Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   How Fake News Is Used to Undermine Trump & Divide America (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=95442)

Sea Dangles 09-05-2019 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1173491)
what other countrys Israel ? please even a prison doesn't just expect a fence to be its only line of defense .. Trump supporters however think its That easy

Wayne,just write “walls that work” and you will be enlightened. People like you who have opinions that are based on ignorance make me chuckle. Do you think we need a wall around the White House?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 09-05-2019 05:13 PM

^^^I have no idea what he's talking about

Jim in CT 09-05-2019 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1173493)
how well are the ones all ready there working?? and you want billions more to spend on something that wont do what you say it will ...

you shut your door at night ... (omg the world has had doors for centuries.. didn't know they were to keep mexicans out?? ) what a simpleton view of the world I can see how Trump appeals to you and the base ...

we shut our doors to keep people out who we didn’t invite. not just mexicans. and it works.

yes doors have been around for centuries. so have walls. because they work.

who says walls are all we need? your side, not my aide, wants to abandon ICE. think for a moment man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Dad Fisherman 09-05-2019 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173506)
we shut our doors to keep people out who we didn’t invite. not just mexicans. and it works.

yes doors have been around for centuries. so have walls. because they work.

who says walls are all we need? your side, not my aide, wants to abandon ICE. think for a moment man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well some of the other things resulted in torn apart families, imprisoned children, and AOC crying on a chain link fence.....sooooooo
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 09-06-2019 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1173509)
Well some of the other things resulted in torn apart families, imprisoned children, and AOC crying on a chain link fence.....sooooooo
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

the cause of torn apart families, was adults who chose to take children with them on an illegal
journey. it’s also always worth noting that none of the snowflakes uttered a syllable
about separated families and caged children, when obama was doing it. selective outrage is fake outrage.

if we didn’t separate the kids, and threw everyone into one facility, and even one of those kids was hurt by an adult there, then the same people would be complaining that we threw the children to the wolves.

it’s very common for adults who are being processed through the criminal justice system, to temporarily lose custody of their children. happens all the time. it’s necessary.

and if i was born in mexico and couldn’t find work and couldn’t come here legally, i’d come here illegally if i had to. i absolutely get the motivation. but regardless of intentions, breaking the law has consequences, not all of them pleasant.

take every single penny we confiscate from mexican drug dealers and gangs, and use that money to improve those facilities. we have to detain these people
until their hearings, common sense and empirical data suggest that 90% of those released dont show up for their hearings, but they deserve compassion and
dignity.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso 09-06-2019 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1173494)
Wayne,just write “walls that work” and you will be enlightened. People like you who have opinions that are based on ignorance make me chuckle. Do you think we need a wall around the White House?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Talk about living in ignorance whats your worldly Job experience.. when it comes to physical security or security in general why would we need a wall around the white house ..?
please explain

PS the current fence is 6ft 6 in tall :kewl: I doubt the secret service Just depends on the fence seeing its just that easy

Sea Dangles 09-06-2019 07:48 AM

Call it what you want,it is a deterrent. Any guess why it is there? And did you have time to use google or do you prefer to run blind and spout off.... Are you naive enough to actually think that the wall will be the only obstacle to stop illegals from entering. Jeez
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso 09-06-2019 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173520)

empirical data suggest that 90% of those released dont show up for their hearings, but they deserve compassion and
dignity.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

why do you post false hoods and right talking Points


Recent data shows that asylum seekers continue to appear for immigration court proceedings at high rates. In fiscal year 2018, Department of Justice (DOJ) figures show that 89 percent of all asylum applicants attended their final court hearing to receive a decision on their application. When families and unaccompanied children have access to legal representation, the rate of compliance with immigration court obligations is nearly 98 percent.


https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/res...court-hearings

Pete F. 09-06-2019 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173520)
the cause of torn apart families, was adults who chose to take children with them on an illegal
journey. it’s also always worth noting that none of the snowflakes uttered a syllable
about separated families and caged children, when obama was doing it. selective outrage is fake outrage.

