http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...s-world-elite/


read it


Soros is one of the meglamaniacs who think he is God http://humanevents.com/2011/04/02/to...-is-dangerous/

POS http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...hopes-to-spur/

especially this communist



http://commieblaster.com/george-soros-fund/

I hear commieblaster.com is one of the premium web sources for objective commie blasting information.

You guys seriously need to stop feeding your adrenaline addictions with these crackpot conspiracy sites.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.9600e528b2f6

more picking and choosing
show me the facts, just the facts
I did not vote for Trump
but I certainly won't vote for Clinton

If Trump put half his money behind Rand Paul, maybe we would have a real choice in Nov.

It is what it is
so vote for who will begin to turn the country around or if you are blind and think all is well, vote for more destruction of our country. It's that simple.

Come on someone must have a list of communists that they could start waving around.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

WOW. If you believe this load of (. . . ), does that mean you will stop criticizing Trump? I mean, if you continue to do so, you, according to your article, could actually wind up reinforcing Trump's followers belief in him.

Maybe Trump knows about this supposed syndrome and is masterfully using it--sort of being a mastermind rather than a buffoon. It's (his success) all rather murky, mysterious, contradictory, inexplicable.

Except . . . the brainiacs just don't seem to get the simple explanation that a great segment of Republican supporters are fed up with typical GOP failure to deliver on its promises. The simple reality that many, if not most, Trump supporters exist on the rational basis that he will not be another weak-kneed Romney or nicey-nice McCain or more of the same Republican all-talk-no-action. That he will fight fire with fire. That his tactics are more like the lying aggressive in-your-face tactics the Democrats have successfully used for years. They overlook the simple reality that Tumpers don't adore The Donald because they think he is virtuous and righteous, but they prefer him as an alternative strength to typical Republican weakness.

And the most rational support for Trump is the Supreme Court decisions to be made. Because of that, and because the Republicans have failed to be an effective opposition to the direction the country has been lead, there is a perceived tipping point that we may finally arrive at that place of total transformation, and because of that we don't have the luxury of concern about Trump's character.

The GOP elite thought they were secure in their status quo. So much so that they could destroy their base's desire for someone like Cruz who had no fear of media or Democrats, and represented a radical departure from typical GOP cave-ins to Progressive legislation. Because the party would not support Cruz, the only departure left from the path they had taken was Trump. The GOP created him. Either it supports him now, or suffer worse self-destruction. Perhaps, even a splintering off into the creation of a new party.

But never mind all that. It's easier and more palatable to find some psychological syndrome babble for the Trump phenomenon. Especially if it further discredits the Republican candidate.

BTW, If you insert Hillary's name for Trump's in the article, it would work just as well. The very same phenomenon, if it exists, would perfectly describe Hillary's suck-ups.

A well regarded journalist citing real research...that is a "load?" My own empirical evidence certainly seems to back up the findings.

That's scary. I don't understand the Supreme Court argument at all. The guy is a Dem most of his life, loved the Clinton's and suddenly in the span of a few years takes Jesus as his savior and you think that's an indicator of predictability on his picks...makes no sense.

That seems to be your go-to these days, that it's all the same. Demographics don't back up your statement...

Amazing that the two most blind people on this site can't or won't open their eyes,they know they are in the wrong and yet willingly will still follow that path.That is what is truly sickening.

simple spence, Trump is not a progressive
I'm pretty sure he follows the Constitution, progressives want it removed and want more government in our lives and to be bigger and larger. I thought you were smart

Jim and Scott make two, what about the others?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He sure as hell isn't a conservative. His positions are founded on the last 24 hours news cycle...it's whatever he thinks will get a rise out of people and get air time.

sounds like your posts and positions...you and Trump are a lot alike :bl:

Inane.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ok...everything but the hair...

