Intelligence Committee report out
 

Well this is interesting, are you sure Floridaman did nothing?

The House Intelligence Report mentions Devin Nunes FIFTY TIMES.

He was in repeated communication with indicted Giuliani associate and Ukrainian Lev Parnas.

Congressman Nunes is a fact witness.

"The president informed every department for which we sought records — the State Dept. the Office of Management and Budget ... the Defense Department, his own White House personnel — to refuse to turn over a single document."

The phone calls are listed starting around the 154th page

It contains new evidence of phone calls between Giuliani and Nunes back in April.

Why was Devin Nunes calling Rudy Giuliani and Lev Parnas?

OMB initiating calls to Giuliani starting in April

https://intelligence.house.gov/report/

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploa...-_20191203.pdf

Yeah Rudy having multiple calls to the budget department, nothing inappropriate about that right guys?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Phone records are putting the one perfect call defense out the window, I think Rudy, Nunes and others better lawyer up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It’s fun watching you guys get all lathered up over nothing. Guess you haven’t learned anything from Russian collusion, kavanaugh and the countless other times you’ve predicted trump doom over the past few years.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think it’s far more fun to watch you guys spin round and round at each new batch of evidence comes out. These are actual phone records secured by supoena to AT&T, so explain if your can why Trumps personal attorney is calling and receiving calls from OMB in April, that should be entertaining for us all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[QUOTE=Got Stripers;1181029]

These are actual phone records secured by supoena to AT&T


[size=1][i]Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wOW!!!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That’s your explanation wow, I was expecting a more detailed explanation of why a personal attorney, without any position or government job might be calling and receiving multiple calls from the department controlling the military aid. Or why on the same day he also had numerous calls with the White House, maybe it was a last minute cabinet posting 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So tell us what the calls were and what law was broken.

Really that’s the defense, what law was broken, no you tell me why a private attorney should be calling or getting calls from the OMB. The conspiracy keeps expanding and the defense is getting more desperate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don’t entertain the paid troll. They aren’t there to dabble in facts.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Hey, you're the one making a big deal about it. Why should I be the one to say what the calls were about? Maybe there were discussions like those that Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch had on the tarmac.

Ok so you have no defense I got it, no surprise, those calls are almost impossible to defend, so to expect a guy on striped bass to come up with one is a big stretch.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yeah, that's it.

You have absolutely no clue what they were about and your panties are in a bunch
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It’s just another piece of the puzzle the picture is almost in perfect focus and you guys are so predictable spouting the party line and defense, but I do find it amusing.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I need to find this party line. It sounds like fun
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

In lawsuit against CNN, Devon Nunes says network should have known Parnas was "a renowned liar, a fraudster, a hustler, an opportunist with delusions of grandeur..." Not good timing given phone records in intel report.
Perhaps he should have warned them, it might be based on personal experience doing whatever they did together.
Just what was their relationship business or personal?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Oh my
🙀🤡🍔
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Individual 1 is in the phone log also
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

🙀🤡🙀
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

While the details of these communications aren't known, their simple existence undercuts the contention of some presidential defenders that Giuliani was operating independently of senior administration officials.


Wow some republicans caim rudy was acting independently of senior administration officials But he was never on a Republican witness list will he be on the Senate's List..... But they want Biden's son to testify ....

Republicans are looking only at Their Base in the polls not the evidence, they are living up to their name the party of NO

The four year Benghazi investigation and the two year Hillary email investigation resulted in zero indictments. The mueller investigation resulted in 23 indictments and I suspect there are a number coming at the end of this process, the phone records would fit in well on a made for TV show on bringing down the mob on racketeering charges.

Facts don’t matter to the GOP, look at the way they continue to put forth the Ukraine not Russia meddled in 2016 narrative. The FBI, the CIA, all intelligence agencies and the state department now coming out to again confirm there is zero evidence to support that conspiracy theory. It’s all about fabricating a cover story for what everyone was doing for Trump’s personal benefit in the 2020 election, if this were a private criminal trial, I guarantee the defense would be talking plea deal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wound up for another round...:happy:

What cat got your tongue, when the right on this board starts responding with one liners, it’s because like the GOP; there just is no defense in light of the overwhelming evidence. You don’t even need to hear these phone calls, when they weave in perfectly with all the testimony to date. It will be more conspiracy theories or hey get over it the president can do whatever he wants, just ask Barr.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

vent baby vent....

maybe because the FBI agent in charge of the email
investigation, sent a text to his FBI agent/mistress, where he explicitly said “we’ll stop Trump from becoming president.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You mean the investigation and announcement that likely cost the Dems the election?
Not the investigation that was kept secret till after the election, that likely would have cost the Trumplicans the election?

touting more conspiracies I am amazed at the power you think theses people had based on Text messages and their positions

but when it comes to Sworn statements all from multiple people all with a clear understanding on Trumps intent and their positions your go back in your hole :faga:

The phone records indicate that Nunes and Guiliani were in touch regularly last April, just when Giuliani was working a foreign policy back channel to try to convince Ukraine to open an investigation into the Bidens.

Nunes also had conversation with Parnas, the Giuliani associate who was helping in the effort to dig up dirt on the Bidens...

Not sure how they explain this away
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

what conspiracy theory? We have Strzoks text, what i posted, is what he texted to his mistress. And he was leading investigations into Hilary and Trump.

Power I “think he had”? He was
leading those investigations. I can’t prove his investigation reflected political bias, any more than you can prove there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

^^^^^^ This

It's the Nunes fart joke defense.

Lets just see how it plays out. I am sure glad Congress has chosen to spend countless man hours and tens of millions of hard earned tax dollars in this bull #^&#^&#^&#^&. Thank God the country pretty much runs itself. As an independent vote for the candidate that I think will do the best. Last time it was The Donald, before that Mitt and before that Obama. If the Dems want to win the presidency that give us (independents) someone that doesn't sound glib about giving away health care or college with no plan to pay for it. They are making it too easy for Trump, who by the way has been doing a pretty fair job. He is not getting impeached, it just is not going to happen. But lets just keep playing this game. Like I said thank God the country runs itself because there is no-one behind the wheel in Congress right now.

I think he will be impeached, but he will not be removed and as a fellow independent, I’m hoping for better choices.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Turley torpedoed the Democrap impeachment fantasy today
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Hillary is mulling jumping in so there you go
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What a shock you might see it that way, no different then every other defense of Cheetos drug deal. He will be impeached in the house, then you can applaud the GOP handling of the senate trial. He will then be able to proudly wear that badge of honor into the 2020 campaign, which surely will make the 2016 run look like a church picnic.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you do love making things up.. any more than you can prove there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine.

wow you just can't except the evidence can you .. All Trump needed to do was let people testify .. he refused and they (republicans) haven't disproved anything ( just saying it was just a phone call isn't a defense )

this guy

On Wednesday, Turley argued there was no proof that President Donald Trump broke a specific law related to the Ukraine scandal and therefore should not be impeached.

But in 1998, Turley made the opposite case, telling Congress during former President Bill Clinton's impeachment hearings that Clinton's actions didn't need to violate any laws in order to be impeachable conduct.

"While there's a high bar for what constitutes grounds for impeachment, an offense does not have to be indictable," he wrote in a 2014 op-ed for The Washington Post.


some torpedo

I think Jim did except the evidence.🤐🤠👤
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you have no idea what he said yesterday do you?