The Trump administration has chosen to prosecute immigrants under criminal statutes, rather than simply placing apprehended immigrants into civil immigration removal proceedings. Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, people can be prosecuted in the criminal justice system for illegal entry, illegal re-entry, or assisting someone in illegal entry. However, past administrations have chosen to simply deport most offenders from the United States rather than use the resources of the criminal justice system to prosecute them. Criminal action had rarely been used in cases of families or parents and children coming across the border.
The use of criminal charges against parents caught crossing the border triggers a legal situation that necessitates separating children, while the use of civil immigration detention and removal does not require this to occur. When adults are detained and prosecuted in the criminal justice system for immigration offenses, their children cannot, by law, be housed with them in criminal jails, so the family unit is separated. The children are placed with the Department of Health and Human Services in shelters until they can be released to a family member, guardian, or foster family in the United States.

Previous administrations used family detention facilities, allowing the whole family to stay together while awaiting their deportation case in immigration court, or alternatives to detention, which required families to be tracked but released from custody to await their court date. Some children may have been separated from the adults they entered with, in cases where the family relationship could not be established, child trafficking was suspected, or there were not sufficient family detention facilities available. Both the Obama and Trump administrations have tried to establish more capacity to detain families and children, rather than releasing them until their hearing date. However, the zero-tolerance policy is the first time that a policy resulting in separation is being applied across the board.


if we didn’t separate the kids, and threw everyone into one facility, and even one of those kids was hurt by an adult there, then the same people would be complaining that we threw the children to the wolves.

it’s very common for adults who are being processed through the criminal justice system, to temporarily lose custody of their children. happens all the time. it’s necessary.

The Trump administration has chosen to prosecute immigrants under criminal statutes, rather than simply placing apprehended immigrants into civil immigration removal proceedings.

and if i was born in mexico and couldn’t find work and couldn’t come here legally, i’d come here illegally if i had to. i absolutely get the motivation. but regardless of intentions, breaking the law has consequences, not all of them pleasant.

take every single penny we confiscate from mexican drug dealers and gangs, and use that money to improve those facilities. we have to detain these people
until their hearings, common sense and empirical data suggest that 90% of those released dont show up for their hearings, but they deserve compassion and
dignity.

Most Released Families Attend Immigration Court Hearings
The latest case-by-case records from the Immigration Courts indicate that as of the end of May 2019 one or more removal hearings had already been held for nearly 47,000 newly arriving families seeking refuge in this country. Of these, almost six out of every seven families released from custody had shown up for their initial court hearing. Usually multiple hearings are required before a case is decided. For those who are represented, more than 99 percent had appeared at every hearing held. Thus, court records directly contradict the widely quoted claim that "90 Percent of Recent Asylum Seekers Skipped Their Hearings."

Under our current system, there is no legal requirement that immigrants actually receive notice, let alone timely notice, of their hearing. Given many problems in court records on attendance and in the system for notifying families of the place and time of their hearings, these appearance rates were remarkably high.

These and other findings discussed below are based upon an analysis of court records conducted by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University. These court records, updated through May 2019, were obtained through a series of FOIA requests submitted by TRAC to the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR).

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Meanwhile the Criminal courts are bogged down prosecuting people accused of illegal immigration who previously would have been dealt with by civil proceedings and delaying prosecution and sentencing for rape and other dangerous criminal cases.

You are selectively outraged at immigrants by lies propagated by the Trump administration and state media.

wdmso 09-06-2019 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1173531)
Call it what you want,it is a deterrent. Any guess why it is there? And did you have time to use google or do you prefer to run blind and spout off.... Are you naive enough to actually think that the wall will be the only obstacle to stop illegals from entering. Jeez
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

clearly your Naive to think Trump and his supporters care about anything else except the wall ... and their foolish enough to think its already being built ...

google Trumps wall responses More than two years later, Trump’s wall remains unbuilt

Before Trump became president, 654 miles of the nearly 2,000-mile U.S. Mexico border had primary barriers. As of today, that hasn’t increased.

