I called the dems in CT who screwed us for money, whores. If the Republicans controlled the legislature for 95% of the last 40 years and did this to us, I'd call them whores. But unfortunately for you, it was democrats.

"You constantly make fun of to women's looks. "

So to you, making fun of Rachael Maddow is more objectionable, than his calling my mother a whore, my wife Da Pussy, and attacking Kevin's kids.

That makes all kinds of sense Paul. Stick with that.

You deserve the insults the way you insult people here - you always have and you always will. Kevin is a big enough man to defend his own kids.

Since the word whore is so easily used, you should call McConnel and the conserv. in Kentucky (and many, many other states) who look down on the liberal states but gladly take their $.

Both of you need to knock it off and get back on topic or you're both getting a vacation.

And I don't care who starts it, takes two to have a pissing contest. At some point somebody has to be the bigger man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"You deserve the insults the way you insult people here "

But the liberals here who insult people (or their wives and children), they don't deserve insults. Right?

Paul, it's pretty simple. You resort to insults when you feel it's justified. And I resort to insults when I feel it's justified. We're both doing the same thing. Clearly, you agree with your justification more than you agree with mine, which is a matter of opinion, and that's fine.

It's a funny coincidence, that the ones who you call out for using insults, are all conservatives. That's just a coincidence, right? It's not because it's all political?

To be clear, I could literally care less when anyone here insults me personally (I did react when Pete brought my mother into it, that was my bad). I dish it out, and I have zero problem with taking it.

What I like to point out, is the obvious hypocrisy of someone who criticizes insults made by the republicans, and ignores/defends the insults made by the liberals.

OK. Have you ever criticized a fellow liberal, for insults here? I have suggested to Dangles that he back off, on multiple occasions.

To the original topic, even Chuck Todd apologized. Again, it's a funny coincidence that all of the errors, are moves that help democrats. Just a coincidence.

This is now almost a non story, as other, bigger things have happened this week to help Trump, like the Flynn mess, Obama's apparent involvement, and what the judge is doing with the DOJ's decision to drop the case. And the election in CA, which was supposed to be a real indicator of things to come, until the Republican won, and then PRESTO, now it doesn't mean anything, which it probably never did.

Katie Hill had flipped the seat for the first time in 26 years... It had been red before that. The Garcia guy was a good candidate. The democrat actually led after the first election but no one was over 50% so they had a runoff and Garcia won.

I wouldn't exactly call this an indicator of things to come....

I don't think there is any comparison between the daily insults you and the other conserv. throw out here. SD has NEVER posted anything remotely intelligent, just some of the most vile insults possible. Scott seems to be trying to dumb down his posts for the last 3 years.

What happens in a single congressional district, rarely says anything about the country. But both sides pretend it does when it suits them.

has it been that long?

In other words, no, you have never criticized a democrat. Pete went after TDFs children, called my mother a truck stop whore, called my wife Da Pussy. You can't speak against it. But I make fin of Rachael Maddow, and you get all bent out of shape.

Paul, all that matters is politics. We get it.

You're constantly insulting people here - even PRIOR to anyone saying a word to you. You start posts with insults in them. So don't claim you don't have a part in it. He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was. Bad but not quite the same. Your on here 7 days a week - night and day. You refer to Dems as "the other side" as if people are at war. TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you. You've complained that Pete makes too many posts but for 8-10 years you had by far the most posts here. So how much is too many posts? Is it one more than you make?

"So don't claim you don't have a part in it" I never, ever claimed I don't do it.

"He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was"

If that's true, it's a distinction without any difference. He didn't make interrogatories about my wife or a bout TDF's children. He made statements. Statements that you didn't object to. Not only did you not object to what he said about TDF's kids, you objected when I called him out on it. You had no problem with what Pete said, but you had a problem when I called him out. But when you don't like what someone says, it's heroic when you call them out. Go ahead and explain that.


"TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you"

Yes he can, you're right. Apparently the only one who can't defend himself, is the only tattletale here. That's you. And again, it's OK when YOU criticize me for insulting others, but when I criticize someone else for insults, you say the insult recipient doesn't need my help. Does Rachael Maddow, Hilary Clinton, and Dan Malloy need your help? WHy do you defend them against me? How is that any different than what I did? Here's the difference. TDF is here, and they're not, and TDFs kids didn't do anything to Pete. So I'd call him out again for that in a second.

You and I are doing the same exact thing (we both use insults, we both criticize others for using over-the-top insults), but it's heroic when you do it, problematic when I do it.

"You've complained that Pete makes too many posts "

I point out, correctly (not complain) about how many anti-Trump threads he starts. I don't care how often he posts in a general sense. I could care less, and don't keep track, wouldn't even know how to look it up.

When you stop using insults, I'll recognize your position to tell me not to do the same. When you stop calling others out when they use insults you don't like, I'll recognize your position to tell me not to do the same.

For some reason you fail to recognize that you constantly insult people first something I normally do not do. As far as telling Pete to stop with the insults I'll do that when he starts insulting me. There is no comparison between you and I here or you and anyone else. You need to recognize that since you've been on this forum it is going downhill with your constant insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, please don't respond to this. TDF said "At some point somebody has to be the bigger man." Between you and PaulS, I think you're the bigger man. Let it rest. It's not going anywhere relevant or meaningful to the rest of us.

Ouch
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I do respect guys like TDF who don't ever take the bait when someone else throws an elbow, and I do aspire to that, and I routinely fall short, obviously.

I try to make a point not to argue with someone when they are obviously correct, as you are here! So OK.

Ouch
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Whiners gonna whine
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Roly - Exactly, look who posted directly below that request.

Then the debutch tries to insult me by saying Jim is the better man (his insults are the reason I and many other ignore him) and then Jim basically says " I agree with you, I am better than Paul"

You guys throw so many insults around you don't even recognize when you do it anymore.

No need to justify your stupidity friend. I have accepted you as is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I told you I would never associate with a vile scummy person like you.

Where were you yesterday? Trying to find a job to earn some $.

You pathetic overweight loser.

Paul, what i was agreeing to in Detbuchs post, is that i should stop engaging in trading insults. that’s what i meant, nothing more. You get to choose whether or not to believe me. Fair enough?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fair enough.

a breakthrough....I give it 45 minutes

That's a start.

You can’t be smart.

The reason I make this statement should be obvious. Allow me to explain...

You have stated many times how you don’t associate with people like me. No problem,you have a choice and I respect that. Yet the very next sentence is a question.....which means you are attempting to engage me.
THIS IS ASSOCIATING WITH ME

You can’t be even a little smart.
Now start your next whine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

By associating I mean hanging out, going fishing, having a drink. Would not want to do that.

I will insult you back whenever I see you insult me.

9:10 to 9:57....almost nailed it

You are aware of what associating actually means?
Asking for a friend
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sure I know.