Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   StriperTalk! (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Striper Bill Feb 28, MA State House (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=76147)

Haus 02-21-2012 07:29 PM

CH, every single thing you have said about me is wrong. Would ya just give up on calling me out on every little thing. You're wrong and will remain to be wrong. If you want to dispell everything I say, why don't you give me your idea on how to increase the stock or what ur opinions are? Stop trying to disprove me and give me your ideas.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

CowHunter 02-21-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haus (Post 922343)
No, I'm not. Just because I said SF is backing it doesn't mean I knew they sponsored it. Backing and sponsoring is diff to me. Did they write up the Bill? I don't know that either. How am I "for" SF if I cont agree with everything they say? Im just a guy that uses common sense to try and get the striper population increased and sustained. I love surffishing late at night and year after year it is disappering for me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I understand now... "Backing" and "sponsering" two different things. Why Promote Stripers Forever then? Trying to rid of googans or weekend rod and reel com guys because you hate them kind of selfish and wrong if you ask me.... Good luck with your agenda....

Haus 02-21-2012 07:46 PM

You're out of your mind. Go talk crazy on some othe site.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Haus 02-21-2012 07:54 PM

Again, I never said I wanted to get ride of certain groups. I did say I didn't like them. Again, u are spinning my words.
You are unbelievable and unable to have a normal discussion.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Chunkah 02-21-2012 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowHunter (Post 922333)
We ALL Want more Fish, I love surf fishing and boat fishing, Unfortunately it has become a very expensive hobby... Real Plain and simple, who is proposing this "Bill"??? STRIPERSFOREVER! You want people to support Stripersforever and their agenda... SF: Slogan: Got FlyRod, Slots and Grey poupon????this is another go round...
Striped Bass is a Gamefish in NJ.. Its rec guys only, allowed 3 fish at 28", is that SF's idea of a gamefish??? Ive never seen so many dead Bass like here... Biggest problem is finding big enough coolers...

Hey CW...do you support 3 @ 28"? Seems like overkill to me.

Also, the bills that will be proposed on the 28th are proposed by various State Reps, not by Stripers Forever.

thefishingfreak 02-21-2012 08:03 PM

I think he speaks perfect sense. You posted a thread about the bills coming to the Massachusetts state house, written and orchestrated by SF and their agenda. Calling comms greedy pigs for not backing it.
SF can go back to Maine and worry about their own state. Massachusetts is doin a fine job without another states radical organization cramming their bills down our throats. if this bill gets thrown out SF will be right back to the massachusetts state house trying to get it passed another way. Waisting our states tax dollars.
Again....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

CowHunter 02-21-2012 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chunkah (Post 922356)
Hey CW...do you support 3 @ 28"? Seems like overkill to me.

Also, the bills that will be proposed on the 28th are proposed by various State Reps, not by Stripers Forever.

I do not support 3 at 28", never have.. 1 fish limit for charter and rec guys is ideal. SF has been behind this for a few years now, throwing alot of money at it. State reps, think government is best solution?

CowHunter 02-21-2012 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haus (Post 922351)
You're out of your mind. Go talk crazy on some othe site.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Go Preach stripers Forever and their agenda while not even knowing you are??? Like FishingFreak said, mass has been doing just fine managing their fishery while ME is a DISASTER....

Haus 02-21-2012 08:45 PM

OK
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

derekl 02-21-2012 09:20 PM

Greed is the overall problem here and will never get settled comm guys say everything is fine and if they dont get there money they wont be able to pay there bills. Join the club part time comm guys say they need the money or they cant keep there nice boat and mostlikey truck without making that extra money
Rec guys want to be able to keep catching fish for the next 50 years and want the fish for ourselfs

So here is my problem

Com guys there are other fish out there you can catch

Part time com guys if you cant aflrd the boat and the gas maybe you should get rid of the big boat and big truck

Rec guys well you just sit idle for a while whe. There isnt anything to fish for you can say i told you so and catch them for the sport you love not for the money you need. But the.kicker is if the fishing goes south the com guys wont be fishing anymore and the part timers who couldnt afford the.boat and gas wont have there boats anymore either
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