Under the Obama administration, total ICE deportations were above 385,000 each year in fiscal years 2009-2011, and hit a high of 409,849 in fiscal 2012. The numbers dropped to below 250,000 in fiscal years 2015 and 2016.

Under Trump, ICE deportations fell to 226,119 in fiscal 2017, then ticked up to over 250,000 in fiscal 2018 and hit a Trump administration high of 282,242 this fiscal year (as of June).

yea googles Great

Sea Dangles 09-06-2019 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1173535)
clearly your Naive to think Trump and his supporters care about anything else except the wall ... and their foolish enough to think its already being built ...

google Trumps wall responses More than two years later, Trump’s wall remains unbuilt

Before Trump became president, 654 miles of the nearly 2,000-mile U.S. Mexico border had primary barriers. As of today, that hasn’t increased.

Under the Obama administration, total ICE deportations were above 385,000 each year in fiscal years 2009-2011, and hit a high of 409,849 in fiscal 2012. The numbers dropped to below 250,000 in fiscal years 2015 and 2016.

Under Trump, ICE deportations fell to 226,119 in fiscal 2017, then ticked up to over 250,000 in fiscal 2018 and hit a Trump administration high of 282,242 this fiscal year (as of June).

yea googles Great

Ha,you are funny but seem infected withTDS. Try to picture the wall being built to discourage illegals from entering the country. Now just picture our President doing this to protect our borders and citizens from potential crime. Try not to invoke Trump into this conversation, just leave him out....

NOW does the wall work?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 09-06-2019 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1173465)
The Stable Genius has to have spikes on top as recommended by his gut, not a flat piece of steel as recommended by the experts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36kXjJZ0mMU

Thanks for the video that visually shows that the wall is a deterrent. Some will be able to scale it, a lot, including little children, won't. One piece of the puzzle on how to deter many illegal border crossings.

The Dad Fisherman 09-06-2019 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173520)
the cause of torn apart families, was adults who chose to take children with them on an illegal
journey. it’s also always worth noting that none of the snowflakes uttered a syllable
about separated families and caged children, when obama was doing it. selective outrage is fake outrage.

if we didn’t separate the kids, and threw everyone into one facility, and even one of those kids was hurt by an adult there, then the same people would be complaining that we threw the children to the wolves.

it’s very common for adults who are being processed through the criminal justice system, to temporarily lose custody of their children. happens all the time. it’s necessary.

and if i was born in mexico and couldn’t find work and couldn’t come here legally, i’d come here illegally if i had to. i absolutely get the motivation. but regardless of intentions, breaking the law has consequences, not all of them pleasant.

take every single penny we confiscate from mexican drug dealers and gangs, and use that money to improve those facilities. we have to detain these people
until their hearings, common sense and empirical data suggest that 90% of those released dont show up for their hearings, but they deserve compassion and
dignity.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I was being sarcastic:hee:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 09-06-2019 08:49 AM

Just another little tidbit in the ongoing smorgasborg of fake news:

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/201...02d7fd625046d4

Jim in CT 09-06-2019 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1173532)
why do you post false hoods and right talking Points


Recent data shows that asylum seekers continue to appear for immigration court proceedings at high rates. In fiscal year 2018, Department of Justice (DOJ) figures show that 89 percent of all asylum applicants attended their final court hearing to receive a decision on their application. When families and unaccompanied children have access to legal representation, the rate of compliance with immigration court obligations is nearly 98 percent.


https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/res...court-hearings

Where were the complaints when Obama used these same exact facilities, and separated families in the same way? Answer that, please...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...ill-go-missing

Jim in CT 09-06-2019 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1173540)
I was being sarcastic:hee:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I thought you were, I wasn't 100% certain though...

scottw 09-06-2019 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173543)

Where were the complaints when Obama used these same exact facilities, and separated families in the same way? Answer that, please...

