In what way?

Didn't you say I stole someone's secret spots? And I told you I haven't fished any spots that people from this site took me to so no one could truthfully say that. So why do you think it is ok to lie like that?

Rollie - That is one of the reasons I think you are a vile scummy person.

I weighed all the insults from each and Trump's outweigh any hundred other individuals.

In force
🤡
Dumb
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Because I only know people from this site... keep lying
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

HA HA

Rollie, so what am I lying about?

Rollie and his HS education. Pointing out a typo. what a child. Is that an attempt to make you feel good about yourself bc you're a loser?

Don't you have any pride not making any $?

You might want to be less sensitive or defensive (this is not an insult), and not take personally things that are not referring directly to you. And you might want to tighten up the scope of what you consider an insult (this is not an insult).

It’s fine,rocks are not personal property. A little honesty would not hurt on occasion. Make your Dad proud for a change.
And please stop whining, your husband is even embarrassed 😩
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I am content with what I have. I spend my time helping those in need now. The good news is that leaves more for you,perhaps you can get some new bike shorts.👍🏿

Post pics💪🏻
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Ahh, I see! So you, and only you, get to decide what sins are forgivable, and which are not. I'm so sorry Paul, somehow I missed that announcement that you are the arbiter of such things.

Who cares if she apologized? If Trump apologized, would you accept it and forget everything? After Hilary lost, she blamed every force on earth for her defeat, except her own shortcomings, so there's zero evidence the apology was sincere.

At that level, almost all are scumbags, so you're voting for whose policy you like better. That's what you do, it's what I do.

But in your own words, that's not all you did, you also made him aware of those who were violating the rules. AKA, tattling.

Another non-answer. You throw honesty and lies out there but I told you how you lie. That shows what a vile scummy person you are.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Good hopefully you can help someone in need. Maybe give some of those fresh vegetables. I'm fine with the bike shorts thanks. I've actually been given a number of bike kits. I doubt you or Scott know what that is but you both can look it up. you should try it. I'll help you lose some of that excess weight.⛄🍔
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How is it tattling when I'm just asking how something doesn't violate the rules? What was the point of posting the rules if they're not enforced?

And why does the word retard bother you more when you called Democrats whores? You don't think people find that offensive?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How is it not tattling when you tell the authority figures who you think violated the rules, in the hope of getting them punished?

"And why does the word retard bother you more when you called Democrats whores?"

The people who you call "retards", are people who were born with challenges. They didn't ask to be born with challenges, they didn't do anything to deserve those challenges, it just happened to them. Normal human beings feel empathy for them.

You are comparing those people, to the democrats who have run CT for 40 years and led us to bankruptcy, and gotten wealthy from their union masters along the way?

My state rep Joe Aresimowicz is speaker of the CT House, he also is a full time employee of the largest state employee labor union. Joe has done quite well for himself rewarding the union (himself) with massive state spending which we all know the state can never pay for. He also gets a nice paycheck as a legislator for, supposedly, representing me. So he represents both the taxpayers and the union, gets paid by both sides simultaneously during contract negotiations. That makes zero sense. But it's worked out very well for Joe.

If I call Joe a whore, in my opinion he has earned that label through his actions, and for sure he is capable to defend himself against it.

You are saying a person with Down's Syndrome, deserves to be called a "retard", as much as he deserves to be called a whore? That's what you're really saying?

Many of the positions you have taken recently on this board have made it clear that you are no deep thinker. This one takes the cake. To you, being born disabled is as much of a character flaw for those you call "retards", as crooked politicians who knowingly make disastrous public policy because someone is paying them to do so.

I feel bad for you, I really do. When I think of the debates we used to have and how sharp and knowledgeable and challenging you were, and I compare that to what you have descended to...I feel sorry for you, that's all. Shame on you.

Face it you specifically called Democrats whores and then you have the nerve to criticize what someone else does. Hypocrisy at its finest. I feel bad for you and the anger you demonstrate on a daily basis here where you cannot go an hour without insulting people. What was so bad in your life to cause you to be like this? You've been angry on this site for years. Maybe it's time to go talk to someone. I'm sure work has an EAP
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You are assuming that calling out someone for the destructive things they do, and calling someone out for a condition they are born with, are the same thing. That's the basis for your argument. It's a very weak argument.

No it's not they're both vile statements. So are those right-leaning States who depend on the government to transfer funds from the left-leaning states whores also? And I bet if I open up every other active thread in this forum you're arguing with somebody else
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Now you're moving the goalposts.

You lost me (and everyone else) at suggesting there's any moral equivalence between insulting a crooked politician, and insulting someone born with a disability. I find the air quite clean on my side of this Paul. Quite clean. I'm very comfortable embracing the idea that we avoid using hateful language that's deeply offensive to innocent people who often struggle through no fault of their own. You think it's OK to use that language to achieve your own ends. Fine.

Some people (not you), think that adults who lie and cheat, and people born with disabilities, are different.

"And I bet if I open up every other active thread in this forum you're arguing with somebody else"

And you're not. Nor is everyone else.