CowHunter 02-21-2012 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by derekl (Post 922379)
Greed is the overall problem here and will never get settled comm guys say everything is fine and if they dont get there money they wont be able to pay there bills. Join the club part time comm guys say they need the money or they cant keep there nice boat and mostlikey truck without making that extra money
Rec guys want to be able to keep catching fish for the next 50 years and want the fish for ourselfs

So here is my problem

Com guys there are other fish out there you can catch

Part time com guys if you cant aflrd the boat and the gas maybe you should get rid of the big boat and big truck

Rec guys well you just sit idle for a while whe. There isnt anything to fish for you can say i told you so and catch them for the sport you love not for the money you need. But the.kicker is if the fishing goes south the com guys wont be fishing anymore and the part timers who couldnt afford the.boat and gas wont have there boats anymore either
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rec Guys: Have $$$ but Can always sell fish black market and make some extra $$$ but dont need it.

Com Guys: Can always sell fish Black Market and make more money, there are plenty of other fisheries to make $$$ if SB goes south.

Part Time Com Guys :Have money, Bass is bonus $$$ to keep extra nice boat and truck, can sell black market and get double Ma price black market and get even nicer boat, truck...

Chunkah 02-21-2012 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowHunter (Post 922369)
I do not support 3 at 28", never have.. 1 fish limit for charter and rec guys is ideal. SF has been behind this for a few years now, throwing alot of money at it. State reps, think government is best solution?

I agree that 1 a day is ideal and is what I would like to see happen here in MA....1 @ 36"

So SF supports the 3 @ 28" in NJ? Is there any documentation to that effect? That would greatly discredit them wouldn't it?

Chunkah 02-21-2012 10:13 PM

CW...I'm happy to answer whatever you ask but I'm really not sure what this means...

"State reps, think government is best solution?"

Thanks

Haus 02-21-2012 10:18 PM

The striped bass stock will only go south if we let it. There is no reason it should go south.
Let's just say surf fishing was overwith becuz stripers didn't come close to shore anymore, like cod, haddock and pollack. That would totally put a huge dent in many fishing suppliers pocket. It would have a ripple affect much worse that a few regulations to help save the striper population.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

derekl 02-21-2012 10:18 PM

So you agree that com guys are greedy and instead of managing things so everyone can enjoy them you someone who makes money off killing the fish as many ways as possible should be able to.do.so untill there is nothing for anyone

And your research on this is that you found one large pod of fish so everything is fine even though you said that SF destroyed the fishing and it still hasnt gotten back to the way it was
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

derekl 02-21-2012 10:23 PM

Hows this its the peoples fish 1 fish per person per day how ever big you want it to be do with it what ever you want for everyone up and down the striper coast

Now you will say that isnt fair but what isnt fair about it everyone gets the same amount
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

MikeToole 02-21-2012 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowHunter (Post 922369)
I do not support 3 at 28", never have.. 1 fish limit for charter and rec guys is ideal. SF has been behind this for a few years now, throwing alot of money at it. State reps, think government is best solution?

Since you support cutting the rec limit in half, do you also support cutting the commercial quota by half?