[

remember when Obama's family members were all here illegally and collecting benefits....that was great :uhuh:

Jim in CT 09-06-2019 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1173536)
Ha,you are funny but seem infected withTDS. Try to picture the wall being built to discourage illegals from entering the country. Now just picture our President doing this to protect our borders and citizens from potential crime. Try not to invoke Trump into this conversation, just leave him out....

NOW does the wall work?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

NOW it's brilliant.

Sea Dangles 09-06-2019 11:18 AM

12,000 years later the snowflakes think they don’t work.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F. 09-06-2019 11:22 AM

You do have a problem with a President demanding the federal government go ahead and seize private land and then promising to pardon those who seized the land. Don’t you?

spence 09-06-2019 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173543)
Where were the complaints when Obama used these same exact facilities, and separated families in the same way? Answer that, please...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...ill-go-missing

Jim, he didn't ... seriously do some homework.

Pete F. 09-06-2019 11:30 AM

Must be a snowflake.

Congressman Will Hurd of Texas is an increasingly lonely voice in the “build the wall” Republican Party of Donald Trump. A 41-year-old former undercover CIA officer, Hurd represents one of the largest congressional districts in America, Texas’ 23rd, a vast expanse of land roughly the size of Georgia that stretches from San Antonio to El Paso.

Hurd’s district includes 820 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border, more than any other member of the House of Representatives. But if you’re expecting Hurd, who was narrowly re-elected to a third term last year, to support President Trump’s “big, beautiful wall” and stand with the decision to partially shut down the federal government over the fight, you’ve got it all wrong. Trump’s border crisis is a “myth,” Hurd tells Rolling Stone, and a wall made of cement or steel slats is a “third-century solution to a 21st-century problem.”


“What I always say is building a wall from sea to shining sea is the most expensive and least effective way to do border security,” Hurd says.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...l-myth-781204/

Jim in CT 09-06-2019 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1173555)
Jim, he didn't ... seriously do some homework.

fact-check.org says between 2010 and 2016, about 500,000 illegals were referred for prosecution.! they were allowed to bring their kids?

spence, the most widely circulated photo the left used, to show what a monster trump is on this issue, turned out to have been taken during the obama administration.

nothing but hypocrisy and fake, politically motivated outrage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F. 09-06-2019 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173559)
fact-check.org says between 2010 and 2016, about 500,000 illegals were referred for prosecution.! they were allowed to bring their kids?

spence, the most widely circulated photo the left used, to show what a monster trump is on this issue, turned out to have been taken during the obama administration.

nothing but hypocrisy and fake, politically motivated outrage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nothing but lies and fake, politically motivated outrage from you.

Did you actually look on fact-check.org?

If you did you would have found the following and by looking further you could eliminate most of the half-truths you repeat.

Falsehoods About Family Separations Linger Online
By Angelo Fichera

Posted on August 27, 2019

Quick Take
A viral social media post falsely claims that former President Barack Obama “separated” many more children at the border than President Donald Trump.

Full Story
The Trump administration announced a new rule on Aug. 21 that would allow the U.S. government to detain immigrant families that illegally cross the border for longer periods of time than currently permitted. It’s the latest attempt by the administration to deter illegal immigration.

That rule would keep families detained together, instead of being released pending a court date. And it avoids the issue of children being separated from their parents, which occurred in large numbers last year as a result a Trump administration policy that referred “100 percent of illegal Southwest Border crossings to the Department of Justice for prosecution.”

Online, though, misinformation about such separations lingers: One deceptive social media post, shared more than 120,000 times on Facebook, erroneously claims that former President Barack Obama separated many more children than President Donald Trump did.

“1900 children separated from parents at border,” the text reads next to a photo of Trump. “Result – Media Frenzy.”

Next to a photo of Obama, it reads: “89,000 children separated from parents at border. Result – Silence.”

As we’ve written before, there were some separations under the Obama administration, but no blanket policy to prosecute parents and, therefore, separate them from their children.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ inspector general released a report in January noting that, “historically” such family “separations were rare and occurred because of circumstances such as the parent’s medical emergency or a determination that the parent was a threat to the child’s safety.”

