For options that reduce landings, there would be revenue losses to herring processors and impacts on processing plant employees. The cannery in Maine is particularly vulnerable to options that significantly reduce the Area 1A TAC since the cannery has traditionally been dependant on that area in the summer. Reductions in available
herring, highly variable landings, and increased cost of herring will make it difficult for the cannery to continue to produce canned herring at a profit and keep employees working"
NEFMC - A Herring Specs 2010-2012

Try looking in the mirror Mike and think about the 140 people that lost their jobs in eastern rural Maine. It impacts the whole community; the corner store, gas station, the tax base and the local school. All now being shored up by unemploment payments. You really should visit!

To say nothing of the last US cannery closing and an industry lost.

Sleep well Mike

JohnnyD 04-21-2010 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring (Post 763734)
...

The difference between your posts and the people you disagree with is that they present a point and you basically just say, "no you're wrong, look in the mirror. I don't know how you sleep at night" and then spin into some other topic.

You harp that the decrease of quotas (that's what this is all about, right?) is what caused the cannery to go under, yet don't provide any proof for it other than hearsay from meetings. On the other hand, there have been numerous references to people *from the sardine industry* that have stated that demand for sardines is in the toilet.

Also, you continue to ignore my point that according to the State of Maine, the historical commercial landings have been consistently and significantly below what the new quota has been set to. Again, isn't that what this is all about, the decreased quota in Maine???

This is my favorite of your comments:
Quote:

Originally Posted by meherring
The work of you and your friends as devastated the Maine herring fishery - midwater trawlers, purse seiners, cannery workers and not very helpful to lobstermen either. It also may prove to be a very bad ecosystem choice for us all as the lobster industry tries to replace about 30,000 mt of bait with products from the West Coast, Europe, ect - where ever they can get it.

So you're telling us that the decreased quota which was never met has "devastated the Maine herring fishery". And on top of that, all the extra bait that could potentially be off the coast of Maine (which wasn't being caught any way) "may prove to be a very bad ecosystem choice for us" as lobstermen get bait for other, potentially more sustainable areas? How exactly?

BasicPatrick 04-21-2010 10:45 PM

MEHerring

If you are so concerned about the smaller local fishermen will we see you support the ASMFC Addendum being pushed by NH to loosen the days out rules for the small boats so that they are not dominated by your industrial fleet?

On another point, tell me, if there is not enough Herring to supply this plant then why all the effort to make sure we have a full set of regulations for carrier vessels that can take Herring from a Pair Trawl at sea and land it in a variety of locations including Canada...hey...Canada still has Sardine Plants doesn't it...wait for it...greed and profit is all your kill it all, sell what you can and dump the rest industry cares about.

Come on now...let get honest...if the money paid to the plant workers at Bumble Bee was the same money paid to the foreigners at the Norpel we might not be talking. It's all about the profit...right.

In all fairness I should tell you that as we move forward with Am 5 every time the council is talking about River Herring and you blame it on Striped Bass...each and every time you say the words "Striped Bass" I say the words ..."Dead Whale". How many did you kill this year sailor.

As I have said all along it is a real shame about the 140 persons. I hope instead of playing on the internet or running to Canada to set up the next country whose fisheries you are going to decimate, at least some of you connected industrial type folks are convincing the LL Bean Lady or Ohara or someone to flip the plant into a Lobster processing facility and give those 140 (average age over 50 by the way) people and those to come after them some longer term job security. Your State just passed a bill within the last week to allow Lobstrs to be sold as processed. A new product that people actually want is now allowed in Maine and there is a worldwide market. Please tell me your goignto use your influence to help them because playing here in the internet with us is not goign to accomplish anything.

As a matter of fact I should send you a thank you note for keeping a political discussion going on a recreational board the week the Striper are arriving...you can do what I can not. Let's keep arguing so more of my recreaitonal brothers learn about your nasty nasty industy.

Your serve

flatts1 04-21-2010 10:54 PM

My goodness, where to begin.


Quote:

"As for your article, its all heresay, you weren't even there."
MEherring, did you happen to notice I quoted those who were there. You really need to pay more attention. These are your fellow commercial fishermen that you and your friends screwed over. You know it, I know it, and all of the non-herring commercial fishermen in New England know it. No amount of spin from you will ever change that. FACT: Midwater pair trawling for herring in New England created CHOIR.


Quote:

"The work of you and your friends as devastated the Maine herring fishery - midwater trawlers, purse seiners, cannery workers and not very helpful to lobstermen either."
Wow! And I mean WOW!!

Did it ever occur to you that the midwater pair trawlers are simply not compatitble for the New England region? There is a reason why they had to bring these boats over from Europe and the west cost of the United states. As was mentioned by previous folks, there was never a problem with herring before the MWTs. Ooops, I forgot. The Russians devastated the stock first. After the US booted them from the EEZ, you were later allowed to make that same mistake. Great company you have there.


Quote:

"The MLA is not a supporter of CHOIR..."
I said they have "supported CHOIR's positions". Pay attention. Do you disagree that MLA supported the so-called "buffer zone" like virtually everyone except the midwater herring lobby?


Quote:

For options that reduce landings, there would be revenue losses to herring processors and impacts on processing plant employees. The cannery in Maine is particularly vulnerable to options that significantly reduce the Area 1A TAC since the cannery has traditionally been dependant on that area in the summer. Reductions in available
herring, highly variable landings, and increased cost of herring will make it difficult for the cannery to continue to produce canned herring at a profit and keep employees working"
NEFMC - A Herring Specs 2010-2012
Obviously if landings are reduced it will impact processors.

Shhh. I'm going to let you in on a little secret. Don't tell anyone. We'll keep this between you and I. The trick is not bending to industry pressure to allow things to get so out of hand that reductions are inevitable. It's called pay it now or pay it later, MEherring.

In other words, had the MWTs never been promoted (yes promoted) by the state directors in the first place, then the TAC in the inshore Gulf of Maine would still be at 60,000 mt as it had beeen for sooooo long before they showed up.

Did you ever hear herring described as "the rice of the sea"? I learned that from a commercial fisherman. Everything changed when the MWTs impacted this region. Everything!

Think about that for a moment and imagine what your friends in Prospect harbor could be doing now with 60,000 metric tons of SUSTAINABLE harvest without pair trawlers.


Quote:

"Sleep well Mike"
Sleep well, yourself. There is a reason why you don't give your name.

stripermaineiac 04-22-2010 05:23 PM

LOL Tha shame of it all is that as we argue there are still no steps being made to stop the foreign deep water boats from China,Japan,Spain,Russia,France,Brazil,Argentina,a frican nations and so on from raping the ocean with in eye sight of our comercial boats that have to go by all these rules that are made for them.Show me one foreign boat that doesn't go by the same rules we enforce on our fisheries that is held accountable. My point isn't about the rules ,the herring,net sizes of number of fishing days allowed. It's the unfair advantage given to these foreign fleets as they take the fish home can or process them and then sell them on our markets at the expense of our economy so that some poleticians can put more money in their pocets.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com