Exactly ! However the false narrative about Benghazi that was put out by Hillary and President Obama was a direct threat to national security .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Since there is no quote by Trump in your quote of Hayden, I can't tell if Hayden is spinning or if he doesn't know what he is talking about,

I thought so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Trump didn't "invite" Russia to hack Hillary's server. He said that they already hacked it. You don't invite somebody to do something they already did, you invite them to do something they have not yet done.

And he added that, "Russia, if you're listening I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing [in the emails that you already hacked]. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press." That is pure sarc against Hillary's irresponsible use of the private server and against a press he considers lax on criticizing her for deleting the emails.

He is obviously assuming that her server was already hacked, and not because he invited Russia or others who hacked her server, but, rather, if there was any invitation, it was by Hillary. It was her irresponsible insistence on the private server that invited hacking.

But, as is a prime function of spin, it turns your guy's mistake into one commited by your opponent.

This makes no sense.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Really? Butch in a bubble?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yeah, everyone knows that Hillary is butch--Trump sort of babbles--and your brain is in her bubble.

That's because you are a devout follower .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How about something not from 2009 and not blogger street interview it funny you'll uses your gotcha stuff and cite it as Truth But when the left does the same gotcha stuff its BS lets stick to facts heres what Newt says about Facts VS feelings from a CNN interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4f5ewIYYuQ

Seem you got spin down to a science if you believe in science that is

It's catchy but lacking.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm not as perfect as you think you are.

You know what else is lacking? Intellectual honesty, especially from a guy who cannot admit that the Republican party did the heavy lifting to end segregation and pass the 15th amendment to secure voting rights for blacks.

That is historical fact.

I pointed that out.

You implied I needed a history lesson.

I asked how so?

You never replied.

You, like every liberal I know, are unable to accept historical facts that aren't politically convenient for you. If your beliefs require you to deny historical facts, get some new beliefs.

Bingo. Things like historical facts and 3rd grade arithmetic, must be denied to be a liberal. It's amazing.

Originally Posted by detbuch View Post

Trump didn't "invite" Russia to hack Hillary's server. He said that they already hacked it. You don't invite somebody to do something they already did, you invite them to do something they have not yet done.


wdmso reply: yet trump doesn't attack the Russians for committing the crime or espionage He supports it with a request of assistance

I don't think Trump would attack the U.S. for its espionage either. Every major nation does it. So Trump is not "supporting" espionage (your spin). And it only seems to become a crime if you are caught. And the only punishment meted out for it is by the nation being spied on. Then things can be smoothed out by swapping spies.

And Trump is not searching for Hillary's missing emails. So he doesn't need to ask for assistance (your spin). He didn't "ask" for but "hoped" that the Russians would find, among their hacked product, the missing emails. That the Press (which largely leaves unscathed Hillary's deletion of emails when she was subpoenaed to deliver them) would greatly reward the Russians. Obvious sarcasm, not a request for help or a support for espionage.

And he added that, "Russia, if you're listening I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing [in the emails that you already hacked]. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press." That is pure sarc against Hillary's irresponsible use of the private server and against a press he considers lax on criticizing her for deleting the emails.


wdmoso:
So you support a guy who want to be the next POTUS using sarcasm when it come to the Russians Hacking

Oh, get off your high horse. Everybody on this forum uses sarcasm, including you. As do all politicians, and on matters far more important than Russian hacking. Hillary is no exception. She has used it regarding her wiping of the emails. She uses it a lot. And on matters, such as Benghazi, far more important than the obvious and expected Russian hacking

He is obviously assuming that her server was already hacked, and not because he invited Russia or others who hacked her server, but, rather, if there was any invitation, it was by Hillary. It was her irresponsible insistence on the private server that invited hacking.

wdmso:
And the Invitation, it was by Hillary thats like saying she deserved to be raped did you see the sexy clothes she had on she was asking for it

No, it is not at all like saying she "deserved" it. It was saying that if we choose to spin on the notion of "inviting," it was Hillary's use of the private server that "invited" hacking more than anyone else's words or accusations or sarcasm. If we want an analogy on the spin of "deserving," it was more like a criminal deserving punishment for committing a crime.

But, as is a prime function of spin, it turns your guy's mistake into one commited by your opponent.


wdmso:
Seem you got spin down to a science if you believe in science that is

I don't "believe" in science. I don't treat it as a religion as many do. It is a useful tool. But, like all tools, it is often misused. But thanks for the sarcasm. And you might want to hone your spin down closer to a science rather than haphazard reliance on the spin of others'

From some liberal rag today.

The Real Plot Against America

In retrospect, it worked out much better than planned. Who’d have thought a pariah nation, run by an authoritarian who makes his political opponents disappear, could so easily hijack a great democracy? It didn’t take much. A talented nerd can bring down a minnow of a nation. But this level of political crime requires more refined mechanics — you need everyone to play their assigned roles.

You start with a stooge, a fugitive holed up in London, releasing stolen emails on the eve of the Democratic National Convention, in the name of “transparency.” Cyberburglars rely on a partner in crime to pick up stolen goods. And WikiLeaks has always been there for Russia, a nation with no transparency.

The emails show office gossip — catty, sometimes crude back-and-forth by party operatives, and a bias for one candidate. Ho-hum. To make the plot work, reporters have to take the bait. On cue, they decry the fact that politics is going on inside a major political party. The horror — Democratic hacks saying nasty things about Senator Bernie Sanders.

Next, lefty extremists have to act like lefty extremists — that is, myopic to the greater good, guided by a Trumpian sense that they alone know how to solve the world’s problems, and everyone else is a sellout. Angered at the contents of the cybertheft, they boo any mention of their party’s nominee. And told by Senator Sanders, the man who brought them there, that booing is too easy, they boo his call to unite to save their country from a monster.

