but but Obama.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"The investigation was a sham "

I see. First there was no investigation, now you say there was one, but it was a sham.

One the people that Ford listed as a corroborating witness, said not only did she have zero recollection of the attack, but that Ford's lawyers pressured her to lie. No red flags there!

"It's the height of hypocrisy to expect the Democrats to do something that the Republicans refuse to do"

How about asking the democrats to do the same exact thing they did during the Kavanaugh spectacle - believe the woman? WHy is that so outlandish?

Paul, we now know for a certainty, that democrats do not "believe all women"...only women who accuse Republicans.

What the GOP is asking for, is for the democrats to be consistent. But we can't have that, can we?

You're humiliating yourself here like the rest of them.

All of the liberals believed Kavanaugh's accuser, based solely on the accusation. None of those people, believe this accuser. Despite the fact that this accuser has a ton more corroborating evidence, and unlike Kavanaughs accuser (who admitted she hated the thought of a conservative being on the bench), Reade is a democrat who worked for Biden, and therefore cannot be accused of being driven by partisanship.

Despite all that, the "believe all women" bullsh*t went the way of the dodo pretty quick.

Biden himself, said we have a duty to believe the accuser. Why isn't he saying that now? Why does he deserve more protection than Brett Kavanaugh? Can you at east attempt to answer that?

You guys are HYSTERICAL.

What does Obama have to do with this, exactly?

Did you see that Barack went golfing on an empty country club golf course, while Michelle recorded a message sent to all phones in DC, telling citizens to stay home unless it was urgent?

Think for a second, of the sheer and utter contempt you'd have to have for the little people, to tell them to stay inside while your husband is hitting the links! That's liberalism, though...it's never about what "they:" should do, always about what "we" should do. "They" are entitled to live better than us...what a swell couple they must be.

If the republic survived those two czars, we can survive this clown just fine.

How many times have we heard but but Obama? Why do we have to just talk about Biden when there's a direct contradiction by what the Republicans have done or should I say what the Republicans have not done. Think about the utter contempt shown by the Republican leaders for anyone who is not a trumplican and not deranged by their love of Trump - day in and day out when Trump gets up there and lies and insult people and they keep their mouth shut. Did they get all tingly when he stood up on the stage and made fun of retards and spazzes? That's what conservativism has turned into these days. If it wasn't so sad it would be hysterical.

And tell me what Obama's playing golf has anything to do with this thread? You've humiliated yourself again here
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

As I said it's HYSTERICAL to watch you demand something out of the Democrats that you don't expect out of the Republicans. Look up the word hypocrisy why don't you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

hypocrisy....what...you couldn't figure that out?

So we should just point out hypocrisy from politicians whenever anyone feels like it.

Did you see Trump got tested for the virus and I can't. That has nothing to do with this thread but I thought I would just throw it out there.

"How many times have we heard but but Obama? "

From me? A few at least, to point out glaring double standards. Would a speck of consistency be too much to ask?

"there's a direct contradiction by what the Republicans have done or should I say what the Republicans have not done"

I didn't buy the accusation against Kavanaugh, I'm not buying the one against Biden. Where is the double standard there?

"Think about the utter contempt shown by the Republican leaders for anyone who is not a trumplican'

I see Republican leaders criticizing Trump regularly for his style. So your premise there is seriously flawed. If you are upset that Republicans prefer other Republicans to democrats, I'm very sorry fo rthat.

"Did they get all tingly when he stood up on the stage and made fun of retards and spazzes? "

You ruse of retard is very offensive. When did he make fun of "retards"? And if that's offensive to you, what was your position when Obama made fun of them, when after bowling gutter ball after gutter ball, he joked that he looked like a Special Olympics athlete. That was OK, right? Lemme guess, it was different when Obama did it..

Demanding? When did I demand anything? I'm not demanding squat. I'm asking for an explanation of the flip-flop, and thoroughly enjoying watching you guys bend over like contortionists because you can't bring yourself to say, "yes, they are being hypocrites on this". That's OBVIOUSLY the case, but you can't bring yourself to say it.

