![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
AFTER the MEGA 24" Paddle Tail Storm BLIZZARD of '09:
|
yep. Acording to the ol Nebe-o-meter... the storm has formed in New Zealand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=had0m...eature=related |
I'd trust Rav's indian friend before the weatherman. :hihi:
A 100 inchs of snow sounds like alot, but not uncommon around the Great Lakes. One year in the late 90's Pulaski had 96 inches dropped in a 24 hour period which broke a record somewhere in Colorado back in 1939. Watertown is infamous for their big storms due to lake effect. The difference is they are always prepared up there. |
LOL
Quote:
I dunno Dave....that nebe-0-meter is a very powerful Tool... and right On up there with native American Wisdom... concerning this event. :rotflmao: |
The Weather Channel isn't calling it yet as of the early AM -
But they are saying now that's it's tracking further east than they thought - which means snow. Looks like they're gonna have to dig a bit to get a look at the groundhog...:hihi: |
NWS is sayin its going east of us with little snow
I want to go check out that New Zealand action that looks awesome |
Quote:
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6...ob1/Phil-1.png |
Quote:
|
:1poke: So Bigfish what time we headed to the ditch Tuesday. I have some ice fishing traps ready!!!!
|
RIJimmy............I'm coming to your house and I'll bring 2 more bottles of JB !!! :cheers2:
|
this should be good! i hope we get snow :D
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
-spence |
She would be great on WLNE.
|
hottest
weather chick i've ever seen
|
78 Blizz
Finally! A place to talk about the Blizzard of 78!
52" of snow in downtown Providence. Stuck there from the Monday morning of the storm until Thursday morning. Marriott Hotel. Food ran out on Monday night. Had one blueberry pancake on Tuesday, after taking some supplies of a trailer truck. On Thursday, we walked to Attleboro on the Rte 95 on divider in platform shoes (it was the seventies after all...). We fell down a lot... Got back to CT on Sunday. The car we drove in was found in April and impounded. It was stuck in a pile of snow at a gas station on a corner - we had to abandon it (fiat spyder convertible...). Our boss had to drive through Massachusetts to get us back to CT. Ok... done. Thanks for listening. |
1 Attachment(s)
From Accuweather.. one of the few with the cajones to post long range predictions...
|
Wife has surgery in hartford tuesday, not a good travel for there.
NWS is saying models have the storm tracking east of the CWA and we would only have a light covering in front and perhaps a wrap around comma after, this looks like the comma could be pretty cold, 1" or less of moisture 10-15 X factor for snow. Weatherunderground is dead on it too. he old stalled cold frontal boundary provides a ribbon of strengthening baroclincy allowing for the surface low to intensify as it reaches our latitude. Intense deformation band of snow in the cold conveyor flow develops on the backside of the low on Tuesday and Tuesday night bringing significant amounts of snow across the Northeast within 100-150 miles of the coast down to the northern Mid-Atlantic and extending north into much of New England. As the mid-level low pressure features aloft approaches the coast secondary development occurs later Tuesday night as the primary shears out keeping snow over the region until Wednesday morning. This solution has the potential to drop a foot or more of snow across a wide region of the Northeast. QPF’s range from three-quarters of an inch to an inch and a half in both the NAM/GFS. This snow would also be rather fluffy as cold air gradually incorporates itself into the circulation of the storm system from the north. Snow ratios should range from 12-16:1 or higher near the end of the storm as max omega intersects a moist snow growth region in the deformation axis. The SREF plumes also have decent support for this scenario as the SREF mean precip over the Northeast ranges from a half inch to an inch in the above mentioned areas with many plume diagrams showing an inch or more of QPF. So not a lot of moisture - QPF but a lot of snow - 12-16:1 |
The National Weather Service admits they don't have a clue about the storm at this point. Sorry about the caps, that's how they post these discussions:
.LONG TERM /MONDAY NIGHT THROUGH SATURDAY/... MONDAY NIGHT THROUGH WEDNESDAY... THE MODELS CONTINUE TO STRUGGLE AND FLIP FLOP ON A POTENTIAL STORM SYSTEM FOR SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND. THEY ARE HAVING A TOUGH TIME FIGURING OUT HOW MUCH TROUGH AMPLIFICATION WILL OCCUR WITH NORTHERN STREAM ENERGY. THEY ALSO ARE NOT SURE ON WHICH PIECE OF ENERGY THEY WANT TO CAPTURE AND HOW CLOSE TO THE COAST THE SYSTEM WILL TRACK. THERE IS NO POINT IN GOING INTO SPECIFIC DETAILS OF EACH MODEL...SINCE MOST HAVE NOT SHOWN MUCH CONSISTENCY AND HAVE BEEN VERY UNSTABLE FROM RUN TO RUN. THE ONLY THING WE CAN SAY IS THAT SINCE THE MODELS GOT AWAY FROM THE INLAND BOMB SCENARIO...THE ECMWF HAS BEEN THE MOST CONSISTENT AND STABLE WITH A LESS AMPLIFIED SOLUTION AND A FURTHER EAST