Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   StriperTalk! (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Good news for the future ? (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=87007)

BasicPatrick 10-24-2014 07:37 PM

There are THREE (3) major spawning areas that contribute to the Coastal Striped Bass Stock. Chesapeake, Delaware and Hudson River. Fish from ALL THREE of these areas leave their spawning grounds and migrate along the coast. All three migrate into MA and are part of the fish we catch in MA. Combined, the rest of the spawning fish throughout the entire coastal range make up less than 1% of the coastal migrating population. There are spawning fish in pretty much every state just not enough to matter compared to the three aforementioned spawning areas. These are not assumptions but scientific facts.

If anyone wants to challenge or debate these facts then 1) Give John R $1000, 2) I'll do the same, 3) the losers cash goes to the charity that the winer chooses and 4)My statement will be evaluated by Dr. Gary Nelson of MA DMF, he is Chair of the SB Stock Assessment and the guy I think we could agree would have the knowledge if I am communicating fact or fiction.
_____________

Now for the rest of the story...

Environmental conditions clearly have more to do with the amount of (young of year )production than any conservation measure fisheries mangers can provide.

The Data clearly shows that the same SSB that produced the largest year classes on record have also produced the smallest.

I find it completely ridiculous when people argue that because we can't control the environment we should keep fishing at the current rate of harvest. Who or what is to blame for the declining number of available SB has nothing to do with the FACT that we know there are less fish available. The same lack of control of the environment existed when we increased harvest based upon the knowledge we had a high and increasing number of SB. Now that we KNOW the numbers are in serious decline, it is obvious to me it is time to reduce harvest. That is good management, not to mention good common sense.

To conclude, the last time we had questionable year classes we had a 1 @ 28" coastwise standard and the number increased. Shouldn't that be the new number. I think it should.

I know some people want a larger minimum size but we do kill and are charged with 9% release mortality so I want those fish to count. Not to mention I think most normal shore bound anglers, (the ones that buy the low end tackle sold in a million more places then high end tackle) should be allowed to harvest a reasonable fish.

Ill be fighting for a larger minimum size as that is what MSBA voted to support....just giving my personal opinions here.

niko 10-24-2014 09:21 PM

every person who has posted here supports the reduction. we may have varying opinions on the health of the stock, but just the fact that everyone agrees that something needs to be done should be viewed as a positive thing. i would truly be amazed if the reduction is not approved wednesday

BasicPatrick 10-25-2014 12:55 AM

Niko, I agree all of us posting here support the reduction. However make no mistake the votes at the upcoming meeting are far from guaranteed. As a matter of fact the soft counts I am involved in have a reduction being passed but the reduction being in name only...I will explain.

I do not think even the mid/south atlantic states like VA that openly are saying they are not in favor of a reduction will be able to duck using the reference points from the new assessment. Ill assume the new reference points are adopted. This will mean that "a" reduction is REQUIRED.

The second vote will be the timeline to take the reduction. The choices are clear. Take it all in one year or the three year phase in aka 7/7/7. The problem I and many others worry about is that if they choose the phase in and fail to achieve the target the only way to reduce harvest in a few years will be seasons, because we will already be using stretched out measures from this action that did not work. As I have stated in other places, do you want to risk the possibility of having to give up some of May or September? Not to mention the nightmare of having different size and or bag limits for three consecutive years.

Conversations up and down the coast indicate this vote is in serious question and one or two votes either way will swing it. Indications are that New England states are all for 1 year. Nj appears to be a real swing vote on this questions and indications are that NJ is in the 3 year camp, God I hope info on this is incorrect.

After that vote the coastal regs then will be another long debate, too many options....for me I just hope it ends up one fish. Any second fish or intricate slot and the discards are going to kill us in the next assessment.

Then there is the chesapeake votes and the commercial reduction votes etc.

I hope guys aren't assuming this reduction is a done deal. This Wednesday the rubber hits the road. Stand up and be heard or stop whining as this is the meeting we all need to show up and be present. Just like the big Menhaden vote of a few years ago, If we fill that room, our presence will matter. Leave it half empty like the hearings were half empty and we will have no one to blame but ourselves.

God I hope guys come out from behind the keyboards. 800 on a VS, 500 on a rod, 30 on a Sebile....my point is this Wed is worth taking a sick day over.

big jay 10-26-2014 07:17 PM

Great news - NJ is the swing vote?
Land of the "bonus" tags and 3 rec keepers a day.
Awesome.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Green Light 10-26-2014 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MakoMike (Post 1054771)
I can save you the effort of trying to find it, the YOY index for all of the states, except for NY, is zero. All of the migrating striped bass come from the Chesapeake bay spawn. NY has a breeding population in the Hudson river but they don't migrate very far, most never get more than 50 miles from the river.