Anyway, when did I make demands? Are you feeling OK? You seem to be hearing voices...

He's more important than a close-minded drone who calls disabled people retards. I'd say you should get tested, based on your posts on this thread, you seem to be suffering from something. See if they can test your IQ while they test for the virus.

You're getting angrier and angrier Jim. Take a break you angry man
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Your posts here consisted of one laughably idiotic dodge after another on the issue of liberal hypocrisy. Frustrated from getting annihilated on that issue, you let fly with the word "retard", which is as disgusting to anyone with any empathy, as the n-word.

Backed further into a corner from which you can't begin to escape, you say I'm angry. I'll admit I don't like the word retard. But this has revealed a lot more about you than it ever will me.

And I asked when Trump made fun of the people you call retards. You dodged, and called me angry.

I'll assume (could be wrong) you're referring to the liberal claim that he made fun of a disabled reporter, which no one would think is beyond him. However, there is actual video evidence of him using those same stupid physical gestures to make fun of someone else who wasn't disabled, so there's every reason to believe he just makes those gestures to demean anyone who doesn't kiss his ring. but your side ran with the "he made fun of the disabled" claim, even though Obama very explicitly made fun of disabled people and no one cared.

Like I said you're an angry man quick with the insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Once again Mr False Equivalence shows his mastery of his craft, and in doing so demonstrates that he doesn't know the difference between self-deprecation and ridicule of others.
Malignant narcissists are not capable of self-deprecating humor, it is too damaging to their fragile self-image.

Exactly it was a self-deprecating comment made on The Tonight Show and apologized for later.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The man who called disabled people "retards" for no conceivable reason, is crying like a little girl because I called him out for doing so. Go tattle to the moderators as usual.

Oh, he apologized! That erases the whole thing.

Self deprecating...so because he was making fun of HIMSELF by saying he was so bad at something that he looked like a Special Olympics athlete (when in fact, Special Olympics bowlers are much better than he is, it was as ignorant a thing to say as it was insulting).

Obama doesn't know any "retards", because where he comes from, home of the sophisticated swells, they abort those kinds of babies. That's what sophisticated, superior, more evolved intellectuals do.

The only person in the history of SB.com to stoop to that level. Who is surprised?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If you can't figure out I was making fun of Trump you're dumber than I thought you were. It shows derangement of trumplicans that they had no problem electing the guy who stood up there and made fun of spazzes and retards. Why would you think I'm crying like a little girl?

I didn't tattle I asked why when Bruce posts the rules of the site are they not enforced.

As I said you're just an angry man who can't control himself whenever you don't like a post you just resort to insults.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you mean posted something to mock the Republicans who supported Trump and how they had no problem with him up there making fun of spazzes and retards
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What the hell is wrong with you? First of all, you weren't making fun of Trump, you were criticizing him. Second, you were criticizing him for something I don't think he ever did. Third, by what logic is a disgusting term acceptable, as long as you are using it to poke fun at Trump?

That just makes all kinds of sense.

You tattled like a little girl. Multiple times.

more droning on from a deranged trumplican. You seem to have more problems with my using the term spazz and retard then with Trump on stage making fun of people with disabilities. More hypocrisy out of you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No I didn't you compulsive liar. I just pointed the violations and asked why they were acceptable. I didn't go behind anyone's back like a tattle-tale does. See you're a compulsive liar you can't help yourself.

You're an angry man face it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you didn't tattle, but you admit to pointing out the violations of others to the moderators of the site and asked why the moderators didn't use their authority.

As opposed to tattling. Because what you freely admitted to, is very different from tattling.

Call me anything you want, I don't make fun of people with Downs Syndrome. That distinction is all yours, congratulations, kudos to you.

And for the tenth and last time, you didn't, you couldn't, offer a syllable about the topic of this thread, other than to blame the GOP for the fact that your side turned the rudder over 180 degrees the nanosecond an accusation was made against one of yours.

