Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   Ukraine (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=85255)

spence 03-03-2014 10:59 AM

Ukraine
 
This is pretty heavy...

I like this perspective from the WP.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...39c_story.html

-spence

Nebe 03-03-2014 11:17 AM

Putin was made to look like a fool at Sochi. This is his attempt at redemption.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sea Dangles 03-03-2014 12:06 PM

There are enough Russian nationalists in Ukraine to warrant protective measures. We are always telling other nations what to do but I have a feeling if the shoe were on the other foot we may be whistling a different tune. Do you honestly feel if Block Island chose to become independent we would wish them good luck?

spence 03-03-2014 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1033862)
There are enough Russian nationalists in Ukraine to warrant protective measures. We are always telling other nations what to do but I have a feeling if the shoe were on the other foot we may be whistling a different tune. Do you honestly feel if Block Island chose to become independent we would wish them good luck?

That begs the question was/is there really a threat to the Russian speaking Ukrainians? Most of those dead so far were shot by the old government's police.

Primarily this appears to be about Putin trying to stop the power shift towards the EU. His bribe to the former president didn't appear to work as planned...

-spence

Sea Dangles 03-03-2014 01:06 PM

Security is paramount and breeds some odd partnerships.We exploit countries every day to protect US interests.Does that make it wrong?

spence 03-03-2014 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1033869)
Security is paramount and breeds some odd partnerships.We exploit countries every day to protect US interests.Does that make it wrong?

Did I say it was wrong?

-spence

justplugit 03-03-2014 02:52 PM

" Obama would be wise to seek Russia to defer Russian aggression without
specifying too clearly what the US ladder of escalation might be." Ignatius, WP.

Putin is in the catbird seat carrying the "Big Stick" and will do what he wants.
We have become like Casper the Ghost carrying a tooth pick and planning to cut our military in half. True peace comes from strength ,not weakness, without it there is nothing to negotiate with.

Sea Dangles 03-03-2014 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1033888)
Did I say it was wrong?

-spence

I thought it was implied,but as is usually the case with you jeff,something was lost in translation.I will bow out now before I am baited into discourse which relies heavily on semantics, and facts and opinions become blurred by your imagination.

But I still look forward to making a fishing trip happen this year. Please bring Nebe to translate, I often don't understand what you are trying to convey.

Nebe 03-03-2014 03:43 PM

:rotfl:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 03-03-2014 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1033895)
I thought it was implied,but as is usually the case with you jeff,something was lost in translation.I will bow out now before I am baited into discourse which relies heavily on semantics, and facts and opinions become blurred by your imagination.

But I still look forward to making a fishing trip happen this year. Please bring Nebe to translate, I often don't understand what you are trying to convey.

Playing devil's advocate is hard work. I hope you're not tired out.

-spence

spence 03-03-2014 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justplugit (Post 1033891)
Putin is in the catbird seat carrying the "Big Stick" and will do what he wants.
We have become like Casper the Ghost carrying a tooth pick and planning to cut our military in half. True peace comes from strength ,not weakness, without it there is nothing to negotiate with.

Nonsense. The Russian economy is nothing without access to western banking, trade and his ability to sell natural gas to the EU at a premium.

Aside from China it looks like there's already strong alignment between the US and EU.

It's amazing how fast the Right jumped on the opportunity to divide Americans. I'll give the GOP this, they haven't proposed any meaningful policy in a decade, but their one liners are priceless.

-spence

buckman 03-03-2014 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1033929)

It's amazing how fast the Right jumped on the opportunity to divide Americans. I'll give the GOP this, they haven't proposed any meaningful policy in a decade, but their one liners are priceless.

-spence

Never mind mirrors , I don't think you have any windows.

List the "meaningful " Democrat policies
By that I mean good ones
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 03-03-2014 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1033934)
Never mind mirrors , I don't think you have any windows.

List the "meaningful " Democrat policies
By that I mean good ones
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Deflection.

