that’s right, einstein, he was just indiscriminately shooting at everyone he saw. especially the blacks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm thinking any woman seeking an abortion as she flees Texas is well-advised to grab a gun and let her reflexes rule. You know how easily a person of delicate sensibilities can feel threatened.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’m surprised anyone here has you un- blocked.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'll bet you don't remember Joe Isuzu either :eek5:

not really.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

According to the right - Ashli Babbitt should not have been killed as a rioter while breaking into the Speakers' Lobby at the Capitol

Yet, Kyle Rittenhouse is hailed as a hero for killing rioters

Question: If Rittenhouse were at the Capitol on 1/6, would he have shot Babbitt?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If Babbitt chased you, and while you were down, she lifted a gun and pointed it at your head, would you shoot her?

"Ashli Babbitt should not have been killed as a rioter while breaking into the Speakers' Lobby at the Capitol"

Whose life did Ashley Babbitt put in imminent danger?

"Kyle Rittenhouse is hailed as a hero for killing rioters "

Who said this?

Loosen the straps on the tin foil hat, buddy.

If I saw an active shooter who had killed two people and I was armed and he was in front of me I would have shot Kyle.
That guy who had the guns mistake was he failed to pull the trigger.
It would have been self defense, the kid had already killed two other people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don’t think killing comes natural to most people. Had he shot Rittenhouse he would likely have been heralded as a hero for stopping suck a reckless teenager. So sad all around.

So in that case, the officer of the law should have assumed that the perp was unarmed.
But in Kyle’s case the unarmed guys who were “scaring” him were unarmed and he shot two of them.
Who’s got a tinfoil hat on?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don’t think it does either, but if you put yourself into a situation that is quite possibly violent and bring a weapon, it’s not because you’re there to give people first aid.
But he had Bandaids
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So, without knowing why he was being chased, nor why he defended himself from the attackers, you would have shot him? Judge, jury, and executioner? From the prejudicial, biased, and often hateful comments you make, that's not surprising.

And, given all the facts revealed in this trial, you think you would have been exonerated as acting in self defense?

sure you would Pete. sure you would.

what you described is retaliation, not self defense. not unless you had a reason to believe you were next.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why else would you bring a gun?
To administer first aid?
Isn’t a gun the NRA way?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

very sad all around. 100% correct.

and a textbook example of why it’s a horrible idea for local government ( and the feds) to allow these riots to continue until rioters run out of Molatov cocktails. When a governor decides that being seen as sympathetic to BLM is more important than keeping peace, he’s asking for this to happen.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Just saving the next victim.
Kyle will likely try to kill again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no such thing as pre-emptive self defense. the threat to you
must be imminent.

sorry if that’s going too fast for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So if you would have shot him, why did you bring the gun? You claimed that shooting him would be self defense. Did you bring the gun to defend yourself?

So you can only kill someone in self defense if you’re already dead?
Kyle didn’t even have someone in front of him with a gun.
Someone in front of you with a gun that’s already killed two people is an imminent threat.
Sorry if that’s going too fast for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

As I understand it, I have the right to arm myself and that is an unalienable right.
Do you think that is bad?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think Rittenhouse would agree with you. And would believe he has the same right.

That’s what you think his answer would be, what’s yours?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The evidence presented in the trial, in my opinion, validates his claim of self-defense.

Let me guess.
Someone attacks you & threaten your life will fight back with kindness
And if that doesn’t work you will fight back with your Dildo or your Bong.

Ah well, as they say FAFO
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This should cause a few to loose sleep tonight :cheers2:

No it fell flat because those 2 are disconnected with anything current or mainstream … and the inability to do a 1second google search LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’m proud to be disconnected from most of what’s current and mainstream. You can keep most of what you’d call current and mainstream.

You ended with LOL, that was a great zinger there at the end.

As for “current”, I just googled it, when was the last time those commercials ran?

Finally wayne, we assume that reference was your attempt to poke fun at us for weighing in in things outside our lane. Isn’t that pretty much what we, including you, do all the time here?

unless the listings about keeping prisoners in line, or about the math behind insurance, you and i are both posting about things that we aren’t professional
experts at.

in your case, you do it with astonishing thoughtlessness. Every single person here, knows exactly what you’re going to say before you say it, on every single issue. Every single time, no exceptions, not once, not ever. The liberal is always right, and when you know you can’t respond to what was said, respond
to something no one said.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Whose life did Ashley Babbitt put in imminent danger?