stripermaineiac 02-22-2012 12:05 AM

Well fishinfreak an cowhunter I've been a member of Stripers Unlimited,CCA,Stripers Forever,RFA an many local an state clubs. Don't ever remember striper forever supporting stupidity like 3 fish 28 in as its a group to preserve the fish not kill more.All the way back in the 70's it was the same I make a buck off the fish so there are loads of them.Sport fishermen do catch an kill more fish. DAAAA there are only a few million more of them than there are comms. So they will. but percentage wise the few comms kill a higher singular number as far as number of fish killed per angler.How many a day for a comm. MMMMMM a heck of a lot more than 1 or 2 per sportfishermen per day. The quote googans that keep a lot of illegals mostly have a difficult time speakin english so much of that is only knowing what they know from where they came from . to many of them it truly is just for food till they learn our customs.Catch n release to them is like heardin cows to the farm then lettin them go before killin then for meat.thats not fixable for a long time to come.But excess is just that. There is no parety in numbers an percentage for comm an sport as one group is given a much higher catch per angler than the other. Now if comms can only keep 1 or 2 fish like the rest of us well MMMMM might be something to think on. C+R well many of us do that already.I've still not heard the comms say they'll take any cutbacks at all but are very quick to say sports are the problem an should stop wasting political time n money trying to take steps to preserve the Striped Bass.Bob Pond said it best long ago. As long as there is a bounty on the Stripers they will always be exployted an overfished.So many of us now just release about all we catch that it's gonna be harder to do much more than we already do. so we try to educate an speak a bit of reason so we don't end up back where we were in the 80's. But today as back then those small numbers that sell stripers still try to ignore all the rest of what is said. We used to have huge schools of stripers all along the striper coast now there are just a couple left. Food used to be a valid argument but the last couple yrs the ammount of bait up n down the coast is huge.Herrin an macks are all over the place. Sardines are coming back. sand eels are again found in the sand on many beaches. But few or no stripers. Just because someone is catching them in their back yard does not mean that the thousands of anglers not seeing them are all wrong. WE NEED TO PUT THE BRAKES ON TO KEEP IT FROM GETTIN WORSE.EVERYONE needs to cut back.I have a Charte liscence. I dictate what happens on my boat and the shore trips I do my best to teach people conservation minded fishing so their kids can do it too someday.

likwid 02-22-2012 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowHunter (Post 922384)
Rec Guys: Have $$$ but Can always sell fish black market and make some extra $$$ but dont need it.

Com Guys: Can always sell fish Black Market and make more money, there are plenty of other fisheries to make $$$ if SB goes south.

Part Time Com Guys :Have money, Bass is bonus $$$ to keep extra nice boat and truck, can sell black market and get double Ma price black market and get even nicer boat, truck...

So basically you're saying you support poaching.

Mr. Sandman 02-22-2012 07:19 AM

:deadhorse:
comm vs rec.

This is all NMFS fault. The "user group" theory is just dumb and it does not work. Further, the entire fishery system is deeply flawed. My God, they even have the Codfish as their emblem fish and now that is headed into catastrophe, how fitting.

The banner below says it all on how to fix this problem. Bite the bullet and just do it. end of story.

Sea Dangles 02-22-2012 07:58 AM

1 at 36" makes the rec anglers and guides happy.Manage the comm. quota responsibly on a yearly basis. It is a system that would have a huge positive impact on the fishery, and would be virtually unopposed.

afterhours 02-22-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowHunter (Post 922384)
Rec Guys: Have $$$ but Can always sell fish black market and make some extra $$$ but dont need it.

Com Guys: Can always sell fish Black Market and make more money, there are plenty of other fisheries to make $$$ if SB goes south.

Part Time Com Guys :Have money, Bass is bonus $$$ to keep extra nice boat and truck, can sell black market and get double Ma price black market and get even nicer boat, truck...

black market sales (poaching) by both sides puts a big hit on the sb. what about all those ma comm tags reporting no catch...sure :smash: poachers are greedy sob's stealing from everyone.

Mr. Sandman 02-22-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 922427)
.Manage the comm. quota responsibly on a yearly basis.

Unfortunately as has been demonstrated, this can not be done in the current system. They tried, its not working and it's filled with emotions of all the user groups, who, like warring religious wackos, don't see the benefit of conservation of the fish if it means THEY can't participate to the degree they once did.
The only proven way to help the fish is to treat it in a similar fashion as tarpon, bonefish, permit, etc. Otherwise, as long as there is $/lb on the fish, it is doomed. Further, fishery managers, need to open their eyes more and protect the little fish that SB consume.