-spence

buckman 03-03-2014 06:00 PM

I hope this Ukraine thing doesn't continue in the obvious direction it's heading .Your dear leader might have to sit in on a security council meeting or two .
I believe Ukraine is loaded with natural gas . This has nothing to do with Russian nationals . That's an excuse to invade . We've seen it before
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

justplugit 03-03-2014 06:04 PM

---
[QUOTE=spence;1033929]Nonsense. The Russian economy is nothing without access to western banking, trade and his ability to sell natural gas to the EU at a premium.
__________________________________________________ _____________

EU will have to want to take the big blows here.

__________________________________________________ ______________
Quote=spence

It's amazing how fast the Right jumped on the opportunity to divide Americans. I'll give the GOP this, they haven't proposed any meaningful policy in a decade, but their one liners are priceless.
__________________________________________________ _____________
Spence get real, this current administration has done more to divide our country then anytime I can ever remember in my life time.
Palin and Romney both brought up the possibility of a possible geo political Ukraine issue and were put down by the great forward leftist thinkers. Lets think about the pressing global warming. :)

spence 03-03-2014 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1033937)
I hope this Ukraine thing doesn't continue in the obvious direction it's heading .Your dear leader might have to sit in on a security council meeting or two .

Ohhhh, I see you fell prey to more Drudge nonsense. Soon Jim will chime in with voting present in IL.

Quote:

I believe Ukraine is loaded with natural gas . This has nothing to do with Russian nationals . That's an excuse to invade . We've seen it before
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
And in violation of their own treaty with the Ukraine. Note they were pending joining the EU which is a stepping stone to joining NATO. Russia is close to having a NATO wall between Europe.

-spence

buckman 03-03-2014 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1033939)
Ohhhh, I see you fell prey to more Drudge nonsense. Soon Jim will chime in with voting present in IL.


And in violation of their own treaty with the Ukraine. Note they were pending joining the EU which is a stepping stone to joining NATO. Russia is close to having a NATO wall between Europe.

-spence

Hope you're right . I'm a little less trusting of socialist dictator wannabes
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

JohnR 03-03-2014 10:34 PM

Well thankfully we have John Kerry to guide a path through the shoals here. If that doesn't work, we have Joe Biden in reserve on the bench ready to go. /Sarcasm

This is a fustercluck no matter how it works. Putin was trying to keep a lid on this until Sochi was done. This hit the hot water just after but had been brewing for a while.

Ukraine has 4 things important to Russia:

  • Wheat - they are the Slavic breadbasket
  • Warm water ports - year round warm water ports to sell their oil & LNG plus the Black Sea Fleet headquarters.
  • Buffer between the Russians and everyone else.
  • Russians. A lot of Russians that descended from the Russians that defended Ukraine from the Germans in WWII. Oh, and those that were put there to replace the many evicted Tartars
Ukraine means a LOT. Of all the former republics under the Soviet umbrella the one that probably means the most is Ukraine.

Militarily there are no great options. The Navy cannot get in there (the Turks might not even let us through as they try to figure out are they Muslim or EU/NATO). The Air Force would be playing in Russia's back yard. The Army is nowhere close and what is 1000 miles away is at the end of a Russian railroad for logistical supply.

NATO/EU is a near useless shell of a force that could stop the Russians heading west but not much else - the fruits of a peace dividend and near 2 decades of having the US do their heavy lifting. We can't afford it anymore. They are not going to go into Ukraine and have the Russians turn off their heat (they buy Russia's LNG).

If I were the Baltics, Poles, and Czech/Slovs, I'd be real nervous.

This will at best be settled diplomatically / economically. At worst, if our vaunted elected leaders fail, any other country with a treaty / memorandum is going to be real concerned that we will not meet our obligations. Taiwan / Japan / Philippines / Poland / Balitcs / Israel are all watching this very intently.

Crimea is gone, South Oesstia all over again. With luck, Crimea is the only thing lost. They could use the same tactics and get the entire coast from Odessa to the Crimea under their wing and have a small, landlocked Ukraine remaining.

