A few minutes, must have been quite an attack.

Why did she have the server at her house in the first place? Seems to me it was only to have the ability to destroy evidence if need be.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If your intent was to hide evidence you wouldn't use email...ever.

Or if you did you would just delete 30,000 of them . You're a piece of work Jeff .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

exactly..

Your right, it wasn't much of an attack......considering the only defense they had was shutting down the server for a few minutes.

I bet that showed them..... :rolleyes:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

...and there's another check mark in the "To Stupid" column

Maybe you shouldn't be in her corner.....with your defense she's starting to look like a regular Barney Fife
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She has no legal or ethical obligation to submit personal emails to the public record.

As a propeller head you know any server will come under attack from time to time. Just people fishing...

Story hasn't really changed over the past year though. Shouldn't have done it, she admits this, no harm we're aware of, no malicious motive and a lot has shown to be overblown inter-agency infighting.

Ugh.... :wall:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So I'm wrong?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yep.

If your intent was to hide evidence you wouldn't use email...ever on a server out of your control FIFY




well - at least when they started it back up and fully installed the RAT



Yes, but us propeller heads know that a lot of times you only know you are compromised is by inspecting the traffic that leaves your perimeter - not something this server or operation was capable of doing. Us propeller heads also know that the DptState systems are far more secure than an unpatched single exchange box in a bathroom. I can think of several ways to access that system. She created a monumental security blunder.

Unfortunately people are missing the point. SHE BROKE FEDERAL LAW. Why all the confusion, everyone knows if you cant trust someone with the small stuff, you can't trust them with the big stuff.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"Clueless" would be the more appropriate word....

...or "In Denial"....I'll let you choose

Exactly, and at a minimum ,you will see the information that the FBI has, which in an honest administration would bring an indictment , released before the national Democratic convention .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Spence will now say that breaking federal law is acceptable because people have done it before Hillary.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

fixed it:laugha:

The report doesn't say she broke federal law, it says that the working assumption -- that copying a state.gov address on emails -- wasn't sufficient to satisfy State Department procedure to comply with the National Records Act. They wanted the emails to be printed instead.

Further the report states that both the NARA and OIG agreed "Clinton's production of 55,000 pages of emails mitigated her failure to properly preserve emails that qualified as Federal records during her tenure and to surrender such records on her departure."

So what the report says is that they would have liked them to be printed when she left, but her follow on action was good enough.

You can read the report here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/...039/?tid=a_inl

The report states that she acted without permission, did not ask to have her own server, and if she did, they would have said no.

Irrelevent details, a fabrication that is part of the vast right wing conspiracy (likely funded by the Koch brothers) to take her down.

That doesn't necessarily make it a violation, it's a grey area they cleaned up after she left. The report also states that John Kerry is the first Sec State to have a state.gov address.

How about a violation of Common Sense...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Moot.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Spence:

Significant Hillary FanBoy, Andrea Mitchell, even sounds like she is debating against you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8CeuYStd3s

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/20...tm_campaign=nl

The article ends with:

Now that a non-partisan source has said Clinton broke the rules, it will descend into, “Ok, she may have technically violated the rules but she didn’t do anything illegal!” Let’s see how long it takes before that sets in.


I think Spence had already set it in long before the article was written.

Maybe if the FBI wasnt overburdened with Hillary's criminal investigation things would be different in Orlando......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What would compel you to make such a reprehensible remark?

Isn't it infuriating when someone makes an illogical connection ?
I think I'm becoming liberal
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well, at least you'll never be accused of being a racist :hihi:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Deplorable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nor will you ever be asked to accept responsibility for anything you do...

FBI drops the ball IMO

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/05/fbi-d...ns-emails.html

as her path is fixed by corruption plain as day

How can you suggest charges when there isn't a case you can prosecute?

Most important is it looks like there was no evidence of mal intent or attempts to cover anything up.

inappropriate and negligent
if it were anyone else, they would be fired, fined and in jail

it's up to prosecutors now

Huh? Legally speaking this story is dead.

I listened to the press conference, I will post the transcript later and highlight key items. Had ANYONE else done that than the political uber elite they would have been prosecuted.

There will be significant protesting form the Intelligence Community.

The FBI has said either :

Nobody will be prosecuted for mishandling intelligence information if you say it was not intentional

or

The rules still apply to the peasants.

Both have significant, negative impacts on information storage.

Any thoughts on a 3rd possibility - those of you with a Security clearance (that can comment?)

And we are left to believe that this is just another situation of blaring incompetence and carelessness where nobody will be held accountable. Status quo for this administration
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yep. It's worth noting that the FBI doesn't have a history of being overly political. I think it was worth doing the investigation, you have to investigate to determine whether or not any laws were broken.

Laws were broken, they just apply to the little people.