JD, that is just a statement of fact. You can't blame Obama, but from what we've been told, there were indications this guy was being tracked because of his statements and associations.Not one imho, I'd want in our military.
Fore warned should have been fore armed.

Fact??? Nothing has been proven yet.

When liberals said similar things about Iraq they were accused of wanting US troops to die to help make their point.

-spence

By who?
And why do you keep coming on this lame thread?:rotf2:

Wouldn't surprise me if you did several times.

I'm trying to test my assumption that ScottW can't really product an unlimited number of non sequitors.

-spence

Spence, this was the original post, what Fact??? are you questioning. :huh:

Unless there has been another terrorist attack i don't now about since 9/11
then "if they find it is terrorism in the end" the fact is it will be under Obama's watch.

If you are looking for facts pointing to terrorism, a few I remember, he had
e-mailed the al qaeda recruiter in Yemen, he went to the same Florida Mosque
that the 9/11 terrorists attended, he had SOA (soldier of Allah)under his name on his professional card,
and was charged with premeditated murder as he bought the guns he used shortly before the attack.
I go along with Fishbone's post and the possible reasons why he may not have been charged as a terrorist so far,
but if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck it's a duck.

I don't know that I can "product" anything...