CowHunter 02-22-2012 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stripermaineiac (Post 922398)
Well fishinfreak an cowhunter I've been a member of Stripers Unlimited,CCA,Stripers Forever,RFA an many local an state clubs. Don't ever remember striper forever supporting stupidity like 3 fish 28 in as its a group to preserve the fish not kill more.All the way back in the 70's it was the same I make a buck off the fish so there are loads of them.Sport fishermen do catch an kill more fish. DAAAA there are only a few million more of them than there are comms. So they will. but percentage wise the few comms kill a higher singular number as far as number of fish killed per angler.How many a day for a comm. MMMMMM a heck of a lot more than 1 or 2 per sportfishermen per day. The quote googans that keep a lot of illegals mostly have a difficult time speakin english so much of that is only knowing what they know from where they came from . to many of them it truly is just for food till they learn our customs.Catch n release to them is like heardin cows to the farm then lettin them go before killin then for meat.thats not fixable for a long time to come.But excess is just that. There is no parety in numbers an percentage for comm an sport as one group is given a much higher catch per angler than the other. Now if comms can only keep 1 or 2 fish like the rest of us well MMMMM might be something to think on. C+R well many of us do that already.I've still not heard the comms say they'll take any cutbacks at all but are very quick to say sports are the problem an should stop wasting political time n money trying to take steps to preserve the Striped Bass.Bob Pond said it best long ago. As long as there is a bounty on the Stripers they will always be exployted an overfished.So many of us now just release about all we catch that it's gonna be harder to do much more than we already do. so we try to educate an speak a bit of reason so we don't end up back where we were in the 80's. But today as back then those small numbers that sell stripers still try to ignore all the rest of what is said. We used to have huge schools of stripers all along the striper coast now there are just a couple left. Food used to be a valid argument but the last couple yrs the ammount of bait up n down the coast is huge.Herrin an macks are all over the place. Sardines are coming back. sand eels are again found in the sand on many beaches. But few or no stripers. Just because someone is catching them in their back yard does not mean that the thousands of anglers not seeing them are all wrong. WE NEED TO PUT THE BRAKES ON TO KEEP IT FROM GETTIN WORSE.EVERYONE needs to cut back.I have a Charte liscence. I dictate what happens on my boat and the shore trips I do my best to teach people conservation minded fishing so their kids can do it too someday.

The Map on their site used to tout NJ as a "gamefish state". Dont know if they were taking credit for it or what, and eventually it has changed on there. My problem was the definition of Gamefish state the current 2 fish at 28" in that state, then take the commercial quota away from the commercials, 321,000 some odd pounds, and give it to the Rec guys with an honor syste "Bonus" tag that you can print multiple copies of? It called "The Gift that keeps on giving". In this case did this change the amount of fish killed by getting rid of Com fishing in NJ? Absolutely not, you gave it to a different group that is killing even more....

CowHunter 02-22-2012 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeToole (Post 922392)
Since you support cutting the rec limit in half, do you also support cutting the commercial quota by half?

If they cut the com quota in half I wouldnt have a problem with it. I do however have a problem with what they do with that quota? Give it to the rec guys like here in nj - bonus tags? Spread it out to the com quota's of other states? IF There is a problem with the Striped Bass Population then there should be cuts all across the board, state to state. Healthy stock mutually benefits everyone.

CowHunter 02-22-2012 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haus (Post 922388)
The striped bass stock will only go south if we let it. There is no reason it should go south.
Let's just say surf fishing was overwith becuz stripers didn't come close to shore anymore, like cod, haddock and pollack. That would totally put a huge dent in many fishing suppliers pocket. It would have a ripple affect much worse that a few regulations to help save the striper population.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes it will, but the reality of it is that in many areas of the striper coast, they may never come close to shore anymore regardless of regulation.

CowHunter 02-22-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by likwid (Post 922416)
So basically you're saying you support poaching.

Is that what I said????

fishysob 02-22-2012 08:45 AM

I love all the guys trying to justify making money to offset fuel prices and to pay for their large boats and engines. If you can't afford to run your boat without selling stripers then maybe its time to downsize your boat to one you can afford to run or fish from shore. Just remember the eighties and the decline of the striper. If you want to go back to that era then keep increasing quotas for commercial and for limits for recreational. There is no need for more than one fish a day. Or we can just keep your head up your a** and pretend that everything will be fine. Ignorance is bliss!