This major leadership deficit in our country is gonna hurt us real soon. From both parties.

The Titanic Deck Ass Containment Apparatus Rearrangement Team is in full swing.

spence 03-04-2014 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1033991)
Well thankfully we have John Kerry to guide a path through the shoals here. If that doesn't work, we have Joe Biden in reserve on the bench ready to go. /Sarcasm

Remember after 9/11 people thought we had the foreign policy dream team...look how that played out.

The important negotiations here will be with the EU.

-spence

detbuch 03-04-2014 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1034019)
Remember after 9/11 people thought we had the foreign policy dream team...look how that played out.

The important negotiations here will be with the EU.

-spence

I might actually agree with Spence on this. Not about the 9/11 bit and "how that played out." The playing out involved back and forth opposition and agreement with those who were not on the "dream team." And an ultimate dismantling of the dream teams policies by those who followed. But that's, as Spence likes to say, old news. And if he were true to the implication that old news is no longer relevant, one wonders why he likes to so often bring up old news. I guess if that tactic suits his argument of the present moment (but subject to change the next day or hour in another thread) it's acceptable--after all, it's CHANGE. And change is the highest aspiration of the progressive mind. Apparently, the more often, the better.

But I digress. I may actually agree with the important negotiations being with the EU. If Spence means by that negotiations amongst Russia, the EU, and Ukraine. In fact, those are the ONLY relevant negotiations. And, power to truth, if the EU is not militarily strong enough or morally resolute enough to stand up to the same of Putin's Russia, the "negotiations" may be one sided in results.

The U.S. has too long been the military backbone for Western Europe--and NATO. That is not only outside our sphere of influence, but we are, again, in the process of weakening our own military might. Europe, if it wants to stand on whatever it considers its principles, needs to be willing to fight for them.

As far as "economic" sanctions--those cut both ways. Besides, Russia has always managed to be outside of Western Europe's economic sphere. And it is forming other alliances rapidly, now, in response to threats against its hegemony in what it considers its sphere of influence.

JohnR 03-04-2014 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1034019)
Remember after 9/11 people thought we had the foreign policy dream team...look how that played out.

The important negotiations here will be with the EU.

-spence

Today, I would trade that dream team for this dream team. The 2001-2002 team might have been C players at the time but the current crop is a solid -D at best. The influence the current administration can bring to the table is marginal at best but they are doing a wonderful job of accelerating our influence.


Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1034026)
But I digress. I may actually agree with the important negotiations being with the EU. If Spence means by that negotiations amongst Russia, the EU, and Ukraine. In fact, those are the ONLY relevant negotiations. And, power to truth, if the EU is not militarily strong enough or morally resolute enough to stand up to the same of Putin's Russia, the "negotiations" may be one sided in results.

The U.S. has too long been the military backbone for Western Europe--and NATO. That is not only outside our sphere of influence, but we are, again, in the process of weakening our own military might. Europe, if it wants to stand on whatever it considers its principles, needs to be willing to fight for them.

As far as "economic" sanctions--those cut both ways. Besides, Russia has always managed to be outside of Western Europe's economic sphere. And it is forming other alliances rapidly, now, in response to threats against its hegemony in what it considers its sphere of influence.

:claps:

Nebe 03-04-2014 11:41 AM

The irony here is that the us stock market is soaring today. That's the biggest "F-U" to Putin we can send. No one takes him seriously.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Piscator 03-04-2014 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebe (Post 1034039)
No one takes him seriously.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Lets call a spade a spade...not many take Obama and his "team" seriously either.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 03-04-2014 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 1034041)
Lets call a spade a spade...not many take Obama and his "team" seriously either.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

OK . . . I guess you chose the "spade" locution on purpose. But be careful. The administrations NSA spies are searching communications for key words and phrases that indicate extremist tendencies.

Piscator 03-04-2014 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1034048)
OK . . . I guess you chose the "spade" locution on purpose. But be careful. The administrations NSA spies are searching communications for key words and phrases that indicate extremist tendencies.

:huh:

What are you talking about?

