Senators reach deal ...
 

Funny this deal gets passed and i didn't see any catchy

democrats kill virus relief bill:kewl:

I have seen the Trump supporters on other sites,, still making outlandish claims still blaming democrats about the details of a bill

That Their President is going to sign :kewl: unless Fox tells him something else

they killed
it earlier. that’s why you didn’t see anyone say they killed
it this time.

are you denying that senate democrats are the reason it didn’t get passed a few days ago?

When faced with a pandemic, every doctor says the first thing you need, is $35 million for the kennedy center for performing arts. that will keep us all healthy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

More IQ points lost, won’t be getting those back... :rolleyes:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does that make you feel good?

Wayne, don’t worry about his supporters. Hold you ground and control what you can control. We will get through this. Do you go on other sites to discuss politics also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does this make you feel good?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And what would have been different 3 days ago except you complaining the dems killed it.

Your a Fox parrot just admit it

Nope just here ,,, I'd still fish with anyone here , politics stay at the dock

Weren't you the guy that said he only responds when somebody calls him out.

And did this make you feel better?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So what other sites are you referring to?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It did - to stick up for someone.

It is that I think responding to someone's posts (who isn't talking to you) and insulting their intelligence says something about them. I thought you were better than that but I'm prob. wrong since you seem to be doing that more and more.

if it passed three days ago, god knows how
many thousands of people
wouldn’t have been furloughed.

you can’t just say, the dems
killed it.

fox parrot? i hate sean hannity. the only one i watch occasionally is tucker carlson, who like
me, regularly criticized republicans and praises liberals.

you’re the parrot here. not me. when do you criticize liberals or praise conservatives? when have you ever done
that? on what major
issues do you disagree with liberals? We’re all
ears wayne, go ahead and tell us which major issues you side with conservatives on?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Did you duck into a nearby phone booth to don your cape or do you walk around wearing it all the time?

WDMSO is a big boy and he can take care of himself.

Because you've just been the perfect example of thoughtful and meaningful posts here lately.

Your posts lately are basically a mix of fighting with Jim, calling Scott snarky, or passing your holier than thou judgements on anybody that disagrees with your views, so spare me your thoughts about my character. I sleep fine at night.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You forgot about how I respond to SD.

I go read brightbart comments .. very entertaining to see what true trump believers think
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If you think 3 days would have changed things on the ground your not realistic
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Since you have so much experience in the private sector, you tell me how many Americans you think got furloughed in the last 72 hours?

I agree three days isn't the end of the world. But the fact is, the senate democrats killed it on Monday, and the did so because they wanted funding for liberal projects, some (not all) of which have absolutely nothing to do with helping sick people - do you agree with this, yes or no? Requiring that companies have officers in charge of inclusion and diversity? $35 million for the Kennedy center for the arts?

I just debunk your inaccuracies. As for being on conservative sides of things ..still waiting for them to do something postive
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You must think i know. No one in the private sector 2 live with me ones working nurse 1 laid off dental office

This bill isnt going to prevent future layoffs lets hope it helps

35mil for the Kennedy might not have been need if Republicans didnt target planned parenthood or other non profits... who knows maybe both have been removed
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You keep ignoring the Repubs. wanting $500B with no oversight. Why should the govern. spend $ w/o the people who are putting the $ into the system know where it is being spent.

Any bill being negotiated includes the wishes of both parties and some things get negotiated away. The diff. here is that you only focus on one side and blame the Ds. Pres. Trump even seemed to agree w/that by stating he didn't want a company to get $ and then buy back their stock.

I’m happy to dunk on Congress, but I don’t understand why some people think it should be quick, easy, and painless to get a majority to agree on how to spend two trillion dollars.

just in


Republicans right now are holding up COVID relief package because the unemployment insurance is TOO GENEROUS,

In a statement, Sens. Tim Scott, R-S.C., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Ben Sasse, R-Neb., said that the bill could provide a "strong incentive for employees to be laid off instead of going to work" because some people could theoretically make more by being unemployed.

they continued. "If the federal government accidentally incentivizes layoffs, we risk life-threatening shortages in sectors where doctors, nurses, and pharmacists are trying to care for the sick, and where growers and grocers, truckers and cooks are trying to get food to families' tables."


really only big business who they want to give billions to.. would lay people off so the government can pay them .. the individual has no such power to lay themselves off :wall:

So you read Breitbart and then come on hear feigning surprise that other “sites” have folks supporting Trump.

Is this how retirement is gonna go? Why not try happiness...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That’s when the big boy pants are put on just to make your Daddy proud. Captain Courageous reports for doody.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don't mention my dad you scummy douchebag.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

So you read Breitbart




actually...it's Bartbright :uhuh:

Their jim jones type supporters on that site

You should take a look
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Ha, I get my fill here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don’t talk about my Dad that way. Where is the respect? Remember the big boy pants. 🦁
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This is one of the reasons you remain ignorant. And by ignorant, I don't mean stupid. I mean the non-judgmental definition--uninformed or misinformed. You pick one supposedly or reputedly negative thing or name about something or someone and then judge the whole by it. What site, or news agency or TV network does not have at least one person or commentator or program that many think is bat$hit crazy? Are your relied on sources purely free of any such blights? So you dismiss what could be enlightening information by ignorantly casting a negative light on the entire source.

