The Clinton foundation
 

I suppose this doesnt matter to the Hillary Clinton supporters. Hopefully some will wake up to the dangerous position this puts America in when it comes to potentially influencing decisions made in regards to foreign donors and their agenda for America.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...eek-probe.html

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/...-countries-go/

Endless scandal mongering.

When are the Republicans going to realize they can't lift America up simply by trying to bring others down. This is why you have Trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no but you improve things by putting crooked criminal types in jail, not electing them to the highest offices in the land and giving them unchecked power .....stupid :yak4:

Three words you won't hear at the DNC. The Clinton foundation
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...s.html?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't think Hillary got that memo either...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...e.html?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Another coincidence....
https://pjmedia.com/homeland-securit...ed-in/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Russian reset :) Hillary may have helped the Russins to develope their hacking capabilites in return for donations to the Clinton foundation and speaking fees. She may have helped them hack her server...lol
http://nypost.com/2016/07/31/report-...reset/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

:btu:

You guys dont stop do you> How many of theses Hillary outrages have you been trying to Make real from Whitewater to Benghazi to the Bill Clinton’s foundation was actually established in 1997

1 the GOP has never been able to prove anything

2 Show any criminal activity

Because if they are as corrupt as the GOP and their supporters say they are .. then Hilliary and Bill are superheroes or are wizards wiping aways all there illegal activities .. as the march thru history . or the GOP are just that Dumb

Read up on this...

We can prove that she has lied on multiple occasions (sniper fire, GOP framing Bill to make it appear as though he cheated).

Most people feel that Benghazi was not handled well (Ambassadors request for extra security was denied).

The FBI concluded that she was extremely careless with sensitive information.

Is any of that criminal? Nope. Does it all amount to nothing? For you and Spence yes, not for many others.

When you and Spence refuse to look for any flaws, you won't find any.

ok
 

ok

I really wish they'd start debunking their own propaganda. The google is pretty easy to use. If they'd make a minuscule effort to reduce the BS there would be plenty of bandwidth for some real discussion.

I see more deflecting than debunking.
Pot calling kettle spence
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Go read up on Boko Haram.

Anything specific?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I love you Wayne...that was freaking hilarious!

Yes, the link you posted. Good lord.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

isn't it .. I mean look at the effort put into theses threads when 2 people post an opposite view.. you would think the world was on fire ..

Say what you want believe what you want but dont post feelings as facts .. or stories sent to your inbox or FB

you can hate Hillary but you cant Cherry pick her public record and not acknowledge her commitment to public service but some how = bad POTUS

love or hate the the Donald But you cant Cherry pick his success as a businessman and ignore his statements some how = good POTUS

I am an independent and have voted for R's and D's and was part of Reagans Inaugural Parade Canceled by Cold in 1984 as a young marine at 8th&I and voted for the person with the best plan for America not party ..never vote just party and this election is no different

you can read the CBO projections through 2026...easily available for viewing...if that does not concern you I really don't know what to say...the world is on fire if you have not been paying attention.... the Clinton have been scoundrels from day 1....the cult like devotion that they seem to enjoy is distressing and the thought of them in the White House again is stomach turning.....so much so that Trump as default is...well...perhaps slightly better...I'm far more concerned with what they will do(or have done) rather than what they might say....I do enjoy your perspective...:)

If you voted for Reagan, you must have changed your mind about what the best plan for America is if you vote for Hilary.

As for voting for the person not just the party, in this race, of the two candidates, the one that is least affiliated with party is Trump. Hilary is the embodiment of what the Democrat Party has become. Separating her from the party doesn't leave a whole lot left in terms of what is best for the country. At least Bernie had some degree of separation.

Typical non answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's like fishing, you've got to put your time in.

Voting for Reagan and not voting for Trump . there is no moral equivalency . sadly the best. Plan for America is not electing Trump. Well just have to agree to disagree. On which of the 2 would be worse for America aka big picture not vs singular issues like SCJ appointments
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Singular issue like SCJ appointments?
Singular issue that will have the potential to impact any and all issues this country and it's citizens face moving foward.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

SCJ appointments are , at least to me , the single biggest issue critical to the big picture .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The makeup of the Supreme Court is not a singular issue. As the two previous posts to this have said, it encompasses all issues. All the other so-called issues in this election are minor to it. They can all be fixed by following administrations. Most major changes in the way we are governed have had to go through the Supreme Court in order to be made law. The character and constitutional philosophy of those in the Supreme Court can permanently change how we are governed.