Jim you can’t have if it both ways upset when one of your MAGA hero’s is shot

By a trained police officer who felt the threat was reasonable

But demand it reasonable that a child shoots a man 4 times who threw a empty trash bag at him ? Who injected himself into the chaos

We’re the people who chased down the jogger justified when he grab their gun . To claim self defense ..?

This Wild West mentality of conservatives seems only acceptable if the shooter support their ideas .. Kyle is just what Trump and his followers wanted to mobilize in Kenosha and in Portland..and across the United States all they got was a child until they lost the election then the rest decided to make an appearance

I have no dog in this fight the jury will decide .. and that’s that

I may agree or disagree with the verdict. But that’s how our system of justice works..

And I expect to see the usual comments from both sides blaming something or someone when they decide
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’m proud to be disconnected from most of what’s current and mainstream. You can keep most of what you’d call current and mainstream.


As I’ve said you’ve been radicalized by the the honey poured in your ear from you sources and inbox .. far from the free thinker you attempt to present yourself as.. you spew the most Hate on this site … you get upset because your endless posts get push back .. and that upsetting you think every response is just about you your myopic unable to see the larger conversations going on in the nation …. I acknowledge I never been able to convey my thoughts on papers I suck at it.. However I don’t try to see the world as I wish it was.. I see the world as it .. because I’ve actually seen the the world to include the good bad and the ugly . And that’s served me better than a A in creative writing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"As I’ve said you’ve been radicalized"

Right, the one who can praise and criticize both sides is the radical, not the one who refuses to ever concede the other side can ever have a good point on anything.

"you spew the most Hate on this site"

Nonsense, I respond to vileness after someone else engages in it.

"you get upset because your endless posts get push back"

Nonsense, I respond when you claim I said something I never came close to saying. You and Pete do it every day.

"I see the world as it is"

Seriously? You keep saying that Rittenhouse is my hero, and that I condone everything he did. "See the world as it is"? Wayne, you can't get through a single thread without completely lying about what it is that conservatives say.

You said maybe a month ago that Republicans are incapable of doing anything for other Americans. I believe that you sincerely believe that. And it's stupid, it's demonstrably false. The data show that there is very little difference in generosity between conservatives and liberals, and to the extent there is a difference, it suggests conservatives are more charitable, even though they have lower average incomes.

You see the world as CNN tells you it is. That's a far, far cry from seeing the world as it is.

We'd get along great if you could just respond to what I actually say, rather than accusing me of being a Trumplican who thinks Rittenhouse is a hero and all the other nonsensical craziness you claim that I say.

Sincerely, have a great day. Beautiful day today. Taking my golden for a long walk.

:o

have you looked in the mirror?

Glad to see you’ve abandoned the sarcasm and went back to your nonsensical ramblings.

You do you, know your limitations
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Funny how the fake media makes up lies like the kid crossed state lines with the gun & should never have been in Kenosha.
Turns out his father lives there, the kid is there all the time as well as where his mother lives.
The gun was also stored at his fathers house.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Matt Gaetz wants to hire Kyle Rittenhouse as a congressional intern.
I'm pretty sure that Matt Gaetz is looking for a wingman to find teenage girls, not an intern.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Not that it matters much to me, but I hope you're not as nasty outside this forum as you are in it.

He’s got competition with his douchebag in crime Gosar.

It’s pretty sickening, kid obtains a firearm illegally, uses it in display of mind-bending reckless manner, kills people and they want to celebrate him as a hero. Just because he was acquitted of federal charges doesn’t mean he’s not a lessen for what wrong looks like.

Looks like civil charges are likely.

you talking about rittenhouse? that’s so off, it’s hard to tell? what federal charges? what laws were broken to obtain the firearm?

he’s no hero. but he is a victim of your sides deranged slander cartel, and he’s going to be win a ton in defamation suits. but you say no, and obviously you know
more than alan dershowitz on the subject of tort law. you’re never stupidly wrong

if you’re not talking about rittenhouse, and again your points were so wrong on the rittenhouse facts you may not have been, i apologize

if you were talking about rittenhouse TDF was correct to ask if you are the dictionary definition of wrong.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device