MakoMike,

I agree with you that the YOY index has been historically measured in the Chesapeake bay. I must disclose, I am not a biologist! :-) But, I do know that striped bass spawn in other river systems. Perhaps these populations are too small to justify measuring them? I frankly do not know. Again, I am not a biologist! :-). But, the scientific/analytical part of my brain cannot help but to be curious about the missing data.

Again, I agree with you! :-).

Green Light 10-26-2014 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by niko (Post 1054953)
every person who has posted here supports the reduction. we may have varying opinions on the health of the stock, but just the fact that everyone agrees that something needs to be done should be viewed as a positive thing. i would truly be amazed if the reduction is not approved wednesday

Word! ;-)

MakoMike 10-27-2014 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Green Light (Post 1055086)
MakoMike,

I agree with you that the YOY index has been historically measured in the Chesapeake bay. I must disclose, I am not a biologist! :-) But, I do know that striped bass spawn in other river systems. Perhaps these populations are too small to justify measuring them? I frankly do not know. Again, I am not a biologist! :-). But, the scientific/analytical part of my brain cannot help but to be curious about the missing data.

Again, I agree with you! :-).

FYI. New York state does also collect YOY data, but as I said, those fish don't migrate very far.

Green Light 10-27-2014 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MakoMike (Post 1055099)
FYI. New York state does also collect YOY data, but as I said, those fish don't migrate very far.

Cool! Good to know!! Thank you MakoMike.

piemma 10-28-2014 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAKAI (Post 1054801)
Blinded by science !
Statistics can be used to dance to many tunes.
But as someone who has been obsessed with chasing this fish since the late 60's, I'll trust the empirical evidence. The near shore fishery for bass is a shadow of what was. Many spots that would hold decent fish even in the lean years are seldom producing at all. Some still do but in general these fish are not as wide spread as the past.
We are too greedy to back off a bit. The keep em all attitude I've seen this year is more than I can recall seeing. As long as you can score $100 a fish, good luck with the culling, stacking, highgrading and poaching. Non enforceable and the fines are to lame to be a deterrent. A part of me wants this fishery to go right down the tubes, just to teach us all a Fn lesson. 😠
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm with you. I really think nothing will stop the slide now. Too much money being made on the remaining big fish.

brianmoc 10-28-2014 06:52 PM

Fall run in Gloucester? 2014
 
You missed it because there was there was not one of any worth? well if you lived there or came after work on the lucky days you would have thought there was. nevertheless, i hope of the cuts? otherwise?

here is Skip Montello trying hard this fall to catch a fish.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=186D...ature=youtu.be

and as to the at stupid plum island surf cast logo you have? TELL YOUR FELLOW FISHERMEN TO STOP KILLING SO MANY FISH! TELL SURFLAND AND LIZ TO STOP DISPLAYING PICTURES OF 28' FISH.

stripermaineiac 10-28-2014 08:04 PM

Just spent 5 weeks fishin the Vineyard and 10 days in Rhody.LOL My retirement gift so to speak.Saw resident fish leave and no migration filling the holes.Last week of the Derby had days with just a couple 10 to 14 lb bass weighed in. This trend started 10 yrs ago. With less than 300 boat n shore bass weighed in -288- . Not much real effect on the bio mass anymore. bass fishing in Rhody was slow to poor all season.Block was good for a bit but besides that we all know the story.
We, the rod n reel coms have a small affect. Big boats land between 10,000 an 30,000 a haul. most bicatch goes back dead.Sometimes over 1/2 the catch. How many big boats do this. I watched 6 boats working Vineyard sound from 7 gates one night. We are our own problem. We need to stop quibbling and work together.We don't it really will be a dead sea. Greedy will always lie for a buck. Theives will always steal unless we step on the mess by working together. If the regulators don't due what the majority wants then we need to file suit to change the process and replace the people that truely are corrupted.No point being nice about it anymore. Fishin down right bites most places now. a few nice times from time to time but the all n all numbers show just how bad it's gotten. I kept one fish this yr to eat an weighed her in after she drove a 6/0 into my finger. MMMMMMM thats way more than 25% or 33% cut back. Keep argueing . If I get my truck fixed in time I'll be in Conn to speak my peice.Ron McKee- The Striper Maine-iac

Redsoxticket 10-28-2014 09:14 PM

I know you have something useful to say but for the life of me, I can't figure it out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianmoc (Post 1055195)
You missed it because there was there was not one of any worth? well if you lived there or came after work on the lucky days you would have thought there was. nevertheless, i hope of the cuts? otherwise?

here is Skip Montello trying hard this fall to catch a fish.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=186D...ature=youtu.be

and as to the at stupid plum island surf cast logo you have? TELL YOUR FELLOW FISHERMEN TO STOP KILLING SO MANY FISH! TELL SURFLAND AND LIZ TO STOP DISPLAYING PICTURES OF 28' FISH.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com