I am well aware of his character. I would never, under any circumstances, voted for him in the GOP primary, for exactly those reasons. I agree with you on his character. You keep acting as if I defend his character. I don't.

Is your list complete? When he is judged, is it fair to leave out unemployment of 3.5%, lowest minority unemployment ever, kept us safe from jihadists, waived student loans for wounded vets, helped bring about criminal justice reform, tax cuts for 60% of Americans...why not include those things as well?

That's the difference between us. I prefer to judge him on everything he does, the good and the bad (there's plenty of both). You must dismiss all the good, you are not capable of acknowledging the good, in your mind it must be as simple as there only being bad, there not being anything good.

What do you think it means, that you focus on the bad and intentionally deny the good? Governors Cuomo and Newsom both praised his handling of the virus. They can admit he did some good. You can't. Why?

They had no choice or do you think Trump*s statement that they have to be nice to us meant nothing
And ponder this
So unregistered foreign agent for Hungary/Acting Director of National Intelligence/Amb. to Germany Ric GRENELL has given a Senator who spent July 4th in Moscow a list of where Mike Flynn was caught talking to foreign spies.

LET'S ANALYZE, SHALL WE?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pleas do.

No, actually I said you’re a moron
I have since reconsidered and decided that you are merely an imbecile.
But just keep proving my point, little boy.
Those Jesuit spelling skills are not up to ESL levels.
Perhaps an immigrant could give you lessons.
Many of them have transferable skills that may have applications in your cubicle.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete, give it a rest please.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he's a little frustrated....

see post 60

I am a world-class speller. What I can't do, is type.

I saw it many times. In your mind, it was defensible. I can say the same thing about my posts.

I'll stop too.

Thank You
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So calling Dems. whores and people pussy, commenting on women's look is defensible?

Tell us again what a good Christian churchgoer you are.

Why is he frustrated - he is giving it out as good as he is getting it.

So a bridge too far is moron (or is it imbecile) but Pussy is ok?

You too Paul, Give it a rest.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He called my wife, Da Pussy. You didn't have an objection to that. But when I call him that, you say that's inappropriate. Defend that.

Like you, I do it when it's done to me (or in his case, my mother, or my wife, or TDF's kids). It's OK for you to retaliate, but wrong when anyone ese does it.

Not "dems". I use the whore label for any elected official who screws their constituents for money. I specifically called John Rowland, a Republican, a whore, and you know that, so you are now lying because the truth doesn't fit your argument. But in CT, the overwhelming majority of elected officials who have screwed us for money, happen to be democrats. While it might make you feel better if I blamed our problems in CT on Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan, that would also be stupid.

My point was that pussy seemed to be ok but when moron was used, TDF decided that was enough.

That is not what I said.

You're a liar. You call Dems. whores. Then you tried to justify it when I called you out. You constantly make fun of to women's looks.

I always laugh when you come back and quote the same post multiple times.

"AND ANOTHER THING...…"

I called the dems in CT who screwed us for money, whores. If the Republicans controlled the legislature for 95% of the last 40 years and did this to us, I'd call them whores. But unfortunately for you, it was democrats.

"You constantly make fun of to women's looks. "

So to you, making fun of Rachael Maddow is more objectionable, than his calling my mother a whore, my wife Da Pussy, and attacking Kevin's kids.

That makes all kinds of sense Paul. Stick with that.

You deserve the insults the way you insult people here - you always have and you always will. Kevin is a big enough man to defend his own kids.

Since the word whore is so easily used, you should call McConnel and the conserv. in Kentucky (and many, many other states) who look down on the liberal states but gladly take their $.

Both of you need to knock it off and get back on topic or you're both getting a vacation.

And I don't care who starts it, takes two to have a pissing contest. At some point somebody has to be the bigger man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"You deserve the insults the way you insult people here "

But the liberals here who insult people (or their wives and children), they don't deserve insults. Right?

Paul, it's pretty simple. You resort to insults when you feel it's justified. And I resort to insults when I feel it's justified. We're both doing the same thing. Clearly, you agree with your justification more than you agree with mine, which is a matter of opinion, and that's fine.

It's a funny coincidence, that the ones who you call out for using insults, are all conservatives. That's just a coincidence, right? It's not because it's all political?

To be clear, I could literally care less when anyone here insults me personally (I did react when Pete brought my mother into it, that was my bad). I dish it out, and I have zero problem with taking it.

What I like to point out, is the obvious hypocrisy of someone who criticizes insults made by the republicans, and ignores/defends the insults made by the liberals.

OK. Have you ever criticized a fellow liberal, for insults here? I have suggested to Dangles that he back off, on multiple occasions.

To the original topic, even Chuck Todd apologized. Again, it's a funny coincidence that all of the errors, are moves that help democrats. Just a coincidence.

This is now almost a non story, as other, bigger things have happened this week to help Trump, like the Flynn mess, Obama's apparent involvement, and what the judge is doing with the DOJ's decision to drop the case. And the election in CA, which was supposed to be a real indicator of things to come, until the Republican won, and then PRESTO, now it doesn't mean anything, which it probably never did.

Katie Hill had flipped the seat for the first time in 26 years... It had been red before that. The Garcia guy was a good candidate. The democrat actually led after the first election but no one was over 50% so they had a runoff and Garcia won.

I wouldn't exactly call this an indicator of things to come....

I don't think there is any comparison between the daily insults you and the other conserv. throw out here. SD has NEVER posted anything remotely intelligent, just some of the most vile insults possible. Scott seems to be trying to dumb down his posts for the last 3 years.

What happens in a single congressional district, rarely says anything about the country. But both sides pretend it does when it suits them.

has it been that long?