But, the report notes, that changed as a result of the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy last spring. The Department of Homeland Security “separated large numbers of alien families, with adults being held in Federal detention while their children were transferred to the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),” according to the report.

That report also said the department had “thus far identified 2,737 children in its care at that time who were separated from their parents. However, thousands of children may have been separated during an influx that began in 2017 … and HHS has faced challenges in identifying separated children.” The government is under a court order to identify other children who had been separated, but either way, we know the total far surpasses the 1,900 figure used in the meme.

As for the number of children who were separated under Obama, there have been no official figures released — but, as we said, the HHS inspector general noted that such separations were rare.

The “89,000” figure used in the meme is similar to previous claims that “90,000” children were separated under Obama — a number the Associated Press last year pointed out may have been incorrectly pulled from a 2016 Senate report. The report said that, since the beginning of fiscal year 2014, the Obama administration had placed “almost 90,000” unaccompanied children “with sponsors in the United States.”

At the time, the U.S. was experiencing an influx of unaccompanied children arriving at the border from Central America. The “90,000” figure largely represented children who had arrived at the border without a parent or guardian (though, as we said earlier, there may have been limited cases in which children were separated for the child’s safety).

That process for releasing unaccompanied children to sponsors continues. For reference, HHS data show that 133,502 unaccompanied children were released to sponsors during the 36 months between October 2013 and September 2016. The figure for the 33 months from October 2016 to June 2019 (the most recent data available) was 132,340.

Amid backlash, Trump ended the widespread practice of family separations through an executive order in June 2018. Court filings show that some separations have continued to occur.

The administration’s new rule to detain families until their cases are complete would replace the 1997 Flores settlement agreement, which has limited the circumstances and duration for which children can be detained to about 20 days. The government would be able to use certain Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities, which are not licensed by the states, to house families together.

Attorneys in the Flores case have already signaled they will challenge the rule; a federal judge in California is expected to determine whether it lives up to the settlement agreement.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/08/fa...linger-online/

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/05/tr...-on-democrats/

If you actually go to factcheck.org and put separation into the search engine you can find more similar to the above.

But that wouldn't fit your agenda of Orangeman good (but I don't really like him and that leaves me an opening if it doesn't work out) and anyone who opposes Trump and the sycophants in his house of misfit toys is a snowflake, cuck, socialist, liberal, etc.

Sea Dangles 09-06-2019 12:54 PM

If it makes America stronger and safer the #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&s go haywire.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers 09-06-2019 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1173482)
why i they cannot violalate the constitution when it pleases them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You mean like Trump who believes he owns the power of the purse and not congress as intended by the constitution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 09-06-2019 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1173493)
how well are the ones all ready there working?? and you want billions more to spend on something that wont do what you say it will ...

you shut your door at night ... (omg the world has had doors for centuries.. didn't know they were to keep mexicans out?? ) what a simpleton view of the world I can see how Trump appeals to you and the base ...

i’d wager the walls are working where they exist. i’ll wager most illegal immigration takes place where there are no walls.

P.S. a-der-der.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 09-07-2019 05:03 AM

"This (AP) story has been corrected to reflect that Alabama WAS included in charts mentioning wind speed probabilities from August 28 to August 31. The story previously said it was not."

AP Agency reverses course on Trump’s Alabama hurricane claim


The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a statement that information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to the president had demonstrated that “tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.” The advisories were dated from last Wednesday, Aug. 28, through Monday, the statement read.

Friday’s NOAA statement, points to graphics issued by the National Hurricane Center to support Trump’s claims. The maps show percentage possibility of tropical storm force winds in the United States. Parts of Alabama were covered, usually with 5% to 10% chances, between Aug. 27 and Sept. 3. Maps on Aug. 30 grew to cover far more of Alabama.

