Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1184969)

You're in the wrong thread, so tell me did you work hard to be this much of a moron, or are you the product of a combination of enthusiastic inbreeding and a mother who spent her pregnancy huffing paint thinner while servicing her other clients in a truckstop bathroom?

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1184975)

You're like a dog with a pull toy, go read the other threads..........

I'm not going to spend the time to put up the documents on the difference between the previous admins and this one.

He'll be gone soon, he's backed up to the sea right now.

"If you lie to the court, there are penalties for that."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explains the possible downsides for the White House if it pursues the claim of executive privilege

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1184978)

i read the other threads. Nowhere did you state what the maximum number of allowable cagings is, before one becomes a
monster.

i’ll just assume
that you don’t have an answer, but you know it’s one more than obama did.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1184994)

It’s choosing to take ALL the children from the parents, every single one that’s the problem.
You’ve said before that they deserve it. Shouldn’t have brought their children.
Go chase your tail........
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1184902)

The trial has started 3 days into the Trial the murder weapon has been found and ballistics match the weapon ...

Republicans think that because it wasnt found by the (House) prior to the Senate its not relevant :rotflmao:

But somehow hunter Biden is:btu:

Again I have no illusions the Senate will not remove him... But I guess the American people and the historical record should be denied this new information from a 1st hand witness,,

And republicans beating the Drum of let the voters decide and overturning an election BS , Yet they dont want to present anything that may damage the POTUS how upstanding putting Trump before the Voters .. :btu:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1185013)

The bank robber leaves the bank without money, no crime he can go free, just because you repeat it like the lame arguments his defense put forward, doesn’t make what he did not an impeachable offense.

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185018)

Your silly analogy notwithstanding, Trump did not commit a crime. He did not, as you would have it, bribe anybody. Zelensky denies any attempt to bribe him. There was no victim. Ukraine got the money on time (and more substantial military aid than the previous administration gave Ukraine). That is not a lame argument. it is a fact.

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185011)

There was no crime. Ukraine received the money . . . before the due date . . . there was no victim . . . there was no quo. Does Bolton's, excerpt dispute that?

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1185036)

I know crazy to think you would want to hear from a first hand witness, the VERY thing the right has been bitching about since this all started, be careful what you wish for Moscow Mitch.

Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1185039)

The money was released once they got caught and they knew the scam was up.

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1185024)

but it’s a fact that doesn’t help liberals. and they can’t process such facts.

Trump is, literally, their North Star. Everything they see and hear is processed through an algorithm that asks the question “how does this make Trump look bad?”. It’s their entire being. WDMSO literally said, there are no facts which make democrats look bad or make republicans look good. Literally, not one single fact. It’s not easy to talk with these people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185044)

That is pure speculation.

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185044)

That is pure speculation.

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185044)

That is pure speculation.

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1185057)

Easy way to cure what you call "speculation"

Release the documents, everything in government has a paper trail.

Let the witnesses testify, lots of career staff had their hands on this.

Obstruction works, until the light reaches the evidence.

You may like not like John Bolton’s principles, but he’s very principled. He’s also smart. And he just loves a good fight. He's not planning to lose.

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185061)

If it requires all of this, then impeachment should not happen without it. You don't impeach to get evidence. You impeach because you have it. And it should not happen because of speculation.

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1185064)

Plenty of evidence, boy the streets would be full of criminals and murders if they all needed to be caught with the bloody knife in the victims house.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1185061)

If it requires all of this, then impeachment should not happen without it. You don't impeach to get evidence. You impeach because you have it. And it should not happen because of speculation.

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1185071)

Congressional oversight is the duty of our elected representatives.
They requested the documents.
Floridaman refused to provide any.
Zero

But plenty will come out, most of it has been requested under FOIA and some has already been delivered.
It will all reach the light, a great deal of it prior to election day.

Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1185053)

No, any reasonable person would recognize that when the Trump admin. saw other people now knew about the holdup and they then unfroze the $ w/in a day or 2 it was bc they got caught. I don't believe they ever gave any explanation for releasing the $.

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1185182)

🍔
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device