Intent is the buzz word that let her slide on lack of Professional Responsibility and Common Sense.

Bingo!!

Her "intent" in the use of a private server rather than the professionally responsible use of the department server is left open to question. And her answer is even more questionable. At best, it is, as you say, professionally irresponsible. At worst, it has the strong appearance of avoiding transparency, of hiding intentions which she would rather not be known.

In other words,she is so stupid that she sacrificed security without really intending to do so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Another one heading for the exit


White House Economic Adviser Gary Cohn Quits


But trumps staff guilt pleas and security clearances and staff quitting 4 ambushed in nigier every weekend in maro largo travel expenses of staff POTUS for life still better .. than Hillary emails ....

Another rat jumps ship before it explodes in flames and sinks leaving a smoldering oil slick of floating cheato grease
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nahhh - she knew EXACTLY what she was doing. The Most Qualified Person in History to be President was doing this to keep stuff hidden from others ans to cover her ass if she got caught. So yes, she intended

I can't believe you guys are still fixated on Clinton's emails :rollem:

Proof that brainwashing works.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If the only news coming out of the WH was a single resignation, that should be considered a good day for Pres. Trump.

No angry tweets, no words or praise for Putin (or vice versa), no law suits, no new arrests, no news how the Trump family continues to use the WH for personal gain, no news on people co-operating w/Mueller, no news on sex scandals or talk of officials beating their wives.

Why do you keep bringing it up?

RR brought it up.

Actually he just mentioned putting her in prison, you're the one that assumed he was talking about e-mails.

Once a Crook...

Usually that is the context.

I couldn't bring myself to vote for either one of the last mainstream presidential candidates, but when people start with the "But Hillarys" I wonder if they let their children get away with things because Johnny did something worse and he didn't get in trouble.

That's why it's important not to let Hilla . . . er . . . Johnny get away with his shenanigans . . . precedent begets repetition.

Would that be like the Mexican repatriation?
J Edgar Hoover
Or maybe Trumps buddy, Roy Cohn
Or which of the many political faux pas would you like to prosecute former politicians for?

If they were prosecuted in the first place, not allowed to be gotten away with, there would be no need to bring them up as a sort of "but Hillary" meme. They would not be precedents that you could use to let your child get away with wrongdoing.

Hillary getting away with her shenanigans can be used as a precedent you can use to excuse your children's transgressions, just as her husband's sexual deviations gave many children excuses to do the same. And yes, that applies to letting other malfeasances go unpunished.