But Russia still has to seal the deal. Some work remains. If enough angered lefties won’t go for the Democratic nominee, a longtime foe of Vladimir Putin, it will be just enough to put a Putin puppet in the White House. And it would also usher in the term that drove the right wing crazy when George H.W. Bush used it — a New World Order.

What’s in it for Russia? Well, everything. Territory. Hegemony. Its takeover of the Crimean Peninsula has brought sanctions and condemnation from the West. What stands between Putin and further aggression in, say, the Baltic States, is a NATO pact that has kept Europe safe for nearly 70 years. And if you thought Trump stiffed the poor suckers who signed up for his “university,” wait till you see how he treats some of our oldest allies.

Plus, Putin despises Hillary Clinton. Like Trump, his skin is rice-paper-thin, albeit a paler shade of orange; and, like Trump, he never forgets a slight. He still hasn’t gotten over Clinton’s comment on George W. Bush’s infamous look into Putin’s soul. As a former K.G.B agent, said Clinton, “he doesn’t have a soul.”

What’s in it for Trump? Help at winning the ultimate throne of his gilded dreams. And maybe some investment money from Russian oligarchs close to Putin, one of many things Trump may be hiding in his tax returns. The two narcissists share a love of torture, authoritarian rule, and women on runways in bathing suits.

But then, a wild card, something unplanned. Putin didn’t expect Trump to be so all-in with his collusion. He knows Trump is a fool, world class in only one thing — ignorance. He doesn’t need spies for that. He knows Trump is a man who will say anything, and deny in the same breath that he ever said it. The Talented Mr. Trump.

Last November, before a national television audience, Trump said of Putin, “I got to know him very well.” And Wednesday, Trump said, “I never met Putin.” That was a standard Trump lie, on one end or the other. But even Putin couldn’t fathom that Trump really will say anything.

So there was the Republican Party nominee for president inviting an American adversary to wage cyberwar against the country he wants to lead. If that wasn’t Trump’s shoot-somebody-on-Fifth-Avenue moment, nothing will be. What’s more, he was way too obvious about the role of the other pawns in the scheme. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press,” he said to Mother Russia.

Also, he’s getting carried away with his dictator-philia. On Thursday, he said Putin was a better leader than President Obama. D’oh! In public, at least, you’re supposed to root for the home team.

Trump misses the old days, back when you could “knock the crap out of” a demonstrator. Yeah, the old days. Back when it was disqualifying for an American politician to flirt with treason.

This all seems too preposterous to be planned. Where are the conspiracy nut jobs when you really need them? Even fiction, Philip Roth’s “The Plot Against America,” about a fascist-lite president during World War II, does not have this level of absurdity.

But it unfolds, still, if not according to Russia’s design, then according to Russia’s will. Trump is now a national security risk, actively rooting for a foreign adversary to tamper with an American election. And very soon, he will start receiving classified briefings on that adversary. Ehhhhhcellent!

Uranium one..The reason Putin loves Hillary. Look it up, if you don't know what Uranium one is so you can read it yourself rather than take my opinion.
Hillary has been proven to be terrible at national security.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Did the DNC editors help with this one too ?
I think you need a break from the forum , you're becoming unglued .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't believe Clinton ever deleted anything while under subpoena. And as per State Department policy she had the judgement on what was a government record.

As for Trump, even if it was sarcasm it would be seen as an invitation for a foreign government to interfere with a US election. It's yet another in a long string of reckless comments that demonstrate why he doesn't have the temperament to be POTUS.

Yea, because donations to the Clinton Foundation influenced 9 US government organizations including the DoD, Treasury and Energy Department, the Utah State Nuclear Regulator and the government of Canada. People in the loop say Clinton wasn't even involved in the process.

By the way...the deal was actually a result of a Bush initiative to expand trade.

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Expain how I'm being unglued. Maybe explain how I parrott the DNC talking points also.

Pls. don't run away this time.

See above
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It obviously was and it was funny .
Explain to me again the harm .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ok, bc I posted a op ed from a newspaper - Thanks got it.

No everything you pasted above that too.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You mean bc I posted that the RNC had issues with emails in the past or that I pointed out that Trump doesn't even seem to know who the VP is? That is coming unglued - got it.

Let's talk about how many time Pres. Obama said I in his speach. You didn't get that from some right wing wack job site who actually spent time counting the word I in his speech. That is not a talking point?

Yeah the Clinton news network...lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The FBI found she deleted work emails which a subpoena was not necessary since she was required by LAW to turn over all work related emails when she left her SOS position.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...-emails-friday
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

People in the loop...lol

Uranium one...see below :)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015...inton-web.html
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Perhaps they could actually investigate and report on facts rather than just recite the conspiracy theories from an author out to bash the Clintons.

Totally different issues.

That was just a joke for Spence . He has a problem calling the president a narcissist .
You really don't have a sense of humor at all
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it was hilarious which is why the lib panties are all in a bunch...Hill's campaigns has apparently been hacked as well

I think O referred to himself only 119 times which was a little disappointing....thought he'd really go for it this time and smother himself with affection.....

They banned uniformed police from the convention floor. Apparently they feel police in uniform may negatively effect their chances in November. I don't recall former Democrat Ku Klux Klan klegal Senator Robert Byrd being barred from the convention floor. I guess KKK okay, Cop in uniform not okay.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/29/philly-...floor/?ref=yfp

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's yet another in a long string of poor judgments that Hillary was unable to determine something as easy as "what is a government document" . . . if her "judgement on what was a government record" in her deleted emails was so obviously and egregiously wrong, that would demonstrate why she does not have the judgment to be POTUS.