![]() |
Quote:
|
COVID-19 is quite clearly a threat to national security and pandemics were identified as such since the Bush administration.
Covita failed in his duty to protect the American people Bigly Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Then in late February, you have Pelosi and DIblasio telling their constituents that it was safe to go out in crowded public places. Also interesting if you look at the states with the highest death rates, and look at the political leadership of those states. I guess you never bothered to look at it that way, because sure as heck you won't like the results. If you want to say Trump did a poor job, I think one can make that case. But there's not a lot of logic to supporting Biden, who clearly would have done even less than Trump did, if you listen to what Biden said then, which is what matters. Can't have it both ways, big guy. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
220K dead
Millions infected The infections are rising at the highest rate in months and Covita claims he’s doing the best in the world Keep believing Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
From all this, you expect a Trump or a Biden could solve covid. And don't bring up this phantom THE science. There is no proven one scientific view on all aspects of the virus, nor on the best way to conquer it. And no, I don't put stock in what Trump says about how well we're doing. But I don't see this massive failure that you claim. And I'm optimistic that we are going to get through it and are doing well with creating vaccines, drugs, and protocols. I think it was good to open up the economy. That probably saved more lives in other ways that are not considered by those who focus with strict blinders on killing the virus. You seem to view the presidency as some kind of dictatorship or our system some sort of Progressive European thing. With all the factors of what and who we are as a country, we may be doing quite well. But just keep counting. That's so meaningful and helpful. |
Quote:
can you be specific? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Covita’s brilliant closing argument: #^&#^&#^&#^& Science. 15 days to the end of a Moronic Sociopath.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How about the way Cuomo handled the nursing home situation? effective leadership, or a self-inflicted disaster? Paul, Trump did one meaningful thing back in January. All the democrats, including Biden, said it was a stupid overreaction. Now those same exact people are saying he didn't do enough. That's called "wanting to have it both ways". And Pelosi and DiBlasio were on TV in February, encouraging their constituents to go out to crowded public places. Can you comment on that? Or can you only criticize Republicans? |
Everyone (other than Trump) has learned a lot since early on - and will continue to learn new things. You go on the best science based info. you have. Trump ignores science (and frequently does the opposite).
|
Quote:
You allow democrats the benefit of a learning curve. "go on the best science based info. you have" So how is it, back in January, that Trump saw the need for travel restrictions, but the democrats all missed it? And back in January/February when Cuomo was forcing nursing homes to admit infected residents, most people knew at that time, that the disease was especially dangerous for seniors. Yet Cuomo forced nursing homes to admit covid-positive residents, and prohibited nursing homes from allowing healthy people to visit loved ones. You're saying with a straight face, that this was based on the best science available at the time. Liberal=good, conservative=bad, no exceptions, not ever. |
Quote:
|
Trump said the virus would disappear when the number of reported new daily cases was in the hundreds.
He’s still saying it with the number in the tens of thousands — and rising. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Back to Barrett
The GOP is kicking and screaming about how they are allowed to confirm Barrett 7 days before an election so they're gonna do it, and they can fear monger about court packing. But I'm not seeing any conservative offer an actual articulation for not just waiting a few weeks. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's th eone thing Trump did. It the democrats said it was an overreaction. "it did nothing to prevent Covid coming in from Europe or from US citizens allowed back in from China with little testing or quarantine" I'm not saying the travel restrictions helped or didn't help. I'm saying he implemented that ban early, and all the elected democrats and everyone in the media, said it was an overreaction. You had very prominent democrats - Pelosi and Diblasio - encouraging people to go to crowded public places in late February. You have Biden saying Trumps travel restrictions were "hysterical" and "xenophobic". If they get a pass, then on what basis do you attack Trump? Trump was more conservative than they were. If Trump is guilty of not doing enough (and maybe that's fair), then how can they not be more guilty? They were saying into late February, that the virus wasn't serious enough to warrant even Trumps travle restrictions. Again, you can't have it both ways. But that's what you're trying to do. I'm very reluctant to give anyone grades on this issue, I just don't know enough. But it's absurd to give Cuomo and Pelosi and Biden a pass for what they said and did, and simultaneously say Trump should have done much more. There's no logic to that, that's pure partisan bullsh*t, and it's what every one of you is doing. |
Quote:
They weren't in a position in January to implement the lockdowns that they eventually implemented in March? What changed? "nor were they privy to the same intelligence Trump was which was far more serious than he was letting on" The feds were keeping secrets from the states. That's what you're saying? And only Trump had the federal intelligence, not any democrats in congress? The democrat-controlled house, they didn't get briefings? You're not backing into whatever scenario paints the democrats in the best possible light, no sir. Every assumption you make, is in favor of liberals. Trump had the intelligence, but somehow congress didn't. Trump conspired with Russia, but the Bidens didn't sell influence for money. It' snot Cuomos fault that NY was hit early and hard. Forcing nursing homes to admit sick residents? Beyond stupid. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're lying, or amazingly ignorant. Biden said it was hysterical and xenophobic. Pelosi introduced a bill in the House to undo the travel restrictions, even Chris Cuomo pans her for that. Where in Gods name do you get your news? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
elected trump potus and gave sente control to the gop through the end of this year. is that going to fast for you? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
in your analogy, the democrats were in favor of leaving the starting pitcher in after the three walks, then after the home run and only then, are they acting like the manager should have known to take him out. there weren’t any orominent democrats in january and february, calling for more severe reaction. we closed schools and shut the economy down. almost everyone is wearing masks outside. what more do you want? what more should we have done?? we bent the curve, which everyone said wasn’t guaranteed. no hospitals were overwhelmed, out of respirators. unemployment and the stock market coming back. m way too many dead, but what were democrats suggesting in january, which trump ignored, which would have helped? can you name anything at all? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Jim there is only one manager, the manager on the other team is not at fault, come on give it up your manager is hapless.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
the legislature is also powerful, as are the states. again, what was trump suooosed to have gone back in december or january, based on what we knew then? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
clearly not where you get yours It’s true that Biden has referred to Trump and some of his statements and actions in the context of his handling of the coronavirus outbreak as “xenophobic.” But it’s unclear whether Biden was specifically referencing Trump’s travel restriction on China, as Trump has claimed. |
Quote:
|
The unfathomable thing about the four justices siding w PA Republicans tonight: they would’ve stripped a state supreme court of the authority to say what the law is in their own state.
That’s way beyond right field. It’s judicial activism on steroids. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
same question for you, based on what we knew in december and january, what should we have done? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which means you give him an F because you hate him, but you don't know why. We basically shut the country down, and everyone is wearing masks and social distancing. Many countries didn't go nearly that far. What more was he supposed to do? |
Quote:
In other words, no matter what he does or doesn't do, it's wrong, because he's Trump. Why not just admit that you're all that thoughtless? |
Why this is just like Deja vu all over again🥱
Biden, Jan. 31: America needs a president they can trust, especially at times of a crisis. You know, we have right now a crisis with the coronavirus, emanating from China. A national emergency, you know, worldwide alerts. The American people need to have a president who they can trust what he says about it, that he is going to act rationally about it. In moments like this, this is where the credibility of a president is most needed, as he explains what we should and should not do. This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia – hysterical xenophobia – and fearmongering to lead the way instead of science. Now perhaps you may assign superhuman powers to Biden and assume that he did this within an hour of Azar announcement of travel restrictions to start February 2nd. But actually all you need to do is look at Covita’s tweets during the time of concern about Ebola and you can see why Biden had concerns about the ability of the current President to mount a coherent defense against a national threat. There’s more than 220 Thousand people dead now and Tweety’s still saying it going away Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com