That you do not understand that is an indication that you think our elections are a matter of personality, not legal substance. This is a pernicious mind set that we have been conditioned into by popular and inattentive media and evasive politicians who know our weaknesses, and convince us that their niceness and goodness, and political correctness are the keys to good governance. And that hoodwinks us into disregarding and eventually not even considering that rule of law is far, far more important then their promises and personalities. It leads us into a lawless government which rules by whim and personal "interpretation."

I do understand it .. But I just dont share your apocalyptic view on the matter.. if Justices are nominated by a Dem and approved by the full United States Senate .. But yet you have no issues with the GOP stone walling Obamas nomination to serve yours and their agenda and stack the court with your minions . OK

Conservatives and the GOP in general tend and claim to try to nominate Judges who apply the Constitution by the original text (the kind which Trump says he will nominate). Thus, with textualist adjudication Constitutional government will not be replaced by Progressive government. If you don't disagree with that, then you share my view that the Constitutional "apocalypse" will be avoided.

Whatever view you have, and if you care to "share" it, your comments indicate that you don't think that the legal framework for government we have really matters. What seems to matter to you is the persons or personalities we have running that framework. Which, actually, reduces the framework to insignificance. As Jim in CT would say, Constitution Schmonstitution.

I guess, in my opinion, what you don't understand is that personal "interpretation" to some degree changes, rewrites, that which is interpreted. And the less that interpretation is anchored in the text, the more it is rewritten, reshaped, the more it becomes totally different than the original.

The Supreme Court, through Progressive "interpretation," has been the main vehicle by which Progressives have overcome the obstacles imposed by the Constitution (FDR's New Deal, and the multitude of progressive legislation that followed up till now would never have happened, except in States where the people voted for it, if the Constitution had been faithfully followed by the Court); and even the vehicle by which Progressives have overcome the so-called "will of the people" expressed by their votes (gay marriage and abortion, for instance).

Of course, if you agree with what the Progressives have done, your response might be "so what!" " It's all good." Some of it may be good. And even if a lot of it is good, the problem is in how it has been accomplished, and what has been destroyed in the process. What "apocalypse" has happened.

If what is left of our framework of government is personalities who we invest by our votes with the power to shape our society, then we are basically under the thumb of the chosen. You worry about what Trump will do. Others worry about what Hillary will do. Minorities will worry about what the majority will do. No one is safe from the hand of government. There is no framework that stops it.

Not even your God. There will be no unalienable rights provided by your creator or by nature. Government, Progressive government, will replace that.

If you disagree with that, tell us how.

http://www.investors.com/politics/ed...a-law/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm concerned. You've been immersing yourself in crackpot websites and promoting utter nonsense like the story above.

If you need help just ask. Good crew here...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nothing to see here....

http://thefederalist.com/2016/08/11/...ation/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Clintons donated a million to Charity....

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/08...ation/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

http://www.investors.com/politics/ed...-doom/?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?sto...&id=1662362177
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...n.html?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

surreal....

August 16, 2016 2:47 pm

An illegal immigrant who was tapped by the Hillary Clinton campaign for a new effort to register Latino voters is tied to a multi-million dollar voter registration effort funded by George Soros.

Astrid Silva, the 28-year-old illegal immigrant who railed against Donald Trump during a prime-time speaking slot at the Democratic National Convention, was featured in the Clinton campaign’s press release announcing the new “Dreamer” effort.

Silva is the organizing director of the Progressives Leadership Alliance of Nevada, a social and environmental justice group that is already involved in a massive campaign to register 400,000 Hispanic voters for the November election. That effort, known as the “Families Fight Back” campaign, is almost entirely funded by liberal billionaire George Soros.


good to know that you can be here ILLEGALLY and soar to such heights :huh:

and you are surprised Scott?
as long as you follow the plan Soros is laying out before our eyes, you can soar to these heights to amass voters in millions.

and spence thinks I am over the top believing the Soros and his buddies want a world government :rolleyes:
this is what will ruin this country if we stand by and let it happen
It's time to fight back against the progressive movement because it will fail no doubt about it


THE CONSTITUTION IS MORE THAN JUST A PIECE OF PAPER!!!