![]() |
CBP admits agents never whipped Haitian immigrants
Will anyone in the left apologize for the way these guys were smeared?
President Biden? Will he correct the record? he went on and i. about the racist injustice of whipping these poor folks. Duke lacrosse case, officer wilson, the covington catholic kids, UVA rape case, Kyle Rittenhouse, and in, and on, and on. It’s dangerous to be in a position where The Narrative will benefit from calling you a loathsome racist. Paul is saying people move to FL because it’s essentially one big Klan rally. When you know you can’t even pretend to say that your guy’’s results aren’t a disaster, you fall back in calling everyone a racist. For small-minded insecure people, that’s easier than just admitting your side blew it. |
Did I say that or was in jest. But I forgot I was dealing with angry Jim. I bet if I wanted I could keep you up until midnight tonight just by continuing to post but alas you remind me of the Doctor Who treated a friend's son many years ago. My friend's son asked the doctor a question and he ignored him and when my friend's wife asked him why he is not answering the 5-year-olds question he said because he'll just ask another one. When that happens with you and people just stop responding to you you claim they don't have an answer. In fact it's they get tired of dealing with angry Jim
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
you’re calling everyone who disagrees with you a racist. but i’m angry. lobbing baseless insults is what weak people do who know they’re losing, Paul. Just sayin’. It’s all you’ve got right now. you can stop responding any time. It’s a free country. Who’s stopping you? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Jim and fox left out this part
Of the report released Friday , found the agents did not strike the migrants, but did use unnecessary force. Their headline and all other right wing sites are selling more victim hood. Because they weren’t seen as hero’s And upset they still may get discipline . No accountability for Jan 6th ring leaders no accountability for refusing legal subpoenas no accountability for the officer who stood still as children were gunned down or an unarmed man gunned down shot 60 times.. The party of law and order focuses on Hunters Biden claiming all his wrong doing . While useing a lop top that’s been in multiple peoples hands with an agenda that’s not Truth .. this is what a witch hunt looks like .. all for the base not the For the benefit of the Republic Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
But it’s ok when YOU do it. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Zsomething Republicans are afraid of if it involves those I groups I listed to include those involved in Jan 6th Laws don’t apply to republicans but the sure demand they apply to everyone else Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
First Amendment advocates respond to a new Arizona law limiting recording of police The law, which was signed on Wednesday by Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, states that people can be charged with a misdemeanor if they record police from less than 8 feet away after getting a verbal warning, as they are conducting law enforcement activity like arrests, questioning suspicious individuals, and handling those who are emotionally disturbed. another example of Republicans trying to hold others accountable while trying to shield what they see as their personal enforcement Units yep more whataboutism |
Will anyone in the left apologize for the way these guys were smeared?
yep Jim keep thinking thats what happened.. not sure why you defend bad behaviour .. or push back against police accountability as they were smeared Seems you a ken Paxton texas AG and avid law breaker are on the same page it's really unfortunate that these border agents who've given their lives to securing our border and defending Americans [sic]," he added. "And here they are being punished; they should be rewarded." no surprise seeing He thinks laws don't apply to him either even the BBC headline US border agents' horseback charge on Haiti migrants 'unnecessary' In its findings released on Friday, CBP did not recommend any of its officers be fired but acknowledged "failures to make good decisions at multiple levels of the organisation". https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62102019 its telling you haven't started a thread on the Cops shooting an unarmed black man in Ohio 60 times , let me guess you think they to are victims of a Bias media and cop haters |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
And get back to me when you find a current democrat AG under several active criminal indictments Who was re elected by a base who ignore such things .. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Jim has a prominent Trumplican ever been driven by moral imperatives to do anything positive for the American people?
