Remember Paine Stewart . The plane climbed to 65k . Is this not plausible here also ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

One would think that the first thing that the pilot would do is notify the tower that THERE WAS A FIRE ON BOARD...

I think that this was a pilot suicide event due to his political beliefs to bring attention to the opposition party. I also think that the Malaysian government has known this all along and is a reason why it was so slow to release information..

There's nothing ground control can do to help at that instant. I'd think their energy would be focused on where the aircraft was going and addressing the issue. If it was a bad fire you could have perhaps a few minutes.

I'm sure there's a pretty standard process they train for in these situations.

-spence

They've reported that the very first thing ingrained in pilots when an emergency occurs is to communicate the issue to ground control (especially when manually shuttting systems down). I'm not a pilot so I can't confirm but it's been reported numerous times so far.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Ha, I read just the opposite ;)

-spence

Navigate then communicate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If I remember it was aviate, navigate then communicate.

The "incident" appears to have happened as they were passing off to Thai controllers. That could have contributed confusion.

-spence

Nope.

Aviate, navigate then communicate.
That puts ATC Last.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Spence beat me to it. What may further be an issue with communications is if they were switching over to HF radio.

Here's the piece that's making the rounds today.

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03...ectrical-fire/

-spence

Good thing I'm not a pilot!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I see you read Business Insider
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Article was on Wired but I believe BI posted it this morning.

-spence

I hope that is what happened. If that's the case, they should be able to tow a side scan along that flight path and eventually find the plane sitting on the bottom. E v e n t u a l l y.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There's one major flaw in that theory. The tire/landing gear wells aren't pressurized, and at 35,000' there's not enough ambient oxygen in the atmosphere to keep tires burning. Every so often, a clueless stowaway gets the stupid idea to crawl into a wheel well while a plane is on the ground. Once the plane takes off and the gear is retracted, they die from hypoxia, well before they die from hypothermia. Their bodies fall like a block of ice to the ground when the gear is lowered on the final approach.

Reasonable point, although I'd suspect a tire that ignited on takeoff could burn at least until 10,000 feet. By that point it could have spread?

I've heard of tires igniting on landing but never on take off...who knows.

-spence

And then there is the lithium batteries in the cargo hold that has downed other planes before...
A fire is very plausible.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The actual thing a pilot does first in an emergency, or when the emergency is first realized, is to mutter those very famous words, "oh chit". My uncle flew in the air force for thirty three years from prop planes during WW II to B 52's during Vietnam, and he told me those two words are the first post emergency words enunciated in virtually all instances by pilots and people in the cockpit. My wife had a math professor that I was dying to meet, because as a navigator on B 52's in Vietnam he was shot down twice and survived. I wanted to ask him if thats what he said when the missiles hit the plane and never did before he passed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i think there was talk about a strange climbing to 45,000 feet
for a short period which may have been an attempt at putting out a fire

so that "is" a possible scenario.... remember that many tires
are cheated or of poor quality. MALAYSIA wasn't up to specs
on several issue's as compared to our regulations.

Eventually... very deep water along that flight path...

would a jetliner that sank to very deep depths
and then imploded leave no trace evidence or debris?

that is something to think about

I think there will be debris eventually; seat cushions and such

Not sure they'd ever find it. With a deep water search there would have to be some value to justify the process.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

90% of the time, that's the brakes getting overheated and igniting the tire. In take-off, the brakes aren't being applied. Airlines use pure nitrogen in the tires, too, not compressed air, to decrease the chances of a tire fire.

As far as climbing to 45,000', I would say that an hour after take-off with full fuel, it couldn't climb that high. You'd have to burn off a lot of fuel first. If there was even the slightest chance of a fire, the last thing they would do is dump fuel. The 777 has a rated service ceiling of 41,000'.

"The life of everyone on board depends upon just one thing: finding someone back there who can not only fly this plane, but who didn't have fish for dinner."

Bwaaahhhhhhhh!!!!!!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I believe the plane made two course changes after passing the "closest airport"
So someone was at the controls
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, there was another good article today that trashed the smoke theory...

-spence

Pakistan??
Would be a very long shot but just feels like there's a lot being held back for good reason...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

looks like the Australians think they found it

Not sure about that yet...but I hope for the families they can close the loop.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Some objects spotted on satellite imagery. Now they have to go and actually find it to see if its related.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

croc's