Pete F. 09-07-2019 05:54 AM

Not a single word in the NOAA statement backs up Trump’s claim on Sunday that Alabama “will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated.”

Only a malignant narcissist would be unable to admit they too cannot predict the weather and be obsessed with it for close to a week, so far, keeping the story alive.

Yesterday the Stable Genius tweeted this, perhaps he was worried about the late night comics having to find new material.

The Fake News Media was fixated on the fact that I properly said, at the beginnings of Hurricane Dorian, that in addition to Florida & other states, Alabama may also be grazed or hit. They went Crazy, hoping against hope that I made a mistake (which I didn’t). Check out maps.....
....This nonsense has never happened to another President. Four days of corrupt reporting, still without an apology. But there are many things that the Fake News Media has not apologized to me for, like the Witch Hunt, or SpyGate! The LameStream Media and their Democrat.....
....partner should start playing it straight. It would be so much better for our Country!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 09-07-2019 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1173599)
Not a single word in the NOAA statement backs up Trump’s claim on Sunday that Alabama “will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated.”

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he's not a meteorologist and they get it wrong all the time...triggered snowflakes a need to settle down :kewl:

Pete F. 09-07-2019 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1173600)
he's not a meteorologist and they get it wrong all the time...triggered snowflakes a need to settle down :kewl:

As I said:
Only a malignant narcissist would be unable to admit they too cannot predict the weather and be obsessed with it for close to a week, so far, keeping the story alive.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 09-07-2019 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1173580)
You mean like Trump who believes he owns the power of the purse and not congress as intended by the constitution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Congress funded the military. The President is commander in chief of the military, and directs how the military and how its resources will be deployed in defense of the nation. Congress is comprised of the House and the Senate. The Senate plus the President can override the House. Which Constitution are you talking about?

scottw 09-07-2019 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1173603)
As I said:
Only a malignant narcissist would be unable to admit they too cannot predict the weather and be obsessed with it for close to a week, so far, keeping the story alive.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he likes to keep you busy cutting and pasting

scottw 09-07-2019 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1173609)
Congress funded the military.

I can't believe the military is using premium gasoline??? that is disgraceful

Pete F. 09-07-2019 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1173610)
he likes to keep you busy cutting and pasting

He’s losing it.

“President Donald Trump's aides and confidants are growing more and more worried about his mental state after days of erratic behavior, wild outbursts, and bizarre fixations.”

As of Friday evening, Trump had posted 15 tweets and five maps about Alabama and the storm to try to prove his original tweet was correct, despite the fact that he'd been publicly rebuked by the National Weather Service.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers 09-07-2019 07:40 AM

Hey if Trump looses in 2020, he can always get a job as a weatherman, or I really think he would be the super sharpie sales rep for the eastern US. Nobody draws a better black fake wind field circle than Trump.

scottw 09-07-2019 07:43 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1173616)
Hey if Trump looses in 2020, he can always get a job as a weatherman, or I really think he would be the super sharpie sales rep for the eastern US. Nobody draws a better black fake wind field circle than Trump.

I thought it was great that the triggered dummies at CNN, while attacking trump managed to mistake Alabama for Mississippi...you'd think that a high-minded, more highly educated American news organizations would know the difference

scottw 09-07-2019 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1173614)

He’s losing it.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

keep banging your head on that padded wall :wave:

detbuch 09-07-2019 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1173603)
As I said:
Only a malignant narcissist would be unable to admit they too cannot predict the weather and be obsessed with it for close to a week, so far, keeping the story alive.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This seems like a fuss over nothing. So I haven't paid it any attention. Did Trump predict the weather? Or was he interpreting or regurgitating what he thought the weather folks said? Did Trump actually say that he can predict the weather better than or without the forecast of weather experts?

It seems that a great portion of our population is infected by a malignant anti-Trumpism which sadistically reacts against just about everything Trump does or says.

Pete F. 09-07-2019 07:51 AM

What’s next? Will the National Air and Space Museum construct exhibits on the significance of military aviation during the Revolutionary War?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com