As usual, liberalism isn't about what 'they' should do, it's about what 'we' should do. 'We' should believe all women. 'They' can pick and choose when to believe the accuser, based solely on the political affiliation of the accused. Because that makes sense.

As I said, and as rational people already know, there is video evidence to suggest that Trump's mocking the reporter (who didn't have any mental limitations, so I can't imagine why you brought 'retard' into it, I suppose you just have some latent hostility towards them) had nothing whatsoever to do with the reporter's challenges. And since I said that Trump's mocking the guy was juvenile and stupid, no one here can fathom why you are calling me a Trumplican. But I only criticize him for stuff he actually says and does, I don't have a compulsion to fabricate things to accuse him of. Which in your mind, makes me a Trumplican.

You say so!

Kevin! Kevin! A conservative said something that hurt my feelings! Isn't that against the rules, at least when conservatives do it? Waaah! Waaah! Waaah!

And even if they did insult you, you just said that insulting words aren't really insulting if you are using them to make fun of someone. That's what you said? So you had no more reason to get upset by it, than I did by your use of 'retard'. Right? Right???

Maybe you're menstruating, that would explain a lot.

Sounds familiar

"You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever."

Which level are you referring to? Insulting people with Downs, or tattling to the moderators? Because as far as I can see, he has the distinction of being the only one to stoop to both of those levels.

Again, that's what the D stands for, in TDS. I think they see the likelihood of re-election (which I still don't think is as likely as I wish it were) and it broke their brains.

So you have more problems with me using what Trump did than with Trump and what he actually did and you voted for Trump on top of it? You hypocrite.

Menstruating good one. Youre a classy guy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I still don't understand why some claim it is Trump Derangement Syndrome when the most apparent affliction is Trump Defense Syndrome.
And rational people think it is far less defensible.

(1) for the third time, please show me where Trump ever made fun of people with Downs Syndrome.

(2) even if he did do it, does that mean it's OK for you to do it? Maybe we can raise the bar?

(3) I did vote for Trump, as you voted for Obama, after Obama very explicitly made fun of people with Down's. Here's the difference between you and me. I can say (because it's true) that I voted for Trump, even though he does things that I think are disgusting. You can't bring yourself to say that about Obama. Even in this case about making fun of people with Downs (assuming Trump did it, which you refuse to provide evidence of), you justify Obama's making fun of them. You can't just say it was a horrible thing to say. You literally are incapable of it. it's bad when anyone makes fun of those people. It's bad when Obama did it, and if Trump did it (big if), it's just as bad. You give Obama a pass, because you like him.

'Youre a classy guy"

I never said I was. I don't consider myself especially classy. But I calls 'em like I sees 'em, and you are presenting yourself lately as a bratty little girl who will say absolutely anything to avoid any criticism of anyone with a D after their name. I have never, ever heard anyone suggest that using deeply offensive words is acceptable and non-offensive, as long as you are using them to make fun of Trump. Or in Obama's case, making fun of himself. Where did you come up with that stupidity? Where is the logic? You're saying that if I insult myself using the n* word, no one should be offended by that? Or do only liberals get such blanket immunity?

And i'm classy enough to never, ever use that word the way you did.

Ya dun gone and victimized him agin, how deer ya?
Doncha no he's already a deplorable and now you gone and toll him dis.

yeah let's raise the bar here that's a good one
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Here is the tough question
Would you trust Donald J Trump with the lives of your loved ones?

Not what I meant. I can make it crystal clear if you can’t catch the hint.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Somebody does not know what tattling means.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Only for 8 years.👍🏿
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's a broad question. In a military sense, I'd have no problem with one of my kids serving under him. If my house was on fire, would I expect him to rush in and save my kids? Hell no.

Yup.

I didn't tattle. I merely informed the authorities here, of the behavior of my peers when I thought said behavior was unacceptable, instead of dealing with it on my own. But I didn't tattle!