And your ignorance may not be entirely innocent. I suspect you disagree with the "world view," as you've put it in the past, or with the political view or slant, of Breitbart, or Fox New, or various bloggers, etc., so you intentionally pick something you think is negative about them, point that out, then think you've proved that they are to be scorned and dismissed.

Breitbart and Fox news are excellent sources for things that the left leaning media avoid covering or get wrong when they do. Breitbart and Fox got a whole lot more right on a lot of the nonsense ginned up about Trump. They've pointed out a host of fallacies, misconceptions, and lies told about Trump. They were far more accurate and ultimately right about the Russia hoax, the impeachment hoax, the obstruction hoax, and a whole lot more, than was the leftist media.

That's true of many "conservative" or libertarian bloggers such as those whose videos I've posted and you've dismissed via this method of pointing out a thing that you think is negative about them personally, and so dismiss, avoid, the content of their message which you were not able to dispute.

Your method is a recipe for remaining willfully ignorant. How useful was your source for the fish tank cleaner drinkers?

Feel free to support all the fish tank cleaner imbibers you want.
Some hope that politicians look for support among the people not so easily confused
Apparently that is not the case with Trumplicans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) worked to scupper the phase-three coronavirus relief package on Sunday after Majority Whip James Clyburn (D., S.C.) told caucus members last week that the bill was “a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision.”

Clyburn’s comments came on a Thursday call featuring more than 200 House Democrats, during which caucus members laid out a list of provisions they wanted to be included in the Senate’s trillion-dollar package."

Another one who refuses to accept who planted the seed ,,, your kool aid drinkers on tube are just birds of the same conspiracy feather. Only you would expect others to dispute a guy you tube , opinion rather than presented facts

Maybe you should ride your high horse over there and read the comments, then come back and tells us what you think , because you clearly have no idea how extremist their views are , hiding behind words like patriotism and MANGA

The volume of hate and vitriol is amazing. Our forum is respectfully and moderate in comparison. Notice the ads here , I've attached 1 from their site

🔨
MANGA
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There you go again. Demonstrating what I said you do.

And wanting Hillary to be brought to justice is not extreme. A great many Americans, not an extreme fringe, feel that way.

And much of what is in Breitbart is information and commentary from the "conservative" prospective that you won't find in leftist outlets.

And if you think that asking for a vote is hate, vitriol, and extreme, then I can understand why you side with Progressives.

Progressives seem to have this notion that anything they don't agree with is extreme . . . as well as hateful, racist, and all the rest of the mantra.

you've exposed yourself as one of them ... where facts a reality are absent .... :btu:

One of who? I didn't "expose" my view on Hillary being brought to justice. It's not unusual that you've exposed yourself, for the umpteenth time, to be lacking in reading comprehension. It's no wonder that you can't understand articles or videos that don't sync with your "world view." No doubt, to me, that it's a defensive mechanism when you dismiss or refuse to respond to information that would put a chink in your armor.

I doubt that anything will be done to Hillary re her political misdeeds, so I don't think about it. And I don't respond to polls. So I'm not one of those who would have voted to the ad in your link.

And I have no illusion that when I "expose" your problem with being able to think or discuss rationally that a light will go on in your head and "expose" your problem for you to more clearly see it. I just do it a little for fun and a little to shine that light for others who may wonder what's going on with some of your gibberish--such as you display by your above post.

Please Present all her Crimes ... and not just the imaginary one's... But those brought by law enforcement .... I can't wait

If a large portion of the population have the view that she committed some sort of crime, let's say, in the way she handled her emails, they are not holding an extreme view, that is, not holding a view that is the furthest from what would be considered "the center," or not holding a view that is held by so few that it is an "extreme" outlier.

There are enough people who think she committed a crime, that to consider their view to be an extreme one seems to be at least erroneous, or, more underhandedly, might be considered a biased tactic to marginalize and dismiss them. And further labeling them beyond that as vitriolic, or haters, is demeaning them as well. It is a pretty shady way to have a discussion.

And if you're trying frame the argument as one can only believe that a crime has been committed when it is brought by "law enforcement" (whatever that means), then your attempt at thought control is closer than you know to that "authoritarian" form of government that you accuse others of.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that Donald Trump committed crimes before he became president, according to a new Quinnipiac poll conducted after Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress.

Among those surveyed, 64 percent believe that the president committed crimes before he was elected, with 24 percent saying they don’t think he did.

Those polled were split on whether they believe Trump has committed crimes while in office: According to the poll, 45 percent believe the president has, while 43 percent say he hasn’t.