It's a vain move, no doubt, but he was a big force behind getting this relief bill put together. It's not unfair that people associate him with that money.

Who is getting checks anyway, aren't most people getting direct deposit?

He's done things a lot worse than this. This isn't much. A little bit of spiking the football, but he was a big force behind it.

People who didn't have to file taxes last year will get checks and those who paid by check.

What’s wrong with foster homes?
The money I make is usually just side jobs, like your mother.
Your Dad pays me.💪🏼
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The IRS said that if they have an account # for you on file, it's going there electronically.

"Actually he didn't - the final talks were conducted by McConnell, Schumer, Mnuchin and a little by Mark Meadows"

And very early on, Trump was championing the idea of checks to people.

Nothing's wrong with foster homes just looks like whoever raised you did a #^&#^&#^&#^&y job. My mom's deceased and I think I told you that before which goes to show what a f****** piece of s*** you are. My dad would find you a vial scummy person too. Your husband must be a real C UNT to be with you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You would find him charming. He likes turtles
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I highly doubt it. As I said I try not to associate with people like you so I couldn't see why I would ever want to associate with your husband.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How about you gentlemen start acting like adults, and nix the name calling please.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I will not insult anyone first. Hope that works for you. Thanks
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Deal
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no kidding....aren't these some of the same people that call other people "petty" :rotf2:


everybody drink ......

I think some of them were the same people who noticed your constant snarkyness.

spelling it wrong doesn't get you credit for a new word in your limited vocabulary :rotf2:

Pointing out typos just shows how petty people are and reinforces their snarkyness.

ok.....

Meltdowns
Tantrums
Antifa
Values
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

lack of values
lack of class
hypocrisy
unintelligent.

Unintelligent
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I also think uneducated.

Seems right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Or perhaps this?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

^^

Yep
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It looks like people can't obey Kevin's ask.

you started with the name calling again after you said you wouldn't...soooo

I am ready to give up educating .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

sounds like biden likes lizzy for vp...that would be fabulous...

Your post was directed at me. We all recognize it. I said I would only respond. Which I did.

SD agreed to stop calling people names. He can't help himself.

was it??...you shouldn't make everything about you... and try not to become triggered so easily...like teasing a kitten with a string :bounce:

That would go a long way towards satisfying the progressive wing of that party. A long way. He can't pick a moderate (not that there truly are any). He might need to throw a bone to the Bernie supporters.

Yes, I am sure it was.

I'm not triggered. I just see no reason to take your snarkyness.

If he picks Warren hes a fool , the right hopes he does but honestly she did so poorly in the primarys there is no benfit ... now if he picked the burn. That would be different
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

'there is no benfit "

Yes, there is enormous political benefit. Selecting her would please two key groups on the left - women and progressives.

You have it exactly backwards. As a Republican, I hope he selects Bernie. No ticket with Bernie on it, has any chance in any general election. He wants a revolution, and people between the coasts ain't asking for a revolution.

Yet when I choose not to take someone else's snarkyness, you say I'm angry. It must be very convenient to enjoy a benefit that you deny to others.

The difference is that you start it with your posts. I don't.

Guess you didn't pay attention to the primaries

People hate Warren on equal footing with Hillary

Swing voters wouldn't see sanders as a socialist threat as VP. The right would of course use this angle ...


But I dont see the biden thinking about sanders and Sanders thinking about VP

So there's nothing to argue

"Guess you didn't pay attention to the primaries "

I pay very close attention. Biden isn't going to pick Sanders. First, your side is so obsessed with identity, that they can't have a ticket of two old white men. Second, the progressives don't like Biden, he's not liberal enough. He needs to balance his ticket by moving it way to the left. The progressives would prefer Bernie (based on primary results) but it can't be two old white men, and Biden already promised publicly he'd pick a woman. So what woman? The smart choice, would be the woman with the most appeal to Bernie supporters. That's probably Warren.

The fact that the Democrats have to appeal to the most extreme progressive wing, is a massive albatross around their necks. If they could nominate today's version of Bill Clinton (smart, charismatic, moderate/populist on the issues), that person would win the general election in a landslide (I voted for Clinton). But such a person has zero chance in the primaries of the current democratic party. Zero chance.

"People hate Warren on equal footing with Hillary "

In my opinion, not on your side. They just liked Bernie better.

"Swing voters wouldn't see sanders as a socialist threat as VP."

I'd love to hear your justification for that statement.

"But I dont see the biden thinking about sanders and Sanders thinking about VP"

Because Biden said it would be a woman. He can't go back on that promise.

Word I’m hearing is either Klobuchar or Kamala Harris. Amy would be a good choice; effective Senator, knows how to get things done, appeals to Trump voters. Since Joe is getting old (over 80 in office) good chance she becomes president.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device