JohnR 03-04-2014 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 1034055)
:huh:

What are you talking about?

That there is another definition of "spade" (infrequently used in a derogatory manner towards black people formerly of African extraction). The PC / Diversity folks will be scanning your system for you may use other terminology that would indicate you are an Obama hating racist white heterosexual male.

You can't use sayings or phrases unless they have been pre-approved by the diversity kommissars.

detbuch 03-04-2014 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 1034055)
:huh:

What are you talking about?

Just a poor attempt at humor. Calling a spade a spade is obviously not meant to be a racial reference. On the other hand, a spade is a sometimes derogatory reference to a black person. Well, it used to be, but gone out of fashion. So, when referring to Obama you say calling a spade a spade . . . well . . .

detbuch 03-04-2014 01:55 PM

OOps . . . sorry John . . . I jumped in while you were posting and before I saw it. And I like your explanation better.

buckman 03-04-2014 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1034057)
Just a poor attempt at humor. Calling a spade a spade is obviously not meant to be a racial reference. On the other hand, a spade is a sometimes derogatory reference to a black person. Well, it used to be, but gone out of fashion. So, when referring to Obama you say calling a spade a spade . . . well . . .

I like that. " gone out of fashion "
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Piscator 03-04-2014 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1034057)
Just a poor attempt at humor. Calling a spade a spade is obviously not meant to be a racial reference. On the other hand, a spade is a sometimes derogatory reference to a black person. Well, it used to be, but gone out of fashion. So, when referring to Obama you say calling a spade a spade . . . well . . .

It wasn't an attempt at humor, sound like a poor interpretation on your part...Jesus...what has the world come to here...I went and googled the term and looks like some have turned this into something more...take it from the Erasmus translation..."a garden tool".

Reminds me why I don't come on this thread much anymore, everyone is so uptight and looking for any reason to jump on someone.

PS. Putin is Eurotrash...might as well bring the KGB into the investigation too :devil2:

buckman 03-04-2014 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 1034065)
It wasn't an attempt at humor, sound like a poor interpretation on your part...Jesus...what has the world come to here...I went and googled the term and looks like some have turned this into something more...take it from the Erasmus translation..."a garden tool".

Reminds me why I don't come on this thread much anymore, everyone is so uptight and looking for any reason to jump on someone.

PS. Putin is Eurotrash...might as well bring the KGB into the investigation too :devil2:

Damn you're sensitive
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Piscator 03-04-2014 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1034066)
Damn you're sensitive
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Chicks dig my sensitivity...

buckman 03-04-2014 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 1034067)
Chicks dig my sensitivity...

"Chicks" is rather degrading , don't you think?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Piscator 03-04-2014 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1034070)
"Chicks" is rather degrading , don't you think?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don't be so sensitive Steve.....:humpty:

detbuch 03-04-2014 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 1034065)
It wasn't an attempt at humor, sound like a poor interpretation on your part...Jesus...what has the world come to here...I went and googled the term and looks like some have turned this into something more...take it from the Erasmus translation..."a garden tool".

Yes, it was, really, an attempt at humor. Apparently a VERY POOR attempt since you took it seriously. I did say your phrase was obviously not meant to be a racial reference. I thought that the use of "spade" as a racial slur was more widely known, but in no way did I mean to say anything negative about your post--which I thought was a good retort to Nebe's post. My admonition to "be careful" was kidding and in reference to so much of the "spying" being done on us in the name of security. I should have made that more clear. Maybe some smiley emoticon would have helped. :uhuh: I apologize for my stupid ignorance :wall:

Reminds me why I don't come on this thread much anymore, everyone is so uptight and looking for any reason to jump on someone.

If there were some emoticon for eating humble pie I'd insert it here. Again, I wasn't jumping on you, it was, really, truly, friendly kidding about how some PC/diversity folks, as JohnR put, it would find a reason to do so.

PS. Putin is Eurotrash...might as well bring the KGB into the investigation too :devil2:

I also agree with that. :love:

On the other hand, if you were just joking as well, you got me. :yak5:

P.S. That's why I liked JohnR's explanation better than mine.