You're using vile language in calling someone a whore just because you don't like someone's politics and now you trying to justify it in your mind. You never said you used it for a crooked politician you just said Democrat whores. I'm not moving the bar at all. I admit retard is vile and I used it for a specific purpose see post 60.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So, you refuse to come clean but it cost you a fishing buddy. No big loss I guess. Sorry goes a long way towards making amends. But you will never admit fault. Such a sad waste.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"You're using vile language in calling someone a whore just because you don't like someone's politics '

I don't know that enriching yourself while taxing people into oblivion and then spending 100 billion more than the taxes will fund, is a political position. John Roland was a Republican, he is also a whore who enriched himself while screwing the people he was supposed to represent. I call them whores regardless of politics, I don't care what their position is on climate change or abortion when I call them whores.

Paul, in my opinion it's possible for an adult to act in such a way as to earn insults. Obviously you agree, which is why you have called me scummy. That's fine. I agree that sometimes people (adults) act in a way as to deserve ridicule.

I don't think that being born with a disability, means those people deserve to have hate speech thrown their way. You do. You did it, you angrily defended it multiple times.

"You never said you used it for a crooked politician you just said Democrat whores"

I said democrat whores who screw their constituents when the union says to do so. If there are any democrats opposed to bankrupting the state for their union masters (as far as I know none ever oppose the budgets or tax hikes), I would not include them.

'I admit retard is vile and I used it for a specific purpose"

The vile nature of that term is due to the pain it causes the disabled. That has nothing to do with lobbing it at Trump. Your use of that word doesn't hurt Trump, it hurts disabled people.

The democrats in our state legislature screw us for money. That makes them whores of a sort.

Trump, for all his faults, does not make fun of "retards", no matter how many times you say it.

I have called Joe Aresimowicz a whore to his face, in public. That's what he is, and even he knows it. I walked out of there and there were people thanking me. If you went to a SPecial Olympics event and said "Trump makes fun of retards", youd get the crap beat out of you, and you'd deserve it. I know one Dad, I'd pay you a lot of money to say that in front of. Enough to cover your emergency room copay.

When I say something vile, you've done something to deserve it. When you say "retard", the "retards" didn't do anything to you. All you see is your hatred of Trump, you don't see, you can't see, how hurtful that is to people who didn't do anything to you. It's every bit as bad as n*gger.

None of them re capable of coming clean. Has a liberal here ever apologized, admitted to being wrong, or admitted that the other side has a good point? Ever?

I haven't lost any fishing buddies scumbag.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

My bad
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Biden Accuser’s Lawyer Is Trump Donor With History of Representing Sexual Harassment Accusers shocking

In 2017, on multiple occasions, Reade rretweeted or “liked” praise for Biden and his work combating sexual assault. In the same year, Reade tweeted other compliments of Biden, including: “My old boss speaks truth. Listen.”

Reade referred to Biden as “the blue version of Trump.” Reade also pushed a Sanders/Elizabeth Warren ticket, while complaining that the Democratic National Committee was trying to “shove” Biden “down Democrat voters throats.”

Love of Russia and Putin. During 2017 when Reade was praising Biden, she was condemning Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s efforts to hijack American democracy in the 2016 election. This changed in November 2018, when Reade trashed the United States as a country of “hypocrisy and imperialism” and “not a democracy at all but a corporate autocracy.”

Reade’s distaste for America closely tracked her new infatuation with Russia and Putin. She referred to Putin as a “genius” with an athletic prowess that “is intoxicating to American women.” Then there’s this gem: “President Putin has an alluring combination of strength with gentleness. His sensuous image projects his love for life, the embodiment of grace while facing adversity.”

In March 2019, Reade essentially dismissed the idea of Russian interference in the 2016 American presidential election as hype. She said she loved Russia and her Russian relatives — and "like most women across the world, I like President Putin … a lot, his shirt on or shirt off.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/3046962001/

and the right embraces her like their own , what's not to love shes against Biden and for Putin .. and Republicans only play Fair ....

(1) Biden's accuser is a democrat who chose to work for Biden.

(2) you are surprised that she picked a lawyer with experience in this field?

'and the right embraces her like their own"

You bet we do. She will make it more likely that Biden loses.

In your recap of things people have historically said, you conveniently left out what Biden said ,during the Kavanaugh hearings, about believing women who come forward. so why is it "unfair" that we ask Biden to subject himself to the same standard that he held Brett Kavanaugh to? Please explain?

keep attacking the victim....

She's doing a piece for the New Yorker with Farrow that will be out before the election. Everyone on the left knows this will hurt Biden and make them look like the hypocrites they are on the issue of "believe all women". It's not insurmountable of course, especially not against Trump.

Surprised Farrow is doing this, as he's also a liberal democrat who knows this will help Trump. Unless he hopes that it gets the power brokers to shove Biden aside and put Michelle Obama in there, who I don't think we'd have a prayer against.

1. Have an investigation, I have said it multiple times here, as have others. If it happened when he was a senator, have a senate investigation. I will read what Farrow comes up with, and make my own opinion later.

2. Is it attacking the victim to bring in her own tweets and quotes? If she is out there tweeting and commenting about Biden a year or two ago and now does a 180 on it, it bears questioning that she isn't a nutjob, albeit one we should at least hear out. You sound like Trump 'don't attack me with my own words....'