MikeToole 02-22-2012 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 922427)
1 at 36" makes the rec anglers and guides happy.Manage the comm. quota responsibly on a yearly basis. It is a system that would have a huge positive impact on the fishery, and would be virtually unopposed.

I think you're in dream world if you think this would be unopposed. Many recreational fisherman come from the standpoint of why should I be limited to one fish when other can catch many more and sell them. When I talk to people about limiting their catch the first thing I often here is why shouldn't I keep my two when other can keep 30. Plus those keeping 30 quickly become recreational fisherman once the commercial quota is met. Another often stated reason is the stock must be healthy or they wouldn't allow commercial fishing. Even worse, I my as well get them while I still can, if I don't kill them someone else will.

Many people who support game fish status understand that the only way to get recreational fishermen to agree to cuts is to remove the commercial fishing excuse.

Chunkah 02-22-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowHunter (Post 922435)
If they cut the com quota in half I wouldnt have a problem with it. I do however have a problem with what they do with that quota? Give it to the rec guys like here in nj - bonus tags? Spread it out to the com quota's of other states? IF There is a problem with the Striped Bass Population then there should be cuts all across the board, state to state. Healthy stock mutually benefits everyone.

The proposed MA Bill states that the commercial quota, if eliminated, will be set aside for conservation, not aded to the rec catch or passed along to another state.

JohnnyD 02-22-2012 11:25 AM

It's like history repeating itself. I bet we could go back to the last thread on S-B.com that talked about the last time a bill came before the MA House and it'd be a close carbon copy of this thread.

Highlights from last years thread: Recs saying it's the Comms, Comms saying things are just fine, random mentions of 1 @ 36", Cowhunter talking out of both sides of his mouth while putting words into someone else's mouth, Comms saying that Recs are greedy and are the problem... etc etc.

It's all noise and means nothing unless you head down to the State House or send a letter/email to your representative. This bill is already decided and in the end, the group with the most money will prevail. However, if you support the bill, then you should join up with StripersForever so that they have more money for the next one. I'm sure the Comms have a similar organization that lobbies for their interests.

CowHunter 02-22-2012 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyD (Post 922469)
It's like history repeating itself. I bet we could go back to the last thread on S-B.com that talked about the last time a bill came before the MA House and it'd be a close carbon copy of this thread.

Highlights from last years thread: Recs saying it's the Comms, Comms saying things are just fine, random mentions of 1 @ 36", Cowhunter talking out of both sides of his mouth while putting words into someone else's mouth, Comms saying that Recs are greedy and are the problem... etc etc.

It's all noise and means nothing unless you head down to the State House or send a letter/email to your representative. This bill is already decided and in the end, the group with the most money will prevail. However, if you support the bill, then you should join up with StripersForever so that they have more money for the next one. I'm sure the Comms have a similar organization that lobbies for their interests.

Right, but according to u I can only be a rec or comm.. cant be both? I dont have a com license anymore and dont sell fish so whats it make me? I also dont stand on a rock and wait for striped bass to come to me year after year and complain when they dont. There is some effort involved and curve balls every season. Im sorry it is difficult for some. You can either evolve, adapt or do the same #^&#^&#^&#^& over and over even if it doesnt work. Im not complaining about the lack of bass. Many have been complaining that the collapse is this year than next year its that year and so on. How many seasons have you been complaining? Explain the latest YOY numbers, where that come from??? Theres plenty of Fish to catch out there.....

Haus 02-22-2012 02:06 PM

Lions and tigers are almost extinct, but there are always places to go to kill them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Typhoon 02-22-2012 02:18 PM

I just sent two letters to Pacheco and Gobi asking them to vote against it.

I want to know how much money Stripers Forever is taking from the environmental lobby. Be careful who you sleep with. The chatham hook fisherman's association got in bed with EDF and look what that got them.