No, I didn't say it's ALL the same. I said the article, like so many that you cite, is a load. I've explained why in the above. And I have said previously that this election is not about character. Neither candidate can rightly claim to be, shall we say, impeccable. We have had many Presidents in the past who would not, today, be considered honorable, but who were deemed by historians to be great because of what they did in office. I would not agree what some did was great, I would even say it was destructive. But historians are just as biased as the rest of us. The historians deemed men, who would not be "well regarded" in terms of their character, great because of the consequences resulting from their election.

This election is not about character. It is about consequences.

You agree with Progressive style government. I assume you want a continuance and growth of the administrative State. That you agree with expanding the scope of government power. Ultimately, with a "benevolent" State that cannot be hindered from governing in any manner it chooses. Hillary is for you, in spite of what you consider negligible human faults, the ideal, self-professed, Progressive with a supposedly tremendous resume who will continue that "trajectory" of government growth. Because, after all, we are a product of history, and for a Progressive history is intrinsically and inevitably constant progress. But that natural historical progress must be shepherded and protected by expert administrators who constantly organize society in a way that is consonant with history. Ordinary people left to their own devices create a fustercluck.

I don't agree with that style of government. I believe that we are not a product of history, but that history is a product of our actions and beliefs. And that it has upheavals and reverses as well as improvements due to human endeavors. We create history, it doesn't create us. Our constitutional system of government was not historically inevitable. It was consciously created, and is still among the most advanced systems which promote individual freedom and responsibility. I believe that centralized systems such as the various forms of Socialism, including Progressivism, are semi-advanced forms of control over individuals which replace old monarchs and religions with more modern forms of dictatorial control.

I would open the door that might still allow us guarantees against government intrusion and control in every aspect of our lives. And, yes, the Supreme Court appointments will have a lot to say about that.

BTW, if you and others on the forum continue to criticize Trump, that will be an indication that you don't believe the article you posted here.

The question is, is Hillary well regarded?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it's really nice that you take the time to explain these simple concepts that he seems incapable if grasping :jester:

you'd think those opposed to Trump and the Republicans would cheer his self-destruction and their certain triumph....seems like they are gnashing their teeth hoping, practically encouraging him to become a better candidate or something???

I'm endorsing the Goldwater Girl and looking forward to the impeachment circus ........

You need to follow it with a Kool-Aid chaser...

More from you Man let me guess ..he was being metaphorical again

but when he speaks about the constitution he is "Literally speaking"

He is speaking to his uninformed base who already buy into the ISIS founder remark the media is against him Obama is a muslim and voter fraud can impact the election the list is endless


Donald Trump, trailing narrowly in presidential polls, has issued a warning to worried Republican voters: The election will be “rigged” against him — and he could lose as a result.

Trump pointed to several court cases nationwide in which restrictive laws requiring voters to show identification have been thrown out. He said those decisions open the door to fraud in November.

“If the election is rigged, I would not be surprised,” he told The Washington Post in an interview Tuesday afternoon. “The voter ID situation has turned out to be a very unfair development. We may have people vote 10 times.”

I wonder what are Bernie's feelings on those statements.....

Maybe he will coment when things get settled in the $600k 3rd home he just bought.

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_302345...5-000-vacation
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"I don't agree with that style of government. I believe that we are not a product of history, but that history is a product of our actions and beliefs. And that it has upheavals and reverses as well as improvements due to human endeavors. We create history, it doesn't create us. Our constitutional system of government was not historically inevitable. It was consciously created, and is still among the most advanced systems which promote individual freedom and responsibility. I believe that centralized systems such as the various forms of Socialism, including Progressivism, are semi-advanced forms of control over individuals which replace old monarchs and religions with more modern forms of dictatorial control."

Very well said

I should write in debutch as presidential candidate

times have changed over the years,today's socialist, socialist democrats or democrats in the 20's, 30's were communist, they needed to improve themselves and sure enough democrats were born.....Soros has never left the old school and he is greek,majority of Greece still call themselves communist.....:)