TRACK. THE ECMWF HAS BEEN FAR SUPERIOR IN MOST OF THESE SITUATIONS THE LAST FEW YEARS...SO UNTIL WE SEE IT GO FOR A MAJOR WINTER STORM WE WILL KEEP THE FORECAST ON THE MORE CONSERVATIVE SIDE. HOWEVER...THE 00Z ECMWF MODEL DID TREND A BIT FURTHER WEST FROM ITS LAST FEW RUNS...SO THIS WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSELY WATCHED. ALL IN ALL...THE AMERICAN MODELS AND THEIR ENSEMBLES ARE CLOSER TO THE COAST/STRONGER AND HAVE A MUCH BIGGER IMPACT THAN THE INTERNATIONAL MODELS. LIKE WE SAID BEFORE...WE WILL LEAN TOWARDS THE ECMWF SOLUTION BASED ON ITS TRACK RECORD...BUT ALSO WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT SOME OF THE AMERICAN MODELS INTO OUR FORECAST. REGARDLESS...ALL THE MODELS DO HAVE A CLASSIC INVERTED TROUGH SETUP...SO WE FEEL THAT WE WILL GET AT LEAST SOME SNOW PULLED BACK INTO THE REGION. THEREFORE...RIGHT NOW WE FEEL THE BEST FORECAST IS FOR A LIGHT TO MODERATE SNOWFALL ACROSS MUCH OF THE REGION SOMETIME LATE MONDAY NIGHT INTO EARLY WEDNESDAY. THIS IS NOT SET IN STONE THOUGH AND SINCE THE MODELS HAVE BEEN SO UNSTABLE THE LAST FEW DAYS...WE DO NOT WANT TO RULE ANYTHING OUT. THIS INCLUDES THE MORE INTENSE AMERICAN MODEL SOLUTIONS WHICH WOULD BRING A SIGNIFICANT SNOWFALL TO MUCH OF THE REGION. ONE OF THE INTERESTING THINGS ABOUT THIS FORECAST IS THE AMERICAN MODELS ARE CLUSTERED ON ONE SIDE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MODELS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. THE AMERICAN MODELS HAVE BETTER RESOLUTION...BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE CORRECT. WE WILL JUST HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE HOW THINGS PAN OUT AND HOPE THEY COME INTO BETTER AGREEMENT OVER THE NEXT 24 HOURS. RIGHT NOW WE WILL LEAN TOWARDS THE ECMWF...BUT KEEP ALL OPTIONS OPEN. WILL RUN WITH CHANCE POPS MONDAY NIGHT...AND LIKELY POPS TUESDAY AND TUESDAY NIGHT. WILL PROBABLY HOLD ONTO SOME CHANCE POPS ON WEDNESDAY MORNING WITH UPPER LEVEL TROUGH STILL TO OUR WEST. IF THE MODELS COME INTO BETTER AGREEMENT...LATER SHIFTS WILL WANT TO UPGRADE TO CATEGORICAL POPS. EVEN THOUGH WE THINK WE WILL AT LEAST GET SOME PRECIPITATION...THE MODELS ARE ALSO STRUGGLING WITH TIMING SO WILL KEEP THINGS IN THE LIKELY RANGE. AS FOR PRECIPITATION TYPE...THINK IT WILL BE MAINLY SNOW OVER MOST OF THE REGION. HOWEVER...SOUTHEAST OF THE I-95 CORRIDOR THERE WILL LIKELY BE SOME BOUNDARY LAYER ISSUES AT TIMES RESULTING IN SOME LIQUID PRECIPITATION. IF THE DEEPER FURTHER WEST SOLUTIONS VERIFY...BOUNDARY LAYER ISSUES COULD PUSH EVEN FURTHER NORTHWEST. THIS FURTHER COMPLICATES AN ALREADY EXTREMELY CHALLENGING FORECAST! REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS SOME VERY COLD AIR WILL LIKELY MOVE INTO THE REGION ON WEDNESDAY BEHIND THE DEPARTING STORM SYSTEM. DEPENDING ON JUST HOW INTENSE THE STORM BECOMES WILL DETERMINE JUST HOW COLD IT GETS...BUT TEMPERATURES WILL LIKELY BE SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW NORMAL. |
Here's the weatherman's dilemma
No consensus in the models across the board - US (GFS/NAM) shows the Mega-Storm European (UKMET) shows it going way east Canadian models(GGEM, ECMWF) are in the middle This winter the GFS has been pretty accurate, but with the variance, even in models from run to run has almost everyone just shrugging In the middle of the very snowy American models and the out-to-sea UKMET lies the Canadian GGEM and the ECMWF. These models have trended west over their last couple of runs but not as extreme as the GFS/NAM or SREF’s. They take low pressure about 100-150 miles further offshore than the American models with some light to moderate QPF, generally under a half inch, in the deformation banding on the backside of the storm. This would still give areas within 50-75 miles of the coast a 2-6” snowfall, roughly a half to a third of the output of the GFS/NAM. |
Quote:
We need a nipplemeter here. |
Quote:
"Here's the weatherman's dilemma No consensus in the models across the board - US (GFS/NAM) shows the Mega-Storm European (UKMET) shows it going way east Canadian models(GGEM, ECMWF) are in the middle" And either way we'll be pissed at them... tough gig! |
Quote:
I watched it 4 times before I even realized she wasn't speaking English. |
Quote:
I'm betting on the red blooded mega-storm, and I'll be using my Union made shovel to clean it up. -spence |
don't know their picks for the stupid bowl yet. Maybe they would do better with that.
|
ECMWF has been more accurate in these types of scenarios this year
|
doh
what? no mega storm...?
,,,,,,,,, http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6.../3d-smiley.png,,,,,, |
MAybe maybe not
|
Quote:
May the Cap could provide us with a permanent link in the Weather area...:uhuh: She's even hotter than Dylan Dryer...now all Channel 10 has is that fat broad on in the AM...:mad: Ya know, life is too short to have to watch ugly women on TV that early in the morning...just sours my outlook on the rest of the day..:hs: |
Oh yeah, the Mega-Storm...
Sounds like a winter Nor'Easter to me... Hey, Rav - what's your Native American friend calling for?...:huh: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com