![]() |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I only have half a boat. I haven't seen it. I said I don't want to be responsible for it. And I said I will not do any work on it. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I am sure there is quite the tale to be told.
|
Gettysburg 'flag-burning hoax' sees armed far-right groups assemble
Posts on social media by supposed antifa leaders urged members to meet at the Pennsylvania site on 4 July. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53299847 Showing up Armed? Guess they thought Trump would bail them out or make them deputies in his war against the left Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Really kinda strange that the Militant Left keeps trying to lure the Militant Right into a gunfight. Shouldn't THAT be the most terrifying? Militant groups of one side trying to lure the other into battles on the streets of out country? And why ohh why, do the Dem mayors pull back their Police Forces from protecting some of these areas and let the Militant Left run wild? Are they TRYING to incite the violent Right to come in? This is REALLY starting to sound like late 20s/early 30s Weimar. Remember, that was not organic, that was marionettes. |
Where did the determination that anyone on the left is trying to lure anyone into anything come from?
There is no evidence to suggest that those responsible for the online posts are in any way linked to antifa - a loosely-affiliated network of mainly far-left activists. Just look at a few of these links https://www.google.com/search?q=beth...w=1098&bih=515 |
Quote:
|
I saw the videos of some of these people, pretty disgusting. About as Low Life as CHOP/CHAZ, well, without the death and destruction.
I am impressed by both of your continued there is no Antifa and we have always been at war with Right Wing terrorism. |
there are groups that are not calling themselves antifa, but they ARE calling out anyone on the right, therefore they must be on the left.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g...-idUSKBN24605G “I don’t see no white militia,” he declared. “We’re here. Where ... you at? We’re in your house. Let’s go.” I saw a video of them in the road armed to their teeth confronting a white guy accusing him of stuff and asking where their reparations are. The guy was holding 2 AR-15's. They were dressed all tactical and the guy in the car asked him what are you, answer black militia. Trying to provoke a fight on a public road in broad daylight. Is this really where we are at? but it's all Trump's fault :rolleyes: |
Quote:
I watched that a couple times. If they are within the law of where they are, I don't care if they are armed. There were a lot of 22s in the mix ; ), Big BFGs with lights and Bipods yet tiny BX25 mags hanging out of them :hihi: They did look confrontational, but they did not ACT confrontational. Yes, the reparations comment was stupid. Don't worry though, Spence is sure they don't exist. |
You picked a great example of trying to bring back the Confederacy, perhaps you think the traitors actually had a noble purpose or that it still should be the rock upon which the old Union would split.
Stone Mountain Park officially opened on April 14, 1965 – 100 years to the day after Lincoln's assassination. Four flags of the Confederacy are flown at the site. The Stone Mountain Memorial Lawn "contains...thirteen terraces — one for each Confederate state.... Each terrace flies the flag that the state flew as member of the Confederacy." As Alexander Hamilton Stephens, VP of the Confederacy said But not to be tedious in enumerating the numerous changes for the better, allow me to allude to one other though last, not least. The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split." He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the "storm came and the wind blew." "Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and normal condition." And if you think the desire of the Tweety campaign is not to be divisive and is a leader in critical thinking. The campaign ads over the weekend vowed to protect a new statue: "Christ the Redeemer" .................................................. ..............in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It has zero bearing on me, I am not a racist or a redneck or a Confederate lover. The history of the mountain has nothing to do with me. If there are people who have a problem, there are ways of doing something about it legally other than causing such a disruption. If this stuff goes on and on unchecked, it could find it's way to Vermont and to Middleboro for all we know. Keep on bashing Trump and stick your head in the sand about reality. |
Quote:
Remember, Tweety said we were going to go to Mars. Now, we can’t go to Europe, Canada and Mexico is closing their border too. Sick of winning yet? |
Quote:
Just what constitutional change do you propose to make, that will make peaceful protest illegal? You claim not to be a racist, but you support one. Tweety is threatening to veto the Defense Authorization Act if Congress follows through on plans to rename military installations named after Confederate generals. It is straight-up white supremacy. The Confederacy was not the United States of America. It was a rebellion against it. That’s not patriotism. It’s the opposite. Tweety's running on a neo-Confederate platform, and the virus, you're just gonna have to live with it. 133,000 dead today, the virus is out of control and the end is not in sight. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The only reason NOT to change those names is because the left wont stop. They took down the statue of Frederick Douglas !! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Absolutely stupid. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Doesn’t she know there’s only 14 weeks left in the campaign. She’s a slacker and Donny Jr doesn’t deserve such a gold digger! Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Now in an effort to prove his alignment with White Supremacy, Tweety’s new ad proclaims the historical greatness of manifest destiny.
Manifest Destiny, a phrase coined in 1845, is the idea that the United States is destined—by God, its advocates believed—to expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Of COURSE . Why didn't I think of that?? Quote:
When you are done with Rules for Radcals or NY Times articles on why we need to cancel Washington and Jefferson, I challenge you to go back through history,take the US out, and wonder where things would be without us. No one here would likely be in a better position than they are today. Half of us, if ever even born, would still be in Europe, consumed by the violent warring of those countries. It is childish to put today's lens on 100 or 200 years ago. |
Don’t worry after this clown, we will likely see the end of American exceptionalism in our lifetimes.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Whoa is me
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com