The Dad Fisherman 03-04-2014 06:35 PM

You guys are all a bunch of crazy crackers.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Piscator 03-04-2014 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1034105)
I also agree with that. :love:

On the other hand, if you were just joking as well, you got me. :yak5:

P.S. That's why I liked JohnR's explanation better than mine.

Detbuch, no worries at all. I leaned something though...lots of stuff on Google related to how that phrase has transformed....

Piscator 03-04-2014 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1034106)
You guys are all a bunch of crazy crackers.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Cracker.....wait a minute. Like :lasso:

or

"Cracker, sometimes white cracker or cracka, is a derogatory term for white people,[1] especially poor rural whites in the Southern United States. In reference to a native of Florida or Georgia, however, it is sometimes used in a neutral or positive context and is sometimes used self-descriptively with pride."

Or do you just mean we are nuts?

:)

spence 03-04-2014 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1034026)
...and agreement with those who were not on the "dream team."

These may be the neocons you claim to have no knowledge of, or perhaps it's all one in the same.

Quote:

And an ultimate dismantling of the dream teams policies by those who followed. But that's, as Spence likes to say, old news
Wha? I thought Obama was getting pounded from the Left because he left so much Bush era policy in place.

Quote:

And if he were true to the implication that old news is no longer relevant, one wonders why he likes to so often bring up old news. I guess if that tactic suits his argument of the present moment (but subject to change the next day or hour in another thread) it's acceptable--after all, it's CHANGE. And change is the highest aspiration of the progressive mind. Apparently, the more often, the better.
Premium grade spin here :hihi:

Quote:

But I digress. I may actually agree with the important negotiations being with the EU. If Spence means by that negotiations amongst Russia, the EU, and Ukraine. In fact, those are the ONLY relevant negotiations. And, power to truth, if the EU is not militarily strong enough or morally resolute enough to stand up to the same of Putin's Russia, the "negotiations" may be one sided in results.
I'm not sure EU might has anything to do with that. NATO responsibility would supersede the EU if it came to blows. It will be up to the EU leadership -- especially Germany -- then make the financial gamble that buffering Russia right now is worth it.

Quote:

As far as "economic" sanctions--those cut both ways. Besides, Russia has always managed to be outside of Western Europe's economic sphere. And it is forming other alliances rapidly, now, in response to threats against its hegemony in what it considers its sphere of influence.
I think Russia has a lot more to lose from sanctions than the US. What are they going to do, not repay their debt to the West?

-spence

detbuch 03-04-2014 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1034119)
These may be the neocons you claim to have no knowledge of, or perhaps it's all one in the same.

Nope. How it "played out" involved the back and forth opposition and agreement of the Dems and everyone else. Besides, that's old news.

Wha? I thought Obama was getting pounded from the Left because he left so much Bush era policy in place.

Oh, so the Obama policy and the 9/11 policy are much the same. And yet you imply that Obama's is better, and the Repubs haven't had a worthwhile one in 10 years. Anyway, the 9/11 policy is old news.

Premium grade spin here :hihi:

Spin vs. spin. May be premium grade, but could never match the quality of yours. :cheers2:

I'm not sure EU might has anything to do with that. NATO responsibility would supersede the EU if it came to blows. It will be up to the EU leadership -- especially Germany -- then make the financial gamble that buffering Russia right now is worth it.

Coming to blows is so 19th century. The wrong side of history, as J. Kerry would say. Surely the NATO wouldn't stoop to outdated tactics. Financial gamble? You mean sanctions actually do cut both ways as in your " The Russian economy is nothing without access to western banking, trade and his ability to sell natural gas to the EU at a premium"? That is, there is actually trade in which BOTH parties gain or lose?

I think Russia has a lot more to lose from sanctions than the US. What are they going to do, not repay their debt to the West?

-spence

But I thought you said the important discussion was with the EU, Ukraine, and Russia.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com