Or do they just adopt victomhood because they have no rational alternative? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
from the guy who’s response to everything, is but trump! Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Gas prices are down like 25 cents good job numbers and the GOP is stuck on Hunters laptop and brown people invasion. When there’s been no change of border policy since the election.. Current restrictions at the U.S. border have not changed: single adults and families encountered at the Southwest Border will continue to be expelled, where appropriate, under Title 42,” said CBP Commissioner Chris Magnus. “As temperatures start to rise in the summer, human smugglers will continue to exploit vulnerable populations and recklessly endanger the lives of migrants for financial gain. June 6th 2022 But to the gullible faithful it’s all a lie by the media and the government That’s the response to everything factual Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
you don’t think this is a reason why there’s so much violence against cops? fortunately it doesn’t matter what you think. it matters what america thinks, and they’ll make their voices heard in a few months. i like my sides chances. how about you? your whole party and the entire media, is demonizing cops, who then have a target on their backs. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"Why do Republicans hate police officers?" he asked. "Why won't Republicans stand up for police officers and stand up for cops when they're getting the hell beaten out of them? In Congress, they love yapping about how they support the blue when they go on the House floor, but when police officers are getting eviscerated, getting brutalized, when they're getting beaten to death, suddenly, they love the rioters, they love the thugs, they love the people that are beating them up and beating them to death."
"These Republicans who are calling these people tourists, these Republicans that don't want to get to the truth," he continued. "They don't want to really understand why police officers were brutalized that day, the same liars who said that they love cops, they're the ones that are stopping everybody who is responsible for the beating of and the eventual death of these police officers." "They're stopping justice from happening," he added. "So they don't love cops. -- they hate cops if cops are actually doing their job and trying to stop their party from not being able to steal an election." Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Albuquerque SWAT team raids house looking for an alleged robbery suspect. Using nuisance Flashbangs to get the suspect out ignited and engulfed the home in flames. After the fire, police find the body of a 14-year-old boy. He was not the suspect.
The police attacked the wrong house, flash-banged it, burned it up, stopped firefighters from putting out fire, then found out they burned alive a 14 year old child who was in home. But if you criticize them for this, then you're personally responsible for any subsequent increase in crime anywhere in America, because how can cops possibly be expected to do their jobs if any of them are criticized, ever? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Yeah, except it was the right house and they caught the suspect fleeing out the back while fire fighters were extinguishing the fire.
https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/apd-o...wat-operation/ “The suspect reportedly exited the home as Albuquerque Fire Rescue was extinguishing the fire. He was taken into custody and then transported to a local hospital for burn injuries.” Little details that completely change the narrative, not a surprise Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
shouldn’t we be sure we have the story straight, before we ruin someone’s life? is that too much to ask? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Meanwhile, the family that lived in the house is now homeless – and says they were innocent victims in all of this. KOB 4 spoke with a woman whose sister and her family lived there. She said the people involved in the SWAT standoff weren’t related to her family and did not live there, but were acquaintances of her nephew who stopped by to pick up a bike. Now, she’s questioning how police and the SWAT team handled the situation. The family is also blaming police for starting the fire, claiming flash bang grenades ignited it. Police confirmed that multiple “munitions” were used at the scene – they’re used in SWAT situations to get suspects to surrender. They are working with AFR to determine if one caused the fire. And after the police initially claimed the target of the raid was wanted for robbery and other violent crimes, it turns out the warrants were for a probation violation. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
many conservative commentators and organizations have pushed a pro-police, law-and-order narrative. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) declared, “The president should use the Insurrection Act to deploy active-duty military forces to these cities to support local law enforcement many of them reflexively defend the police, and see them as the armed servants of the state? Militarization of the police goes back to the Reagan-era war on drugs when one program informally began giving surplus military equipment from the Pentagon to police departments across the U.S. The initiative, known as the 1033 program, was formally implemented when Congress passed a law in the 1990s. Post 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security enabled anti-terror grants that police departments across the U.S. could tap into to purchase new military-grade equipment such as armored trucks, ballistics gear and armored personnel carriers. These grants provide even more than the Pentagon surplus program Departments that received military gear were supposed to use it to prevent terror attacks, but instead, Balko says officers often ended up using the equipment for everyday policing duties. When police officers dress, train or are armed like a military soldier, he says some officers will start to see themselves as such. and we see this daily in America yet House Republicans began Tuesday morning by calling the upcoming inaugural hearing of the chamber’s investigation into the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol a “sham” and a “political charade this was their response to police testimony House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said he was “booked in all these different meetings.” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) told reporters he was tied up with a committee hearing. Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), who rose to her position after her predecessor was sacked for criticizing Trump’s role in the attack, declined to say whether she watched. Rep. Matthew M. Rosendale (R-Mont.) said he did watch — but only the opening statement from Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) “I was quite disappointed,” he told ABC News. they only want to support police when it suits them classic |
still waiting on our resident Cop can do no wrong Fans. have to say about shooting an unarmed man 60 times while he ran away from them
|
Quote:
duh. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
wdmso, what do you say about how the left handled the duke lacrosse case, nick sandman, officer darren wilson, kyle rittenhouse?? any comment?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Didn’t they all become Faux Patriots and keynote speakers at CPAC?