I am a commercial license holder who sold zero fish last year. I also purchase fish at my company from local fisherman. I also have a charter boat license.

DZ 02-22-2012 02:38 PM

This thread is getting interesting - like I traveled back in time to the Striper Wars in the 1980s. Only then it was Bob Pond and Stripers Unlimited that were being bashed like SF is now. Same arguments, almost same scenario. Last of the fish offshore. One difference is the technology today to find them. States and Feds couldn't get it together and make everyone one happy. So finally a few congress people took control and probably saved the bass otherwise this site would now be called www.scup-com.

For the sake of those reading and posting it would be nice to know in your profile whether you're a recreational fisherman, a charter boat captain, a commercial R&R pinhooker, or a charter business that also sells bass. I feel that is important in helping others understand your opinions.

DZ

Jackbass 02-22-2012 03:23 PM

It should also be said the bill proposes reducing recreational limits to one a day and imposing a slot. This is an extremely contentious issue it makes friends turn on each other. But everyone in their heart of hearts has to see the fishery is being destroyed and history is repeating itself. When the commercial fishery was re opened the asmfc used striped bass as a poster child of fisheries management. Then the rec limits were loosened. It is sad to see a species that will be brought to the brink twice in less than 30 years. A species that was once so abundant it was used as fertilizer. People talk about weather patterns, fish moving off shore, lack of forage, meanwhile we continue as if nothing were happening. The only piece of this puzzle we have any sort of control over is our selves. We as fishermen are the control in this study. Regardless of what happens around us we can only control What we do. We can't even do that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sea Dangles 02-22-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeToole (Post 922456)
I think you're in dream world if you think this would be unopposed. Many recreational fisherman come from the standpoint of why should I be limited to one fish when other can catch many more and sell them. When I talk to people about limiting their catch the first thing I often here is why shouldn't I keep my two when other can keep 30. Plus those keeping 30 quickly become recreational fisherman once the commercial quota is met. Another often stated reason is the stock must be healthy or they wouldn't allow commercial fishing. Even worse, I my as well get them while I still can, if I don't kill them someone else will.

Many people who support game fish status understand that the only way to get recreational fishermen to agree to cuts is to remove the commercial fishing excuse.

You want 30,get a license. Otherwise it is 1 which is a lot of food and fun to catch.

tattoobob 02-22-2012 05:25 PM

The way I look at it is if one state does this it won't make a difference it needs to be coast wide or it will just be pointless

MassBass 02-22-2012 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tattoobob (Post 922538)
The way I look at it is if one state does this it won't make a difference it needs to be coast wide or it will just be pointless

gotta start somewhere right? all of the states collaborating at once? pointless to think so...

bass are being depleted, it's obvious. anywhere but south. and all I hear comm guys saying is me, me, me, mine, mine, mine, take, take, take. this shiet's gotta stop

CowHunter 02-22-2012 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DZ (Post 922499)
This thread is getting interesting - like I traveled back in time to the Striper Wars in the 1980s. Only then it was Bob Pond and Stripers Unlimited that were being bashed like SF is now. Same arguments, almost same scenario. Last of the fish offshore. One difference is the technology today to find them. States and Feds couldn't get it together and make everyone one happy. So finally a few congress people took control and probably saved the bass otherwise this site would now be called www.scup-com.

For the sake of those reading and posting it would be nice to know in your profile whether you're a recreational fisherman, a charter boat captain, a commercial R&R pinhooker, or a charter business that also sells bass. I feel that is important in helping others understand your opinions.

DZ


DZ, the same technologies, and even more sophisticated technologies are used to manage the species. We also have an eez zone protecting stripers beyond 3 miles... Was that the case back then? How many states in New england have draggers, netters, etc targeting the species? This time around if there is ever a collapse you will still be blaming the coms? I am a rec, and a charter captain, I take guys out, they kill their limit, its a rec catch, as it is their catch. Those bites we had on the cape exist and are elsewhere on the shoreline. On the boat it gets to be very common.....


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com