Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
went from minimum wage to Einstein, Feinstein, World War 4 and quantum mechanics...don't know if I can hang with these geniuses :laugha:
|
Quote:
Home Health Aide Salary. Home Health Aides in the United States are largely women. The group as a whole has a nationwide average of $10.33 per hour for pay. the agency might get paid 19-30 bucks an hour who provide's the home health aid worker were do you guys get you info from?? https://www.payscale.com/research/US...de/Hourly_Rate |
Quote:
"Job satisfaction for Home Health Aides is high." "Earning a certificate from a recognized program can be done in as little and one and one-half semesters at any community college. This certificate qualifies graduates to work in entry-level positions as aides. " "Home Health Aides who transition into a Registered Nurse role may receive large pay increases as the latter position pays an average $56K per year. Certified Nurse Assistants or Licensed Practical Nurses are common next-step roles for Home Health Aides moving up in their careers" |
Quote:
There are a huge number of openings for skilled workers, these are not minimum wage jobs, these are jobs that won't let you buy a McMansion in Greenwich, but will let you buy a raised ranch in the Hartford suburbs. "So why aren't people getting the skills to get these jobs" Great question. Maybe getting those skills is something to consider, rather than amassing $200,000 in debt getting a useless liberal arts degree from a third tier private college. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can only imagine how different the spin on low unemployment would be., from Zimmy and WDMSO, if Hilary had won and if the democrats controlled congress. If everyone is making barely above minimum wage, why is consumer confidence so high? |
Quote:
Societies way to manage "these People" has been government and control of markets. As I understand what you propose, no controls are needed, the market will work as it works and life will be free of interference in any form. Is that correct? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That in a macro sense, the economy isn't meaningfully healthier than it was on Obama's last day. Sure, we need to talk about the debt and other potential pain points like inflatipn, but you, Spence and WDMSO, seem to be unable to consider the positives. |
Quote:
In order to have intelligent, fruitful, discussions, key words have to be defined, or, at least, correctly understood by all parties in the discussion. I have defined what I mean by free market and by freedom in various past posts. Perhaps you missed those posts. Perhaps you disagreed with them--but never rebutted them. I'll try again. My concept of being "free" in relation to other people is that a free person does not coerce, or is not coerced by, other people. Many would consider that coercing others would be a mark of "freedom." But coercion of another results from needing something from whom you coerce. Ergo you are not free. Your coercion bonds you to those you coerce. Is Kim Jung Un free because he has near total power over his populace? No, he is trapped into depending on those who submit to his coercion. What do I mean by a free market? A market in which neither party to a transaction coerces the other. If your objection to the viability of such a proposition is that there are always people who want power over others, therefor their will always be those who make the market unfree unless there is something to control them from doing so, I have on more than one occasion said that, concerning a free market, government control is not of the market, but of those who impose on market freedom. The role of government in a society based on freedom, is the protection of freedom. It is not the role of government to regulate "free" people, but to regulate (punish, etc.) those who coerce. It is not the role of government to regulate free behavior (that would be a contradiction), but to protect free behavior. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm holding all of the cards in this here game. |
Quote:
I think you have all the cards that are left, if you check carefully you might find that they are Jokers and the Queen of Hearts. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I'm holding all of the cards in this here game. Quote:
|
Quote:
What do YOU propose to overcome what you claim is the ever present problem of those who want power over others. You seemed to imply that "control" is needed. Power over others is needed to control those who want power over others. Who do you propose should have such power? And is that not what I said was the function of government in a free society--to "control" those who coerce, that is, punish those who wield unconsented power over others so that they don't continue to do so? So, if that is too innocent, or too rational, or too commonsensical for you, then what brilliant, secret, unrevealed and undisclosed by you method do YOU propose? Or are you saying that it is futile to even try? Should we just succumb to what you call the "darker, more sinister motives or basic stupidity." |
Quote:
OK. So the fact that his background is in business and not community activism, that didn't instill a confidence in business that wasn't there before? Confidence has a big impact on the economy. All the regulations he did away with, that didn't unleash any more potential of the markets? The GOP tax cuts, which cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, instantly making every company more profitable and more valuable, that had zero effect? And the overseas cash that's coming back, that does nothing? Apple alone is paying a one-time tax of $38 billion to the feds, to bring back $250 billion in cash. That's $38 billion the feds have to help people, which they didn't have before. The GOP tax cuts on individuals, which will obviously increase consumer spending, that had zero effect? "show me a Trump Jump. I don't see it." The slope of the line doesn't need to change. What matters, is that the Dow and unemployment are both continuing to head in favorable directions. You refuse to concede that which doesn't serve your agenda. When my beliefs cannot stand up to irrefutable facts and common sense, that's the day I'll change my beliefs. Obama helped the economy (see? I can say that even though I despise the man, and my head didn't explode). Trump is doing things to continue to help the economy. |
Quote:
That was pretty funny, good comeback. "I already did consider the positive" Did you mention any of the positives in any of your posts on this thread? I may have missed that, all I saw from the lefties was negatives. "I said you are projecting" No, I'm not. As of right now, at this moment, unemployment is low, black unemployment is extremely low, the markets are up, consumer confidence is up, and most of us got a small bump in take home pay thanks to the tax cuts. Right now, at this very second, all of those things are irrefutably true, and all of those things are good. True or false? Please tell us, is that true or false? Yes, we need to look forward, and consider potential pitfalls like debt and inflation and trade wars, etc. |
Labor dept. should have released report on last quarter's wages. Anyone see them?
|
Quote:
Wait until our farmers start dumping crops they can't sell. #tiredofwinning |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Wait thill the next Health Insurance increases kick in... who will Trump Blame for that??? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com