Meanwhile you attempt to falsely paint all protesters as criminals, all Democrats as far left and teachers as groomers. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
that tin foil hat gets tighter and tighter. I taught public school. i know many many great teachers. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jim you use examples that are years apart and fit your nonsense of that the media is bias . Mantra The duke team was exonerated and the DA was punished for misconduct and debarred 2006 Nick incident 2019 settled a law suit And had his day in court Wilson was never charged and hid behind qualified immunity And Rittenhouse please! the rights boy hero. And now BPA who used excessive force OJ was found not guilty by a jury don’t see you using him in your list of white people victims greatest hits . You forgot Derek Chauvin, and his 22 years sentence.. But conservatives who champion those on your list have this to say Floyd got EXACTLY the justice he deserved! Thank you for your service Officer Chauvin! Criminal George Floyd committed suicide with drug overdose and that is a fact. His Black victims are glad he's gone. At least you see 60 shots for what it is.. However the core of your party see it differently Get out of the car with your hands in the air! On another note, the magazine changes done by the officers went flawless. Cops understand what these people are like... And my favorite Where are the riots? Oh , thats right, you only care about dead black men when there's a presidential election to steal. Yep from the mouths of the current GOP faithful Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
She is 10-years old. She was raped, impregnated, refused an abortion in Ohio after Roe was overturned. Her story was reported, GOP leaders called it a hoax. The story has been confirmed. Will we see at least one apology? One display of decency, civility, anything?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Re: The OH case. How will mandatory reporting laws work in states with abortion bans w/ no rape exception? Seems there’s real risk that reporting rape of a minor may trigger criminal investigations or monitoring of reporter/minor’s family to stop/punish out of state travel. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Should the following apologize for doing what they do constantly to their viewers. LIE Fox’s most high-profile hosts — Tucker Carlson, Jesse Watters, Laura Ingraham — suggested this week that the account of the 10-year-old rape victim was a “hoax” and “politically timed disinformation,” and claimed that the Biden administration was “lying” about the case after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Republican AG says he'll investigate Indiana doctor who provided care to 10-year-old rape victim GOP Rep. Jim Jordan deletes tweet calling the story of a 10-year-old girl being raped 'another lie' And HIPAA will not protect people from Republicans trying to charge them for getting abortions out of state or taking the morning after pill federal laws will shield their reproductive health data from state law enforcement, or legal action more broadly. The answer, currently, is no. If there’s a warrant, court order, or subpoena for the release of those medical records, then a clinic could be required to hand them over. Republicans marching America backwards in time . Meanwhile Abortion laws in Colombia are now among the most liberal in the Americas. LOL Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
try being a little bit honest....
the story was run with no corroboration and parroted by the likes of pete and the leftist and the muppet posing as president to claim that pregnant 10 year olds were now no longer able to get abortions thanks to the Supreme Court... the timing and the release of the info by the doctor was purely political with little regard for the little girl....which is shameful the Ohio AG has said she would have fallen under his state's exceptions and could get an abortion which means she wasn't forced to travel to Indiana..."Attorney General Dave Yost said Monday night that Ohio law would have allowed the girl to have an abortion in the state." the Indiana AG is investigating the doctor because it doesn't appear she reported the rape as she is required to... the Ohio doctor is being referred by her clinic for violation of HIPAA laws.....“A source familiar to the situation” said Indiana abortionist Bernard’s employer “has filed a HIPAA violation against her for sharing details about the young patient,” Imagine thinking that not killing babies is "marching America backwards in time"... "Bernard has even sued to block an Indiana law prohibiting dismemberment abortions." |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Ps Jesse waters never admitted he was wrong he went were right were you went Scott his immigration status..or like you he deflected about hipaa laws! As if the right cares about privacy! he went just were his viewership loves to go.. as if an American could be a child rapist … But an illegal now your talking |
Quote:
would you rather be in foster care, or slaughtered in the womb? simple question. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com