Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1234877)

Requirements for the next Republicans presidential nominee



The candidate (and businesses) will not be allowed to have declared bankruptcy more than seven times.
The candidate (and businesses) can be involved in no more than 6000 lawsuits.
If elected, the candidate can make no more than 31000 false or misleading claims in 4 years·
The candidate will be allowed to have paid no federal income tax in no more than 9 of the 15 years preceded the 2024 election.
The candidate will have to make their tax records known prior to 50 years after their last day in office.

The candidate will not be allowed to have more than one paid affair with a Porn Star while married. And will not be allowed to illegally spend more than 200,000 dollars of campaign funds to keep the Porn Star/affair quiet.

The candidate can have no more than 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.

A current or prior spouse cannot have accused the candidate of rape more than once in a divorce case disposition

The candidate will not be allowed to have more than two campaign officials who work secretly for Pro Russian factions in the Ukraine,

The candidate will not be allowed more than once to illegally use funds from his own or any other charitable foundation. And the candidate will not be allowed to illegally use these funds to buy more than two self- portraits.
In any 6 week period

the candidate, if elected, will not be allowed to fire more than six Inspector Generals.

The candidate will not be allowed to raise more than 250 million dollars to an official election defense fund that does not exist .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1234879)

there is absolutely no way that you thought this up and wrote it on your own :hihi:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1234881)

Truly when you read it all, you almost have to believe it's made up, but that is just how bad Trump has been his entire life. The party is about to embrace him (assuming he isn't charged first) as the potential front runner.

Term Limits are needed so badly, because we have gotten to the point, the vote is cast to prevent the other side from putting a dirt bad into power and for Jim's benefit; it applies to both parties.

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1234879)

there is absolutely no way that you thought this up and wrote it on your own :hihi:

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1234884)

Of course not . Silly Rabbit! do you ask everyone who tells a joke if they wrote it?

Lol.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1234883)

we have term limits for potus, and desperately need them
for congress. couldn’t agree more. no argument against it.

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1234883)

we have term limits for potus, and desperately need them
for congress. couldn’t agree more. no argument against it.

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1234891)

I don’t think I’ve ever met a single person that thinks we don’t need them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1234891)

I don’t think I’ve ever met a single person that thinks we don’t need them.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1234892)

Except the politicians who want to spend their careers in DC.

There is no rational argument against it.

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1234897)

Aren’t those the ones voting on it :hee:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1234898)

And therein lies the problem

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1234903)

you are just crushing the obvious today....good work:scream:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1234910)

Thanks Scott your compliments mean the world to me.

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1235007)

All of the current Republican vs. Republican attacks and finger pointing today tells you they are getting those last tracking polls in and see there is no “red wave” at all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1235007)

All of the current Republican vs. Republican attacks and finger pointing today tells you they are getting those last tracking polls in and see there is no “red wave” at all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1235033)

I see we have the Proud Boys for Ron DeSantis.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1235040)

I hope the democraps continue to vomit this stupidity....

The Washington Post
Isaac Stanley-Becker-Yesterday

Obama says democracy ‘may not survive’ in Arizona if Republicans win, “That’s not an exaggeration,” he added. “That is a fact.”

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1235041)

Yes sir, nothing says “democracy is dead” quite like the citizens showing up to vote in free elections, and they themselves choosing who represents them. What could be less a democratic?

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1235034)

Who does Antifa support? Harvey Weinstein? Or are only Republicans judged by the worst people who vote for them?

In CT-5 house district, a guy I know named George Logan is running, a black republican, very successful engineer, son of Guatemalan immigrants, first one in his family to ever even see a college let alone go to one.

The CT democrats compared him to the monkey Curious George in an attack ad. Saying "This is George. George wants to run for Congress...."

Very subtle.

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1235048)

probably gonna need some additional funding for safe spaces.....:kewl:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1235053)

whole new levels of unhinged loon leftists....goodness!

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1235055)

Seems your exceptionally bothered
Over The idea that those you support are not the patriots you may believe them to be.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1235059)

it's amazing how you constantly and so confidently create compete fiction between your ears....

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1235066)

Again you say absolutely nothing

Just the response I expected
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1235117)

Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson was asked a simple question on the campaign trail this week: Would he commit to accepting the results of next week's midterm elections?

His answer was anything but simple.

"I sure hope I can, but I can't predict what the Democrats might have planned,"

Yep both sides ya right
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1235121)

Stacey Abrams says GA makes it harder for democrats to vote.

Make that wrong.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1235133)

stacey-abrams-if voters-can-navigate-gov-kemps-voter-suppression

You know Jim the laws passed after trump lost If you ever read outside of fox you might see the truth

Under the state’s new Election Integrity Act, Georgia citizens can challenge a voter’s eligibility on the state’s voting rolls an unlimited number of times. Right-wing groups, spurred by baseless claims that the 2020 election was rife with voter fraud, have mounted thousands of organized challenges across the state, putting even

Republicans use Georgia election law to try to cancel registrations

Poll workers inform voters they had been canceled or contested

following the 2020 presidential election as the right-wing voter watchdog group True the Vote teamed up with the Georgia Republican Party on a campaign that cast into doubt the eligibility of more than 360,000 voters from across the state.


That’s what voter suppression look like Jim Fox won’t run these stories

Jim your heads so deep in the sand you are unable to see the 200 republicans actually are doing what you claim 1 democrat did

And no both sides don’t do it

Stop being a cheerleader for bad behavior
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1235136)

every november, GA sets records for voter turnout. black turnout is especially high.

“no both sides don’t do it.”

last year courts threw out NY’s redrawn district likes, saying it was illegal gerrymandering. Here in CT, in 2 consecutive gubernatorial elections, democrats in bridgeport and hartford claimed they ran out of ballots ( who knew you needed ballots on election day?), and kept polls open later than originally scheduled, just in those cities, which coincidentally are 99% democrats. in the red districts, enough ballots were sent that polls closed at 8 pm.

and the new black panthers hanging outside a voting place holding clubs. That wasn’t voter intimidation.

And here in CT they recently re-drew the northwest district, the only somewhat purple district in the state, to include enough of waterbury to make it reliably blue

yup. only the right does it.