Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1133375)

Spence seems to think a lot less of Israelis than Trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1133368)

Having an ally in the Middle East, when we are at war with jihadists, doesn’t help us in any way that you see? You don’t think we share intelligence with Israel?

Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, that’s not complicated. What if next, the jihadistsbdecude they hate music? Do we pretend there’s no such thing as music?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1133373)

If memory serves me correctly the city has had many owners over the past 3 millennium.

The 1947 protocol intended to keep the city under International control. When Israel announced all of Jerusalem to be their capital in 1980 it was found to be a violation of international law.

It's complicated, but I don't think you can just issue a mandate and expect everyone to follow.

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1133377)

they were already our ally !! and they haven't let us use their air bases to attack theses Jihadist why do you think that is ?? for the same reason the US has steered clear of the Jerusalem question for decades

Whats your take on settlements legit or just land grab like we did with the American Indians

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1133382)

It is complicated, however the open status of Jerusalem has been under pressure due to minor things like invasions...



Did Israel grab the land? Or did they not relinquish it after each and every attack on them?

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1133417)

Is your suggestion to give the land back after a conflict? Please elaborate. Tell your s what you would do?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1133418)

Israel has also removed settlements and offered backnprevious strips of land. It didn’t make anyone stop hating them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1133420)

What land have we kept after a conflict ..

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1133420)

Thats what the peace process was designed to hammer out


What land have we kept after a conflict ..

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1133421)

build 10 remove one.. I love your reasoning


3\4 the arab world hate them for what they do.. the rest have always hated them for political reason and history ..

in the USA 3\4 love them for political reasons the rest clearly see what they do and dont give them a pass and the right says we hate them

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1133427)

The Arab world hates them because it is popular with the little guy and because Religion - not politics. Well not fair because for many Arabs Politics IS Religion.

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1133436)

I find it interesting that people who support the nation of Israel based on historic claims, do not support Native Americans claim to sovereignty when they controlled all of the New World 500 years ago.

The "New World" was not a nation 500 years ago. The inhabited sections were populated by different tribes, not one people, who at various times and places, fought with each other. One of the first efforts at some form of unity was by the Iroquois, which by no means included all "Native Americans," and was an effort in response to European settlers. I suppose, restoring all of the "New World" to the various tribes, what is left of them, would be the end of the U.S. Perhaps the U.N. could settle the matter for us.

Palestinians historically were the residents of Palestine and comprised a number of tribes, one of which became known as the Jews.
It is a long and complicated history and Jerusalem has been in the possession of many rulers. The British plan of dividing up the middle east into separate entities has not worked very well yet, has it? It will be hard to change because fortunes rest on the outcome and no one wants to lose their share.

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1133423)

Guam

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1133447)

They took if from the Spanish Kingdom who relinquished the territory without incident.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1133444)

One would need to remember that Native Americans had a different view of the world that was not based on owning property but living as part of the world around them.

That makes it difficult, then, to compare notions of Native American "sovereignty" regarding property, to land disputes between Israelis and "Palestinians."

Didn't work out well for them, did it?

Perhaps, there is a lesson for us there regarding borders and immigration.

There is no more an ethnicity of Palestinians than there is of residents of the United States, Americans.

Agreed. Israel seems to be far closer to the identity mix that comprises the U.S. Not so much similarity of identity mix in the Palestinian territories.

That link is very much to a current Jewish perspective IMHO.

I agree with that. But is it incorrect?

But what I said was Palestine was "were the residents of Palestine and comprised a number of tribes, one of which became known as the Jews"

In that case, then the Jews there are also Palestinian. And so would be the Christians. Sounds like civil war among Palestinians.

Look at it from a much longer period of history like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine
for Palestine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem
And this for Jerusalem

Originally Posted by Cool Beans (Post 1133592)

TO be absolutely honest using the same logic, this could be the map of the US. How different would it be if some more powerful people, forced us return the land? We have been here only a few hundred years.

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1133597)

makes a pretty solid great case for strong secure borders and no illegal immigration does't it?

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1133800)

Jerusalem UN vote: Trump threatens US aid recipients

UN Nikki Haley warned member states that President Trump had asked her to report on "who voted against us" :spin:



http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-42431095

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1133808)

Par for the course. Less concerned with policy as much as retribution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1133808)

Par for the course. Less concerned with policy as much as retribution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1133811)

He is vindictive but I am not sure where you drew this opinion from. His policy is not exactly choosing the easy road. Your insider must have told you about Trumps priorities.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device