![]() |
Pocahontas? So What?
Left leaning press crying their liberal tears again, butt hurt by Trump referring to Elizabeth Warren as Pocahontas.... So what???? OK, maybe could have made it more clear in front of the WW2 Navaho Code Talkers. What I got out of it was just reminding us how Warren took advantage of the system by procuring mortgage loans by claiming to be a Native American. Awful woman. Another cheating, lying politician. (most are, both sides of the aisle, IMO) But she is dangerous and needs to be taken down a few notches, sooner than later. Eff her for claiming it a racial slur. She was being called out! Nothing but a DNA blood test is going to prove whether she is, or was just lying..... God I hate that woman.....
|
Really???
|
What is your question?
|
Quote:
|
Oh it gets better Jeff....To close this "Breaking News" story, the reporters are even more outraged that the ceremony to honor our Native American heroes was done right beneath the portrait of Andrew Jackson! And you know what a bad man he was.... What he did to the Indians and all.... Cripes, don't we ALL have more to do than this death by a thousand cuts?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He made it all about himself Instead of honoring some Heroes. Similar to what he did at the CIA event a few days after being elected president. He's not fit to be president of the US.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I swear to god I am convinced that all of Trumps antics are scripted. It’s too predictable. Why would this be scripted? To polarize the American people and distract them from the real problems that this country faces.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Warren is absolutely disgusting. Everything about her is ugly, she just gets uglier and uglier. It's almost as if she wasn't born to human parents, but as if she was conceived by hypocrisy.
She attacks banks for making money off student loans, but it's OK when she gets rich teaching one class, at a job she got by lying about her heritage. She makes Hilary look cute and cuddly, she really does. And brother, that's saying something. |
Wouldn’t term and sperm limits be nice? Boot them all out. And family members.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
And I find it sad that Trump couldn't honor these guys without taking a swipe at her. She doesn't deserve to be brought up when talking about these amazing heroes. But that's pure, vintage, classic Trump. I don't like it.
He's also not even a little bit wrong for wanting to attack her, but not in that setting. |
again Trump and his supporters have no respect for the office of President of the United States ..
How dare they say MAGA if this is their vision of what America should look like and whats acceptable behavior of our POTUS .. sorry I wont accept it |
If that comment didn't make you chuckle though....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sad thing is there were probably people who thought it was funny and appropriate. Oh, now wait...
|
Quote:
|
What's to say that hasn't already been said before, he just continues to be an embarrassment, who hasn't he disrespected at this point? I'm surprised he didn't follow that inappropriate comment up by stating I think you redskins should kick her off the reservation. He literally has no control of his twisted mind and sick inappropriate sense of humor; if he even considers it humor.
|
Quote:
you get the comedic benefit...and then the outrage form the left is icing on the cake |
Quote:
After 8 years of your snarky whining this is nothing. |
Quote:
Terrible setting, saying that in front of those people, Code Talkers, men that served with distinction (that many on the left probably likes only because they were victims). Hilarious yet unsurprising that the media calls Trump out on it rather than years of Chief Sh!tt!ng Bull for lying about it in the first place. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't have to accept it, because no one is selling it. |
Quote:
Believe me, I'm not one to come to her defense...she deserves a whole lot worse than Trump's insults. |
Quote:
How's your IRA doing? "He literally has no control of his twisted mind and sick inappropriate sense of humor" No, he doesn't. It's embarrassing, I don't know that it's dangerous. For 8 years, Obama tried making bad people like us by being nicer to them. Did that work? Not really. Obama had some foreign policy success, but it wasn't based on his being friendlier than Bush was. |
Quote:
|
The statement was inappropriate for that occasion. He should have used it at another press opportunity.
Warren has been constantly criticizing Trump - she has a bad case of TDS. Payback is a bitch and unlike most presidents Trump will not waste an opportunity to call her or others out on there lies. All in all it was a real bad day for Warren - she is also about to potentially loose her baby the CFPB. |
Quote:
feasible.... |
Quote:
I'm a devout Catholic, and voting for him was unpleasant, but very easy. If you vote based on Christian beliefs (a big driver of my voting logic), at the national level, it will likely be a long time before a democrat is more attractive to a true Christian, than a Republican. Every cycle, the democratic party gets further and further away from Christian values. Fortunately for democrats, there are fewer and fewer Christians. I would have preferred a Republican of character. I think the relationship between the liberals and the media, makes it very difficult for a decent, gentle Republican, to stand a chance. Look at what they did to Bush (called him a liar to start his war, called him a racist despite what he has done for Africa), McCain (a racist whose adopted black daughter, liberals said came from an extramarital affair), and Romney (painted as a heartless plutocrat, who was called a sexist because he kept a notebook of resumes of talented women, that makes all kinds of sense). So we went with a guy, maybe the only guy, who could take all that left wing bile, suck it up, and spit it right back in their face, as effortlessly as breathing, without breaking a sweat. It's completely natural for him. Your side created this. You guaranteed that we would nominate someone like this. Kind of ironic, no? and you can bet Melania is a gold digger. How many poor, jerky, 80 year-olds do you think she dated? |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I agree with you 100%. It would be nice (and shouldn't be too much to ask) to get the benefits of this presidency, without the downside. But for the last 15 years, the media has been brutal to conservatives, and guys that aren't willing to throw elbows back (McCain and Romney), get painted as evil, racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, deplorables. It shouldn't take a Trump to combat that. But it did. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Very easy to say. Not so easy to support with logic. "Democratic party gets away from Christian values " Hell, yes it does. The motto of the current democratic party is, "if it feels good, do it". You don't think that true Christians are more likely to identify with the Republican party, than the Democrat party? "Also, don't try to sell me that Catholicism represents "true Christian." Jesus taught to care for the poor, the weak, the needy, judge not, etc" Yes, Christianity in general, and Catholicism in particular, emphasize caring for the poor. On that you are 100% correct. However, you seem to assume that liberals/non-Christians care more about the poor than conservatives/Christians. There is zero evidence to support that. In fact, the one definitive study on the subject was called "Who Really Cares", was published in the New York Times (not a conservative publication), and it showed that conservatives give more time and money to charity, than liberals. Here is the study... http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/op...21kristof.html The Catholic Church isn't dedicated to helping the needy? Tell that to your neighbors who have received subsidized medical care at Catholic hospitals, subsidized education at Catholic schools, lodging at Catholic shelters, food at Catholic soup kitchens, etc... Last time I checked, the Catholic Church gave more money to help the poor, than any other organization except the US government. "the platform of the republican party is the antithesis of his teachings in endless ways." What the Democrats claim to be the GOP platform, absolutely is the antithesis of Christianity. But what liberals claim the GOP believes, is very different from what the GOP actually believes. sanctity of life the dignity and worth of the individual individual freedom and responsibility charity for the poor The true GOP platform on these issues (as opposed to what MSNBC claims the GOP believes on these issues) is much more in line with Christianity, than the liberal platform. One need only look at the issue of abortion...but there are several other issues that make this clear. After the last few mass shootings, liberals are mercilessly attacking anyone who offers prayer for the families. The GOP is FAR from perfect on these issues, in particular, the GOP (and Christianity) can be rigid on some social issues. But if you ask whether liberalism or conservatism more closely aligns with true Christian principles? Not even close. Not remotely close. The DNC despises true Christian principles. "Calling oneself Christian does not make one a follower of the teachings of Jesus" 100% true. But actually behaving in a way that is consistent with those principles, does make one a Christian. Those principles are far more welcome on the political right, than on the left. |
Very well said Jim.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com